Fmr. U.S. Supreme Court Justice on presidential immunity

Подписаться 7 млн

Просмотров 218 тыс.

50% 1

The Supreme Court’s ruling on Donald Trump’s presidential immunity case will have an immediate impact on the future of the January 6th election interference case. This comes while the Court suffers some of its lowest public support, with some now seeing it as partisan and lacking oversight. Retired Supreme Court Associate Justice Stephen Breyer joins Andrea Mitchell to discuss the state of the Court.
» Subscribe to MSNBC: / msnbc
Download our new MSNBC app for the latest breaking news and daily headlines at a glance: www.msnbc.com/information/dow...
Follow MSNBC Show Blogs
MaddowBlog: www.msnbc.com/maddowblog
ReidOut Blog: www.msnbc.com/reidoutblog
MSNBC delivers breaking news, in-depth analysis of politics headlines, as well as commentary and informed perspectives. Find video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, The Beat with Ari Melber, Deadline: White House, The ReidOut, All In, Last Word, 11th Hour, and Alex Wagner who brings her breadth of reporting experience to MSNBC primetime. Watch “Alex Wagner Tonight” Tuesday through Friday at 9pm Eastern.
Connect with MSNBC Online
Visit msnbc.com: www.msnbc.com/
Subscribe to the MSNBC Daily Newsletter: link.msnbc.com/join/5ck/msnbc...
Find MSNBC on Facebook: / msnbc
Follow MSNBC on Twitter: / msnbc
Follow MSNBC on Instagram: / msnbc
#Trump #immunity #scotus

Опубликовано:

22 апр 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 597

@robhoneycutt Месяц назад

There’s nothing in this clip about presidential immunity. Stop falsely titling the clips to drive clicks, please.

@lindastone4927 Месяц назад

This is what liberals do...bait and switch.

@dianetigert1310 Месяц назад

welcome to MSNBC

@johnbrown5565 Месяц назад

@@dianetigert1310 Welcome to RU-vid.

@drbobcaster Месяц назад

False titles all over the place. Not usually with news channels. Somebody dropped the ball.

@lindastone4927 Месяц назад

@@drbobcaster but this isn't a news channel.

@thedoubs2383 Месяц назад

I didn't hear him talk on the advertised 'Presidential Immunity'.

@peter12488 Месяц назад

because it was an advertisement for the guests book

@Kurt77777 Месяц назад

It's just more FAKE NEWS from MSNBC.

@smithgroove945 Месяц назад

This had nothing to do with immunity???

@lindastone4927 Месяц назад

This is what liberals do...bait and switch.

@kybed Месяц назад

justice breyer is how i think majority of the judges should be.. the constitution is written to be 'abstract' but with a notion that 'we the people' acts with no malice or bad intention but also not disregarding that there are those that acts with bad intentions.. it's written in a way with an understanding that a true or 100% democracy has negative comsequences also.. we cannot ignore that a president (former or sitting) has some sort of presidential immunity or protection from being criminally liable.. absolute immunity is a whole different thing that any reasonable person would immediately conclude it doesn't or shouldn't exist in a democracy..

@heatherheimbueger1275 Месяц назад

I want to Thank Ms. Mitchell for referring to the "other guy", as Mr. trump, and NOT former president. He does not deserve that title.

@CharlesMadsen-ks5re Месяц назад

You don't deserve to comment on here he's still president trump. If you like it or not. Punk

@jarrodl719 Месяц назад

Best president we've ever had

@kosmokritikos9299 Месяц назад

@@jarrodl719 Most Americans disagree and that number is growing. If you do not believe that yet, you will.

@THINJIMI Месяц назад

@@jarrodl719- Rated worst. Biden rated 14th Best. You read and think backwards because Trump told you to. geez, you people really need a wake up call, because your dream is a nightmare.

@kittykitty435 Месяц назад

@@kosmokritikos9299He's too far gone! Anyone who will still vote for a man with all the charges 45 has, isn't smart enough to realize where that story ends. Lack of critical thinking is the problem. There was a video of a preacher who was saying religion has no part in politics. It's about God and Jesus not tRump vs the law.

@snowrose101 Месяц назад

Yes, guns in the 2nd Amendment is about Militias. It says Militia. And that was because we didn't have a standing army for the country.

@thethirdman225 Месяц назад

Yeah, it was called the Continental Army. The militia was a sop to the Jefferson Republicans and the basic issue behind that was slavery.

