Using one of these (bought from Southport Wilkinson store) with my x-t4 It is fantastic sooooo sharp even handheld, the other night I grabbed kit off sofa pointed at moon zoomed changed shutter speed and STILL got a great shot, bought myself a sling strap for it, the included one was a bit short….. heavy but not too bad you soon get into using it
Thanks. The story told in this video was fun to watch. I am leaning towards buying this XF 150-600mm lens for my Fuji camera, currently X-S10 - same form factor as the fancier X-H2S. Question: your video shows close-ups of this lens foot on tripod/monopod base with red knobs, but the Promaster Air Support Monopod does not have red knobs. Which tripod/monopod were you using in those shots?
Thank you! The head you can see in the close ups of the lens is the ProMaster Ballhead from this kit: www.wilkinson.co.uk/promaster-specialist-series-sp425ck-professional-carbon-fibre-tripod-head/ In this video we were actually using the head on a 3 Legged Thing tripod because we were using the tripod linked with a video head to film on 😊
@@WilkinsonCameras The monopod piqued my interest too, looks nice and quick to deploy/collapse. Can you lock/unlock/tension the ball on the tri-base just with your foot while standing? Also, great review! Have been looking into the Fuji XF system for a couple of months with the gen 5 bodies out now.
The monopod caught my eye too, I'd love to see a good travel monopod group test/review. Actually, searching RU-vid reviews for the ProMaster Air Support I got a lot of the iFootage Cobra 2 which is stronger, slightly more features, carbon fibre, but pricier, uses levers + tad heavier.
Thank you! I hope to be able to test it on some birds in the future, they weren't coming out to play when I had it. It's a great combination or quality and weight at that price point. It should be a successful lens for Fujifilm :)
I hate this video !! Because of the fact that I see 506 views. What the F**K is wrong with the RU-vid algorithm. I hit the Sub , If it changes something..Cheers for the amount of work you guys have put in.
Thanks Sebin! We've no idea how the algorithm works either 😅 but thanks for commenting and subscribing as it probably helps, but mostly it's nice to hear from people who have enjoyed the video 😄
So love this lens when I found out fuji was going to bring out a 150-600 thought my dreams had come true unfortunately it is so way out of my price range will just have to carry on dreaming 😔😔
You wouldn’t be able to achieve 1200mm with a 1.4x converter. A 1.4x literally multiplies your focal length by 1.4x and a 2x converter by 2x. You will lose 1 stop of light with a 1.4x teleconverter and 2 stops with a 2x. So the equivalents would be: With a 1.4x : 210-840mm F8-11 With a 2x: 300-1200mm F11-16
You are SO right - what a silly oversight on my part! Facepalm moment right there. Surprised no one else has picked up on this either. We review a lot of products in a short period of time so sometimes silly mistakes like this go completely unoticed. Thanks for pointing it (even though I do look a bit stupid now!!) out and for watching :)
@@WilkinsonCameras don’t worry, it was noted by other people too ;) I just combined it with your wish for a faster aperture so assumed/hoped you wanted a f4 fixed aperture! ;)
Hi Colin, the lens itself will perform just as well with an X-T4, but given the subjects that most people will be looking to photograph with this lens, the X-H2S is a winning combination - purely down to the incredible new AF capabilities of that camera which far outperform previous Fujifilm models 😊
How would you compare it to the Sony 200-600? I use both systems and have to choose between these two for a trip to Svalbard. Leaning towards Fuji but a bit worry with the aperture and speed… thoughts?
If it was just between the two lenses, then I'd go for the Fujifilm 150-600mm. The Fujifilm is about 0.5kg lighter and although they're similar lengths, the Sony feels a lot longer and heavier as the balance doesn't seem to be as good as in the Fujifilm. For long days shooting, this is going to make a massive difference. Image quality wise, I would say they're on a par and you'd be happy with the results either provides. Your decision may well come down to the camera bodies you are choosing between. Assuming you're using a full frame Sony (A7 or A9 series) then you're probably going to get much better low-light performance (assuming you're photographing polar bears in Svalbard, this may not be a concern as the light will be plentiful!) and an improved depth of field. Consider the autofocus performance of the bodies you have to choose from as well - you don't want to go on a trip of a lifetime and miss a shot! If you let me know which bodies you're choosing between I'd be happy to let you know which I would choose :)
@@WilkinsonCameras thanks so much. I use a xt4 and a sony A74. She a you, leaning towards the fuji option because of weight and ergonomics but depth of field and iso performance should be much better on the sony side so this is a hard choice for a trip of that kind...
@@vanessajodar3201 To be honest, in this situation I'd probably take the Sony A7 IV, the 200-600mm (or consider the FE 100-400mm and a teleconverter for some more versatility?) and a good monopod. For that kind of trip I'd want the knowledge that I have the best all-rounder which will cope in low light and has fantastic AF - the Sony is the winner here. The 33MP sensor does allow you some cropping ability in post-production as well. A good strap (Peak Design is a great place to start when you're using two systems - so easy to swap between bodies) to take the weight of the camera and a good monopod will keep you mobile, but make it a more comfortable set up for you. Don't forget a spare battery for your camera too, they drain faster in the cold.
@@MrSjeupie I am going early 2023. For now I am leaving towards selling xt4 and upgrading to xt5 for better AF and pair it with tamron 150-500… best of both world…
90% of the video shows reviewer holding the lens. Photographers usually do not choose their gear based on how would they look with it but how looks the content produced by it.
No it doesn't. It's a good balance between content shot with the lens and showing the physical dimensions of the lens. Photographers will definitely choose a lens based on size, weight, and the ability to be carried all day long.
