Full Interview With the Creator of C++ 

yes. very few actually ever read that and know.

Guess you also need to see the employment criteria the barrier to entry is low compared to others and then you can eventually learn and experiment while having a job

I think it's mostly because of lack of understand. people think web development is html and css and those boring things. I had this mindset 6 years ago when I was learning C++

@@ehsankhorasani_ What did you end up learning?

it just your algorithms

@@ehsankhorasani_ You're right people think web development it's html and css .. also we should consider the benefits of web development for companies and commercial resource.

Why is so? I'm not a c++ or rust programmer, but everything I see about c++ is like "it's damn horrible, outdated, rust is way better" and other stuff.

@@aintnochange, because C++20 and above are very good, all those who criticize C++ and call for switching to rust either do not know C++ or have used C++ below version 11. There is another group of people who rewrite old C or C++ programs in Rust and claim improved performance and something like that. A sane person will understand that rewriting a program again and getting an increase is not news. And this is not a Rust achievement. If you rewrite the old program again in C++, using new features, the gain will be the same or even better. Moreover, some people introduce multithreading into programs rewritten in Rust and suddenly get a performance boost, this is also important to take into account. The Rust community often mentions memory safety; a study is cited that states that 70% (or something like that) of problems are memory issues. But Stroustrup himself in one of his interviews repeatedly said that writing “C/C++” together is not entirely correct, and in research the problems are mainly not C++, many use C++ as pure C. Yes, C++ has a lot of problems, but this does not make it a bad language and it is evolving. But on the other hand, I’m not saying that Rust is bad, I just think everyone is already tired of all this propaganda. And we must understand that if we say that Rust is a system programming language, then in this case Rust will not be able to do without the constant use of unsafe blocks.

It's not a flexible idea to say C++ is irreplaceable.

@@aintnochange it's mainly because of people's attitude. People tend to choose more well-documented, more available and broader-used languages. I've learned c++ for some time and definitely can say that it has it's own flaws and weird moments, but overall it would very unlikely become obsolete as long as there is a system with a low computational power or time-critical computations to be done. Many things, of course, can be done in assembly directly, but writing code in c++ is just so much more convenient, fast and pleasant. And some computations are also done faster/require less code to be written in other languages, but the c++ for me is a nice medium between modern, fast-to-write-in, and computationally fast language

Thanks friend 🙏

how can you say that? he's so wholesome 😭

...and our most foundational infrastructures

@@BrainTrance bjarne wasn't involved with unix.