@snowrose101 Месяц назад

@thethirdman225 Lol! You're about to declare your freedom from a tyrannical king, and you think creating a militia right then would be about slavery? Virginia offered slaves their freedom if they'd fight for the British, but the one to 2,000 that went over weren't the majority of the king's 50,000 or so British forces.

@thethirdman225 Месяц назад

@@snowrose101 Before you ‘Lol’ you might want to consider that I didn’t just say that for laughs. Furthermore, it had nothing to do with a ‘tyrannical king’ (George III was misguided but far from mad or tyrannical*) and everything to do with forming a union. If you can separate yourself from the mythical version of the formation of the United States, you will realise that there were factional interests to be served and in order to get those factions to align, certain conditions had to be met. I’m happy to educate you but it’s far better that you look it up for yourself. Who were the major players? What were the major issues? What was the timing? How was the impasse resolved? Remember that the Declaration of Independence was in 1776 and the Second Amendment was in 1791. So your ‘about to declare independence’ comment is anachronistic, at best. They had already declared independence 15 years beforehand. *Most Americans don’t know what this word means and never consider it from a historical perspective.

@retroguy9494 Месяц назад

Yes, we DID have a standing army. A PROFESSIONAL army. The intent of the Second Amendment was only twofold. 1) To protect ourselves and our government in the event of an attempted takeover by our own army (a coup). 2) To aid in the event of an invading foreign foe. Basically, it backed up the army. You really should read the Federalist Papers, specifically the two which deal with the Second Amendment. You should also read some of the writings of the framers which survive. They were so afraid of the citizen militias turning into a professional army that the Federalist Papers go into detail about how often the militia should meet, train, etc. That is what was meant by 'well regulated.'

@snowrose101 Месяц назад

@retroguy9494 "Most of the Continental Army was disbanded in 1783 after the Treaty of Paris formally ended the war." Wikipedia. The Constitution was written in 1787 - AFTER the Continental Army was disbanded.

@jackmundo4043 Месяц назад

Judge Breyer made a terrible mistake. We need him now more than ever.

@johnwright9372 Месяц назад

He didn't make a mistake. It's his life to do with what he wishes. The mistake is badly informed people voting for candidates for office who grossly abuse appointments for purely party reasons. Trump and his cronies were the worst eve with Alito and Gorsuch. Coney Barrett might not turn into a political lackey. McConnell put 3 of the justices on the Court. G W Bush nominated Thomas and Roberts.

@jvlm3091 Месяц назад

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has replaced Breyer. I think it's OK if you retire when you're in your 80's. This should be mandatory.

@alansach8437 Месяц назад

Wish he was there.

@jarrodl719 Месяц назад

@@jvlm3091wooooooo a dei hires

@Comments-qs6bv Месяц назад

Please remove the app ad!

@deborahbelcher3984 Месяц назад

Gawd yes

@victorwilliams1304 Месяц назад

Now, this is what a JUSTICE suppose to do. Love his interview with Justice Scalia. A Great Legal Mind even now.

@jackbass5860 Месяц назад

Mr. Trump, this question was already decided/answered by the American people when they wrote the declaration of independence. We the people decided we did not want a King and that ALL people were created equally. Sadly the modern GOP does not believe all people were created equally, that minorities and women should have equal rights and equal justice under the law. The GOP believes might makes right and the rich are better than everyone else and should be treated differently, that is the rules don't apply to the rich. What better example of how out of step the modern GOP is than this example of treating Trump as if he were a God or a King. Mr. Trump you are not immune, justice is coming and we will not forget your crimes and your many enablers.

@daveharvey5764 Месяц назад

Then why do you have politicians making laws and regulations they don’t have to abide by.

@jackbass5860 Месяц назад

@@daveharvey5764 What laws are you talking about? You mean like Trump not paying his taxes or not paying the people who work for him? Please explain.

@kennybachman35 Месяц назад

@@daveharvey5764because our enforcement apparatus is corrupted and broken and has no ethical or moral standards.

@jamesdouthat3999 Месяц назад

By the way El stoop ed. Judges have immunity ity, congress has Immunity. So what the only branch of gov that shouldn't is tbe exec?

