Something I've learned after listening to both atheists and believers is that *certainty* is the problem. The believer who is certain he knows the mind and will of God, and the atheist who knows for a fact there is no God, are identical. They're sure about things that no person can ever know. Neither is humble enough to say, "I don't know." A good believer accepts that they are serving something bigger than their own opinions. A good skeptic accepts that incomplete evidence for one idea may still be evidence of something yet unknown.
@@alpinoalpini3849 l disagree. No human is "willing to change his/her mind as soon as better evidence comes along" - We're all biased and will cling to what we believe regardless of evidence. Non-believers are as biased as anyone else. Speaking as a believer, I say: *"It's not impossible, but it's unlikely I'll change my mind, God is the best explanation for our existence."* - We'll always have room to doubt, but...every time I pit God against a non-believer's explanation, God always wins. I don't think its fair you calling me intellectually dishonest.
@@alpinoalpini3849 "But, for the vast majority of non-believers, being an atheist means simply that: not believing the theistic claims of religions... but I do not say gods and goddesses do not exist". Maybe moreso in the past. But today, _in my experience,_ atheists are mostly _anti-_ theists, and express (if not explicitly state) *utter certainty* (to the point that Any/ALL theists---even if completely science-accepting and epistomatically-humble---are ridiculed).
I hope this is the one where it gets tied into Bill And Ted’s Excellent Adventure, as Sony already ignored Napoleon’s conquer of San Dimas in Napoleon. Lol
My favorite actor of all time, Sir Anthony Hopkins. I know he can portray any roles amazingly. I will definitely watch how he will give justice to Freud's character.
Alright, this is the first moment I've actually had a moment to talk. But yeah, I saw the movie earlier today and I've been busy until now. So this is my review of it. It's a bit of interesting interesting movie. It's a lot to take in. I can't really say it was enjoyable or what it's a lot to take in. It was more like a historical film. I thought it would be more like apple Heimer. And that was way way different. I didn't really go on too much in the detail about him. It was a different movie. Can't always see if I liked it or not. I can't really come up with a score on this one. Like I said, it seems like a historical film. But it really didn't go on too much in the detail. Had almost bought like it was a short bill. I mean. Like you blinked and it was over. I mean, I really didn't learn anything much about the guy. So oh yeah. Yes, watch It yourself. I guess and see what you feel about it. But to me. Yeah, I can't really can't really agree this one here that that was stupid difficult to do here
@JreneMay O but we are. Marucs Aurelius pointed this out thousand of years ago. Coward meaning, do you have regrets of things? Wish you spent more time with someone, taught someone better? No that Relegious or not and what awaits is either a Heavly greeting from a God/Gods or nothing at all.
Minus many, many Christian martyrs and Saints who embraced death as a way of seeing eternal beauty. “I die with joy, for I desire to be united to my God. Live so as not to fear death. For those who live well in the world, death is not frightening, but sweet and precious.” - St. Rose of Viterbo
Dr. Freud would be (was) coward before death ... a true believer, a follower of Christ who truly knows his Master, would never be a coward. For nothing.
Well, if his mom was a big liar, like everyone knew that her child was fathered by a Roman soldier named Pantera despite her clearly ridiculous claims otherwise, then maybe people are mad that Jesua was a big liar like his mom and made up a bunch of crap. I mean, it's obviously MORE LIKELY that he is a magical being, but maybe he's just a smart mouth. Kim Jung Il was born from a panda.
@@davidddd2001 how come? How many people could say that they are "god" in the world? Actually there are a lot of them even now who do that. Nobody isn't talking about them. Why? Why they are talking about Jesus? Use your brain and think.
Love this movie. Two great actors ❤❤. The big suprise at the end of the movie was the waltz composed long ago by Sir Anthony Hopkins "And the waltz goes on" I love it ❤❤❤❤❤
I'm so excited to watch this I just bought the movie last night Anthony Hopkins is one of my favorite actors its so awesome . I'm also reading a freud book right now .🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂
❌Wow! Freud was a mess!! ..but I do love how he & Lewis go at each other in this film. Thanks to this fine film I have a bit better of an understanding of both concepts
Rather . . .and to think that people turn to freudian shrinks who blame all on the father and are totally licentious beings . . try God My take away is that America is fast becoming a place of those whose lives are run by God versus those whose lives are run by an atheistic state. Heaven can be found and felt now in our midst as peace and romantic love and fearlessness (RIGHT STUFF) and let's see with the state you get fear-based commercials and people, freudian sex with anything that moves because if there is only one life and no God well . . . do whatever and be whatever you want and take as many pills as possible to save one's miserable little life and go to a freudian shrink who is an atheist that thinks one's father is the source of one's problems. ( Every father-person is flawed UNTIL WE COME HOME TO GOD IN OUR MIDST) Hmmmm? perhaps an old testament read will reveal that we are to return to God within, balance ourselves with the DIVINE, BE of utter love have peace within when ever we want and . . And the screen writer was not of wisdom--for if he were, he would know that CS Lewis could show forth fear from he war . . . AND THEN go to his upraised Image CHRIST within and let fear drop away! There is only one created understanding which is the IMAGE OF THE UNCREATED and this suffices for all men . . .we have to be of love and get drawn in and spiral upward . . . there is nothing better - and that movie was an F MINUS but I am so glad I saw it because now I understand those who would like to rule the world.
I don't really know if I like Mr. Hopkins as Freud, though I do like this movie, it will potentially have a lot of psychological interest, potentially theological too.
