Hahahaha Test everything I say in backtesting before trading it live. I drop some good wisdom… but the best way to validate it & trade it successfully is to test it for yourself 😎
I have been using his concepts. I will say have watched all of his 7-steps videos for beginners, watched ~75 - 80 percent of his RU-vid videos repeatedly more than 3 times. I have been smashing it back to back. Even the old videos like a year or two years ago, I had watch most of them repeatedly and during weekends, his videos are my "Netflix". People in his inner circle or academy must be enjoying big time. How I wish, James Edward could give a scholarship into his academy. With his concepts I analyze and send signals to a WhatsApp groups I belong to.
It is me from Myanmar. I just started learning trading and your each and every videos helps me to understand clearly. Thank you very much. God bless you.
Take a look at Arjo's concept of a sharp turn. An FVG was created going into that supply zone and and one going the opposite direction afte, FVG in FVG out, a sharp turn. Making it a hugher probability FVG
You are definitely making a whole lot of sense here...bit I wanna make one thing clear and that is....for a FVG to be of a higher probability setup ,it needs other confluences like support or resistance before the inefficiency leading to a BOS or COCH was created.... because the only reason why the demand zone works is because of it is also accompanied by a support or resistance level.
What they do is to go inside the Daily FVG and see if there’s a 15M flip. Then the SL goes below that 15M structure point. So not exactly blindly put a limit order on the FVG regardless of the timeframe. Now if you refine too much down to a 1M or 5M flip, since now the risks are small, entering on the FVG in those TFs can increase your chance of getting in.
The point is, that an FVG or IMB is not an area of high volume, it is vice versa. The only thing that a so called FVG can do is to turn a previous SnR level - which contains the volume - into the an untested level to trade from - Support becomes Resistance / Resistance becomes support. This is what the FVG traders are trading without knowing it - the volume on the left side of the FVG.
I primarily trade order blocks/ imbalances. Do you feel that imbalances/ order blocks are a more guaranteed way of trading? What should you do if only the fair value Gap gets mitigated but the order block/imbalance doesn't get mitigated? Should I wait a month until it gets mitigated to trade off of it? The reason why I asked is because I've seen some imbalances not get mitigated for a long time
Great video bro . I learned the fvg but prefer imbalance yet for one particular asset I use fvg aligned with POI which imcludes round numbers. Thanks for another great video; bless
I love your videos because they are simple, and your honest opinion about what you teach is what a lot of other people don't have. Would be nice to have a video on how you deal with profits and taxes, not as a financial advisor, but sort of like a guide you use to help beginners save some money from too much taxation
I think it should be good to enter at the FVG of lower timeframe when the price retrces back to it and place the stop losss below or above the demand or supply zones
Yes, there’s no right or wrong Just for me… and based on the examples I see every day including in this video, the risk reward is waaaay worse from FVG than it is just trading simple supply & demand But as I say, many ways to reach the same outcome, this is what I prefer but FVG is fine if it gives a person an edge 👌🏻
Only God will reward you for helping life also opening my eyes to the market You are a blessing God bless you more and more amen But I'm in a losing streak please do a video on how to control that when it's come🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏😭
This was a very informative video. The funny thing is it seems like you start by saying FVGs and Imbalances are the same thing except for how you trade them, but then you went into detailed examples and I saw the true value of this video. The irony is how the video ends with you saying that both FVG and Imbalance trading strategies are valid and equally successful. So in a fight between FVGs and Imbalances, the result is a Draw. 😅
Yes! Visually they’re the same Personally I prefer IMB But as we say there’s no set right or wrong. Some people like FVG more, and that’s fine! I just don’t 👌🏻
@@JeaFxForexTrading I like your reasoning; personally, I get caught up focusing more on the trades I miss - forgetting that no strategy is 100% perfect nor will it catch every profitable market move
Absolutely everything I teach on my channel is completely the same for day trading & swing trading It’s all fractal price action, meaning it works just as well on the 1 minute chart as it does on the 1 month and everything in between, unless stated otherwise! 🫶
I think the idea with FVGs is to use them as potential reversal zones on higher time frames. As there should be unfilled orders within an FVG, if price drives through easily that suggests the sentiment may have changed. I think imbalance is very good for ranging markets, not so good for trends.
Imbalance works great for both, I’ve been using it for years 👍 FVG can work in trends too, but still never see people catching good RR using that concept over IMB Many ways to reach the same outcome though! theres no right or wrong, its just my personal findings & opinion 😎
Nice vid. Just a question if i may: if we know for sure that price has to fullfill the imbalance, especially the huge ones, why not take the trade that goes into the direction of the fullfilment instead ?
@@God_Is_Unique I do that as well actually, maybe this would be good topic for a video. I’m sure if you watch any of my trade recaps you’ll see that in action too 👏
Flawed rationale IMO. There is no consideration of fractal directional turn and using a lower timeframe. Yes, you can just choose the HTF FVG or the Base SD zone to start to look. But why choose one or the other and surrender to a huge stop area? Actually placing the order is a much lower timeframe context is a completely different activity and that's only after have a clear sign of directional shift so you want to be aggressive, confident, and committed by using a proximal FVG to price.
I have no idea what a PD array is sounds like overly complicated nonsense terminology to me but many ways to reach the same outcome 😆 so all good do your thing 👌🏻
Any prop firm you can recommend me? I am going to kill the market with your wisdom... You are helping me reinforce my skills. Keep it up. I will be back to tell you the truth... I'm sure I will kill it.. thanks for the free knowledge
Bro when i trade with the demo account i get every trade profitable but whenever i trade with real account i blown my account because of overtrading . Please suggest some tip to me i blown my account 4-5 times 😥
Good explanataion mate. However, there is no such thing as a "fair value gap" in the world of trading and finance. It is just a made up term that signifies imbalance which is an real term used for decades. I hope you guys stop looking for fancy concepts and stick to what matters and what worked for years and years before.
@@InnerCircleTrader if FVG and Imb is different can u please show us in the charts how each look like. Because in my observation its the same but different names. U named it Fair Value Gap. But it was previously known as Imbalance. But u can enlighten us if these things are different and show us in a chart
This isnt correct. Not hating, just suggesting you study ICT’s concepts in more depth. Glad youre looking at valuable tools and info, but you have misinterpreted the imbalance and fvg. Study more and dont spread information if you arent 100% certain you got the concept down. There is a multitude of context around FVG and imbalances for you to consider a trade, and you did not identify any of the surrounding context to sufficiently execute a trade.
