Тёмный

FSR 3.1 vs DLSS 3 Side-By-Side Comparison 

Compusemble
Подписаться 840
Просмотров 4,2 тыс.
50% 1

FSR 3.1 was added to several games today. Here is a comparison between FSR 3.1 and DLSS 3 at 4K. Both set to quality mode and using frame generation.
System specs:
➤ MSI GeForce RTX 4090 SUPRIM X
➤ Ryzen 7 7700X
➤ 32 GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 Neo DDR5 CL30 6000MHz
➤ ASUS ROG STRIX B650E-F GAMING WiFi
➤ Crucial T700 SSD Gen5
➤ Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus-G SSD Gen4
➤ ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro SSD Gen3
➤ Seasonic Focus GX-1000
➤ ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III 360
➤ Phanteks Eclipse P500A DRGB
➤ Windows 11
ABOUT COMPUSEMBLE
PC gaming and PC tech.
CONNECT
➤ Like and share the videos.
➤ Subscribe to the channel and hit the bell icon to get notifications for new videos.
➤ Follow on Twitter: / compusemble
#FSR #DLSS #framegeneration

Игры

Опубликовано:

 

26 июн 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 52   
@Compusemble
@Compusemble День назад
What is your experience with FSR 3.1 so far? If you enjoyed this video, please subscribe and leave a like!
@LAD907
@LAD907 День назад
Apart from FSR 3.1 producing higher frames Can't tell the difference at this point
@tanmay8952
@tanmay8952 День назад
because RU-vid compresses the quality
@silenosile3229
@silenosile3229 23 часа назад
Watch in highest res. DLSS is much sharper and more detailed. If in doubt pause the video to compare.
@waltuhputurdaway
@waltuhputurdaway 22 часа назад
​@@silenosile3229sounds like someone is trying to justify their rtx 3050.
@Ronaldo-se3ff
@Ronaldo-se3ff 22 часа назад
@@silenosile3229 You keep spamming that under every comment wtf is wrong with you.
@smwfreak1647
@smwfreak1647 12 часов назад
@@silenosile3229 bro is coping 😭 i got a nvidia gpu bro but god damn you dont need to try so hard for a company.
@d3xx3rDE
@d3xx3rDE День назад
Great comparison video! It's crazy to see that there's barely any difference between the two.
@silenosile3229
@silenosile3229 23 часа назад
Watch in highest res and fullscreen. DLSS is much sharper and more detailed. If in doubt pause the video to compare.
@d3xx3rDE
@d3xx3rDE 21 час назад
@@silenosile3229 I did. No doubt, there's close to no distance. But keep trying to tell me otherwise.
@samirfa5300
@samirfa5300 22 часа назад
I hate when people compare apples to oranges. People, dont forget that FSR 3.1 works on almost all GPUs while DLSS only works on RTX GPUs. DLSS might still be a little bit better but the difference is negligible, especially in 4K. You also dont play a game where you have 2 PCs running side by side to notice differences in picture quality. If you just play a game like you usually do you will be happy with FSR 3.1. Dont be too harsh on an open upscaling tech which works on almost all GPUs. NVIDIAs selling point of their RTX 4000 Series was frame generation which was also restricted to only work on the 4000 Series because of the "needed" flow accelerator. Now that frame generation works on almost all GPUs thanks to AMD, I feel scammed by NVIDIA. I have NVIDIA and AMD hardware and I couldnt care less what brand I buy, it just has to have the best price to performance. People in the comments defend multi billion dollar companys like its their family. They wouldnt even defend their own family like this. Fuck fanboyism. Being a fanboy never helps all of us consumers.
@ThePvsBR
@ThePvsBR День назад
Great is when we can use DLAA, FSR Native + AMD framegeneration. Native resolution with better frames.
@smwfreak1647
@smwfreak1647 11 часов назад
why is everyone hella shilling for nvidia bro? fsr did great with the new update, maybe it still doesnt look exactly as good as dlss but yall know yall be lying saying it looks far from dlss quality. these companies aint doing shit for yall my god.
@kishin7
@kishin7 День назад
Quality for FSR was lower than dlss in older versions so still concerned about that here we may not be able to see it here. Hope im wrong though.
@silenosile3229
@silenosile3229 23 часа назад
Watch in highest res and fullscreen. DLSS is much sharper and more detailed. If in doubt pause the video to compare.
@waltuhputurdaway
@waltuhputurdaway 22 часа назад
​@@silenosile3229hey bot, read the comment. He is on your side
@webolabs
@webolabs 3 часа назад
@@silenosile3229 Not really, this is the first time I can say that FSR is slightly better than DLSS 3
@JesseGaming7593
@JesseGaming7593 2 дня назад
Nice Vid!
@Compusemble
@Compusemble 2 дня назад
Thanks!
@Dew4lk
@Dew4lk 21 час назад
I cant notice any difference, i guess thats a good thing :)
@Joshda039
@Joshda039 2 дня назад
Which one do yall think look better?
@JesseGaming7593
@JesseGaming7593 2 дня назад
