After watching a zillion true crime cases I can assure you people, he did not commit this brutal crime! It was too personal for it to be BK. It had to be someone else a lot more comfortable with the house and also connected to the victims. There are many other people who it could have been. LE needs to start looking into the other people immediately once BK is cleared due to insufficient evidence and no connection at all to the house nor any of the people.
@@ManiCUREdwhat state do you practice law enforcement in? Or which government do you work for with all your knowledge of BK if he did this or not? Just odd for LE to focus on bk and weird he bought a k-bar an Dickies jumper but neither was found during the searches or his apartment or parents house!
So true!!! I always am surprised when people consider people good, just because they don’t have a criminal record! Because, that never means that someone hasn’t committed crimes! It just means they haven’t been caught committing crimes.
4 intoxicated people who wer on the verge of sleep an would NEVER EVER think wat was about to happen would happen an so far as never done any crime before he was a weirdo who has slowly turned him to madness
This is ridiculous. Have these people not been following the case? How stupid these people are. One more time, PROSECUTION SAID THERE WAS NO, AGAIn NOOOOO STALKING THAT HAPPENED!!!!!!!!!!!
The only people who kill for no reason a crazy people and serial killers. Maybe it wasn't just him. In the movie scream there was more than one killer.
The people who say this usually have a ridiculous theory that a 100 pound roommate did it and never left any evidence on their phone or anywhere else. And, of course, there’s also no reason in that scenario. There’s no reason anyone would do it so it would be impossible to find someone who had a reason to do it
When a crime is solved correctly, it is very simple. What makes this seem complex and complicated, is that people are combining false news reports, true facts, and fiction from the internet. That makes a giant mess.
@@JeffSherlock I think this whole thing is a source of entertainment to people. I’m fascinated by what actually happened which is why I read the PCA like 10 times but I’m not interested in anything else that people say until the trial..then the whole truth will come out. A lot of people seem to be much more entertained by speculating. They threw all these wild theories out there before Bryan’s arrest and they kept going after his arrest..I think they’ll keep going after he’s convicted too. The actual facts and evidence don’t really matter…
your talking fake news. How come forensic didn't find cleaning fluids like bleach in his car. When and were did you hear Bryan sister say she saw Bryan use bleach to clean hes car?. How come the cop who pulled Bryan over on his way to his parents house in Pennsylvania didn't see blood in his car!. He'd Harley let him go if he did see blood. Are you from earth or are you visiting from another planet.
People not familiar with the case or can’t hear well the prosecutor himself said that he did not stalk the house, look it up his name is Bill Thompson. I can’t believe they are still saying this knowing it’s not factual, damn
Bill Thompson said he was not stalking the house or victims because he cannot prove the legal definition of stalking. But he never said that Bryan was not watching those girls and/or that house for weeks before he killed them!
Stalking has a very specific legal definition. The victim(s) must be aware of the actions a person is taking in order for it to constitute stalking. He could still have been watching the house and/or victim(s) without their knowledge. So no stalking is correct, but it doesn't mean he wasn't watching.
@@kirsty916 except there’s no connection between Bryan kohberger and that house or anybody associated with that house period end of story. Come to find out Steve Goncalves is stating the prosecution is have trouble connecting him to any of the victims, but your saying it’s a technicality and it’s the definition of the word and they got the right guy. Make sure you get ahold of the prosecution and show them your evidence
He had taken several steps before the murders and graduated to a killer, he had been stalking that house and fantasizing about the murders for 6 months.
