Kudos to the director for being humble enough to take criticism on his labor of love. Years of hard work being criticized must be difficult, but he took all comments , and shared his stand without wavering . Also kudos to The host on asking all questions straight up no BS. Great interaction .
Film me scene dekh kar jis mein kaka kan(sanajay dutt) mar raha hota hai aur dossri taraf prithviraj(akshay kumar) dance kar raha hota hai dekh kar shayad hi koi akal ka andha hoga jo ye na samajh paye ki dwivedi chopra ke hatho bik gaya ait dono ne mil ke akshay ko maamu bana diya. Chopra bhatts srk salman aamir ye kisi ko piche dhakelne k liye apna paisa gawa sakte hai kyu ki in ki asli kamai anti national powers se hoti hai in ko arab se funding hoti hai
irrespective of how the film perform. we will be forever indebted to Dr Chandraprakash for giving us cult classic chanakya series. he is very down to earth n humble. hopefully next project will b much better
Bhai mai dekhne hi inki vajah se gaya . Kuki mujhe khud nahi pata kuki 6 kahaniya padi thi prithwiraj ke bare mai . Mai har baar confuse ho gaya ki mamla hai kya
द्विवेदी जी, माना आपने बहुत ही अच्छा शोध किया है। परन्तु, उपलब्ध १००० कथानकों में से अपने वही क्यों चुना जो हिन्दू राष्ट्र के लगभग विरुद्ध ही है.?? आप फिल्म बना रहे थे या वामपंथी नैरेटिव,,,.?? यह समय इतिहास बनाने का, इतिहास बदलने का समय है,, इसमें भी आप जैसे विद्वान इतने apologetic रहेंगे,तो १०० करोङा घाटा सहना ही पड़ेगा। घाटा भी अलग है, आपको तो वर्षों से अर्जित की गई प्रतिष्ठा भी गंवानी पड़ती लग रही है। कटु वचनों के लिए क्षमा आचार्य 🙏🏻 हर हर हर महादेव 🙏🏻💐
Total transformation of Dr. Chandraprakash Dwadi from his Chanakya days where the Hindu Rastra and Bharityata were focal points, today he is in the psudo-secular camp and using his logical powers to defend a hopeless movie even using Discovery Of India by Nehru. No doubt, the transformation complete.
Movie Ek Bhout Powerfull Tool Hai 21st Century Ka Issko Sirf Entertainment Samajhne Ki Galti Mat Karna Specially Jab Topic History Ho Toh. Historical Movies Ek Document Ki Tarah Hoti Hain kyonki Har Koi History Books Nahi Padtae Hai.
History ko kis tarah Se Aur Kis Intention Se Dikhya Gaya Hai Yae Important Hai. Yehi Toh Problem Hai Secular Filmmakers Ki Wo Kabhi Nahi Dikha Sakte Ki invaders India Ko Islamic Country Banane Aye Thae Aur India Ka Culture Change Karne Aye Thae. Lekin Sirf 22 Crore Logon Ka Hi Culture and Religion Change Kar Paye.
Wonderful discussions. Looks like YRF took over Dr. Dwivedi's creativity completely to make it soft film with Urdu wood masala and less of PrithviRaj facts
part 1 and 2 interview ध्यान से देखने के बाद, एक बात समझ में आ गई कि Dr Chandraprakash Dwivedi, कि शुरुआत एक ईमानदार film maker के तौर पर तो हुई, पर अब उनके व्यक्तित्व में बदलाव आ चुका है जिसका कारण सांसारिक लोभ हो सकता है। बड़ी चालाकी से विषय को अपने सुविधा अनुसार साबित करने की कोशिश भी मुझे स्पष्टता से दिखी। संजय दीक्षित जी ने भी, सम्मान हेतु, अलग अलग समय पर मुखरता से स्पष्ट विरोध नहीं किया या यह कहें कि बात को जाने दिया।
Dr. Chandra Prakash Dwivedi is not sticking to one point but drifting from one defense to another defense.. But he did make a fab TV series Chanakya at one time..
please consider fact " when tv soap chanakya was released or playing, it was a disastrous flop, it even lost all its sponsors." what ever cinema Dr. divedi has created is based on our own books, not any islamic or church driven texts. I have seen the movie. in my opinion (maybe not worthy opinion according to you) this movie is magnificent portrayal of our samrat in every aspect. please support our positive creative people.
