Тёмный

Frances Arnold: New enzymes by evolution 

MoleCluesTV
Подписаться 10 тыс.
Просмотров 42 тыс.
50% 1

Dr Frances Arnold's lecture at the Molecular Frontiers Symposium at the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Sweden, May 2017. The topic of the symposium was "Tailored Biology". Check our RU-vid channel for more exciting science videos! For more information, visit www.molecularfrontiers.org

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

16 июл 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 99   
@payattention621
@payattention621 5 лет назад
The way you implement the Noble ideas into society is the prize - How it benefits mankind.
@RONALDJOHNABRAHAM
@RONALDJOHNABRAHAM 5 лет назад
Congratulations for the historical achievement 😍😍😍
@kairaul2695
@kairaul2695 2 года назад
Instablaster...
@physicsisthelifearunpujer3193
@physicsisthelifearunpujer3193 5 лет назад
congratulations , unbelievable, and it is the only near ever possible hopes in the future
@arghyabanerjee4702
@arghyabanerjee4702 4 года назад
Thank you mam for your valuable lectures, regards from India 💐
@nixonlee3738
@nixonlee3738 5 лет назад
It's a new world to run in the speed of light! Thanks for Dr.Frances Armold's efforts!
@singhslogicalscience2538
@singhslogicalscience2538 4 года назад
Madam i want to be your student.
@peijunli9828
@peijunli9828 4 года назад
oh wow, what a inspiring and amazing talk about biocatalysis.
@shrutihalli7217
@shrutihalli7217 5 лет назад
Congratulations, I am diehard lover of GENETICS
@sebastianaguiarbrunemeier9192
@sebastianaguiarbrunemeier9192 5 лет назад
Awesome talk
@frankfuerbeth494
@frankfuerbeth494 5 лет назад
Exciting!
@dibakarhajong2737
@dibakarhajong2737 5 лет назад
Congratulations Frances Arnold
@juliodemenezespinto7671
@juliodemenezespinto7671 5 лет назад
Congratulations
@venugopal2227
@venugopal2227 4 года назад
let us give a big salute to our beloved Darwin too for paving the way for wonderful scientists like Francis Arnold....it is high time a global investment is ensured to take up such great researches in evolutionary biology esp in the light of thee Covid19 outbreak...virology should have a strict evolutionary orientation...
@jitnarayanshah945
@jitnarayanshah945 5 лет назад
Congratulation wonderful invention
@lingabanoth5710
@lingabanoth5710 5 лет назад
Congratulation Madam
@randommiser3310
@randommiser3310 2 года назад
intresting
@YoutubSUCKZ
@YoutubSUCKZ 3 года назад
amazing woman
@esquinadelcronopio436
@esquinadelcronopio436 3 года назад
👏👏👏
@user-kn2tc4ps1r
@user-kn2tc4ps1r 5 лет назад
may i reupload this video to a nonprofit site bilibili? I'll attach the link below
@MoleCluesTV
@MoleCluesTV 5 лет назад
Hi, is it not possible for you to embed this RU-vid video, or simply put the link to it on your site? Best wishes
@user-kn2tc4ps1r
@user-kn2tc4ps1r 5 лет назад
I'm in China,it's sort of illegal for us to use RU-vid, and most people don't have the access. it's such a insightful and inspiring video, it would be nice if more people can see it. thinks!
@robitmr1164
@robitmr1164 5 лет назад
@@user-kn2tc4ps1r 哈哈,恭喜up主喜提精彩视频。
@robitmr1164
@robitmr1164 5 лет назад
不好意思,我看错了,他不让你公开,唉,没办法,版权意识很强
@logicsconscience
@logicsconscience 2 года назад
Wow
@jasonwiley798
@jasonwiley798 Год назад
Is t here currently any research on creating designer proteins/ enzymes. By which I mean using AI AND SUPERCOMPUTERS to create enzymes that don't exist in nature. These could be used for example break down PFAs.
@jasonwiley798
@jasonwiley798 Год назад
I asked this question before I watched this video. She talked about designer enzymes
@pedrozaragoza2253
@pedrozaragoza2253 5 лет назад
Brilliant research that shows intelligent design.
@rumraket38
@rumraket38 5 лет назад
What a fatuous remark for a lecture demonstrating work that would not be possible if biological evolution of new protein functions was not a reality.
@chunglee6895
@chunglee6895 5 лет назад
BS.human garbage cant understand science
@stefanoleidi1006
@stefanoleidi1006 4 года назад
29:51 she just @vsauce 'd us
@berndstange-gruneberg9898
@berndstange-gruneberg9898 5 лет назад
ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-05r-FLGtsEQ.html: "[The protein space] is bigger the United States national debt." Great sense of humour. Congratulations !
@teresajohnson1352
@teresajohnson1352 Год назад
🤗👍👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
@payattention621
@payattention621 5 лет назад
Wake up
@fukpoeslaw3613
@fukpoeslaw3613 5 лет назад
Pay Attention Evolutionism!
@unfriendlybus3225
@unfriendlybus3225 5 лет назад
Fuck i did not even know i was sleeping
@payattention621
@payattention621 5 лет назад
Sir or Madam The word Fuck is not called for in this situation - I am sorry I upset you I will watch my mouth if you watch yours.
@mukundpaidhungat986
@mukundpaidhungat986 7 лет назад
Brilliant. Try again, fail again, fail better harnessed as a portal into a whole new chemistry of life, I suspect frances Arnold will be back in Stokholm ere to long.
@halfsheep1286
@halfsheep1286 5 лет назад
Very cunning!
@randommiser3310
@randommiser3310 2 года назад
playing with chemistry and calling it evolution..its reaction.
@KenJackson_US
@KenJackson_US 3 года назад
