France to provide Ukraine with 'Mirage' fighter jets | DW News 

Dude or lady (FSB) had bad translation software from Russian 😅 language

According to Zelenksi, Kharkhiv is not important to Ukraine. He don't mind if Russia levelling it into zero ground 😂😂

Question is: what are results after each of these changes? Even if France was to give Ukraine all of its military equipment they will not win!

@@motindo Oh, so you're a prophet now. Try the stock market or sports betting.

@@eyaklen4804 Russia sure doesn't mind. They just want the land. It's not Putin's fault after all. Of COURSE blame it on Zelenksy.

Forget about Macron

Macro thinks he’s Napoleon. Yet he coudnt even stop France getting clicked out of Africa by a bunch of tribal warlords.

cause some have been thrown out of somewhere recently because of someone

@@braxxiantribal warlords with intense help from russian orcs! Before writing something use your head first

​@@lembitu4104Lots of gold and Lithium , Diamonds. ...natural resources that france lost to Russia

I've heard rumours

Yeah, you can really believe that when she says something is likely, 99% it's going to happen, no speculation and pure objective assessments. A rare sight indeed

She didn't say it but Macron-ing is hilarious.

Miron is bitter, they've been kicked out of west Africa by Russia

I. "Really good day for Ukraine to receive NATO warplanes" Really? Won't this just prolong a hopeless struggle? Putin is ready to make peace along the current battle lines. Will the continuation and escalation of this senseless war help anyone? II. "Are these NATO warplanes too little too late?" Neither NATO, nor DW, nor Marina seems to have the slightest clue as to what the Ukrainian/NATO goal is in this war. Russia will never allow Ukraine to become a member of NATO or retake Crimea or the Donbas. Are NATO and Ukraine just trying to provoke WW III? III. " Is the purpose of these NATO warplanes to attack or defend? The best defense is a good offense. Russia is not bluffing about the use of tactical nuclear weapons to defend the Motherland. Almost certainly NATO weapons are going to be used in this NATO-proxy war against Russia to inflict severe damage on key Russian assets. Take, for example, the Ukrainian drone strike which destroyed over-the-horizon Russian radar near Orsk. This radar was not directed at Ukraine, but was used primarily to detect a first strike NATO attack on Russia. Nato is provoking a real catastrophe because Russian nuclear doctrine is clear. When Russia's existence is threatened, she will use nuclear weapons to defend herself. IV. "How will Russia respond to French soldiers in Ukraine?" It requires only a firm grasp of the obvious to see that now NATO is looking for a direct confrontation between NATO troops and Russian forces. What Marina, DW, NATO, et al do not understand is that Russia has a self confidence founded upon 'The Great Patriotic War' which leads Russians to believe that they will prevail in any conflict because they believe that they are tougher and smarter than their enemies -- eg the Wehrmacht in the past and NATO today. Thus, Russia will eventually respond to NATO's provocations with a punch to NATO's nose: for example, a strike on NATO staging centers in Poland or the Baltic States to which NATO will have no good answer because the US, (especially under Trump), will not sacrifice NYC or LA for some obscure base in Poland that Russia has destroyed. Similarly, France and Britain will not sacrifice either Paris or London if Russia obliterates a NATO staging area in a NATO country. In sum, the so-called strategist, Marina, lacks basic strategic insight. (But, on the good news front, Marina has swapped her Zelle 75% off, slightly irregular gray jacket for a brownish t-shirt from the IDF military surplus super-store's bargain barrel).

France is another Pathetic US puppet with no real Sovereignty

So if Russia blows up an airfield in France, the first thing France would do is beg Nato for support. If France wants to act individually, then shouldn't it face the consequences individually?

@@kentmusgrove5038 No, France will not do anything because Russia has the right, without permission of NATO, to do what it deems necessary. Russia is, after all, a sovereign nation.

Sorry you can't have it both ways. You resign your sovereignty when you join NATO

After Sarkozy, France, like Ukraine, is subordinate to the United States.

Indeed. There is no sense in training pilots in Ukraine because that means bringing the planes in a warzone without being able to use them right away, making nice targets for Russian attacks. Better to train the pilots (we're talking about few dozen people at most) and maybe mechanics too in France alongside French pilots and mechanics, then send the planes with the trained pilots back to fight in Ukraine.