इन उल्लू के पठ्ठों Akshay Kumar, Mahesh Bhatt, anurag kashyap, ranveer etc , the entire kabal इनकी घर वापसी करानी है या नही करानी? यह एसी pictures को flop करा कर होगी या hit करा कर ????
@@p1-4970 did you even watch this video and the previous one? Past makes future, he stopped following the past. So, do i stopped following Dr Chandraprakash Diwedi now onwards. You're entitled to your views. 🙏
Sanjay ji : part 2 Can not take torture of listening to justification of Dewivedi ki. I learnt that collection of this movie indicate that public is boycotting it - final verdict & proof.
Surely chandraprakash dwivedi sir's knowledge on vedic shastras is immense,I would really like to see more sessions with him on matters of vedas, ramayan, arthshastra etc but I would clarify that Same DNA does not matter, what matters is what is in their heads.. Humans & chimpanzees have 98% same DNA but if a chimp breaks into your house the last thing you would do is hug him & say, "देखो भाई आए है! " 😂
Exactly nobody is talking about it,he is ducking the questions,claims on Jihad,Islamic conversions,I mean he says there's no proof of conversions, Prithviraj Rasoo is everything for him,not what we can see
He made his stance very clear. His script is based entirely and solely on the Raso he mentioned nothing else. Of course there hundreds of other theories. He didn't take any other views and was strictly as per this particular Raso. Basically he is not making a historical film on facts or popular theory but only on a very particular book he read.
@@reconquistahinduism346 Who are we to decide what he can make or not? This is not China with communist rules. We don't need to watch it if we don't like it just like any other Bollywood films that are bombing nowadays. He had a vision and he made it happen. Simple.
I am 74 Tears Old and always heard this that Prithviraj was blinded and used his Dhabd bhedi baan technique to kill Gauri. This is told from one generation to another.
Dwivedi has definitely been pressured by Islamic part of Bollywood to change his track for commercial success and he clearly mentions that when he says that "Chanakya" support was pulled back. Not sure if we will ever see Dwivedi that made "Chanakya". Jai Bharat !
That's what but as him being the director, thought the movie would be so but seeing Yash Raj production, then it's disappointing...but i wish director sir could take a stand to showcase correct history. But he seems to be in denial
"अपराधी" की भाषा, "अपराध" से कितनी शुद्ध और समृद्ध है! चाणक्य-कार श्री द्विवेदी जी, आपकी अमोघ वाणी ५०% भी चलचित्र में दिखती तो मन प्रफुल्लित हो जाता! :))) चाणक्य मालिका के सर्वेसर्वा के रूप में आपका स्थान चिरकाल तक प्रेक्षकों में मन में सदैव ऊंचा रहेगा। 🙂🙏🏼
Mr. Chandraprakash needs to understand that as a filmmaker it is his responsibility to make content that evokes a sense of pride and not confusion amongst the patriotic people. It then doesn't matter what one book like Prithviraj Raso is saying.
Yes, see my comments on Chauhans and their illustrious history. Dwivedi is from the Congress era and doesn't want confusion and lack of information regarding Hindu heroes to die down so is making these impersonal statements. Unlike Vivek Agnihotri who talks with pride of India's history, Dwivedi wants to escape his deliberate attempt to water history with the stock reply "I am just a film maker.' Don't trust this guy!
Chandraprakash Dwivedi is a great teacher and role model for logical discussion. I was amazed of logical thought process that dripped out of Chanakya which he himself played. You can say, lot of logical thinking I have today is guided from the logical thought process of what I saw a child in Chanakya. I support Mr. Dwivedi and trust his interpretation.
Simply amazing discussion, it's an absolute delight to hear Dr. Chandraprakash-ji, I understand how the entire system was throwing hurdles against him in every step of his life earlier, hope he continues to be a guide for all of us how love and breathe our dharma
Great discussion. Kudos to Dixitji for asking such a straight forward questions but Dwivediji showed great zeal in answering all the questions. Dr Dwivedi is someone who had make shows like Chanakya, Upanishad Ganga,etc at such an adverse time when no one was there to support him. Salute ti his bravery and intelligence. Would like to see more discussions on various other issues.🙏
"Upanishads kehte hain ki ek hii baat Gambhirta se lo... Ki iss jeevan ko gambhirta se mat lo" What golden words narrated by Dr Chandraprakash Dwivedi from Upanishads. Sunke mann halka ho jata hai!
