Freddie Prinze Jr. On Cody Rhodes Losing At Wrestlemania 

Roman is The Man Cody is the 2 We The Ones

Damn. FPJ changed my mind. And then here you come and make me flip back lmfao 😂.

Yeah it was Cody's time they just wanted to cheat him & give Roman his thousand days now we probably gotta wait till the next year that's bullcrap.

They needed to do their due diligence and visually show him struggle. Cody was undefeated since his return, won the Royal Rumble and is the only person to pin Solo on main roster TV. Like in life, when things are too good to be true, they usually are. He can't just rely on things that happened in the past. Sure, facing that adversity isn't disregarded. You just have to take into consideration that not everybody is aware of his time in the business before his return. You could tell the fans what happened, but pro wrestling is about storytelling, so you have Cody eventually win the title, but have him overcome people like Brock before attaining his goal. A face develops characters through the lows of his story. When he has to fight for what he wants, not just be handed it like Roman is often accused of. Losing at Mania will be better for Cody in the long run. Having Cody win the title in such relatively quick fashion would be a disservice to him. He can become more over as a face by fighting through the fire. It's also risky to have somebody win a World Title too early in a run. It can backfire and have the fans turn on them after a few months. The money is always in the face chasing the heel for the championship.

@@joshualayug8589 Exactly. A lot of fans are short sighted though. It's better for Cody in the long run.

Didn’t he use to be a writer? He should definitely come back either way

@@joebarksdale6437 yeah, but not now.. i know his part of A&E/WWE peacock thing for the rival series but other than that nope.. his technically not employed by them..

It would go against all his promos & risk losing the feel good story when he does get the title. If they feel Cody is getting stale, they can always have him get attacked after a win & keep him out for 6 weeks with an "injury". A loss to Brock coming up at night of champions isn't gonna hurt Cody, especially when he wins the rubber match.

NO you're wrong Roman 5/25/1985 Cody 6/30/1985 So, roman is the older one

He made his debut in 2008 and he said mid 20s

You come up with that on your own?

you think all wrestlers think the same? bruh

It the the total opposite, you don't need wwe anymore to be the best.

A lot of guys got their 1st World Title run in their 30's bro. Young champs like Randy Orton are not a common thing. When Bret Hart won the belt from Ric Flair, he was 35 with 4 kids and was already in the business for 16 years at that point. He was over and an outstanding wrestler. So he should have been overlooked because of his age? Stone Cold was 34 when he got his 1st world title run and led the most profitable era in the history of the business. Macho Man was 36 when he got the belt, another damn good champion. Cody is doing the best work of his career right now. You can't write him off yet. Not everyone does their best work in their 20s.

​@@KozyKool2287 DDP was also near his 40s when he became a star

​​@@KozyKool2287 you wanna know what DDP, Austin, and Bret Hart weren't? They weren't multi-millionaires when they won, Cody is. Those guys? They'd been waiting for that payday for decades, a payday Cody already has, it's not even close to the same thing. Also, I don't recall Austin,Bret,DDP beating a guy who was built for 3+ years either. Given that, it's fair to say WWE is not looking for a guy to be champ for 6 months, they want someone who will be champ for years to come. His age in most circumstances wouldn't be an issue, that's very true but these aren't normal circumstances.