Nagsagawa ng Feasibility study ang FUTRAN Philippines sa apat na lungsod sa Pilipinas na posibleng pagtayuan ng suspended podcars rail system. #riseph #philippines #Futran
Yan ang dapat gawin paunlarin ang mga bawat probinsiya pra lumago at lumaki ang income ng mga tao sa probinsya at pra hnd magsiksikan sa metro manila city at iba pang city sa pinas
asa ka pa ! na mere FACT na may mga subway at may reclamation projects na yan, ibig sabihin, AYAW nang imperial manila mag expand, gusto nila, sa kanila mag invest ang LAHAT nang mga bigtime business
@@Dino-pk5hclols, bakit di nyo ask LGU nyo if feasible ang big tickets sa area nyo and if sustainable yung project (ibig sabihin kikita ang line less reliant sa subsidies, or ready ba ang market or economy of scale) if a city is as big as cebu city, davao city, et al na may malaking per capita income or tax revenues.) easy to say but it will be hard to implement if not feasible.
Bagay itong mode of transportation sa aming lungsod sa Baguio City, sana makita ito ng aming butihing Mayor Magalong, sana magkaroon din para bawas traffic
@@TRL-lz7ed eh, ano kung dilaw eh, si digong puro pagnanakaw ang naging legacy nya sa loob ng 6 na taon.hahaha 51 bilyon kay pulong 4.5 bilyo kay digong kada taon mula 2018 hanggang 2022 hahaha......
Wow! Sana ay patuloy na umunlad pa ang ating bansa. Pero may palaisipan lang sa akin yang ganyang disenyo. Paano kung magkaaberya, paano ang escape plan nyan? I mean, halimbawa sa MRT and LRT may mga pagkakataon na nagkakaaberya (pwedeng sanhi ng lindol o technical issues etc.) at kailangang huminto ng tren sa gitna ng ruta. Sa MRT at LRT kahit papaano pwede magbukas ang pinto at may malalakaran ang mga tao sa gitna ng riles. Eh yan kaya? Napag-isip-isip ko lang hehe 😁
Maganda yan. Pag naimplement yan sa mga ciudad sa Pilipinas, dapat limitahan ang mga pampublikong mga sasakyan. Lalo na cgurohin sa mga ciudad na ang mkabili lng ng sasakyan ay yung may legit na parking space at cgurohin ang inspeksyon. Sa Maynila dapat tanggalin na ang mga tricycle at jeepneys, mga kariton at mga sagabal sa mga kalsada pati poste. Dapat umpisahan na ang underground cabling para malinis tinggnan ang mga ciudad. Pag natanggal na ang mga power at cable wires, gumawa ng batas na obligahin lahat na may ari ng mga establisimento na pinturahan uli ang mga buildings sa harap ng mga kalsada. Presto malinis at maganda tingnan. Gaya sa Davao city.
why on earth would you remove jeepneys and tricycles? they are literally essential part of our public transportation... more people would be tempted to buy their own car since they can't ride aything to their work and such. which is not what we want.
Thats a bug question, these are novel gadgetbahn systems that arent so proven and you are locked to that OEM for future expansion, supply parts and maintenance. Cities will be forced and cost more in the long run, while struggling to keep up with demand and increase capacity. Better build tram/light rail with dedicated lane with some elevated portion if you need something cheaper for small cities. And still car far more passengers than any of these systems. Baguio better build a monorail since it has at least an advantage to be train-like and capable of steeper grade and tighter turning radius than light rail. Though still I dont recommend monorails on bigger cities like Metro Manila, Cebu and Davao or anything are on flat lands, since monorails dont have much sense on those and you will need higher capacity and faster trains on big cities.
@@kornkernel2232 yes. This futran system seems like it will be viable only if the purpose is for tourist sightseeing or something like that but if the goal is mass transit system, rail is still king.