व्यवसायिक विवशता और राजनीतिक विवशता एक महान व्यक्तित्वमें वैसे ही परिवर्तन लाती हैं , जैसे एक जंगल के शेर में जब उसे सर्कस का शेर के रूप में काम करना पड़ता हैं..... दुर्भाग्यवश चंद्र प्रकाश द्विवेदी अब यश राज फिल्म्स द्वारा खरीदे हुए सर्कस के शेर हो गए हैं....इस साक्षात्कार से यही उजागर होता है
चंद्रप्रकाश द्विवेदी जीं प्रणाम 🙏 आप ने अच्छी मूवी बनाई है और एक संदेश जो आपको देना था उसको आपने स्पष्ट रूप से दिया । धन्यवाद 🙏 संजय जी आपका चैनल एक नैरटिव क्रीएट करने के लिये प्रसिद्ध हुआ था अब आप मुद्दे से भटक रहे है हर विषय पर tv चैनल जैसा बहस की ज़रूरत नहीं आप review करे कि चैनल क्यूँ शुरू किया था आपका शुभचिंतक 🙏
Dr Dwivedi is a learned man. He has learnt from the effects of making Chanakya serial that the same mistake should not be made again and make a commercial movie in true sense, which comes with a disclaimer that - this movie is a work of fiction and any resemblence to a person dead or alive is purely coincidence. Well done Dr. Welcome to the world of Bollywood.
: गोरी भीख मांगता था अपनी जान की आपने उसे मृत्यु मांगने वाला वीर दिखा दिया । :आपने उसमें सती शब्द लाया मगर उसकी सच्चाई नहीं बताई । और उन हिन्दुओं को नीचा देखना पड़ा जिन्होंने संजय जी एवं अभिजीत जी को नहीं देखा था । :फिर पृथ्वीराज को नृत्य करवा दिया और उसमें उसकी भाव भंगिमा कदापि उचित नहीं थी। आपको ध्यान रखना था। हमने गंगा जमुनी "तहजीब" में औरंगों को कबका फ्लश कर दिया है। गंगा और जमुना हमारी माँ है । उनके लिए बस पानी।
I can understand his situation. With due respect and lots of gratitude for his works in past. Currently he may be under some contract. The film is made under YRF, acted by Akshay. And we all know their nexus and agenda of narrative building through their films.
fascinating discussion..this is how two knowledgeable people debate without acrimony and name calling ..Kudos to both shri CP Dwivedi and Shri S Dixit..
Very interesting debate on various sources of information on the times Samrat Prithviraj Chauhan lived and fought wars in defense of Bharat. Dr Chandra Prakash Dwivedi Ji research on the subject is quite appreciated
Bohut Din Bad Joypur Dialouges Me 1 Assa Insan Dekha Jo Sach Ko Sach Or Jhut Ko Jhut Sidha Bat Batata Hey Keya Jorurot Hey Khamokha Somaj Me Hingsha Falana Eysa Admi Somaj Des Dunya Ki Liye Assa Future Dita Hey So Good Luck Thanks
Dr Chandraprakash Diwedi can not defend 'Samrat Prithviraj movie' (his movie). 1. Why did he compared Prithviraj with Ravan and said Ram ne Ravan ko sataya. 2. Showed Prithviraj fought first war with Md Ghori just because of a prostitute. 3. Md Ghori is Courageous person? 4. Ghori attached India and killed Hindus and broken Temples and Murtis just because of Jai chand? (Clearly he was attacking India from much before). 5. Presented all the facts wrongly. Dr Chandraprakash Diwedi ji trying Jalebi logic, circling. I am not going watch any of your movies now onwards. I lost all my respect I had for you. 🙏
I respect chandra prakash diwedi for his sincerity, knowledge, politeness. We should adopt strategy of left wing ,if they can promote their movies like haider,thappad then why can't we promote movies made by right winger it doesn't matter how bogus these are??
Because such movies made on leftist footprint show our heroes as sekular in the wrong light and promote a wrong history of them ultimately becoming a laughing tool for the world as Prithviraj movie is.
