Тёмный
No video :(

Former LSAT Question Writer + Steve Schwartz on LSAT vs GRE + more 

LSAT Unplugged & Law School Admissions Podcast
Подписаться 21 тыс.
Просмотров 2,5 тыс.
50% 1

Опубликовано:

 

28 авг 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 5   
@kamacazi9639
@kamacazi9639 3 года назад
Here are a few tips about the logical arguments section: 1. Do not read to understand what is being said read the question to understand the type of argument style being used. 2. Once you realize what argument style is being used it helps you focus on specific information and which information to ignore. 3. Look for trap answers
@anonymous-r1s
@anonymous-r1s Год назад
Dr. Harris' position on the diversification of Harvard's GRE acceptance is incredibly unique; It opens the door to the demand side of the application process. I never considered that before. NIce.
@susu13125
@susu13125 3 года назад
Thank you for this! It was really helpful to watch this and I just enjoy hearning you speak about the LSAT!
@jkholtgreve
@jkholtgreve 2 года назад
The GRE is a way for blind students to get in without their admitting institution taking a hit with US News or LSAC’s LSAT metrics. That’s pretty much it. Unfortunately few schools will correlate scholarship awards to GRE scores the same as LSAT scores which is why, unless LSAC reunites it as an alternative or lifts the LSAT requirement completely, it’s an insufficient substitute.
Далее
NYC LSAT Prep Course w/ Steve Schwartz on LSAT Logic Games
1:02:20
Did LSAC Mess Up August LSAT Scores?
5:43
Просмотров 1,8 тыс.
журавли в пятницу
00:14
Просмотров 71 тыс.
Great News For Anyone Taking the November LSAT
5:54
Просмотров 1,1 тыс.
September LSAT Predictions
6:45
Просмотров 758
LawHub - What Is LSAT Argumentative Writing?
1:04:37
How to Prep for the August LSAT
4:47
Просмотров 34
LSAT Logical Reasoning Trap Answers in Less than 90s
1:22
Lower LSAT Scores Without Logic Games?
6:15
my law school application process l gpa, lsat, etc.
12:44