CRICKET BAT GIVEAWAY - one random subscriber each month of our cricket season will win a signed bat - announced in the first video of each month. ENd of season compilation - thanks for watching!
Picky's run out is the most hilarious... starts by trying to be cheeky, then literally pleading the non-striker to run, before angrily storming off... :-)
Are you a Backyard Cricket lover ? Then check this out and don't forget to subscribe mate. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-XbKzXdYqHCU.html
If that was a dead ball, you'd get batmen running to jump up and divert skiers, because it can't be out obstructing the field if it's dead as soon as it touches you, right? 🤦🏼♂
Are you a Backyard Cricket lover ? Then check this out and don't forget to subscribe mate. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-XbKzXdYqHCU.html
In almost all cases the player getting run out is at fault because he didn't follow two simple rules: 1) know your running partner (a slow runner or lazy ass runner or inattentive runner are perfect recipe to get run out if you are trying to steal a quick single or double) - make sure you know your running partner well. 2) Always ensure that the player running towards danger end has acknowledged your call. In fact it is his call to run or not as he is running towards danger end, so commit to run only when he has made a call. 0:15 reason 1 0:27 reason 1 0:40 reason 2 0:55 reason 1
Fantastic clips, village cricket is ace, but is there any sport apart from cricket where one team gets to decide if their own team mater sare out? Thats genius that is.
It’s not a dead ball until the umpire calls it dead. It’s out. Unfortunate but it’s out. As a qualified umpire, I know that club cricketers (actually most) don’t know the Laws of the game. It’s often the case, but it’s why we love club cricket isn’t it 😊
Bit hard to tell from the camera angle, but it looked like those increasingly desperate appeals around 3:20 were all going down leg side. Full marks for emoting though! 😀
Usually in cricketing etiquette, if the ball goes behind the facing batsman it is the non striker's call, in this instance the non striker wasn't backing up and it looks like there was a comfortable single, so despite the Javelin throw, the facing bastman had a right to be aggrieved!
As you asked, the batsman facing is at fault. The ball has gone behind him and he starts to run without getting a call from the non-striker. The non-striker then calls no and he is run out. So the javelin at the end was uncalled for. That is a fine right there! Great compilation, so much to enjoy: some of the LBWs may be hitting the pad outside off stump but not really possible to see from the angle. The guy getting hit square in the box and just falling forward is the funniest thing I have seen on a cricket video. Then there's the "dead ball" call which I said at the time was totally wrong. Nice that the qualified umpire quantified that. Great compilation and enjoy the winter, Walton. I wait with bated breath for April 2020 😀
Are you a Backyard Cricket lover ? Then check this out and don't forget to subscribe mate. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-XbKzXdYqHCU.html
nah you're wrong mate. If you look and listen closely, you can hear and see the non striker say "yep" and starts to walk down, and then he shouts no and goes back. That one there was the non strikers fault, as they changed calls mid run
when someone is obviously dead to rights and you get an umpire that is blind, thick, doesn't know the rules or day dreaming - see how you like it. We had an old fossil standing at square leg and if you really screamed at him "how's that!" for a run out his arm went straight up. Funny but sad really.
@@doctormarazanvose4373 oh that's infuriating, I had one of those too, i lured him down the track, keeper stumped him he was out by couple of feet, the old fart said not out, he got a right ear bashing!
Not necessarily. Sure if the ball has gone completely out of the strikers view, then it’s the non strikers call. But let’s say you are batting, and you play a cut down to 45* behind square, you can still see it. And the batter knows how hard he or she has hit it, that’s something the non striker can’t possibly know. So about 85% of time, it’s the strikers call
@@jacobunderwood4691 the non-striker doesn't know how hard he's hit it lol - so you need to be told how fast something is going before you believe it lol? it's a simple rule - behind and in front of square. Very very simple. If they can't understand that then there's no hope.
The cricketing Bison, thank you for your reply, is that correct? We have to thank Umpire Shacklerama, my spelling, Steve Bucknor and Billy Bowden, amongst others for that total!
correct - but non-striker had plenty of time to complete the run if he had committed instead of waiting. Fielder is out of shot - he may have mis-fielded and the old adage never run on a mis-field may apply. Either way - striker shouldn't have gone anywhere until receiving a positive verbal signal.
I played in a match. I took a caught behind. The umpire asked the batsman “did you hit that?” He replied, no it came off my glove. Umpire gave him not out.
0:46 it’s both their fault, first of all it probably wasn’t the right call by the striker, he wasn’t even able to make it halfway down the pitch before the keeper got it. But on the other hand, the non striker didn’t do very well to stop the striker from running, he just looked at him, didn’t call or put his hand up 🖐. Overall, poor communication between the batsmen.
I'm guessing you had the volume turned down ..... the non striker clearly said no, go back and since he was running to the " danger " end, was his right to do ......
The strikers at fault,he's ball watching after hitting behind the wicket? Should only of been looking at the non striker it's his call! It was terrible calling but all the same
The Striker was at fault for that for thew run out at 46 secs. When the ball goes behind square like that it is always the non-striker's call as they are the one running to the danger end. Running 101
Getting hit in the nuts: Hilarity all around. Getting hit in the face: Grave concern from all involved. Also the second dodgy run was out, that's clear interference. Ran a mile off the straight line just to get in the way of the throw. We all do it but that was way too obvious.
I'll never understand not wearing a helmet. Even on a damp, slow pitch all it takes it an edge and you're catching the ball to your face. Makes literally 0 sense to me. It's easily on the same level as choosing to not wear a box.
I never used to wear a helmet until one of our openers top edged a sweep off a slow left armer into his face and needed 3 operations to put his eye socket and cheek bone back to normal. After that, I always wore one.