Great discussion, last 10 minutes should remove any doubt which normal non reasearcher public might have. Wish we have grit like modern chankya. He has taken a path of film making in the project which is lot different from his style of earlier projects. As this requires a bigger scale and hence big studio collaboration and compulsion of meetings studios requirements. Kudos to him keep making films of nationalist interest. People of nationalist ideology should also think before criticism, the limitations of flilm making projects.
Sanjayji, please check Marathi movie “Sher Shivraj” trailer. In the first scene itself it is shown Afzal khan breaks Devi Tulaja Bhavani’s idol with hammer and decimates temples in his way. History is shown as it is although their budget is less. Please encourage those directors and producers instead of giving platform to sickulars like Dwivedi. In “Fattehshikst” movie trailer, Shahista Khan breaks Tulja Bhavani’s idol and sends broken pieces to Shivaji Maharaj in a box. Upon seeing that Raje and Jiijabai both get angry. (You can check actor’s expressions). This is what we read in history and same thing shown in movie and in trailer itself.
@@vinitparmar2256 thank you. I will be more happy when they show gharwapasi of Mohammad Kuli khan ~> Netaji Palkar. But still they are much better than Bollywood and other film industries.
when trailer released i was disappointed because akshay was not shoted for me. but then i have told my friend that director had spend 18 years so we need to wait and believe in him and watch first then we can say something about it. but after i watched SAMRAT PRITHVIRAJ i was happy and akshay had done great job. he was perfect. and every actors who selected by Dr. CHANDRA PRAKASH DWIVEDI sir was perfect choice. that what I find. and every interview i try to watch because of Dr. chandra prakash dwivedi sir. please sir if you can make this kind larger then life movie for us. i loved it SAMRAT PRITHVI RAJ !!!!
It’s interesting to see, that this film got ‘sandwiched’ by both the sides. It was at least worth watching one time. I hope people support such creators for the larger good, next time.
Film became Pav Bhaji because Dwidevi read too many books on Prithviraj & then decided to stick with Prithviraj Raso version because that was the only Book where Ghori is shown as a Braveheart, Prithviraj as an Idiot & Islamic Terrorism isn't mentioned because they wanted to appease Mullas as well.
आश्चर्य होता है की चंद्रप्रकाश जी को भी वामपंथियों की तरह अपनी कृति को न्यायोचित ठहराने के लिए सामने वाले के प्रश्न को ही गलत और अतर्किक सिद्ध करने की कुटिलता करनी पड़ रही है। अगर पृथ्वीराज का इतिहास स्पष्ट नहीं है तो या तो किसी एक ही काव्य को पकड़ कर फिल्म बनानी चाहिए थी या फिर अगर सभी को पकड़ रहे थे तो इस्लामिक क्रूरता और हिंदू गौरव को प्राथमिकता देनी चाहिए थी, जिसे वे खुद फिल्म बनाने की नींव बता चुके है, पहले ही ढोल पीट के फिल्म announcement के समय। और फिल्म बनाई तो उल्टा कर दिया। 1. हिंदू किरदारों के मुंह से सर्व विदित उर्दू शब्द नाकी वो जिनका आम भारतीय को नहीं पता, जैसे जिन शब्दों के उदाहरण उन्होंने इस साक्षात्कार में रखे। जो अनुमान के अनुसार भी अतर्किक है, क्योंकि कम से कम उस समय तो उर्दू या खड़ी बोली उस समय इतनी सहजता से प्रचलन में नहीं थी जितनी सहजता से बोलते हुए उन्होंने फिल्म में दिखाया। और ऊपर से इस बात का ढोल पीट के की हिंदू हृदय सम्राट की फिल्म बनाने जा रहे है। 2. इस्लामिक क्रूरता अगर रासो में नहीं थी ये चीज़ तो वहा से ले ली पर दूसरे तथ्यो के लिए दूसरी पुस्तके ले ली। 3. गौरी का चित्रण ऐसा दिखाया जैसे बहुत स्वाभिमानी व्यक्ति हो, वो खुद के लिए पृथ्वीराज से मौत मांगता है ना की माफी। क्या सच में ये किसी भी अनुमान से सही ठहरता है, ये तो रासो में भी नहीं है। अपनी बातो को सही ठहराने के लिए लोकमानस की बात की उन्होंने बार बार, तो वे ये कैसे भूल गए की लोकमानस में तो ये भी है की इस्लामिक जिहाद ने किस तरह यहा कितने हिंदुओ क्रूरता से मारा है, बलात्कार किया है, मंदिर तोडे, बल पूर्वक धर्मांतरण किया, जजिया लिया, कितनी ही हिंदू पीढ़ियों को अपने धर्म से दूर कर दिया, हमारे गुरुकुल खतम कर दिए, हमारे कृतियां और ग्रंथ जला दिए, हमारे बचे हुए काव्य और क्रतियो में विक्षेपक डाल दिए। ये सब कैसे भूल गए। निष्कर्ष : आखिर में चंद्रप्रकाश जी ने भी secularism और हिंदू मुस्लिम भाई भाई की झूठी और निराधार विचारधारा के चलते, पृथ्वीराज जैसे एक महान ऐतिहासिक पृष्ठ को बिगाड़ कर बताया और हमारी भावी पीढ़ी को भ्रमित करने की बॉलीवुड के भांडो की परंपरा को जारी रखा। जो कभी भी उनसे आपेक्षित नहीं था। काजल की कोठरी में सयाना भी आज काला हो गया।