on social media but that is the opposite of what the gps on his car says including the night of morning of and all around the time of the murders. along with 12 other times in the 9 days prior. he's guilty
@@djohny-ne3ggthe cast report hasn’t been finalized…all that was a generalization based on a wide range…not near the house…highly inaccurate…they didn’t even know how to open the reports…look at the last couple hearings with mowry was a joke and sy ray showing he’s in opposite direction
officer Payne admitted out of the thousand hours of video footage they don’t have Bryan’s car on video once, not once so I’m not sure where your information is coming from. We do know three out of the 12 times his phone pinged the tower that covered 1122 Queen Rd., He wasn’t there, but it doesn’t matter because the prosecution said he wasnt stalking them, there’s no connection between Bryan and that house and anybody who lived there
Because the Feds. They arrested Xana’s mother and Maddie’s stepmother. Both snitched on the Aryan Brotherhood leading to multiple significant arrests. This was retaliation
I can’t count how many times I’ve seen this comment. It’s you who are slumbering. According to Idaho law, stalking requires that those being stalked be aware of the situation. In this case, the one(s) being stalked-iMO, Maddie and perhaps Kaylee-didn’t know what BK was up to, which was illegal surveillance, what Peeping Tom’s do to gaze upon their targets with lust and to learn their habits. BK was creeping and peeping, probably drooling at the luscious fruit he could never get to even date, let alone to f**k. How do you pro-burghers explain the 12 times his phone pinged off the nearest cell tower to the house, all but one late a night? What was he doing in the Moscow area so many times at night? Shopping? Show us at least one receipt. Dining out? Again how about a receipt or a witness? Was no one else in the restaurant? How about the server? Wake up! You don’t have a clue! 😎😎😎
The prosecutor never said there was no connection. The defense team said that, the prosecutor did say no stalking. The gag order was put into place long before the investigation was wrapped up. They haven't even hit the entire discovery dead line.
@nikkibobby17 if you follow the court proceedings you learn a lot of things which cast enormous doubt on the states case. These guys aren't following it closely at all and are speculating on things that have already been demonstrated to be false
Thompson only said that because he cannot prove stalking by its legal definition. It does not mean that BK was not doing surveillance on those girls on the regular!
@@hotpinkthreadSteve Goncalves recently sent email to attorney Andrew D Meyers, who featured Howard Blum on his YT channel. In the email. Steve G writes: "WE HAVE ONE PRIMARY QUESTION, REGARDING BLUM'S BOOK. WHAT EVIDENCE SUPPORTS THE THEORY, THAT BK WAS FOCUSED ON MADDIE MAY?"..."IN OUR RECENT MEETING WITH THE PROSECUTION TEAM, THEY EXPRESSED DIFFICULTY IN ESTABLISHING DIRECT CONNECTIONS BETWEEN BK AND THE VICTIMS."
@@adamkail4449 I'm sorry but there is absolutely no evidence that he surveilled them. The phone pinging from the same tower with a 45 mile reach when he lives only 10 miles away is not evidence .
Can somebody please inform Harvey & Ashleigh that neither law enforcement nor the prosecution (or any other official) has ever said that Bryan went to the house numerous times and just watched. The PCA simply states that his phone pinged off the same tower that the house uses 12 times. Cell towers have a range of up to 45 miles, and Bryan only lived 10 miles from 1122 King Rd. The PCA even states that at the time of one of the pings, police do not believe he was in Moscow. That just proves that his phone can ping off that tower when he is not in the area. Not sure why they would include that in their own PCA. Kind of stupid.
Such an important point. All of the pings were from when Kobgerger was in Pullman. The Wawawai Park, is some 25 miles or more to the West of Pullman, not the east. These TV boneheads just do not get that.
@JeffSherlock well, we don't know where he was when his phone pinged off that tower, but this stalking narrative has to be put to an end. There is no proof of it, and Bill Thompson (the prosecutor) said in court that Bryan was NOT stalking them. We do know that he was in Moscow for other things, such as the pool party he attended. I'm sure his phone pinged off that tower then.
@loislane9826 Kaylee's dad said Bryan's phone "touched their wifi." We don't know exactly what he meant. Was he just referring to the phone pings? Maybe confused on what a ping was? Or is there something else. We have no idea at this point. And, even if his phone did try to connect to the wifi in the house, that does not prove he committed m*rder.
Confirmation bias isn’t a good look. No connection, nothing in his car or office or apartment. Not stalking out of the mouth of Bill Thompson. Sy Ray’s expert opinion. Touch DNA on a moveable object. Justice for these victims is not the firing squad for a defendant with this much reasonable doubt.