Pilots and fighter jets

Tell that to Putin, he started it.

@@Blodhelm NATO expanded first.

NATO doesn't annex. NATO wouldn't expand if Russian influence wasn't so toxic to it's neighbors.

@@wolfswinkel8906 NATO never allowed Ukraine to join them and never claimed that they would. This war is all Putin's fault. He has been planning this for 20 years or more. Just look at the many statements he has made about wanting to rebuild the USSR and Ukraine not being a real country.

It all comes from America basically

Just another hyped "game changer" for media victory

@@fresh6993 Much like the Russian super tank which Putin never allowed to engage in battle.

Send in the challys I say

It's awful news, basically it means that France is fighting WW3

​@@olivergarcia2304That's why ukrops are begging 😂😂😂

Errrr....can't tell if you can't listen, or you're a Ruzzian troll. The first part of this segment is about supply of Mirages.

@@johnriddington9514 That figures boomer - you can't tell your ace from your elbow. Call the nurse to check your pressure.😂🤣😅

@@julianpetkov8320 This makes no sense whatsoever. Whoever told you that your English is passable lied to you. Stop trying.

@@adrien5834 Google did not translate well into frog croaks? Hahaha.

@@julianpetkov8320 Clearly it can't handle whatever it is you speak.

They are fighting against the Russian air force which has been a no show the entire war.

@@Metoo3232-pu2wc you haven't been paying attention. FABs, which are launched from the air, are causing significant challenges for Ukraine. Furthermore, around 5:30 in the video, he talks about Russian air superiority.

They have to fight old Russian air frames, so.

The French see an opportunity to get their foot in the door to be Ukraine's weapons supplier going forward.

@@timtrewyn453 I'm sure it will be the other way around when the war is over and Russia has been defeated.

Well, Mirage 2000-5 can carry Scalp/Storm Shadow cruise missles, which F-16 can't.

So they has been learning last year to pilot F16 (still no pilots yet) but now they go pilot different plane in no time? Got it.

@@tomatokosir True! Which is another reason why the Mirage 2000-5 is the better fit for Ukraine right now. However, the F-16 can carry the AIM 120 which has a longer range than the Scalp. This is one of the reasons why I say the 2000-5 is slightly less capable than the F-16. There are other reasons why the Mirage is the better fit for Ukraine right now... but they're not the best fit. The Gripen *HANDS DOWN* takes that honor. And due to that fact, it would be far more prudent for the West to only provide Ukraine with the Gripen. It sounds like Sweden is getting close to offering Ukraine the Gripen, but we're still not there yet unfortunately.

@@delta_glider4362 A valid criticism but it still doesn't change the fact that the Mirage is better suited for Ukraine's needs than the F-16 right now. To your point though, the *BEST* option for Ukraine would be for the West to supply them with Only the Gripen. It's by *FAR* the best option for Ukraine and keeping fighter exports to just one model would be the smartest option logistically.

NATO and the Western Liberal Democracies have had enough of this attrition war. Now the tight rope is being applied. Russia are now dealing with secondary sanctions with the caveat of no more Dollar or Euros. Putins regime have to use other currencies to import and export its requirements, that our more volatile to World markets. Good luck with Yaun.

​@militant_pacifist how many Ukrainians should lose their life before you say "it's not worth it"..??

True

That lady is one of the main experts regarding war, talkin nearly every day on DW.

you are just asking for a friend? Putin?

At 5:27 the guest speaks for his friend putin right?

from Poland or Romania

Highways.most countries have land stretches on their highways

@@victortarus2814 You are obviously NOT from Europe! In AUS or CAN or USA or Patagonia for sure.

I wouldn't be taking any 'threats' from the Russian Federation lightly, certainly not if I lived in Europe.

@@alexmillar5640 Appeasing Aggressors never resulted in peace but in an escalation. Russia only understands strength and I am happy that the West slowly starts to realize that.

​@@alexmillar5640"Please fear us" 😢🤡🤣

@@alexmillar5640 Putin made a thousand red lines. He claimed that if they were crossed that it would trigger a nuclear war. NATO crossed them all and Putin did nothing.