I am not convinced. And I have no problem with Dr. Diwedi. My problem is bollywood, akshay and yrf because of whom he could not make a good movie. But unfortunately he can't say so. Hence he is trying to defend the movie
So true Now he is also becoming part of this madrasawood Bhadwood deshdrohis karachiwood mudrers mullawood urduwood jihadiwood appeasement gang So sad 😞
Not so, the majority of Brahmins do not own any land, or any other sources of income other than their education, hence they have now forgotten to stand proud with their dharma. They put the education as foremost responsibility for their kids at expense of everything that dharma stands for and calls for.
Sanjay Sir 🙏…Chandraprakash ji 🙏…Wonderful that two great intellectuals discussing .. some how I feel Chandraprakash ji has bowed to some extent to bollywood (Urduwood) which we can see from his version of taking the history. Seems to defend by quoting many sources. Anyways film is nowhere near getting its investment back..many shows are cancelled due to zero occupancy. He must be careful in future. Wevknow he is intelligent. Thank you Sanjay Sir 🙏.
You are gem of hinduism mr dwivedi ji and dixit ji... Kaafi cheeje hai jo aapki debates dekhke me seekhta hu... Dixit ji mujhe lagta hai ham hinduo ko jyada focus aisi team banane me karna chahiye jo aaj ki date me kisi bhi narrative ko cut down kr sake... Sabhi apna ecchik sahyog de sake Sabko aise parsikshan ki aavsykta hai Jo jis kala me nipun ho vo use istemal kare lekhak kalam ka ; vakil kanun ka ; Technology wala insan technology ka Sab milke hi hum inke narative ko counter kar payenge... Or mujhe khushi hogi ki me bhi kuch kar paau samaj hit me
Dwivedi ji FOOLED Hindus with his Movie Prithviraj but... This interview... UNFOOLED 😂😂😂😂😂 Hindus because Dwivedi ji EXPOSED himself as a CONGRESSI dipped in Secular narrative 300 crore EXPOSE-Y This interview is... 😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@pujasingh9208 aur ye koi nayee baat nhi Deewaar movie ke zamanay se ye propaganda chal raha he …. Jo hero apni pocket me 786 ki plate lekr ghoomta tha aur mandir jakar bhagwan pr chilata tha ! Aur phir bad me dikhaya ke us bhagwan ne uski jaan leli aur maa ko theek kr dia Jabkay Allah ne uski jaan bachayee
Desi Free Thinker exactly That’s what I realized Ki ye 80’s s jaada ho raha hai tushtikaran That’s why it’s mullawood jihadiwood urduwood madrasawood Jhalim jhaved ka Bahut yogdan hia ismeim😡😡🤬
I am sorry for this long monologue, but I felt I needed to share my entire perspective on this conversation. What Dr Chandraprakash ji is saying is quite idealistic but bereft of ground reality, ignoring the iconoclastic, supremacist nature of Abrahamic religions. It all ultimately boils down to the same "secular" gibberish, that's propagated by the Left ecosystem. Hindus have paid dearly and continue to do so because of this deceitful and fictional concept of "secularism." And I completely disagree with Dr Chandraprakash ji's notion that cinema need not be taken seriously. Cinema is a powerful tool that's used to drive narratives, and over time can even alter a person's psyche. Hindi language widely spoken today is the result of multiple decades of Bollywood's Urdu adulteration. Why is a Vivek Agnihotri sidelined, and why is there an entire ecosystem that tries to discredit him and his work, if it's merely cinema? We saw the power of cinema, when an entire nation rallied behind "The Kashmir Files" and the widescale conversations/debates it started. This power is the very reason why a certain ecosystem wants to maintain its total control over the film industry & stifle any opposing voices. It's quite unfortunate that Dr Chandraprakash ji either fails to realize this or doesn't acknowledge it.
