The outcome of that challenge was pretty unfair. When Ferros gets the ball with 2 minutes left in the game he looks at the shot clock (15:41), and it shows him 11 seconds. If the shot clock was right, with 3 seconds remaining, he would have shot that ball, and not stared a new ofensive movement. Even if he missed the shot, France would have to start an offense in the move, and not with checkball, situation where they have a higher points per possesion average. An imparcial result for the chalenge should be a checkball for Brazil with 4 seconds in the shot clock, and not a checkball for France. FIBA should revise its challenge rules ASAP.
Looking now at the "FIBA 3x3 Basketball - Rules Interpretations", updated in 08/04/2020, it states in Example 12-3, page 30, exactlylly the situation seen in this game, and it states that in this case " the challenge request shall not be granted ". What happened in this game wasn't a "shot clock violation", but a "shot clock malfunction". So it looks like the Official of this game made two huge mistakes: (1) granting the challenge; (2) interpreting what happened as a violation, and not a malfunction. So, it looks like it is not a case of changing the rules, but of instructing better the Officials on the game rules.
Actually there is room for rules improvements here. Although the rules differs a "malfunction of the shot clock" from a "shot clock violation", and clearly says that a team could not challenge the former, the rules say that the Official could decide, by himself, to review the malfunction of the shot clock. But, it this case, the rules don't state clearly what should be done if the Official decides to review it and indeed understands that the malfunction happened. I'm pretty sure that this kind of situation thought trough on advance could help prevent injustice calls like the one called on Brazil in this game.
@@LuizHenrique-js4ed Em que país do mundo você acha que governo investe em futebol ? (Resposta: Basicamente nenhum) Qual o sentido disso se é um esporte que gera bilhões de dólares?
Governo não tem que investir em esporte. Governo tem que investir em educação, saúde, segurança, etc. Cobrem das universidades que criem ligas e dêem bolsas de estudos para atletas, acompanhem os jogos desse liga e mostrem pra mídia que o esporte universitário importa.
Namoral eu fico revoltado com o Brasil nessas competições, na maioria das vezes perdemos mais por demérito nosso do que mérito do adversário! Hoje perdemos mais uma vez no detalhe, o cara da França arremessou 4 bolas seguidas de 2pts livre e 2 pts de rebotes sozinhos aonde jogador brasileiro dormiu em quadra, inadmissível e impossível ganhar jogos nesse nível desse jeito!!
The outcome of that challenge was pretty unfair. When Ferros gets the ball with 2 minutes left in the game he looks at the shot clock (15:41), and it shows him 11 seconds. If the shot clock was right, with 3 seconds remaining, he would have shot that ball, and not stared a new ofensive movement. Even if he missed the shot, France would have to start an offense in the move, and not with checkball, situation where they have a higher points per possesion average. An imparcial result for the chalenge should be a checkball for Brazil with 4 seconds in the shot clock, and not a checkball for France. FIBA should revise its challenge rules ASAP. Updated: Looking now at the "FIBA 3x3 Basketball - Rules Interpretations", updated in 08/04/2020, it states in Example 12-3, page 30, exactlylly the situation seen in this game, and it states that in this case " the challenge request shall not be granted ". What happened in this game wasn't a "shot clock violation", but a "shot clock malfunction". So it looks like the Official of this game made two huge mistakes: (1) granting the challenge; (2) interpreting what happened as a violation, and not a malfunction. So, it looks like it is not a case of changing the rules, but of instructing better the Officials on the game rules. Update 2: Actually there is room for rules improvements here. Although the rules differs a "malfunction of the shot clock" from a "shot clock violation", and clearly says that a team could not challenge the former, the rules say that the Official could decide, by himself, to review the malfunction of the shot clock. But, it this case, the rules don't state clearly what should be done if the Official decides to review it and indeed understands that the malfunction happened. I'm pretty sure that this kind of situation thought trough on advance could help prevent injustice calls like the one called on Brazil in this game.