Laugh it up

They know Ukraine will lose soon or late , So they want to give the impression that they are doing a lot. Russia has destroyed almost all of Ukraine SU 24 which were used for long range missles. So, now they need replacments and mirage can do it too. Normally such announcements back fire because Russia will always prepare itself regardless of the seriousness of these sorts of announcements.

​@@rouz0 "Russia will always prepare itself" Not prepared for his SMO. Seriously... Oh your other comments speaks volume. Sorry to bother. ... try harder ... 😊

rouz0 👍

@@rouz0 Will Russia will get again US Lend Lease?

@@Dani-mw2ws ofc they are, and the best part of it is ukies will pay for it.

And Ukraine is levelled

@@zoom777 it’s like right now Ukraine’s power level is 50, at the end of the year it decline to 25, then they got the fighter jets their power level will increase by 10, what’s the point?

As well as nepalese, various africans, and many other mercs.

@@mikes989 Russia has used Mercenaries from Syria, Nepal, Cuba and Africa.

@@mikes989 First Chechen War, RuZZia lost, second Chechen war ruZZia won, so Chechens are not RuZZians ,Ivan

I had to check the date to make sure this wasn't posted 10 years ago.

​@@Dani-mw2ws that doesn't makes sense

Definitely!

For sure

sure it is, as they want break Russia apart and take all Russian natural resources using Ukraine as excuse

More like for Lockheed and Raytheon s profits

@@JohnCSmith-lp1qr Texanfilms is ignorant as many liberal Americans. Clueless about how corrupt Ukraine is and have been in the past. It is a dictatorship with Zelensky. Many doesn't know that Zelensky was put in charge by the USA to provoke Russia. What Zelensky did to the Russian population in Ukraine the media is not telling the people. How many Russians, Polish, Hungarians were persecuted and killed by the Ukrainian government before the Russans entering into Ukraine.

Someone didn't watch the video, lol

dear Russian troll! As simple as western Anti-tank weapons, given in the beginning of the war, were enough to CHANGE THE WAR. Russia expected to roll tanks into Kiev in some 4 days, but Ukrainians who had NONE of the things you mention, had anti-tank weapons + OLD Soviet era weapons... and that was enough to change the course. Russia, the world´s second largest army was not able to break Ukraine. The weapons sent have strengthened Ukraine´s defense... if you fight against the World´s second largest army, there is no easy simple weapon (that one can read that you say) that would change the war totally (beside nukes). How can Ukraine win? They don´t win by rolling over the world´s second largest army... they can win by making this costly for Russia... by as it is now, forcing Russia into a war economic = producing weapons instead of welfare. Destroying their HUGE storage of tanks (some 13.000 estimated before the war). Also by a tougher economic situation (sanctions), and freezing 250 billion USD of Russian funds, that might go to Ukraine. This will be seen in the Russian economy within 2 years, and will put pressure on people and oligarchs who get fed up with Putin´s crazy policies.

@@PjotrII blah blah blah carry on to be ignorant

@@wingtip76 Igor! I know it hurts that people just don´t applaud your comments, but question your whole ideology.

the tide was turned when Russia was pushed back from Kiev more than 2 years ago

We live in a jewocracy.

Very few.

not really. Wanna check numbers for the T-90s?

@@giuseppeanoardi3973 That's pretty high math there.

Dumb comment

2000s circa is hardly old. They just want to stall a complete collapse until our potato in chief cheats out another win.

The aircrafts exist, they are not used for war anywhere. How is it a waste of money? I'd rather call it an interesting use of money already spent.

"Our". Lol. Republicans and likeminded parties worldwide are on Russia's side.

you are naïve they never did, since 2014 they been quietly propping Ukraine, they just telling us Ukraine is using the long range weapons, now Ukraine is losing and losing hard and can now justify the use of those weapons publicly.

@natipuffxkid3738 Ye sure that's why we were rushing last minute javelins etc

@@natipuffxkid3738 Realy also let's think the USA delay of 6 months

@@kreb7 actually, if you gonna put it that way, i blame Russia for not annexing the whole of Ukraine in 2014, Putin miscalculated in exercising soft power, you never wait till a cab becomes a lion, says the fox. ........ you can quote me on that.