Same car as his on victim’s street, DNA on part of weapon left at house, cell phone pings going to and from Moscow, Bryan admitting that he wasn’t home at 4:00am that Sunday, Dylan’s description of a tall but athletically lean male, Bryan wearing latex gloves out and about afterwards, and much more evidence to come. Allegedly proof of Bryan purchasing the weapon that was used etc etc.
Also Sy was paid for his “expert opinion”. There’s a division of the FBI dedicated to cellular analysis that disagrees and they have no reason to be biased like Sy does.
61 yrs old. I've never ever seen or heard of anyone, accused of such heinous crimes, not say anything and just sit there stone faced. If I didn't do this, and someone was calling me guilty, I wouldn't be able to contain or control myself. I would be publicly and privately lashing out my innocence. Jus say'n
Sadly the way courts are conducted does not allow such out bursts with out repercussions. Courts will not tolerate the person being accused , nor the public attending in the gallery, to speak out. So if BK were to shout out his innocence, would be counter productive. So why when he did profess his innocence, at his arrest, do you not believe him then? When arrested he said, he was eager to get back to Moscow to be cleared of such charges. The very reason why he signed the extradition papers right away. Was to clear himself right from the start. Your logic is empty.
@illusionisms The point went over your head. I'm not talking about a simple courtroom "outburst"🙄 There's really no logic involved. I'm referring to psychology and people's natural reactions. Like I said, if it were me, I'd protest like an innocent man would and should!
@@NoNotMe0000 theirs a gag order 🤦♀️ and he wasn’t stalking the victims he is innocent until proven guilty it is in the US he chose to stand silent that’s usually what someone with a brain would do if facing death squadron
@@NoNotMe0000 he is innocent until proven guilty and he chose to stand silent.Judge has control over cameras 🎥 because of people looking for such outbursts and the prosecution did say”Kohberger did not stalk the victims”
Uhhh...what?! He was no where near King Rd looking at the stars. He was in Wawaiwai Park which is in Washington, SW of Pullman. Can you people PLEASE get your facts straight and stop spreading lies! For God's sake. So frustrating.
What about the cops? Have they done anything wrong in this case? No actually Payne admitted in court that it wasn't Bryan's car and the prosecutor Bill Thompson admitted that Bryan wasn't stalking them. So the people that pride themselves on facts are ignoring the facts.
Payne never said that the car they have on camera on the the victim’s street isn’t Bryan’s car. Quit spreading misinformation to help Bryan. The car they labeled as “suspect vehicle 1” is the same make, model, approximate year, and color as Bryan’s..that hasn’t changed and won’t change. That’s all they know.
@@curtf9813 Doesn’t mean it’s his car. And they never confirmed it WAS his car. Just because it looks like his car doesn’t mean it is definitively his car. Unless they have his specific license plate on camera with him driving the car, can’t say it was absolutely BK.
@@Basbhat Yeah they can’t say that it wasn’t his car for the same reason they can’t say it was his car. But that’s pretty much all a person can do with video footage…even if they had a video of someone who looks like Bryan all they can say is that it looks like Bryan…not that it’s certainly him
One person goes through a 3 story house and kills 4 people without a scratch on himself or forensic evidence? A top military man couldn't do that. Why doesn't the news include the other oddities about the case. Some of the parents of the victims are heavy drug addicts. One of Kohberger's lawyers represented a drug case of one of the parents recently. There's a few weird debt/drug problems in that scene. That town could have some kind of weird drug/cult problem.
Right! I think the crime was committed by someone they knew very well and trusted. The layout is known and moving freely in the dark at a fast pace. The dog not attacking at the sight of an unknown person in the middle of the night with a face mask comitting assault then murder?!