@thinkIndependent2024 Месяц назад

@@kennybachman35You cite the problem the layers of the systems are beyond most abilities to think deeply. Antonin Scalia introduction of over simplification has been a growing issue. Dred Vs Scott ignored British law of 1777 when their courts confirmed any slave brought to England could sue for freedom. While our modern court cited 1500s laws against witches to remove science based law on fetus viability.

@user-ze6be3hv6y Месяц назад

How about 80 year old tv hosts retiring too. What a cheap shot to Biden from an 80 y.old lady

@tryscience Месяц назад

She's not holding the codes to the football.

@dawnellenburg Месяц назад

Agree!! My face did this: 😱 when she said that. The unmitigated gall!

@tryscience Месяц назад

@@dawnellenburg No, I think this gall is mitigated. She's not affecting policy across the nation.

@retroguy9494 Месяц назад

Haven't you heard? 80 is the new 50! 😂🤣

@justinkingery2489 Месяц назад

Apples and oranges. Both are people; the jobs are totally different.

@JRR31984 Месяц назад

What the fluck is the second amendment doing WITH the video title for THIS video....

@WattWireNet Месяц назад

I was about to make the same comment. It's called click bait.

@JRR31984 Месяц назад

@@WattWireNet PS Trump is trash.

@Carmine4911 Месяц назад

. 🤔 🤔 🤔 Friend, it has to do with diversity, equity, and inclusion. There is no more meritocracy. That is why parts are falling of airplanes. 🍌 🍌 🍌 🍌 🍌 🍌 🍌 🍌 🍌 🍌 🍌 🍌 🍌 🍌 🍌 🍌 🍌 🍌

@JRR31984 Месяц назад

@@Carmine4911 uh no

@jaysonflask1663 Месяц назад

I use to use the phrase "Mother Tucker" until I found out that research shows that similar words & phrases don't relieve stress like the actual words; kinda like how this video didn't relieve my curiosity since it wasn't about the actual topic.

@franciscoolivasalvear3639 Месяц назад

Why do they said the segment is about presidential inmunity?

@mikemallimo9286 Месяц назад

Click Bait

@franciscoolivasalvear3639 Месяц назад

@@mikemallimo9286 The decadence of cable news!

@B.Alance1st Месяц назад

That is a real judge ,

@ASmithee67 Месяц назад

That is a very poor judge. If he wanted to create law he should have run for legislative office.

@runedharma22 Месяц назад

The Continent was founded by men with firearms. It is a tradition.

@-Gramps Месяц назад

Superb interview, Andrea! Thank you! I’m sorry someone at MSNBC felt the need to use a clickbait description- it destroys *your* credibility, Andrea….

@hellbenderdesign Месяц назад

Good man. And he retired before he died, so that's doing the country a solid.

@gregoryfuzi4745 Месяц назад

Glad he's gone he's a peace of crap. The constitution is written very clearly and he wants to put his own interpretation of it content. This is the destruction of the constitutional rights of Americans for control.

@sidvak9700 Месяц назад

Immunity. Did I just miss the discussion?

@thegreyhoundgirls536 Месяц назад

No you didn’t. Title was click bait. Shame on MSNBC.

@tryscience Месяц назад

The ultra high pressure sales pitch at the end for the MSNBC app convinces me never to install it for so long as I live.

@chrislhundrupmcglone6407 Месяц назад

and the "how to download" ??? They don't appear to have a very high opinion of their viewers.

@tryscience Месяц назад

@@chrislhundrupmcglone6407 It's embarrassing when they dumb things down to the point where normal folks are insulted by the resulting instructions.

@jamescorry63 Месяц назад

and just like MSNBC news and FOX its all FAUX news .lol

@user-pj1lr5vt7z Месяц назад

In Federalist #57 Madison argued that the legislature “can make no law which will not have its full operation on themselves and their friends as well as the great mass of society. This has always been deemed one of the strongest bonds by which human policy can connect the rulers and the people together. It creates that communion of interest and sympathy of sentiment of which few governments have furnished examples, but without which every government degenerates into tyranny. “

@PeBoVision Месяц назад

Click bait headline. Justice Breyer does not even mention Presidential immunity in this segment. He discusses the 2nd Ammendment and the perils of lazily interpreting articles to arive at a predetermined political end. He then shares his personal reasons for retirement. Misreprenting what he said feels eerily Trumpist.