You should focus on public announcements! There are standards that superpowers follow when they are in conflict to manage the conflict and avoid a spiral. When a strategy is announced publicly it gets a different dimension. It is the difference between actively seeking and targeting or targeting only for strategic gain and when trying to pick a bone The fact is during the whole Cold War none of super superpowers ever directly attacked inside each other soil and always fought through proxies. This time things got a different turn and are very dangerous

Go and pray 5 x a day, and do not talk about politics, or go in Iran

Why do NATO soldiers have to fight and die for Ukraine, which is not a NATO member, while 10 million Ukrainians are having fun in NATO countries? If you are honorable and brave, tell your men and women living in NATO countries to return to their countries and fight instead of having fun. Your only purpose is to beg for money. In 2010, Russia gave you 40 billion dollars for the navy in Crimea, but now is Russia an enemy? You owe everything in your country to Russia. If you want help and support, stop begging and take holidays, fight honorably.

2014*

Russia invaded Ukraine already in 2014 and had troops in Ukraine!

Enjoy your fantasy!

Very clever reply. Big like.

U.S. never promised Ukraine fighters. They approved other countries to give F-16 to Ukraine. It also takes over a year to train a pilot to fly a F-16 compared to the outdated aircraft they flew.

What a very American reply .... have you considered working for the state dept.?

😂😂😂

They show up as blinking dots. Russia does not know more about it. For all it matters it can be a mig as well..

@@fireknight8839 Radar systems have databases of signatures of hundreds of aircraft hence the radar after detection identifies the aircraft using techniques more commonly known as Non-Cooperative Target Recognition (NCTR).

Is Russian radar that poor that it can't distinguish?

@@icu17siberia Russia will definitely be able to distinguish between a MIG fighter and a F-16 , however it will not be able to distinguish if it is NATO plane or Ukrainian. This is extremely dangerous because F-16 can carry nuclear weapons and might be part of a first strike on Russia. Russia would be forced to respond according to the worst case scenario, otherwise it would be left vulnerable and its nuclear deterrent would be significantly degraded.

@@JamesSmith-je7vf russia is the only one who has threatened nuclear strikes.. nobody else. so why would a f16 that is not modified to carry nukes be a threat.. you do know the mounting systems on aircraft are different... in order to carry and arm weapon systems

This one is number 487.........

No one else but Putin fans say that... do you support the dictator?

@@claus-not-santa And if it has no effect, why is Putler whining about it every time something new is sent?

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 in cows dream

@@bparisfreedomranger9166 it was even on BBC 🙂 Of course that Mig had the modern missiles. Besides, India's SU30 won all trainning battles against American and European jets. It was open info🤓 P. S. Do you realise that F16 is 40 years old one engine jet? 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@@Infopirates But it has modern advanced armaments with appropriate avionics. F16 is just a delivery mechanism for those armaments.

February 27, 2019. Indian Air Force (IAF) ace pilot Group Captain Abhinandan Varthaman on Monday (November 22) was awarded the Vir Chakra, India’s third-highest wartime gallantry award, for shooting down a Pakistani F-16 fighter aircraft February 27, 2019. But Indian MiG-21s Bison are a different beast from the original Mig 21 with its Phazotron Kopyo radars, helmet-mounted sights, Tactical Data Links, and high-end avionics and sensors surpassing those of early fourth-generation fighters, there is little reason to think that they could not down a Pakistani F-16.

First they need to learn French 😄 And I very doubt they'll do it at least with same speed they learnt English for F16

By western standards, yes

for professional "journalism", watch RT. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

The Mirage trainee pilots are likely to be different-from-F-16 Ukrainian pilots.

They have been training for some time already. We are in war time communications. Nobody is saying the truth anymore. Mirage can already be in Ukraine. They were rumor last year. Those who talk dont know, those who know don’t talk.

@@7up-dp1kk Yeah bro, sure... The Mirages are in Ukraine just like the F-16s... What you are saying is just wishfull thinking.

It's going to be a long war.

@@7up-dp1kk >They have been training for some time already. didn't you posted exactly this line under F16 report year ago? 😆 Where are these for some time trained F16 pilots?