I don't care how it looks, I'm much more interested in the fps, and the fps is high!
@nicane-9966
@nicane-9966 2 дня назад
when you cant easily tell the difference anymnore is when you realize AMD has made good upgrades.
@Joshda039
@Joshda039 2 дня назад
@@JesseGaming7593 that's fair
@Joshda039
@Joshda039 2 дня назад
@@nicane-9966 fr
@ishiddddd4783
@ishiddddd4783 2 дня назад
hard to see in a youtube video, and it's the whole ordeal with upscallers, once you have them enabled and in a monitor rendering the game, it's a lot easier to notice them, that and the scene it's dark so artifacts are harder to notice. Fsr3.1 is better than 2.2, but just barely, and still quite far behind DLSS, and it shows if you are playing in a monitor bigger than 24''
@DesocupadoXtremo
@DesocupadoXtremo День назад
Is it running at wich resolution? And wich preset?
@EpicBunty
@EpicBunty День назад
Which.*
@waltuhputurdaway
@waltuhputurdaway 22 часа назад
Can you read? Look at the description.
@rayder3543
@rayder3543 День назад
How can there be so much FPS difference? You might be using different presets Edit: it was FG, the AMD one generates more frames.
@madcowgimbo
@madcowgimbo 2 дня назад
Well, I can't tell the difference between the two. Both look great. I'm happy to game with either of them.
@SP95
@SP95 2 дня назад
It looks like DLSS still has better anti aliasing and anti ghosting as well as a less blurry image but the youtube compression makes the comparison hard Can you also provide some zoomed X4, X6 or X8 samples as well next time you ever do any side by side comparisons like this ? And thanks for this nice test 👍
@sasquatchcrew
@sasquatchcrew 2 дня назад
For some odd reason I have always been interested in this and while I don't care for either of them, its nice to have both as options. For some reason, on my LG CX FSR had some more contrast in the image, slightly less detail at certain times (easy example is hair, but thats arguable and goes back to TressFX/Nvidia Hairworks days) But for the most part both images look fantastic. I do believe you are correct, these kinds of videos are very hard to accurately judge with youtube compression. DLSS always gave me ghosting and images popping in and out. I saw one instance at 10:30 where you can see in the DLSS side that 'pop' in. I have been using FSR quite often now and have noticed it has its own quirks like lack of image detail as a trade off for speed with added unique blurryness that clears up after a few frame cycles. I have to say moving forward while I prefer DLSS, I have a 7900xtx and that was that. I just think its sad for games to have to rely on the tech, but the graphics move faster than the silicon does.
@ACViper
@ACViper 2 дня назад
I disagree, dlss has better anti ghosting but the textures are more blurry. FSR3 at native res looks better than dlaa, at least for me in 1080p.
@waltuhputurdaway
@waltuhputurdaway 22 часа назад
​@@ACVipernative aa looks better for you because everything is massively oversharpened.
@biquiba
@biquiba 2 дня назад
Was FSR 3.2 faster than DLSS or is it just FSR 3.1 that is more performant?
@TheMostWanted92
@TheMostWanted92 День назад
I feel like FSR 3.1 is more performant. Or something to do with the AMD frame gen. FSR 2.2 and previous versions generally performed on par with DLSS from what I remember.
@PeterPauls
@PeterPauls День назад
@@TheMostWanted92 The description says FSR 3.1 and DLSS 3 both uses Quality upscaling and Frame Generation and in my experience FSR 3.0 already generated more frames but lower quality ones, I think they compensate the lower quality with more interpolation and in the end if you don't look for artifacts both looks great. I am using an RTX 4080 and I will use DLSS and I keep update my DLSS dll files for better image qualiy, just drag and drop the latest Frame Generation and DLSS dll from Techpowerup.
@waltuhputurdaway
@waltuhputurdaway 22 часа назад
​@@TheMostWanted92Frame gen is on for FSR 3.1 side
@xorbe2
@xorbe2 День назад
At least mention what the various games are.
@waltuhputurdaway
@waltuhputurdaway 22 часа назад
Ratchet and clank, ghost of tsushima, horizon FW.
@Pinoisreadingabook
@Pinoisreadingabook День назад
both are using frame generation, maybe he should have done a video just using dlss and fsr...
@waltuhputurdaway
@waltuhputurdaway 22 часа назад
Which is why in ghost of tsushima FSR 3.1 got more frames as FSR3FG gets more frames than DLSSFG
Далее
What Happened to the 9th Generation?
22:18
Просмотров 1 млн
Lets Settle This - Air Coolers vs AIOs
13:04
Просмотров 242 тыс.
🎙️ПЕСНИ ВЖИВУЮ от КВАШЕНОЙ💖
3:23:13
OVOZ
01:00
Просмотров 280 тыс.
10 RPGs To Get Back to in 2024
14:28
Просмотров 538 тыс.
Was the PS2 "Emotion Engine" over hyped?
17:14
Просмотров 440 тыс.
ИГРОВОЙ АВТОМАТ !! КАБАНИМСЯ
2:29:59