@@katelynhernandez7998 Ian’s 2 other profiles and it’s touch DNA 🧬 if you knew the difference then you would not have made the comment, and it was on the metal clasp DNA degrades w/in a few hours they didn’t find it until they moved the bodies and it was a soup of makecDNA in that sorority house didn’t you see the body cam off 100’s of guys a week before in the house not knowing who or what lived their 🤦🏻
His phone was out of range, not turned off. Have any of you actually followed the case? 1, no stalking. 2, no video of his car turned over to the defense yet, 3 no connections to any of the victims yet. 4, cell phone data presented to the grand jury innacurate. 5 dna is suspect with timing and amount-touch dna (not enough for a scientifically accurate sample) on a movable object. 6, No victim dna in his car, home or office. 7, video of the girls with JS walking where he says "They're going to get you for that" after Maddie says she told Adam everything.(a few hours later the girls are dead) 8, 4 people seen running away from the scene of the crime in the bandfield video. 9, The FBI expert had a different year of car initially. 10, Elantra matching the FBI experts report found crashed in Oregon tied to rhe owner of the home not processed for dna evidence. And the list goes on. Only 1 persons dna found in a party house. Police chief moves evidence from an active crime scene in a uhaul. Crime scene destroyed. Coroner not allowed on scene for 12 hours and changed timeline 3x. Prosecution witholding discovery, saying it doesn't exist, then magically finding it the day before the hearing. The way it was investigated produced so much reasonable doubt, no one should put him to death with this amount of wtf going on.
You are exactly correct plus much, much more- I’m amazed by the people that actually believe the garbage that MSM spreads! It only takes 1/2 of a brain to research legal documents and listen to the hearings! Pay attention and research this case and this corrupt town of Moscow! It’s super easy to find out truth and not just be brainwashed like 95% of people are! It’s super sad that anyone could be in a situation like this and yes it happens every day- corruption!
Ted Bundy went into a building with 8 women, two or three in every room armed with a log, killed or severly injured everyone in that house in a matter of minutes. Not one scream from anyone. So there is that, Harvey the lawyer.
@@CelticRuneSinger it's what he does. It's his new angle true crime. He'spromoting his latest endevor. True Crime is all over especially on RU-vid. Who cares about celebritie gossiping like they use to. You must be under 40
Yes weird. Multiple weapons used. Wounds were different. Kaylee beaten and assaulted. No way was this all done in 10 minutes. No way the two roommates didn’t hear more. Prosecutor says he wasn’t stalking. Those kids were not sleeping. They were up. We need to wake up and question everything. Nothing makes sense in this case. He’s saying tons of evidence but the sheath isn’t a weapon and the dna wasn’t direct fingerprint, the phone pings aren’t reliable, his alibi didn’t prove anything. The prosecution said he wasn’t stalking. This is why we need fair reporting.
@@orlawalsh926 because the CIA totally didn’t kill JFK or sell cocaine and heroin to Americans to fund clandestine wars in SE Asia and South and Central America.
Who knows whether he done it or not...most likely... but demolishing the residence that the crime took place in is absolutely insane, especially where there is still investigation and trial going on. In favour of both sides there could be evidence missed in the house that either helps the prosecutors case or the defendants...human error is common. You get rid of that you can no longer go back.
So with how long they've been kicking in the can you're claiming this as human error Coupled with wanta, shoulda, and coulda With the things that were allowed to be destroyed You do understand the bodies were deliberately cremated
I love that you brought Harvey on as a guest.I never knew that he was a lawyer. But Ashley, you are journalist.I feel like you're supposed to be neutral.And you're incredibly biased when it comes to Bryan Kohburger
Plus he use to end every show with the outro of his mock mug shot and voice over saying “I’m a lawyer!” Not sure if he still does, I haven’t watched TMZ for years!🤷🏻♀️
He thought Maddie was alone and also thought everyone was asleep. He killed one and just kept killing as he moved through the house. Kaylee's mom said it best, "He came in to kill one and ended up killing four."
Where's your evidence for him thinking Maddie being alone Also you cannot use stalking since the prosecution has said that's bogus Also you cannot use stalking since the prosecution has said its bogus
For sure. A lot seems off! I also notice most media go with narratives and some persons on here don’t really care for Levins POV but what he’s saying doesn’t seem far fetched either.