Not on a short term, but this is about giving a Democratic country aid in it struggle against a dictatorship. And it is NOT ONLY about Ukraine, but about Europe in general, and TAIWAN in the future.

@@PjotrII Ukraine isn't a democracy.

Well, let us try anyway.

@@kupper123 In fact, it is. Unlike Russia.

@@PjotrII Ukraine isn't a democracy

And how many S-400s and S-300s has Russia lost lately?

@@flopoz2575 Very few. Not enough.

@@nandofim IDK, Russia supposedely has 56 S-400 systems, given that they lost at least two just this month, it is quite a big chunk.

​@@flopoz2575bruh Russia is producing more than NATO, its obvious they have plenty in reserve plus how do you China already sending weapons in bulk and N. Korea. They trade in RMB and rubles impossible to know what they are selling or buying

@@ZgO_o Yes, for sure, they have plenty in reserve. I guess they're not using those reserves on the front because Russians just love getting hit by rockets, that must be the reason. Certainly not because there is not enough air defense systems to cover everything.

If nothing else, the F-16 and Mirage are more jets with a spare parts supply. I don't think MiG or Sukhoi will be supplying Ukraine with spare parts or technical support. The NATO jets won't need work arounds and adapters to use NATO weapons either. Although, I don't think you can put all the American weapons on the French jet and the reverse also.

"Le game changer"! I insist!

That's what the Russians think too

Zelensky refused to step down at the end of his term, he is now a defacto dictator. What "free" country drafts citizens and refuses to let them leave? He banned his political opposition parties as well.

let's see what the EU voters have to say this weekend ...only politicians want war, the army recruiters are short and cannot even fill existing positions

Bla bla bla. Putin knows that attacking Ukraine or a NATO country with nukes would trigger a massive counterattack that would destroy Russia, himself and his regime. Putin is a coward he made a thousand red lines that if crossed would trigger a nuclear war. NATO crossed every single one of them and Putin did nothing. Because Putin is a coward.

Buy Polaroid anyway

Who cares.

still using old Russian military doctrine

France already feels intimidated, it's why it is getting into the war.

Interesting. So by your own logic, do you also find it illogical and unfair that Russia should not be allowed to respond against our weapons being used against them?

​@@salciano No, that is not so. Russia has attacked Ukraine, which is in itself already against international law, by the way. It uses weapons it self has made or it has bought (as e.g. from Iran, North-Korea). So Ukraine has at least any right to use any weapons it has made or got from other countries as it likes in order to defend themselves. If weapons, obtained by others, would not be allowed to use against aggressors area, countries like the Netherlands (which cannot make all weapons themselves) would be unable to defend their territory effectively as it would never be symmetric!

@@nielsnijmegen2917 Wasnt it against international law to attack the ethnic russians in the donbas and violate basic human rights there (as denounced by the UN)?

​@salciano scorched earth policy against all Ukrainians citizens villages and cities is a heinous crime,Donbas was fomented by Russian soldiers posing as separatists funded by Kremlin not wearing standard Russian military insignia, the world sees through Putins lies.

​​@@nielsnijmegen2917 which war is Okay to you??

They kind of do what they want with missiles and drones, why should they send people instead?

@@delta_glider4362 Your comment makes no sense in terms of air superiority. Drones are not -- in today's technology -- an air superiority force. In order for "they kind of do" to make sense, Russia would have to be able to fly over Ukraine with impunity, and they are too scared to do so. They have not used even one of their advanced fighters and the mythical G5 is no where to be seen due to the humiliation of it being shot down with Western tech. You are a "glider" not a jet and should rethink your comments.

There is no stalemate and their never was a stalemate, you do not know anything about warfare in Ukraine. What you thought was a stalemate was Russia paused and went on the defensive while recruiting more troops when they decided they needed more troops to accomplish their mission. Russia does air superiority and they can use it anytime they want to but they prefer to use missiles and drones when they will do the job because they loose less highly skilled pilots and expensive aircraft that way. Russia aircraft are superior to anything the West has besides F-22s and F-35s. Your can not compare warfare in the 90s to todays warfare, warfare has completely changed due to drones and new types of sophisticated weaponry like hypersonic missiles and glide bombs.

