is it? I think it's dreadful. Absolutely no flexibility in there. Jesus & Kane are pretty much lock ins up front, salah lock in midfield, and that defence isn't changing much. Martinelli/Bailey/Neto as starters is a HUGE risk. All three could flop & there is no exit route from there.
Started off with Lloris I thought here we go, I might pick up some new ideas here Procedes to template the bejesus out of the rest of the team 🤣 Honestly, theres a case for all those players, so I totally understand I myself just need to feel a teeny bit differerent Midfield currrently of Salah, Neto, Kulusevski, Sancho and Aaronsen And Zincenko and Dalot for something a bit spicy at the back
I hate templates man, everyone blindly going for the "obvious" picks. My backline consists of: Ward (GK) and TAA, Digne, Trippier, Walker. This enables me to have a frontline of Jesus, Haaland, Nunez.
@@ayaannarayan9276 its the ”closest”, never said it was close. It’s 10 out of 15, if you consider that close or not doesn’t matter to me and who cares if it’s template or not. Just found it nice to see something close to my own team with Bailey and martinelli as a combo that I haven’t seen much of.
Glad to see someone else not going haaland. Kane is a proven return machine, even in weaker spurs teams. And Spurs have been fantastic under Conte. I'm sure haaland will end up making me regret my choice bc that's just how it goes, but Kane seems like the much smarter choice to me
@MADCHESTER UTD Kane will maybe score more than Salah in gw1 because it is a Southampton home and Kane got a good record against Southampton and Southampton concede a lot of goals against the big 6.
@@Dom-gj1km How is he definitely first choice when he has been a sub in pre season and only played 800 minutes last season,seems like Emerson is first choice,anyways seems a riskly pick.
@@Dom-gj1km You really cannot say that. He has never held down a starter spot at spurs since he has been there. He may be the starter now, but definitely not 100% and the other RWB will get game time. Safer picks at that price
That points scored predictor is interesting, does it take into account last seasons form, and the previous, or just last? I’m thinking someone like Bamford, he proved 19/20 that he’s lethal when not injured, 17 goals I think, and IMO Leeds have very underrated fixtures, differential maybe if the predictor hasn’t picked him up? :)
It takes into account previous seasons too, but with a weighting of importance placed on most recent seasons. It's incredibly complex, difficult to do it justice! It's truly incredible.
My team got 97% Ramsdale Trent Cancelo James Walker Salah Mount Martinelli Guimares Kane Jesus Steele Williams Andreas Greenwood Ive considered dropping to raya or sanchez because all the premium goalkeepers block attacking triple ups for the best 5 sides in the the league but eh I like arsenal's fixtures over Brentford or Brighton. The main thing that bothers me about this team though is whether walker will play every game but at least the bench will play if he doesn't. Lingard is tempting me too but right now I'm on martinelli instead. And Bailey yo save 1m but the extra 1m doesnt really do any drastic improvements to the team other than improving the bench. Martinelli and Guimares seem a cut above Bailey
I really like the look of Dewsbury-Hall, looks a proper player and Rodgers likes him. Maddison not getting much attention either and he scored really well last season
I have exactly the same team except I have Ederson, perisic, zinchenko and Lavia instead of Bailey because I dont think he is worth it, after the 2 first fixtures he has really poor games and Pedro neto and Martinelli their opening fixtures are better
I think Haaland will be rested in league games either side of champions league ties. But until then, he’s in my team alongside Kane and going for cheap defenders
Wouldnt touch him or Doherty considering they are all competing for the same position with Emerson,seems way to risky to pick any of them and im pretty sure Sessegnon is last in line.
@@hurleycapetown8420 sessegnon had a great end to the season (and was brilliant at anfield) under conte.. emerson and doherty are on the right too so are out of the question. he would be competing with reguilon and perisic, however, - but sessegnon has occupied that position in the last game of pre season with reguilon missing from the squad and perisic coming off the bench, so I wonder if he might be worth a stab at 4.5.
We'd play 523 if we were going to do that drop one of the midfield 3 because there's 3 center backs as cover anyway and opens up space for trent and robbo to get forward with the front 3 as it is now.
How can you expect your algorithm to give you reliable data when you are literally moving the goal posts daily? You say you are "Accurate at the time of upload" so that means EVERYBODY elses is out of date and how are you prioritising data when game time and unlimited subs etc and many other variables that are not true reflections of what is really happening.
Exactly, people get too caught up in the numbers. It’s a game that’s meant to be enjoyed. Nothing like the feeling of a differential pick getting big numbers when data didn’t predict it.
@@FantasyFootballHub i wouldn't go as heavy in defense. Midfield is where the best points come. I have Grealish, Salah & Diaz. I feel like bailey, martinelli, neto & pereira won't bring enough points in. That's just my opinion. I could be wrong.
It's not really. The defence and front two make up for it. Neto and martinelli at 6 and 5.5 offer amazing value . Midfield doesn't NEED to be strong when the rest of your 11 are that good
@@SurferKroky is the defense that good? Doherty isn't guaranteed & chelseas defense has declined losing rudiger & with all the changes it could take time to adjust. It's definitely a risky team.
@@PalmBaiReader ok take out Doherty ,put in trippier . Reece James has major attacking threat along with clean sheet potential so for 6 mill is a bargain even with Chelsea looking a bit shaky I think