The one very interesting thing in this case is the estrangement of Kaylee and her bf and the fact that she made an exception to come back on this particular night. One last time ever but that couldn’t mean anything right
@@MrShane82 An even more interesting thing is she was given a stern warning on the same night the murders took place and it was on camera. Jack S said they're going to get you for this!!! and that's what prompted her to say to her friend "what did you say to adam?" I told him everything. There's no way in hell that this dialogue has nothing at all to do with what happened. BK was never involved in this shit and he should be released.
The investigation was weeks old at that point. The gag order has been in affect from the beginning. None of us know what evidence there is but we know one thing, the DP is still on the table so they have evidence.
Exactly. All the evidence they have is circumstantial. In the PCA it was stated that Bryan did NOT stalk the roommates. The BIG QUESTION is.... Why did Dylan and Bethany take 8+ HOURS to eventually call 911 from a house drenched in blood everywhere, a house that smelt of death and blood and bodies? The police smelt the stench the second they entered the house via the first floor though the bodies were on second floor. Why didn't the surviving roommates smell anything. Why didn't they see any blood? SMH. There's more but I've wasted enough time for now.
Steve Goncalves recently sent email to attorney Andrew D Meyers, who featured Howard Blum on his YT channel. In the email. Steve G writes: "WE HAVE ONE PRIMARY QUESTION, REGARDING BLUM'S BOOK. WHAT EVIDENCE SUPPORTS THE THEORY, THAT BK WAS FOCUSED ON MADDIE MAY?"..."IN OUR RECENT MEETING WITH THE PROSECUTION TEAM, THEY EXPRESSED DIFFICULTY IN ESTABLISHING DIRECT CONNECTIONS BETWEEN BK AND THE VICTIMS."
I saw and heard(that doesn’t say much aha obviously, I know) that he wore the dickies coveralls, and then disposed of them. They said they recovered the tag, but who knows. I just want the person/s who did this to be brought to justice.
Exactly, BK is more credible than the other people that were there at scene including two surviving Frozen shock sleeping housemates 🥶🥶 BK is not guilty
How is he "more" credible? Whether or not he did it, I'm just waiting to hear the evidence before I declare him guilty or not guilty. To me that is the correct approach.
@@Doris1888 well he wasn't there? Others were there trampling the crime scene, someone had already checked out before cops got there? Where's the 911 call? I would say that BKs alibi is more believable compared to those people!
@@ruthcarter1360 Just because others were trampling the crime scene (which I agree) doesn't mean he wasn't there. His DNA on the knife sheath. But I am willing to listen to all the evidence before I would convict him or say not guilty. I'll agree they goofed with the crime scene but that doesn't mean he wasn't there.
Yes weird. Multiple weapons used. Wounds were different. Kaylee beaten and assaulted. No way was this all done in 10 minutes. No way the two roommates didn’t hear more. Prosecutor says he wasn’t stalking. Those kids were not sleeping. They were up. We need to wake up and question everything. Nothing makes sense in this case. Also Levin is incorrect. His alibi wasn’t that he was out looking at stars. They just said he was driving. They said he liked to look at Stars. No proof yet he was turning his phone off. Also regarding Ashleigh’s statement, there is no proof that sheath belongs to Bryan nor do we know it held the murder weapon. Please don’t present it that it was.
No he's not you have no idea what your talking about go read the PCA... or better yet go watch the lead detective take the stand and answer no to weather or not they could place his car at the crime scene and that theu didn't find his DNA...
There actually isnt a lot of evidence (what has been revealed to the public) that attaches BK to the crime. There is no evidence that he stalked the house, in fact the prosecution has said that he did not stalk (Idaho def of stalk) the victims. His cell phone pinged in the area 12 times. Moscow Idaho and Pullman Washigton are only 15 minutes from each other, it is relativly normal for him or anyone to go between the 2 cities. especially being a college student, WA has legal WEED and ID does not. He was not nearby to look at the sky, his alibi was that he was at wawai park which is in Washington NOT that he was nearby looking at stars, the DNA is touch(transferrable) DNA not regular DNA (bodily fluids). Experts got the car year wrong, Experts say that the cell data that is present does not necessarily put him in the area, if there was a clear phot /video of the car we would have had him right away because the plates were PA plates. and only a back plate. there are plenty of other people who had more motive than BK did.