Half of ukraine is taken, and you call it stalemate?

@@KevinAdams26 Air superiority does not mean you can fly with impunity, you can always get shot down no mater how sophisticated your aircraft is.

The media love its drama. But the western tanks have done a great job in Ukraine, the russian losses are here as evidence. The truth is, Ukraine can win against Russia and in fact, the window of opportunity created by the USA for the russian armed forces during the winter is closing rapidly. In 2025, Russia should have lost most of its air and artillery advantages and its armed forces are already losing in Ukraine while they still have those advantages. If Russia doesn't somehow manage to win this year (which appears less and less likely with each new day) and trump isn't elected or choses to not give up the core national interests of the USA out of nowhere, it's very easy to see how Russia is just bound to lose the war of attrition long term. A country of 140 million people with a GDP of $2 trillion cannot hope to outproduce an alliance of 900 million people with a combine GDP of $40 trillion and access to what amounts to basically unlimited natural resources all over the world. ps: Abrams tanks by the way, no relation to Abraham.

It's better than nothing

The same is true for Russia too. It has to counter multiple types of missiles. The only problem is delays. Shovel forces adopt & Adapt fast !

@@emotionalIntelligence2078 >It has to counter multiple types of missiles It doesn't matter what inside missile or how you send it. As well as SAM doesn't care name of aircraft, and Lancet blow everything from soldjers to different types of artillery and tanks.

@@chenghonggoh4746 it will do nothing except being a "suicide" machine for pilots

This time we're on the right side of history.

Do you think that's wise

Goodbye Poland then

Porlande aus needs something

No.

​@@dawg929Ruzzia does not stand a chance against Poland alone as it currently stands

They arent allowed to talk about such things around here man...

Because it’s obvious Russia won’t win it..

because to lose it - is not a good idea either. western order is about to collapse and the only option to keep it afloat at least partially - save Ukraine

Haha. That's all the Kremlin brigade in here does. Probably means they think that Russia is losing the war.

@@adrien5834 yap yap yap.

NATO has air tankers and the jets can fly from anywhere on the planet and refuel in mid air. Russia is screwed.

@@Metoo3232-pu2wc 👈 👎 🤣🤣

​@@Metoo3232-pu2wc Even air tankers will eventually have to land for refueling.

@@Metoo3232-pu2wc Tell that to the Houthis and the Taliban boomer. 😂🤣😅

Top sarcasm there

Yet Russia still screams bloody murder at the prospect and tries to find new allies in their desperation, like the TALIBAN.

Yeah well... not sure those S-300 / S-400 operators have been laughing recently.

Never heard that American game changer (HIMARS) destroyed Russian game changer (S-400)?

The game completely changed since February 2022.

​​@@artiefakt4402 what are you talking about??

French most battle won

@@jeanbon8223 hahahaha fantasy!

Not fantaisie

Absolutely. And he chose D Day celebrations to make this dumb announcement. Always offering old equipment. He’s a sad case of narcissistic behaviour. Even going to see Putin was just to look like somebody.

I guess the French Air Force is larger that the Swedish one, so more resources and trained mechanics are available to implement such a weapon transfer.

@@groovy_bear Probably true, but on the other hand the Mirage system needs more mechanics and resources than the Gripen system. But maybe there are more Mirage fighters awalible for donation. I just think its a bit strange since Sweden have been open to give the gripen and Ukraine want the gripen. And other countries says no its a bad idea with more than the f16 system

Maybe it never happened...

he would know

As long as someone else is doing actual fighting. They lost the balls with the end of WW1. At least, they have a wannabe Napoleon at the helm. 😁

France ruled Europe for centuries and it's the country who won the most battles and wars in the entire history so I guess we have nothing to prove. History didn't start in 1940 ;)

@@mementomori9790 Yeah. France is probably the only state in the world with a cake as head of state. The French still love frogs though. At least their legs. 😁

😂😂😂😂😂 vive les frogs😂

😂😂😂😂

That would not work at all, there are no Ukrainian instructors that know anything about French aircraft or have any flying experience. All the instrument panels will be in Latin alphabet instead of Cyrillic alphabet.

