FULL FIGHT! Mikaela Mayer vs Maiva Hamadouche | Relentless action 🤯 

Well said.

I think a lot of us echo those words mate....

.

Exactly.

Comme d'habitude il s gagnent toujours chez eux la c'était nul ou Maëva

Incroyable championne, honnêtement j'ai toujours eu cette impression même dans les galas que les femmes avaient beaucoup à prouver sur le ring c'est beau!

Quel énergie!

​@@mikoucigale908610:08

Exactly

You saying Hagler didn't win ?

I think round 9 was clearly Mayer. In fact the ref came over and warned about a stoppage after that round. But agree with you and others, it was a close fight and the scoring was a travesty.

Well I could say that mayer hit hamadouche's gloves lots of times and comentators said "wow a left hook from mayer!". I give the win to mayer, but there are rounds to hamadouche and there's 10-10 rounds...

@@filipegaspar3572 98-92 means that one person won 8 rounds to the other person 2. In the fight, I gave the first 2 rounds to Mayer - - partly because Hamadouche had to be spoken too about holding down Mayer. Round 3 I gave to Hamadouche but then round 4 onwards, I gave to Mayer as she appeared to be 'outboxing' Hamadouche - picking better shots and more variety, getting through the 'wild' swings which were still mostly hitting gloves and arms. Round 8 (Or maybe 9) I gave to Hamadouche but then Mayer took the last 2 rounds by 'outboxing' her opponent. So 98/92. The other judges gave her 2, 1 and '0' rounds. Boxing isn't about wildly throwing as many punches as possible and hoping that enough 'wild' swings will get through. Mayer 'outboxed' Hamadouche in 'every' round and that was reflected in the judges score cards. Hamadouche picked up a round or two more on sheer guts, determination and entertainment value... Its like Deontay Wilder vs Tyson Fury - Fury outboxed Wilder every-time and Deontay Wilder is like Hamadouche - a 'thug' who only has wild swings and a 'reasonable' chin to hopefully survive long enough until that wild swing connects...

@@BAMozzy69 sorry but I don't agree at all with the fury-wilder comparison neither with the cleaner shots from Mayer part. Yes I agree that Mayer had better movement and agree with the decision and yes...the last 2 rounds were unquestionable. But the fight was too close till then, because Hamadouche BLOCKED a lot of shots and also LANDED a lot of shots, that's why I think there were a couple of draw rounds (10-10). But I'm good with the final consequence nevertheless, I think the better boxer won. But things have to be said and that scoring was veeeery suspicious and if there wasn't that last 2 rounds I think the result would be very unfair.

@@filipegaspar3572 That's the way you saw it. I saw it 'differently'. I didn't see a 'drawn' round. Yes Hamadouche landed a lot of 'Clean' shots so it wasn't a 'one-sided' contest but as I explained above, I thought Mayer out-boxed her opponent, landing 'more' cleaner punches - particularly to the 'body' in the earlier rounds. It doesn't matter if a boxer completely dominates a round (without getting a knockdown) or its a 'very close' fight, if a judge thinks they had the 'edge' in that round, they give it to that 'boxer'. It doesn't matter if Hamadouche catches Mayer once in that round or 50 times, if Mayer catches her with 'more' point scoring punches in that round, its awarded to 'her'. Hamadouche was pretty much just constantly walking forward swing both hands and 'most' of them were hitting gloves, arms or missing wildly and as such, unless its 'very' clear (as some of her punches were) they connected cleanly, its not easy to score. Mayer out-boxed her opponent in 'every' round - not to say she didn't get caught a lot too - but she had much better movement, much better variety of punches and could easily of won 'every' round (as 1 judge thought) because its 'Boxing' - not UFC or some bar room brawl... Yes the score does look very one-sided and would seem like a 'walk-over' for Mayer - not representative of the fight overall. Like I said though, its 'scored' on a per-round 'basis' and it doesn't matter if you 'dominate' the round from start to finish or 'narrowly' edge each round, you still win the round 10-9 It my opinion, I think Hamadouche narrowly edged round 3 & 8 but in ALL the other rounds, Mayer edged those - so its an '8-2' score. The 3 judges gave Hamadouche didn't give her more than 2 rounds either so its not a 'split' decision and varying by a round (mid point 1 and the other 2 judges also +/- 1 round) so in their opinion too, Mayer did 'enough' to win at least 8 of the 10 rounds regardless of how 'close' each round was. Looking at the fight overall, as I believe I said in my original post, it was a very 'close' fight that left you wondering who the victor would be. Therefore you may think the score would represent that. However, from round 1, there were questions whether Mayer could 'keep up' that pace, keep out-boxing Hamadouche round after round with Hamadouche relentlessly plodding forward, swinging wildly. Both fighters getting caught with some 'big' punches and each throwing a tremendous amount too - unrelenting for 10 rounds - so credit to BOTH! But Mayer kept out-boxing her opponent round after round as evident in the score-cards. That's not a slight on Hamadouche and its the 'best' fight I have seen in years. She was unrelenting, determined, exceptionally fit and a strong chin to keep going at that pace round after round, making it a very tough and entertaining fight. Each round was 'very' close but in 8+ of the 10 rounds, Mayer edged the round enough to take it. At the end of the day, whether she won 100/98 (8 drawn and 2 rounds won) or 100/90 (as one judge had it), the right result on balance was given.

@@BAMozzy69 lets agree in desagree. As you you said we saw it differently. And as you said, actually doesn't matter the score if the end result is the same. Yes hamadouche's style is wild and lacks movement compared to mayer but thats her style (blocking shots and and pressing forward). Actually in one of the rounds (I think 6th or 7th) Mayer tried to use the jab, stay outside and impose her style but couldn't do it so I don't see that "outboxing". But in the end it's just our different views on the fight and we're no judges (arguing may be pointless ahah). The last thing I can say is that the judges being from the US doesn't look fair for credibility purposes, but that's how it is.

Not a hope will mayer beat Katie Taylor, she's to good for all the fighters 130 to 140. Until Katie retires these other girls will have to wait in line. I've seen Taylor fight live 3 times. She is astonishing.

More like disgraceful, imo.

Trouble is this is not the first time judges have been off for home fighters and its not good for boxing - they tried to do Josh Taylor becoming undisputed when he knocked down the opponent twice and dominated the fight yet just sneaked it!"

Dude, get a grip. She trains at high altitude.