@@el34glo59 how so? courtroom discussions from prosecution have said he did not stalk them. touch DNA is not widely used because it is often wrong. and he never pinged on their wifi (That we know of) so his being in Moscow 12 times doesnt mean anything. cell tower data can not say where he was in location to the house. so maybe you need to adjust your way of thinking... and there is a possibility it is him.. i can say that.. i have a brain that can comprehend a bigger picture.. but the evidence provided does not by any means prove he is the killer.
Extremely misguided, it’s comical. Single source dna, not mixed, not transferred. On multiple cameras, multiple times driving repeatedly down a dead end road. Bleaching car repeatedly in the middle of the night, separating dna in baggies to place into the neighbors trash also in the middle of the night. Screams innocent normal behavior to me
@@davidreph5210 and the prosecution said “BK did not stalk victims “ and the families can’t find a connection, too many sheep 🐑 let’s hope the jurors aren’t as dumb as those that responded to you, at least Sy Ray whom is pro bono and worked w/our military has a better track record than MPD the CAST report isn’t even finished and Brett Payne only had 2 days of training. It’s too bad that the media feeds into nonsense
Fistly, watching the 'TMZ' video of this, it was absolute garbage. Disgusting to see 'NewsNation' continuing to use the orange jumpsuit picture. This guy Levin is horrific. What a pile of absolute manure. There is almost no evidence at all. And, Ashley Banfield invented more fiction right there, during this video. Ethan was taken-down immediately. One swift swing of the weapon.There was no 'battle' at all. None. Nobody had beem stalked. No one had stalked. Kohberger had not stalked anyone. The prosecution has been very, very clear that there had been no stalking at all. Bryan Kohberger is a student of pasychology. He has also--at WSU--studied computer forensics. He is not a student of crime, crimescense, crime techniques.
Levin Is incorrect about him stalking the house because in one of the hearings, Thompson said he never stalked them! Kaylee had over 50 stab wounds! Ethan had many too on his legs so there must’ve been more than one person doing everything and maybe more than one knife! Get your facts straight because Kohberger May not be the person who did this!
@@JuliusSqueezer110 he did not it was part of the jury questionarre and what do you believe is the legal term for stalking? The prosecution said not even on media and obviously you don’t know law
no matter which side you are, you have to ask why the state cannot produce any evidence after 1.5 yrs? 🤔 and why do the prosecutor beg for close hearings while the BK wants everything public? BK needs massive payout when he's freed
@@ozzibear there is no OG PR account. The account you mention simply changed their username. It has been around posting under various lives since the arrest.
I agree - how is it possible for 1 person to overcome 4 people with just a knife? And why was there no blood trail? How could someone clean up all that blood in just a few minutes?
You are so right. Never say never. I thought this was a very strange case but so was the highjackers on 911 with box cutters used to take over a plane full of people.
There’s A L O T weird about this case. Too numerous to mention. Lots of YT channels have investigated much more than Harvey & police have.🙄 SUPER sketchy cops. See Brent Kopacker for starters.
I still think that that kid, that rich kid, the one creeping on the victims at the food truck earlier that night, the one who fled the country pretty much right after it, the one who way way too into hunting and seemed pretty adept with knives, That kid is involved somehow and should've been checked out further.
There was a lot of police that night over there and a lot of people drinking and a lot of people partying young kids. There’s no way Brian did it with all that activity outside of that house. No way it was somebody. They knew . And they actually don’t have proof.
Harvey doesn't know if he hasn't killed before. He's just never been convicted of killing before. His whole focus has been domination over others and has had numerous problems, so he's not the angel that Harvey is making him out to be.
@CelticRuneSinger I don't work for the FBI I couldn't tell you. I have a question for you, how did his father's DNA get on the knife sheave left at the murder scene? Was it simply blown there by the wind?
