France tests the New M51.3 intercontinental ballistic missile with a range of 10,000 km 

🇨🇵❤️🇮🇳

La France ami de l'inde 😊

Hahaha ikr

But not the United Kingdom! Their American missiles dont work they have tested since 2016 and the last one fall and the warhead fall to the bottom of the ocean, ridicolous! Ah ah ah ah the British arrogance never stop to impress, now is the australian vassals they want a Aukus submarine they will get the same thing sabotage equipment. The British always fooled the American say well probably they will never use this so will get them with a pirotecnic fart lol

lol France*

Le pays des laches et des moutons va se Faire demolir par la russie l'Iran la chine la coree du nord et le pakistan, Le royaume uni et les etats unis vont aussi se Faire detruire!

Russian Goblins don't have the intelligence to know that.

​@@ChineseVirusXi Ukraine the country with the most corruption in Europe and with women played by Western oligarchs

@@ChineseVirusXi They must be more intelligent then Ukri since they control 1/4th of their country.

you forgot to add the plasma jet it use, normaly used on satellites launcher, making them emit 0 heat, that what make them terrifying, you can't see or know when they are coming from the low atmosphere

This information is classified

Il va aussi à Mach 15 et certain essais ont était à 30.800 km/h

😂😂😂😂😂🇬🇧👎👎👎👎👎👎

Russia's underwater version of the SLBM is better than the French one in terms of range and number of warheads, even the M51.3 does not surpass it. The range of the R29MU2 is more than 12 thousand kilometers and the maximum number of warheads (12 pieces) of 150 kilotons, you can also insert a sliding avangard vehicle with 2Megatons there. Moreover, France has nothing else besides underwater nuclear missiles, and even more so, even they will not surpass the R36M2 and RS28 that Russia has, which can strike anywhere. I also know the top ballistic missiles and there the M51 takes 6th place, when the Layner R29 is already 5th, that is, even English-language statistics also prove the superiority of the Russian submarine ballistic missile over the French one.R36,RS28 occupy the top 3 in terms of power and range Upd: Of all the types of SLBM, only Trident2 is the best, but after it comes the Russian one.

1. Trident II (USA) 7 800 km with a full load and 12 000 km with reduced load 2. R-36M2 Voyevoda (Russia) 16 000 km 3. RS-24 Yars (Russia) 12 000 km 4. LGM-30G Minuteman III (USA) 13 000 km 5. R-29RMU2.1 Layner (Russia) 8 300 km with full load and 12 000 km with reduced load 6. M51 (France) 10 000 km with reduced payload and 8 000 km with full payload 7. DF-41 (China) 12 000 km 8. DF-31AG (China) 11 200 km 9. JL-3 (China) 9 000 to 12 000 km 10. Bulava (Russia) 9 500 km

@@onevablo1692 Go live in this powerful nation, then.

​​@@onevablo1692France: 67 Millions inhabitants: GDP 3 trillions dollars Russia: 143 millions inhabitants, much less. Period

​@@onevablo1692 vous avez juste oublié la composante aérienne avec l asmpa dont la nouvelle version sera dans les annees a venir hypersonique sinon vous parlez bien du Trident que les anglais ont faillit se prendre sur la tête lors d un essai 😂😂😂😂😂

Les américains on dit qu'il était redoutable irréversible

En l'occurence ce n'est pas une arme destinée à l'attaque, mais le contraire. C'est le but de la force de dissuasion nucléaire française. Dans cette directive, Charles de Gaulle expliquait cet objectif : " Dans dix ans, nous aurons de quoi tuer 80 millions de Russes. Eh bien je crois qu'on n'attaque pas volontiers des gens qui ont de quoi tuer 80 millions de Russes, même si on a soi-même de quoi tuer 800 millions de Français, à supposer qu'il y eût 800 millions de Français". Aujourd'hui le nombre de mort serait largement dépassé (technologie oblige), mais suffisant, pour décourager quelques personnes mal intentionnées à notre égard ... C'est pour cette raison qu'un Poutine parle sans arrêt dans le vide, ces missiles sont aussi en mer, pas qu'en France, d'ou leur importances et intérêts.

force de m'bappé

For dictatorships that think they can f ck all our lives. To make them think twice.