@@robertstennett7566 I get that. I was thinking more on training ground forces. It's the same issues when training Ukrainian pilots on F16's.

there is not a single one left people on the front getting picked up of the streets whit 2-3 days of "training"

Ukrainian drill sergeants are busy in their own land, training capacity is always limited and more is often better in wars.

​@@Bremerhaven_Rocksnot really ukrn had no ground assault success for 2 years Maybe you can get their trench tactics

So can we expect russia to capture Kyiv in the next 3 days?

@@thegreatdane3627 if theres no support of 50 countries for Ukraine Kiev is nothing for Russia.

@@greatgalaxy2118 but there are support, and it will keep coming. So you can keep crying... 😄

@@thegreatdane3627 lol read the history in 1812 French came with European allies, WWII German came, Russians did not cry Russians have not learned to cry. By the what made you think I am a Russian, it's your wrong guess. It would like you are a Danish with your flag. Lol....

Russia have T90, Su 57, hypersonic missiles, thousand nukes and still did not yet win the war and not able to take Kyiv in 3 days 😂

LOL Sure buddy, the Nuke threat is as hollow as Jack-O-Lantern. Just remember the prevailing winds blow West To East. China and India won't be pleased with Russia using nukes and they get the fallout.

Probably because on 2000 Russian nuke only 2 or 3 are able to fly and they can intercept them. With the budget of the Russian army it’s impossible to maintain the quantity of nuke russia pretend to have so probably the bluff will be call soon.

Why all the fuss with France just wondering, as a whole they provided not more than 3 Billions in weapons from now , like 30 less than the USA 10 Times less than Germany and 3 times less than the UK ... The media is pushing for sure, in reality ain't much happening. And you are talking about tactical nuclear .... Chill man it ain't 12 fighter jet sur air superiority and 10 trainer on the ground that is a game changer . After all Russia is targeting Ukraine everyday from Russian territory and Ukraine territory so ain't any difference if Ukraine does the same right ? Buying weapons from overseas or using gifted weapons from other countries doesn't make a difference . Every country in the world is buying weapons from other countries . India is buying Russian planes , yet China would not claim that Russia is ally of India , Egypte is buying Russian planes ans many other . This is plaine simple .

The french are also masters in surrendering fast...

Russian troll - France successfully defended Mali and has a string of military successes against insurgents in Africa and elsewhere, but as always, local politicians serve their own greed over military victories. Same as America in Vietnem. Militarily successful, political disaster. Do not mix the two. If France alone entered the war against Russia and no nukes were involved, Russia would fold within days. Those damn nukes though...

They will teach the Ukrainians how to put your arms up straight when surrendering.

Ooh somebody is very upset here.....

@@The_Stef Some people get upset with what is imposed by reality!

More like 30.

Those Su-57s are going to...wait, what Su-57s?

France couldn’t find a better way to dispose scrap metals.

yet equipped with Fox3 MICA missiles that are not 50 y.o, Igor.

​@@Blodhelm 30-40 year old high hour airframes, ready for scraping, aviation museums or gate guards!

France is a country different from the U.S.A. F-16 training can be done in a few select NATO countries allied with the U.S.A. but France is largely using its own non-NATO military equipment because it has the capability to make its own.

They're already training pilots in France.

@@p4olo537 I heard that line year ago about F16. 😆

Cos Ukraine has no pilots to send it everywhere to learn everything. They barelly learning F16 for last half year after they learned English. 🤷‍♀

more then 2 years in the war and Russia has not done much, with what capacity would they "strike" inte Nato territories lol.

@@Narjoso🥱 There’s so many like you passing cope comments

Russia been holding back but best believe if they strike in Russia I bet my bottom dollar Russia will start hitting hard all over the place

@@Peacewar2020 just saying that the Russian blitz that would conquer Ukraine in 5 days did not go so well, "second strongest army in the world" yeah right.

@@Narjoso Conquer Ukraine with 120,000 soldiers 🤦‍♂️. In 2001 900,000 troops were involved just to liberate Kuwait FFS . And Russia destroyed the biggest Army in Europe twice to the point the Bandera boys rely solely on handouts and grabbing people off the street

Yes for F-16 fighter jet training of Ukraine's pilots.