Fascinating! I don't mean to take _anything_ away from this excellent work, but I'm amazed that such brilliant people have so much naive faith in evolution. At 4:28 it's acknowledged that enzymes are *so well designed.* 11:09 _"Imagine just a single protein a few hundred amino acids long, you've got twenty amino acids to work with. That's a really big space of possible sequences. ... It's a really _*_big_*_ number. And, it's mostly empty. ... So how do you search a space of enzymes that's bigger than you can even begin to comprehend and mostly empty?"_ Good question, but an even better question would be, how did _"nature"_ find the original enzymes? Oh sure, we know a mutation or two can wobble around an _existing_ enzyme and change its function slightly, as you've said and demonstrated. But that _"really big"_ space of 20^450 (or 10^585) permutations is, as you said, well beyond astronomically large. A few billion years just won't cut it. A little math, with assumptions very favorable to evolution, will easily show that _"nature"_ couldn't have found _any_ of those enzymes in a trillion trillion trillion trillion years. Seriously. Make some assumptions and do some math.
@bouncycastle955
@bouncycastle955 2 года назад
Your final sentence is your entire problem.
@KenJackson_US
@KenJackson_US 2 года назад
The _"assumptions"_ I was suggesting, @@bouncycastle955, would go something like this: Assume you have such an enormous population of organisms that it's in equilibrium with a trillion reproductions and a trillion deaths per day. And assume _every_ reproduction has mutations that give it a _unique_ protein candidate across all cases. You have to make assumptions to do some hypothetical math to test out how possible it might be to evolve a new protein. These assumptions are _absurd_ but extremely in evolution's favor. So start with those assumptions and figure how long it might take to search the author's _"mostly empty"_ space to find a small functional protein that would benefit the organism. How long? A billion years? Oh no! I typically come up with a trillion trillion trillion years. Am I making an error? What specifically is _"my problem"?_
@bouncycastle955
@bouncycastle955 2 года назад
@@KenJackson_US several. But consider this: when we can't figure out how to rationally design a protein, we use directed evolution. How is that possible if it would even take a decade, let alone longer periods of time?
@KenJackson_US
@KenJackson_US 2 года назад
​@@bouncycastle955: _"... , we use directed evolution."_ You and I are talking about two very different things. I'm examining how nature could have _ever_ found _even one_ protein by unguided undirected evolution. There are hundreds of thousands of proteins cataloged in the various protein databases. If all of today's life evolved from the mythical LUCA microbe (as is foolishly taught even today), then _all_ of those evolved along the way. Do you think that's remotely possible?
@bouncycastle955
@bouncycastle955 2 года назад
@@KenJackson_US that's your problem, you think we're talking about different things, we aren't. Of course if you think all of those sequences evolved independently that seems like a lot, but the reality is that all of the hundreds of thousands of proteins out there (hilariously conservative by the way) there are only a few dozen protein families and they all use common folds. We don't know that all proteins are related, and probably they aren't, but my money is on there only be a handful of common ancestors. That's the point. Once we have a scaffold, we can evolve it to perform countless completely unrelated reactions. If we were constantly searching around random sequence space, of course that would be difficult, but as soon as you have something reasonably stable, you can adapt it over and over and over which is what we see life doing even today. You know we've observed stable scaffolds arising from previously noncoding sequences of DNA, right? It's not common but it happens.
@richardshane456
@richardshane456 5 лет назад
I compliment your work however as an engineer why are you not looking at the Crux of the problem you're part of the cog of the problem I understand you have a career a life a reality but you do realize you can change that reality in a instant, right? So which reality have you discovered? there's so many out there... for all of you, the natural world doesn't really need anybody's help however continue on as part of the cog of the problem and not the solution but we all understand you're driven by your academic nature to fix things remember to fix something you need to know what the actual problem really is, not a Band-Aid, especially in biochemistry
@lennycarlson1178
@lennycarlson1178 5 лет назад
shut the fuck up you hobo
@cesarethesomnambulist
@cesarethesomnambulist 5 лет назад
@@lennycarlson1178 XDDDDD
@SCIENCEnENGINEER
@SCIENCEnENGINEER 2 года назад
You sound like a messy, troubled engineer. Maybe reorganize ur thoughts first before making more messes instead of work?
@Anon2150
@Anon2150 4 года назад
4:00 "Biology is great, but it can't do what I can do."(?) Let's not forget, biology and chemistry created you, silly. I'm just saying, it's the more impressive thing.
@TearringNable
@TearringNable 4 года назад
She was quoting chemists versus her stance on bio-chemistry relations, so hard chemistry versus bioconversion
@AlphaNumeric123
@AlphaNumeric123 Год назад
What’s so unreal about her is that she probably would have revolutionised solar power if she stayed in that area. Brilliant. Destined to make a big difference
Далее
Frances H. Arnold: Nobel Lecture in Chemistry 2018
34:37
Nick Lane: Origin of the eukaryotic cell
43:45
Просмотров 62 тыс.
5. Enzymes and Catalysis
1:05:51
Просмотров 124 тыс.
Enigma of the Heart - Morteza (Mory) Gharib
1:17:46
Просмотров 5 тыс.
Frances Arnold: Biological Design by Evolution
54:00