The 3.0 engine's noise is louder at low rpm, but less at high rpm. The 4x4 option is only available with the 3.0 engine, because the torque and horsepower ratio of the 1.9 engine is not enough for 4x4 option. The difference between 1.9 and 3.0 is very felt at 0 - 60 km. If you think that ; only for the city car, 1.9 engine may be sufficient, but if you go out of the city for a holiday on weekends, 3.0 should be preferred. Because 3.0 consumes less fuel on high-speed highways. As well as ; Passing the vehicle in front of you on non-highway roads is very troublesome and annoying for the 1.9 engine. Of course, finally, everyone should drive and test it themselves, without being influenced by anyone, and choose their vehicle according to their own options and style.
@@technologicalparking5352 thankyou so much very informative and excellent reply!!! Also did they fix the passenger air condensation problem? Is the air blower have a cover now? One last question, does the side view mirrors automatically fold in when park?
Isuzu MU-X 1.9 Ultimate 4x2 Consuming an average of just 7.2 L to 7.5 L/100km , 150 hp /3,600 กำลังสูงสุด กิโลวัตต์(แรงม้า) / รอบต่อนาที,,,,,,,,,,, Isuzu MU-X 3.0 Ultimate 4x2 Consuming an average of just 7.9 L to 8.1 L /100km, 190 hp / 3,600 กำลังสูงสุด กิโลวัตต์(แรงม้า) / รอบต่อนาที. No fuel advantage when traveling with 7 people of the 1.9 engine.
![[Full Review] ทดลองขับ All NEW Isuzu MU-X 1.9 Ultimate 4x2 : 3.0 Ultimate 4x4](/img/logo.svg){kind=logo}