@@alakdana8099 I can see Maglev as the future and next step of mass transport especially for high speed trains. However, without the discovery of a near or room temp superconductor that can be manufactured en masse relatively cheap, we will not see a massive adoption of Maglevs since it is too expensive given current technology. For metro trains where the max speed is like 80-100 kph, you don't need maglev. There have been reports of incorporating maglev tech using permanent magnets for metro trains though, but I'm not sure what's their advantage over regular conventional train wheels. My best guess is since maglev has less moving parts as its motion and levitation is contingent on manipulating the magnets, it will be cheaper in the long run since it has less maintenance costs. Being cool as fuck and futuristic also add to the appeal lol.
Improving public transportation infrastructure not only improves accessibility within the city, but also demonstrates strong leadership that cares about its residents' well-being. Such proactive steps increase the city's allure to investors, who see the potential for expansion and development enabled by efficient transit networks. Cities with leaders who prioritize personal wealth, on the other hand, frequently overlook public welfare, eroding investor trust and impeding overall progress.
Mabuti naman tuloy tuloy na yung mga Higtech na transportation At napansin kung talagang Naalis na talaga yung ibang corruption sa politiko siguro pero i know meron pa rin corrupt pero iilan na nalang
This to me is the classic example of drawing project. There's not much people there in Isabela and not much commercial establishment. Whose gonna ride that when they can ride tricycle?
Taga isabela po ako, maganda kc jan sa ilagan isabela. Talagang madami nagagawa mayor nila saka kahit taga ibang municipality ako pero mas gusto ko sa ilagan .. bukod sa magandang lugar mababait din mga tao .
Natalo n'a tayo ng THAILAND at INDONISEA pag dating sa Transportation. Tayo Train lang meron. Sana Matuloy Yan, at hindi Plano lang. Mas OK Yan Kung Pati métro Manila malagyan fin.
kung traffic ang dahilan kung bakit yan itatayo yang mga makabagong transport systems. wag nyong kalimutan ang ZAMBOANGA CITY, ILIGAN CITY AT CAGAYAN DE ORO CITY dahil malala na ang traffic dyan.
@@hirayamanawari3583Metro Manila is a huge city. I don't see how there wouldn't be any space for transit. can't build aboveground? build it underground. as simple as that.
ganda din to sa may Roxas Blvd kung hnde ma-approve ang Manila Tramway. Pwede din along Pasig River, sa Rizal Province, Tagaytay, Baguio and sa Cordilleras, sa Caticlan-Boracay.
Ganyan ang mindset, alam niyo ba sa China ang bawat mayor doon ay magkakalaban hindi dahil sa corruption kundi sa pagandahan at sino ang pinaka magandang city.
Alam mo rin ba na andaming local government sa China ang lubog sa utang dahil sa mga projects nilang nalugi? Necessity, hindi aesthetics or beautification ang dapat #1 factor bago pumasok sa ganitong projects.
Ang Roller nito ay regular na maintenance O mahigpit ang pag maintain with crack test Sa solid shafting and welding parts area maaring binigay kapag pinabayaan Ito na kulang Sa maintenance frequency running hrs plan maintenance
Hanggang 20 lang ang sakay? Parang jeepney lang. Parang hindi naman mass transport yan. Feasible ba yang ganyang system kung ganyan lang ang ridership?
Yan noon ang gusto ko sana magandang itayo noon sa Ayala Avenue at Makati Ave hanggang sa mga Barangay ng District 2 sa Makati, pero subway naman ang itatayo ng Makati . Sana i phase out na mga jeep at palitan na ng mga ganitong mass transport sa buong Pilipinas.
I can see why pods are so attractive to people. but come on. pods are worst thing if you're going for efficiency and capacity. hell, jeepneys have more capacity than those pods. a good public transportation network is the solution. not those pods. pods are never the solution to traffic.