@jamescorry63 Месяц назад

MSNBC and FOX both rely on skilled journalists to get their FAUX news and neither has any qualms about misrepresenting anything that does not comply with Murdocks way of thinking ,,,,,lol

@peter12488 Месяц назад

why is an interview not stated an ADVERTISMENT when a PRODUCT is being PROFFERED?

@earlwilliams5473 Месяц назад

Glad we fallow the construction as written. Not as interpreted to meet an agenda.

@davecamp5491 Месяц назад

I'm learning to turn away from MSNBC more and more........Maddow is the only one left.

@mountbara Месяц назад

You mean the other "journalist" other than Carlson to be proven in court to be purely an opinion person?

@robertforsberg976 Месяц назад

Madcow? Isn't he/ she Stephen Colberts twin?

@jcbell-dh1bm Месяц назад

Don't leave, good trolling material, keeps me occupied all day. 😂😂😂😂

@rayatl217 Месяц назад

@@jcbell-dh1bmsounds like your life is extremely sad

@bjdefilippo447 Месяц назад

Justice Breyer is an interesting guest. Please title your clips accurately, so that it reaches an audience who wants the content you have.

@numbskulldiecastracing Месяц назад

"thing' was the best word he could come up with.

@dannydarko371 Месяц назад

What a warm, intelligent, decent man

@mikemallimo9286 Месяц назад

He is absolutely correct about the militias. I did a paper on this in my senior year in college. “For the purpose of a well regulated militia the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” The comment about well regulated militias has been ignored countless times in various court decisions.

@user-mq5ll8vs7q Месяц назад

NRA lobbyist got us to this point. That’s the reason lobbyists and earmarks need to go . So our representatives are representing the people instead of corporations. Vote blue in Roevember

@rudewalrus5636 Месяц назад

I don't know how old Justice Breyer is (somewhere in his 80s?), but Wow, he's still sharp as a tack!

@samueljaramillo4221 Месяц назад

The conservative justices need to listen very carefully to justice Breyer.

@z00ropa Месяц назад

She should retire.

@kaw5361 Месяц назад

💯 she is the worst

@jesavino1255 Месяц назад

Andrea Mitchell needs to go. Cant stand to listen to this liberal pos..

@CLee-hx8mx Месяц назад

Stop allowing military weapons on streets...❤

@user-tf7dx7qh9t Месяц назад

We don't have any military weapons on the street. They use fully automatic weapons. We use semi-automatic weapons. Get your facts straight. 3:41

@carblarson8868 Месяц назад

⁠@@user-tf7dx7qh9t. Say what? Military equipment ha been given to many police jurisdictions.

@Rick-ux5ku Месяц назад

@@carblarson8868 not guns

@jcbell-dh1bm Месяц назад

Did you here that in the Starbucks line this morning?

@carblarson8868 Месяц назад

@@jcbell-dh1bm Here??? The radical-right is afraid of the world. Glad Starbucks pulled out of Russia.

@josephshawler1901 Месяц назад

You still haven’t changed the title of this video that retired Supreme Court Justice says nothing about immunity.

@bmiller949 Месяц назад

I am waiting for the ruling for when someone screams "anti-matter" in a crowed theatre.

@brickedup7971 Месяц назад

I didn't hear about presidency immunity in this clip.

@johnarocha6903 Месяц назад

I thought he was going to comment on presidential immunity.

@oliviatwine1473 Месяц назад

Nothing about presidential immunity in this clip.

@steveg5074 Месяц назад

They need to retire in the Senate at 60s not 80s. What are you talking about?

@Syrnian Месяц назад

I agree 100%. Need max age laws for all political positions. I see 60 as max age as well.

@grantwilliams9838 Месяц назад

They're both so old, they forgot to talk about the headline.

@balddanny Месяц назад

There’s nothing in here about immunity.

@prestonnicodemus9336 Месяц назад

Guess the immunity part got clipped...

@scottpendergrass9074 Месяц назад

Why doesn't he talk about Presidential Immunity? This is ridiculous!

@senatorlainez Месяц назад

John Paul Stevens and Stephen Breyer, two of my favorite SCOTUS justices.

@CCtriC-zr9xy Месяц назад

SC should have term limits. A lifetime position does not keep the position relevant.

@Joe-ew5rt Месяц назад

83 years old and sharp as a tack.

@lindaarmstrongjackman9788 Месяц назад

There need to be limits to terms.