@@RC-no3dr Are you aware of the nuances between touch DNA that was found on the sheath and Actual DNA which was absent in the suspect's apartment and car? And are you aware that touch DNA isn't even admissible in certain parts of the world?
@@ManiCUREd isn’t that a little odd for your own dna to not be found in your own car or apartment? I don’t even see how that’s even relevant. The guy forgot the sheath or didn’t have time to look around for it in the dark, it’s as simple as that.
I think Kohberger confronted circumstances he didn't plan for like the two girls sleeping in the bed together and running into other roommates in the home. Adrenaline can enable a person to do things physically they normally couldn't do
@@CelticRuneSinger Four days after the incident, BK attended a pre-scheduled doctor's appointment. It was reportedly a general check-up related to his PhD studies. While protective gloves might have prevented cuts, it's implausible that his hand wouldn't have been visibly bruised after repeatedly stabbing four people. The knife allegedly used has a guard to prevent slipping, but stabbing through human muscles and hitting bones again and again in a short time would cause his hand to hit the guard with significant force with each stab. There is no way that the person who did this walked out of the house without any injury.
My unpopular opinion is that K didn't commit these murders - I think he might have been there or involved in some way - driving, waiting outside - but I don't think he did the actual murder, but he knows something.
How do you assume that all the residents were asleep? According to the PCA, Xana received a food delivery shortly before the alleged time of the incident and was active on TikTok. Dylan reportedly opened her door several times because she heard loud noises and voices. The PCA states she could understand what was being said and saw a man dressed in black with bushy eyebrows and a mask before entering a frozen shock phase. It's also known that the police heavily relied on the phone data of the surviving roommates to create the timeline. If you accept these statements as accurate, you cannot simultaneously claim, without any evidence, that the residents were under the influence of substances and sleeping soundly to make it fit what you want to be true. Additionally, there was no party at the house that evening.
@@Romina1907. Just because there wasn’t evidence of a full blown party that night doesn’t mean people weren’t doing drugs. And not all drugs make people knock out.
My reply was deleted in less than three minutes. This is why I can't ever write in on your channel. I work in communities as a civil rights Activist and work with police officers every day. I have a lot to inform you I am Deleted. Go ahead take this down.
Harvey you’re wrong. There are regular citizens with no criminal history that do road rage on the spot and unalive others. You’re underestimating people’s anger. One or two of those girls angered him.
Hi there @swedish,,Absolutely spot on💯 Controversy gets attention. & the more fantastical ,sensational the better. Fans of conspiracy theories are imo,targeted with narratives that are used To get clicks etc. Creators putting content out like"Are the FOUR kids still alive & in LE Protection "?,is just one of many examples Of outrageous conspiracy theories used in the case. This horrific case deserve utmost Respect to victims& their families 24/7. Sadly it's used disgracefully by some to get Boosts on channels
I think he's killed people before; they just haven't definitively discovered which cold cases he's tied to. But someone in his physical condition - and with that kind of knife (which was originally designed as a military knife for the express purpose of killing people rapidly and QUIETLY) - could definitely commit this kind of crime. He allegedly used to go hunting and fishing with his father (for all his OCD virtue signaling about vegetarianism) - and he once had a job gutting fish. I'm sure they hired him, too, because he had some hunting/fishing/knife experience, to begin with. "Weird?" Well, sure it's "weird" - not to mention, horrific. But you know the phrase and the song about how much can happen in "a NY minute" ?? And crime victims who survive will tell you how quickly everything happened "all of a sudden." You cannot look at this through the mindset of a normal person. Whoever did this (I believe it's the accused) - got a perverse predatory thrill out of the high risk of the situation - things like criss-crossing with the door dash, or Xana being awake on the 2nd floor, while he slipped upstairs to the third floor, first -- this was part of the sadistic and arrogant enjoyment of "the hunt," so to speak, is my guess, as far as his psychology is concerned. He may also be schizoid - and perhaps committed these crimes in a highly depersonalized state of mind.
