Fully Automated Mun Mission in Stock Kerbal Space Program! 

Me who doesn‘t even know how to controll Yaw, roll and pitch with kOS

Absolutely amazing work, thank you for sharing this with us

Is that a Factorio pun or what

@@xirate7091 KOS stands for Kerbal Operating System, it's an autopilot.

@@xirate7091 what pontus said but I love factorio

Wow, thanks!

MATT HAVE MY KIDS PLEASE

MATT HAVE MY KIDS PLEASE

MATT HAVE MY KIDS PLEASE

MATT HAVE MY KIDS PLEASE

Lol you talking about how the rocket "knows where it is" makes me think of that missile meme. "The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't, by subtracting where it is, from where it isn't, or where it isn't, from where it is, whichever is greater, it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance sub-system uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is, to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position where it was, is now the position that it isn't. In the event of the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has required a variation. The variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too, may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was. The missile guidance computance scenario works as follows: Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is, however it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be, from where it wasn't, or vice versa. By differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was. It is able to obtain a deviation, and a variation, which is called "air""

I would have went with jaw-dropping but you get the spirit lol

I know, and as someone who struggles with normal moon and return missions, i am positively flabbergasted and stumped

they said themselves that they've been busy playing the game instead of working on it lol

@@treehousejackal I've been playing the game since middle school. Civil aerospace engineer now (in particular, thanks to KSP, lol). Guess, I missed my chance at becoming KSP 2 senior developer...

@@oldcameraguy I'm a long-time player too, since around 0.13, which would have been elementary school for me, though I'm going into CS for game design instead of an aero related field. I'm too young to have gotten a chance at being a dev for the game, but I imagine I wouldn't have lasted long before trying to be a whistleblower and getting my ass fired lol

The sad part is that KSP2 actully feels good if it works, I still hope for a wonder that they can catch up with development

@@Jan5366 I have faith. The team is genuinely passionate about the project, which is a lot more than can be said for a lot of actually successful AAA titles. I think the drama with Star Theory getting the axe really kneecapped them and they just never fully recovered. A good way to think of KSP2 is as a preorder and a preview build rather than a fully playable yet incomplete release as early access tends to be.

Thanks Ryan - well said!

That reminds me of something I've heard once and said often. I don't quite remember how it goes, but it's something like this: "A programmer (is someone who?) spends five hours automating a five minute task." It adds up over time I suppose, but at times like this it's really not the point. It's a question of "hey, I wonder if I can automate this?". The answer is almost always yes.

Much appreciated!