@justalittlewine1952 Месяц назад

I’m going to agree with some people who says that there’s nothing in this clip about presidential immunity. I don’t know if it’s clickbaiting .

@user-tm4pz3we6w Месяц назад

Imagine a political party that wants to take away a person's freedom of speech just because that person belongs to a different political party.

@kennybachman35 Месяц назад

We don’t have to imagine it, they’re called republicans.

@mitseraffej5812 Месяц назад

One sharp 83 year old.

@madhabitz Месяц назад

What a treat to get to hear one of the Justices speak, to see that he's actually got a wonderful personality, and to be able to hear a little bit about how he thinks. Oh man, we *never* get to have this happen -- he'd always been such a mystery to me..

@shirleyashanti3031 Месяц назад

I heard him speak many times while still on the Court. Algorithm probably kept u from seeing. It sends what u show interest in.

@fastbow9 Месяц назад

This question is so fundamental to democracy that it shakes the underpinnings of government to ask it !

@petesmith9472 Месяц назад

Ask this man if the Constitution trumps the Ten Commandments

@mstreich Месяц назад

I think elderly (77) newscasters should retire when they lose the thread that democracy is at stake. 😢 2:29

@blanchewilkinson4618 Месяц назад

Perhaps the American people should consider changing the rules regarding the appointment of SCOTUS members. Perhaps they should be elected by the people. Maybe then, they could be considered, "unbiased", and for the people. Just a thought.

@johnmalenchek6597 Месяц назад

Nothing said on Presidental Immunity. Untruth in advertising?

@user-lq7uq4vv8r Месяц назад

Fascinating. Will read his book soon. Would the Justice call your title fraud?

@loridyson569 Месяц назад

They did not talk about immunity!!!

@butterfly21375 Месяц назад

World watching - America Supreme Court very carefully - are they for the people or against the people.??? History is playing out.

@frostfree7 Месяц назад

They are definitely not for the people, they've shown their cards already. The issue is what will be their best strategy: to continue letting the madman fight their battles for them, or to cut him loose because he's unpredictable.

@jaysonflask1663 Месяц назад

@@frostfree7 So you're basically saying we're in the Batman movie with an 80 year old joker who craps his pants.

@ros8737 Месяц назад

Lawyers are apparently allowed to interpret law texts and even draw conclusions that contradicts the very purpose for why the texts where written down in the first place. Judges should be allowed to look beyond technicalities and sentence crimes according to the intention of legislators.

@EugeneKhutoryansky Месяц назад

If you are going to lie in the video title regarding the subject of the video, what does this say about the trustworthiness of all the news content that you produce?

@Lantertronics Месяц назад

Whoever titled this video needs to be fired.

@terryvalentine369 Месяц назад

SO, not a bit surprising, BUT, Why did the ex Supreme Court just have to go on presidential immunity for anyway, I mean other than avoiding prosecution and all ??? 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣

@user-qv8df9vj2o Месяц назад

They just don't get it. Most free country has most guns

@glenwhatley7366 Месяц назад

Well, the institution seems to be in shambles right now!

@zacharycruse6352 Месяц назад

Didn't talk about the subject!

@mpaczkow Месяц назад

One mistake that the founders made was not putting into law requiring a constitutional congress every 50 years to update the constitution. Sure we can have amendments, but they often do not force us to think comprehensively about the law of the land.

@garymoore9413 Месяц назад

Remember, what's good for the goose is good for the gander.

@PirateRo333 День назад

Where is the presidential immunity thing? This is all about the 2nd amendment.

@c.m.169 Месяц назад

This is the 2nd Amendment clip, not the immunity clip.

@shanemaloney2609 Месяц назад

Didnt talk about presidential immunity at all

@michaelmayrend313 Месяц назад

Justice Holmes clarified later that the federal government cannot pass a law restricting a person in doing the act of yelling fire in a crowded theater, but they can still be held accountable for damages caused by their act if they knowingly knew there was no fire/danger.

@arverarobinson6810 Месяц назад

Where's the view on immunity, did I miss it 😅

@richardblock2458 Месяц назад

Retiring at 83 is a personal decision? Are you kidding me? Make way for the 65 year old youngsters?

@roxydejaneiro5640 Месяц назад

The worst thing about textualism is justices ignore the principles of textualism when it doesn't result in what they want.