I disagree with Mr. Levin 1) we don't know that he never committed other crimes 2) IMO this was about long held rage and EGO. He believed he was smarter than everyone else - smarter than the cops, smarter than other law enforcement and he WANTED to pull it off - it was a rush for him. I feel he is extremely narcissistic, with a huge napolean complex - this guy wants power, control, and to be respected for pulling off the perfect crimes. Let's remember his field of study and the fact that he felt he was smarter than everyone else.
…maybe your weird…😂😂😂 not a reason to convict some of a horrible crime… No stalking…no car at crime scene…CPA they aren’t even going to use! Touch DNA …corruption in every level…they are being exposed..,LE covering up for the university…
*Just because Harvey doesn't think he could do it...doesn't mean BK didn't do it.* 🙄 I believe that Kohberger wanted to know if he could get away with murder. I don't think he expected the other 3. So are we going with speculations like mine and Harvey's or are we going with what the investigation says! *I'm disappointed in your having this man on!* Booooooo
Correction: prosecutors have never said that Bryan was stalking the victims. There may be evidence to that end,but the Prosecutors have been veery careful not to accuse the defendant of any crime which he has not been charged or convicted. Also, it’s not weird that Bryan was able to take down a larger person like Ethan: Bryan had a big knife and, based on his training, knew how to use it.
And he could of surprised Ethan. Also, Ethan had lived an idealic childhood/ he never contemplated fighting off a knife while relaxing with his girlfriend.
I think he went there that night to kill one person (he probably thought he was slick enough to pull that off without anyone else knowing) & he killed the three others because he had too (things didn’t go to plan) cause his target was not alone in the room (remember, the one girl had already moved out & came back to visit & show them her new car) the couple were still up & probably heard him & Ethan probably confronted him, so that led to their deaths, but we won’t know anything for sure till the trial
I think that is exactly what happened too. He kept running into people on the way out so he had to kill them to get out. I also think the reason he didn’t kill the last girl was he was exhausted and thought he may get caught if he didn’t get out quickly.
Thank you! Yes, wait till trial. I too think this guy didn’t plan 4 kills. If there were multiple killers, there hasn’t been solid evidence of there being so or they were ruled out.
He did not stalk the victims. Judge judge clearly states this as fact in one of the hearings regarding the survey. Link below of court hearing judge judge confirming he did not stalk the victims. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-LSZZOFhnAno.htmlsi=RbmtQQSEM4xiWGiV
Don't you find it on the girl that saw the guy coming in and out she never called the cops and I don't care how scared you are when you hear someone getting killed you call 911
He committed the crime in the middle of the night while most were sleeping… all were drunk. Dog was used to noise and a goldendoodle (not aggressive as all- I have one). BK is a runner and planned this crime for MANY months. Ethan did catch him by surprise and he left immediately after his murder due to exhaustion
Also "Somebody who has never committed a murder before" Like every killer in history who had never killed anyone before until they did? I wouldnt hire this guy.
It's ridiculous to read the comments of those desperately trying to make BK Bundy 2.0. They insist it could still be true whenever something comes to light that doesn't support their narrative. These same people naively believe in a mountain of evidence that Santa is supposedly hiding for strategic reasons, ready to dump on the defense during the trial. Hint: It doesn't work this way, and the last hearings were quite sobering. There is no mountain of evidence. Over 1.5 years after the crime, they can't even prove the story they put in the PCA. It's not about your fantasies but justice for the victims and BK's rights. Both are closely linked and depend on the work of the investigators and the prosecution. Anyone claiming to want justice for the victims and their families should hold the prosecution to the highest standards.
So how does a murderer kill his first victim, Harvey? Every one has a first and that first is violent and it ain't pretty. Harvey's own Liquor Store example is a logic fail: Just because we don't KNOW of previous violence/killing does not mean he didn't commit any. If he was ever CAUGHT having done them, then he wouldn't have GRADUATED to more complex crime ala the liquor store example. Pretty amateur mistake coming from an attorney...
