Тёмный

Fourier Transform and Inverse Fourier Transform: What's the difference? 

Iain Explains Signals, Systems, and Digital Comms
Подписаться 67 тыс.
Просмотров 11 тыс.
50% 1

Опубликовано:

 

30 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 21   
@mnada72
@mnada72 3 года назад
I thought that fourier transform of a function is by integrating dividing the function by basis functions in the form e^(jwt) in the denominator and hence the negative sign when goes to the numerator. Thank you for this explanation. This kind of analysis is not found anywhere else but this channel.
@iain_explains
@iain_explains 3 года назад
Glad you're finding the detail you're looking for. Thanks for letting me know it's helpful.
@gunhwimoon9254
@gunhwimoon9254 3 года назад
Thank you always. I feel like you already know what I would study about.
@iain_explains
@iain_explains 3 года назад
Happy to help!
@brian7168342
@brian7168342 3 года назад
good explanation, brings me back to my days in linear systems 1
@iain_explains
@iain_explains 3 года назад
Good memories, I hope 😀
@brian7168342
@brian7168342 3 года назад
@@iain_explains yes, lin 1/2 were my fav class. prof made it very challenging but I thank him for it, bc I learned a lot. just graduated in May, and he recommended me a systems engineer position. got hired!
@dmitrikazantsev3692
@dmitrikazantsev3692 Год назад
Very useful. Thank you
@iain_explains
@iain_explains Год назад
Glad it was helpful!
@Julia-hu4xe
@Julia-hu4xe Год назад
Thanks, when we are in the complex plane, we can denote a complex number as A*exp(j*phi). I learned that phi was the argument (angle). When we bring in the time that phi contains also frequency and time, so that we get A*exp(j*w*t+phi). We have substitute phi by a more complex expression - is that correct?
@iain_explains
@iain_explains Год назад
Yes, that's right. Here are two videos that will provide extra insights/explanation: "Why are Complex Numbers written with Exponentials?" ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Cy5IQnBpJoA.html and "How do Complex Numbers relate to Real Signals?" ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-TLWE388JWGs.html
@jamesb5213
@jamesb5213 2 года назад
Hi Iain, great video again. This feels like its really clearing up alot of holes in my understanding. I think a more general question I had thats not "why is the negative sign in the fourier transform" is, "why does there need to be a negative sign in either the FT or the IFT?" It seems like during the video the ending conclusion was "it could be either, but it needs to be one." I mean, both the IFT and the FT would produce an orthonormal basis set of vectors, regardless of the negative sign, so why does a negative sign need to be in one of the two in the first place? Thank you!
@iain_explains
@iain_explains 2 года назад
Ideally you want a transform to be two-way, or 'reversible'. So that you can transform into the new domain, do some maths in that new domain (that might be "easier" to do in that domain), and then transform back to the original domain. That's why you need a +ve in one "direction", and a -ve in the other "direction".
@jamesb5213
@jamesb5213 2 года назад
@@iain_explains makes sense, thank you
@bobbaberson3654
@bobbaberson3654 2 года назад
Hi Iain, both the summary and the video itself is missing in the website under the fourier-related lectures.
@iain_explains
@iain_explains 2 года назад
I think you must have just missed seeing it. It's listed under the heading "Fourier Transform" - it's the 10th one on that list.
@bobbaberson3654
@bobbaberson3654 2 года назад
@@iain_explains my bad :(
@iain_explains
@iain_explains 2 года назад
No problems. You're making lots of great comments and suggestions for improving the website. I really appreciate it. I'm glad you're finding the videos helpful.
@bobbaberson3654
@bobbaberson3654 2 года назад
@@iain_explains I know you've heard plenty of these. You have done an amazing job in content and explanation. I am gonna go through another 30-40 videos and then maybe I send an email with some suggestion. Your website and content definitely deserves more audience. I do love the fact that you handle this channel like a classroom and answer all questions (no matter how stupid they are). Not sure how it scales when you have 100K+ follower.... but problem for a different time ;) have a wonderful weekend, ... well I guess yours started already.
@KSM94K
@KSM94K 10 месяцев назад
I still don't understand why we use the scaling 1/2π
@iain_explains
@iain_explains 10 месяцев назад
omega = 2pi f , so d(omega) = 2pi df , so if you consider the FT equation written in terms of f, and then do a change of variables from f to omega in the integral, you will get a 2pi factor appearing.
Далее
Proof of inverse Fourier transform
18:02
Просмотров 1,6 тыс.
Understanding the Z-Transform
19:56
Просмотров 112 тыс.
Is Phase important in the Fourier Transform?
14:14
Просмотров 22 тыс.
Fourier Series
16:36
Просмотров 489 тыс.
The imaginary number i and the Fourier Transform
17:27
16. Fourier Transform
45:51
Просмотров 103 тыс.