Peace through high firepower

For Putin

AMERICANS love GUNS N BOMBS.

Go back to Moskva... Oh, yeah, right... It's now a submarine.

@creeib "Fearful people make bad decisions". France is peaceful but not ready to be bullied by anyone including Russia. This is not a pissing contest. France is NOT threatening anyone but with its fewer (but performing) missiles will cause disproportional damage to any aggressor including present-day Russia. Si vis pacem, para bellum.

Yup, just like when Staline wanted to attack Europe after WW2 but gave up the idea once he got the confirmation that France had the nuclear weapon ... : )

And what does Putin have to do with it? The R29MU2 Layner is superior to the M51 in range and number of warheads. 🤥

Sno. NAME MAXIMUM RANGE 1. Trident II (USA) 7 800 km with a full load and 12 000 km with reduced load 2. R-36M2 Voyevoda (Russia) 16 000 km 3. RS-24 Yars (Russia) 12 000 km 4. LGM-30G Minuteman III (USA) 13 000 km 5. R-29RMU2.1 Layner (Russia) 8 300 km with full load and 12 000 km with reduced load 6. M51 (France) 10 000 km with reduced payload and 8 000 km with full payload 7. DF-41 (China) 12 000 km 8. DF-31AG (China) 11 200 km 9. JL-3 (China) 9 000 to 12 000 km 10. Bulava (Russia) 9 500 km

​@@onevablo1692désolé, mais toutes ces indications sont toutes fausses car données par les pays utilisateurs...donc pas les bonnes.

France is only showing lucidity about the international strategic environment, which has become all the more complex since Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The French nuclear force has an exclusively DISSUASION AND DEFENSE vocation: it aims to prevent any ambition of a foreign state leader to attack the vital interests of France and to inflict unacceptable damage on its centres of land power with the assurance of being able to retaliate with just as much power thanks to its submarine nuclear force. French nuclear deterrence is characterized by its sovereign and independent character; it has a unique place within NATO since it contributes to the deterrence of the Alliance and has an authentically European dimension. Thus, the existence of the French nuclear deterrent makes a strong and essential contribution to the security of Europe. We are a small country and our key words since the end of WWII have been INDEPENDENCE, DEFENSE AND DETERRENCE. SI VIS PACEM PARA BELLUM!

​@@francinesicard464nous sommes absolument pas un petit pays plus 1 millions km carré toute les terre 11.000.000 zee

Good for you, then.

on s'en branle

don't compare france with Iran, France is the 3rd nuclear power in the world and the 2nd weapon seller, they are not on the same table at all

maybe because France clearly state its goals: "it will only be used to strike back at anyone who threaten France vital interests". Also summarized as: we don't want to use it, but FAFO.

cos we are not terrorist!

Iran n'est pas l'ennemi de la France à ce niveau géopolitique et stratégique donc jamais nous ne frapperons ce pays!

​@@ShinoxSturmreiterDesTodeNot yet, but the jihadist Islamic population is only growing in France

Sauf que la Corée du Nord est un pays dengeureux dictatoriale sans regle ni loi la France utilisera uniquement légitime défense

France is no NK... But you're free to go live there and live your dream.

​@@jojolafrite90😂😂😂😂😂

it's a test without the warhead, just the missile, if they tested it with warheads inside, it could be condemnable, but NK does those with warheads ( shitty one but still... ), thats the difference

@@Scidzcopter One of the many little and subtle. differences between the 2 countries, yes. Probably that the general attitude in the world geopolitics for decades is for something too, somehow. Who knows? 🙄

Do not fear

@@nicoletheseeker6139 fear? lol

@joey8033 good awnser

Don't get slapped by America 🇺🇲 it'll hurt little one

​@@joey8033 China I agree but why would Iran need the technology of the disbelievers that they hate, does Islam allow copying the things of non-Muslims?

because France is the 3rd nuclear power on earth. other questions ?...

Because Iran is a dangerous unhinged theocracy and people like that with nukes is a big NO NO to the entire word and anyone sane.

because we are the boss and you not

"Sensions?

Why do you want to use the technology of the unbelievers?