@commanderbristle Месяц назад

This dude knows what's up, PASS THE TORCH 🗽

@tomasranta6154 Месяц назад

So you think the supreme court doesn’t engage in politics ?

@ccloutier1586 Месяц назад

He is correct. People need to read with the understanding of how it was written. It's a lost art. Now, everyone wants to put their own twist on everything instead of using common sense.

@MikeCee7 Месяц назад

What did Breyer do in the very first second of this video? Did he poke her with his finger?

@thefpvlife7785 Месяц назад

Eliminate life tenures. That’s so harmful.

@ChristopheSmith Месяц назад

It's all in your education. All Swiss men of military age have their military rifle and equipment at home. No big deal . However swiss citizens have an above average public school & apprenticeship system. By the way it is illegal in Switzerland to commit suicide with your military arm. Democracy can only exist in a country having an educated population. It is true though that the Swiss might run in to problems with their system in the near future. For the last decades they have been decreasing their budget of education regularly.....

@BLUEMOONENTERPRISES Месяц назад

Am I the only one who is tired of hearing about MSNBC's new app? It's VERY annoying at the end of EVERY clip.

@kittykitty435 Месяц назад

I think there should be a limit on the supreme Court! Maybe 10 years past the retirement age for everyone else! 77!

@christophergolden5297 Месяц назад

Come and take them

@dawnellenburg Месяц назад

You left & now look at who we’re left with. Retire?! She’s got some nerve.

@ohmbuoy1 Месяц назад

Excellent interview; way too short. Andrea you brought out the intel, and Breyer is far too interesting to only speak with for less than 5. Thanks for at least showcasing a former SC Justice who is obviously a man of conviction and moral fortitude. Too bad there aren't more of him.

@scooterblack5355 Месяц назад

He a player!! Somebody take him to Colombia.

@RidingwithStymie Месяц назад

I think an honest mistake was made labeling video. Please change the title.

@keshaconner230 Месяц назад

I believe Retirement is “Set” for A Reason.😊.

@PonderingOne Месяц назад

👎🏻 Completely misleading video title. 👎🏻

@thegreyhoundgirls536 Месяц назад

Thank-you Justice Breyer for your honesty and commitment to Democracy. Current SCJ need to re-examine why they are serving on the bench; to enrich themselves or to honestly uphold Democracy & the rule of law. I wish someone else besides Andrea would have conducted this interview.

@user-ep2bm5no6u Месяц назад

Your not in Supreme Court they will do their job let them do it analyze everything before they get a chance

@jimallen8186 Месяц назад

Even a textual interpretation doesn’t mean individual right to guns as ‘persons’ is the plural of ‘person,’ not ‘people.’ “The people” carries a unitary context as in the people of a nation meaning a group en mass.

@rickbii63 Месяц назад

No fool they were people.

@oharajh Месяц назад

Fine. If you want to be an Originalist then sure use the original meaning of the 2nd amendment and be sure to use the original arms - muskets only

@garywheeler7039 Месяц назад

They had repeating arms, and cannon, and grapeshot. Although the repeating arms were a brass cylinder that was lighted at the muzzle and shot balls something like Roman candles. Round balls with holes drilled through them. Many shots in a tube. And btw, muskets did not win the war, artillery and rifles did. And, help from the French.

@oharajh Месяц назад

@@garywheeler7039 Just like every big war the US was in someone else had to help the US win the war otherwise the US lost. War of Independence - the French; Civil war still ongoing; Second World War - Soviet Union; Korea War - Still on going; Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan - lost.

@oharajh Месяц назад

@@garywheeler7039 When the Second Amendment was written, the most common firearms were muskets, which were slow to load and had limited accuracy. Repeating pistols were first invented during the 1880s, and became widely adopted in the early 20th century. The first repeating gun to see military service was actually not a firearm, but an airgun.

@CarolinaGuy Месяц назад

There's a time when weaponized journalism needs to come to an end as well!

@Philobiblion Месяц назад

The Discipline of the Law is the practice of English Reason.

@okd521 Месяц назад

I lost any respect that once had for the supreme Court. They seems so disconnected from everyday reality. 10 yr limits

@feardabrood Месяц назад

Nothing about presidential immunity. Clickbait.

@angelaj8958 Месяц назад

The militia is defined in US Code, and includes every male aged 17 to 45. If not in active service, they are members of the unorganized militia. Organized militia also includes female members of the Guard.