I agree with what you said and after listening to Shri Dwivedi Sir, I got a feeling that he is just defending his work and I still can't believe that he referred a book on Prithviraj Chauhan that was published in 2015 when he already has researched in detail by that time. Anyways this film is not been welcomed by the public and that itself is enough I guess.
क्या बात कह रहे है डॉक्टर जी ,गदा का उल्लेख मानस में कई जगह पर हुआ है , गोस्वामी जी ने बजरंग बाण म् भी किआ है, वाल्मीकि जी ने भी गदा का वर्णन किया है। आपको क्या हो गया है ,आपसे यह उम्मीद नही थी।।
But he still used Arabic, Persian, and turkish words heavily. He is mixing Indian words (corrupted sanskrit) and foreign words and calling both as Urdu. This is dangerous. We don't want to reclaim Arabic, Persian and Turkish words. What he is calling Urdu is actually Prakrit. He is mixing both Prakrit and foreign words and calling them urdu. We want to reclaim Prakrit not Urdu.
This is how every debate should happen. Dr Dwivedi was trying to defend and justify in vain the secularised version of his film. But he atleast acknowledges the ugly truth of the Muslim invaders in his heart but does not have guts like Vivek Agnihotri to show it due to Bollywood fake narrative. On the other hand we could clearly see Sanjay Sir was not in agreement with his views but he never tried to impose his thought on Dr Dwivedi nor He tried to fight with him. Instead he listened carefully what all Dr Dwivedi has to say. Hats off Sanjay Sir. Both the persons had mutual respect for each others views. I am sure if a Maulana would have sat there he would have used slangs and abuses on our Hindu culture and defend Md Ghori as a hero who defeated a kaafir.This is what exactly happened in Nupur Sharma case.
The man beats me. He declares himself winner 😂 because Mr. Dixit didn’t refute much n opened a can of worms for him. No wonder he has problem listening. He likes his voice and keeps on spewing his sicularist nonsense. Thank god I didn’t waste my money on it. I wanted to but not anymore.
Cruz ye hai ki agar ye yashraj ke saath movie nahi banate toh picture achi banti aur chalte. Hum sabhi toh ye pehle se jaante the ki ye sirf ek gissi pitti love story hi banegi. Aur inse ye sawal poocha chahiye ki inhone raaso par hi ye movie kyun banai? Kyunki wo shayad inke matlab yrf ke agenda ko suit karta tha. Par inko badhai ki ye baat karne aaye.
I will be well wisher and appreciative of dr cp dwivedi (though i didn't like movie) till last day he is the pillar of this renaissance that you see today Upnishad ganga and chanakya is a must watch for all Hamare matbhed ho sakte hai manbhed nahi
Chandraprakash Dwivedi will forever be remembered for his immortal चाणक्य from every angle. But between then and now, Oscar Wilde's 'Picture of Dorian Grey' fits so perfectly. to the dot... alas, what a fall, what a collosal fall. As for, JD, pls sir, keep enlightening us. Great job.
If you can't convince, confuse, if you can't confuse ,convince with more and more imaginary versions, that's called history. No one's mistake, this is western philosophy, understanding about other civilizations.
Sir in interest of your audience, I need to add a correction to what Mr. Dwivedi said about nose rings or "Nathnis" nt being a part of Sanatan Dharma. This was adapted from mid east culture and is now seen in Devi pictures. Lalitha Sahasranama verse 7 describes how even the starts would appear dull when compared to Devi's "Nasabharana" (Nose Ornament)
🙏Awesome you broke the noose. This is it. My entire village being a temple village/town everyone reads the Sri Lalita Sahasranamam and the ornament is mentioned. Good observation 👍
Prithviraj Chauhan serial was way more attractive and has already shown the history which this film perhaps fails to show ...... The serial and its characters are very much alike and fit to their respective characters ,I myself was the fan of that serial and its characters.