Cebu anu na kailan pa kaya magkaka train ? Ang laki ng kita ng cebu wala namang train hahaistt sobrang traffic na sa cebu wala parin solution kahit sa baha wala
Pods are the worst thing you can use for an efficient public transportation. just use trains. trains have a high capacity, reliable, and efficient. remember folks, just because it looks futuristic doesnt mean its a good thing. a good public transportation system is always the solution.
Agree. The capacity is that of a passenger jeepney which puts into question if this system is a legit mass transport system with such low capacity ridership. They should review their feasibility studies, if they have one. This will be a financial headache to the LGUs if they will eventually subsidize this.
I agree. Sure, maybe may appeal for tourism ang podcar na ganyan, pero when our main problem talaga is efficient transport dito, dapat focus natin muna ay ang most efficient and tested mass transit methods. If hindi bus, edi dapat train talaga muna. Kahit light rail o tram, mas effective ang lahat na yan kesa sa pod or gondola-style system na, not to be rude, pero mostly novelty lang ang magiging main benefit kompara sa effective movement of people. Try muna natin magtayo ng maraming tren bago magtayo ng ganyan, ibubuti lang natin kung ganun.
Yep, this is inefficient on the long run. There is a reason why very few built these. This is more of gadgetbahn than a proper solution for efficient transportation. This is being pushed because it's is cheaper to build, looks fancy and unique and all papopgi points. Monorail similar to Tokyo is far better, and monorails arent even the best either but at least it is still a train somehow which has far more capacity than linked pods. I think why this is being pushed due to companies presenting this of course and government officials dont know anything better, considering most cities and regions in the Philippines dont have any competent transport agencies and urban planners to do proper research about best transport to implement. Traditional trains were still relevant for a reason even though it is a few centuries old. It just works, universal, and super efficient. It is already environmentally friendly if you use electric trains. Heck, even diesel trains are still "cleaner" since you mostly need just 1 locomotive to pull multiple cars, or have DMU trains that have smaller engines for each car but able to drive the train faster.
@@kornkernel2232 I agree. I also have gripes with monorails given that they aren't some catch-all solution, and traditional metro-style trains are still a much more fitting solution for dense urban landscapes with a decent amount of flat land (as compared to places where overground rail must traverse steep gradients where other technologies might be more fitting). However, I'd much prefer that they get the funding for a monorail project, even if it's more flashy than practical, because it's at the very least still a functional and 'upgradeable' system that can carry a decent amount of passengers, and maintain a decent amount of reliability. Basta wag podcar porke 'cool', honestly. Edit: Pero yeah, it's honestly surprising that going with traditional trains isn't a no-brainer for us. We already have light rail and we've had hundreds of kilometers of long-haul train transport over the century(ies). I guess we're kind of similar to the USA in a way, in the sense that we're still undeveloped enough in terms of our (as in, our government) understanding of rail and thus flashy projects have the ability to gain public favor despite being super non-optimal, despite us having past experience with rail. We have to really be practical sa large projects like these, because each cent spent on a vanity project is one not spent moving Filipinos more effectively.
Hindi sakop ng NEDA yan. Diskarte ng city government yan. Autonomous sila dahil may sariling charter. Kaso dapat maghinay-hinay ang city government dito. Siguraduhin nila na financially sustainable ito or else, malugi sila.
Pods are inefficient vs trains. Also the amount of energy needed to cool the glass bubble is ridiculous in such a hot country. Stick with what works- trains.
No dapat sa mga provinces dapat yan para hindi lang naka sentro ang mga negosyo sa manila... Pati mababawasan mga tao sa metro manila pag madami na investors sa mga provinces ...
Made in China at baka mga Chinese naman ang gagawa nito. Huwag masilaw sa mga grandeur projects at iwasan ang corruption dahil kada projects, may pang padulas..Tama ba.
filipinos cannot afford to ride sa ganitong transport..dapat bawalin mo ang mga tricicle making saka jeep making para walang maka kumpitensya sa land trasport ang mga ganitong system kundi di babalik ang ROI ng mga investors..this is just a bluff.
