I can't believe this is THE Herman Prey singing there!! What? Such a small part? And then as a bass when he was a world class hugely important baritone? Maybe he was doing it as a favor to the conductor or something?
From 22:47, Et in carnatus est.... Thar section is very unique, sitting right inside the Credo, with an exquisite sound, very well performed here. The soloists are beyond composed. Great work!
Hermann Oskar Karl Bruno Prey war ein deutscher Opern- und Liedsänger, Bariton Geboren: 11. Juli 1929, Berlin Verstorben: 22. Juli 1998, Krailling Ich höre und sehe ihn nicht in dieser Aufnahme, hat jemand einen Hinweis? Danke.
Eine sehr gelungene Aufführung; musikalisch differenziert dargeboten; sehr gute Tonaufnahme! - Schön für mich, Hermann Prey wieder zu hören - am 9. Juni 2020!
I hear and like sacred works by bach, mozart, beethoven, haydn, handel, brahms, verdi, dvorak, ..., and they all have their merits. however, by far, toching me the most is this piece. d950, d956, d960 to me the three pillars of unfathomable depth of emotion by late Schubert.
@@Rickriquinho a pathetic and funny combination of opera and symphony, rather tragicomic than mournful. But don't use words like garbage with juvenile categorization when you're talking about a great composer's work. All great composers have mediocre works
Cambreling as with others fails to relate this work more to the earlier and chirpier masses in the cycle rather than forwards to later romantic heaviness and grandeur; the smirk in the music just under the surface largely escapes him. He keeps a grip on the line and a gentle onward breeze, and finds some inward Schubertian working, yet turgidity creeps in and it begins to sound retiring; the Hamburg orchestra doesn’t get Austrian humour.
Considering that Schubert wrote this mass in the last year of his life, I think it can be accepted as part of his "late" style, and forgiven its lack of chirpiness.
this is gods Music........schubert was not an Atheist..........no great Music was ever composed by an Atheist.......Facts and love from vienna Austria.........where it all began,.,.Haydn,.Mozart,.Beethoven ,.schubert,.,.etc...............
I can understand atheists and may God forgive them, however when I hear works like this, it's the last thing for me to believe that composition of any of these could be possible in the mental state of disbelief.
Clearly you deny atheists the capacity for being human in the deepest sense of the term and for having spiritual and existential longings. That is just plain silly but I guess being a believer yourself you might just not understand the many flavors of atheism and agnosticism and how little that has to do with the core of music, or what any great art is.
Je crois que vous traduisez "plus connu,plus familier" par "supérieur".Petit rappel :le requiem "de Mozart"est en grande partie de Süssmayr (l'un de ses élèves) ,en général avec des indications laissées par Mozart,mais parfois sans indications pour certaines parties...De toute façon, ce genre de classement est ridicule dans le domaine de l'Art:chaque artiste apporte son génie propre.
@@Rickriquinho" Shut up"...Élégant !Ça évoque l'aboiement de quelqu'un qui ne supporte pas d'autre opinion que la sienne .Inutile évidemment de discuter. Heureusement que RU-vid recommande la courtoisie... .
It's far more appealing and inspired, as are all Mozart's masses. Hard to imagine a refined person as Schubert wrote any of the in general lame, bombastic and stale sounding masses.