When i first heard about this movie i was intrigued, like would this two even argue about? And why them? Why not, idk Cambell and Russell or something like that? It's kinda disappointing that it's just "God's Not Dead" all over again
I watch these programs based in histody and they really feed my fear of some people. I mean the diabolical things they were/are capable of is mind blowing. The true evidence of evil. We know it because they created it, defined it and display it.
I am so happy and grateful that I studied --- and am still learning & appreciating (progressively though from 1st year college nursing then teaching experience up to my PhD or so) the APPLICATION OF FREUD'S philosophies and thoughts on what's truth and reality...
A fitting statement for an atheist like Freud who would not know or care that Jesus said to his followers: "Take courage, for I have conquered the world." --- John 16:33
Suddenly, for all the Scientism true believers Psychology becomes a hard science and Freud equivalent to Hawking the moment a theist enters the room and starts poking at materialism.
Possibly. Freud lived his last days in England, and *was* visited by a younger Oxford professor, and it could've been C.S Lewis. That's as far as we know.
So basically I think I'm going to see a film about Sigmund Freud, and then the movie turns into the story of his daughter, a strong independent woman? Sigh.
The question is whether he had an accent. He could speak (besides German), according to multiple online sources, "French, Italian, Spanish, English, Hebrew, Latin, and Greek." At the website freud-museum there's the only recording of his voice, made when he was already suffering from jaw cancer. He speaks English and German. The English part sounds pretty fluent and not heavily accented to my Spanish-speaking ears. Now, your turn.
@emaarredondo-librarian Freud did speak English (and in fact was a keen Anglophile), but in the very few (there may even be only one) recordings of him speaking English at the end of his life to my (English) ears it's very halting and *very* heavily accented. Of course, the oral cancer didn't help 😕
@@lordtains He was a total fucking creep - 0. Sigmund Freud's Oedipus complex: a controversial theory that suggests all boys develop an unconscious desire to possess their mother and eliminate their father as a rival for her affection. 1. Female Hysteria and the Oedipus Complex: Freud attributed female hysteria, a common diagnosis in his time, to repressed sexual desire and unresolved conflicts with the father figure (Oedipus complex). This reinforced harmful gender stereotypes and led to inappropriate medical treatments for women. 2. Psychosexual Development and Oedipal Fixation: Freud's theory of psychosexual development, where children progress through oral, anal, phallic, latency, and genital stages, is widely criticized for its emphasis on sexual development and the potential for fixations at each stage. 3. Dream Interpretation and Repressed Desires: Freud believed that dreams were "the royal road to the unconscious" and revealed repressed desires and anxieties. This led to controversial interpretations of dreams, often focusing on sexual symbolism and family dynamics. 4. Death Drive and Thanatos: Freud proposed the existence of a death drive ("Thanatos") alongside the life drive ("Eros") as fundamental forces motivating human behavior. This concept is complex and dark, suggesting a subconscious urge towards self-destruction. 5. Universal Neurosis and Unconscious Conflict: Freud's assertion that all humans are inherently neurotic and experience unconscious conflicts with their parents and societal norms is considered by many to be overly negative and deterministic. Plus he was a dirty atheist..............
God reveals Himself to believers and we know Him. It’s a mystery that God reveals only to His own sheep. If Freud belonged to God he would know Him. And sometimes, people only remember Him at death - so we aren’t allowed to know precisely who died in their sins and who was saved.
This movie was a load of claptrap. Freud spouting off the simplest questions and trying to make them seem as they're so profound and CS Lewis barely answering and quivering for parts of the movie. This could've been a great debate between two great minds and they turned it into some Hollywood nonsense with a B line lesbians story.
"We're all cowards before death". It is true. Everyone is a coward. But for those who trust God death becomes hopeful and peaceful than those who harbor hatred against God. Athiests believe that there is God they just hate Him. Paul was beheaded without fear of death. Peter too, even John Huss and Jerome died with courage. But dying with hatred to God who so loved you is surely our choice. Our hearts became so hardened that we no longer can sense God's love and goodness. By the way, hell is not everlasting torment. Hell is death for all who chose to die than live a life in loving obedience to the Prince of Peace.
When in history of human being religion wanted to speak, a relationship, to talk with science? I Always thought that was science that was trying to speak with religion, but they categorically refused.
tamana bhatia ia is for vhatia becaue hansik momma a doctor but anup hybrid on weed still dimag satiya bhuda pagal becauss bikram biswas mlre than manoj bajpai and rabdi kisan sleeps on two meal peacfully no snoring no gadiya
Forcing things. Forcing a reconciliation between atheists and theists. Forcing a reconciliation between honesty and dishonesty. When things are forced, they don't ring true.
Frued like other athiests hate God for the experiences they had. Sigmund lost his daughter and grandchild and attributed it to God, when it is satan's insiduous plan to put into our mind to hate God for all the cruelty we experience. Yes we experience pain, God allowed it because satan wants to test us if we trully trust God when, like Job, we lose everything.
That’s because he was ethnically Jewish. His work was a projection of Jewish pathologies onto Western society as an excuse for why they and their shtetl customs couldn’t mesh w Europeans, post-emancipation. “The Ordeal of Civility.”
As a believer I debate atheists and agnostics all the time on social media. And yes, some quote Freud. As a believer, I NEVER quote C. S. Lewis or any other writer. Instead I stick to real life facts and Biblical inerrancy
Stephen Hawking vs Robert Patterson -- a scientist who considers the universe vs a guy who thinks about pancakes -- it's ridiculous. Strawman Letters -- please.
