Gaijin Logic: 652mm Shell Edition 

A spot on the frontal-side turret of the IS-3 has 2000+

@@Tookan69 in wot blitz JG Pz E100 blueprint TD w 170mm canon monster tank e100 hull and a compartment for the gun in the back tall tank anyway gun mantlet has 700+armor all tanks have that same thing spaced armor is OP in wot blitz like imagine sheridan XM551 Sheridan fast and can bounce off a 310Mm if pen AP from a 268. :/

@@king_tiger_3355 Um, this is a War Thunder video...

I know I’ve sadly hit it

@@Tookan69 and im showing u dont rage we have it worse

And Soviet driver hatch.

And tiger ball gun

Don't forget the tiger driver's optic too....

Is the rifle actually Italian? I thought it was made interwar by a German company.

@@DragnEYE no it was actually derived from solothurn S-18/1000 which is anti tank gun made by swiss....

Stalinium Kruppstahl Churchillium And now Mussolinium Is there more to list?

@@capfig4471 you forgot french, paper

@@tyleresker3306 low tier French is made out of Invincium.

@@capfig4471 Adolfium

Stalinium

i did the same thing to a panzerIV once, i litteraly pen the front armor with a 20mm HE in a LA5

He means 625 mm of penetration which cant penetrate a tankette, not caliber

@@potato8606 you do realize it was a joke?

@@applepieavi1517 can you point out that joke? I'm too dense to see it

@@derkaiser9279 sigh He was being sarcastic

@@applepieavi1517 I was just thinking that he was thinking that the author was wrong, i didnt realize it :/

This was the case

Most tank on tank combat happened when one said flanked another. though if we talk about things like operation Citadel, yeah it was face to face.

Ambushing tanks was very common for both sides

the cold war mbts were all about hitting enemies accurately in long range as HEATFS made the armor unneccessary back then. NATO instead focused on low armored mobile extremelly hard hitting accurate vehicles with some helping gadgets (like good optics and rangefinder) for long range engagements. For example during yom kippur war israeli tanks all had L7 cannon which enabled them to penetrate T-55s on 1km+ range. Engagement range estimate on possible ww3 during 1980s was 1.5km at lowest in fulda region. Basically tanks after ww2 very rarely engage each other in close range.

Yep.

I have it 💪

Are you guys talking about the leopard or the smoll tonk?

@@MarinaraSauce. obvly the small tonk

irl most likely at least whole gun assembly would evaporate on impact due to huge energy APFSDS carries with it. so anyway the tank should be considered destroyed or very much inoperable.

@@grendizergo4193 A single AT gun can easily be replaced man. Especially an AT Rifle like the one on the CV/33

Grendizer Go maybe but the barrel does look like it exploded and you can't shoot in game. Play some other game if you want 100% realistic.

@@zoroverse8358 I just speculated what could happen irl, I am not an expert in this field for sure. I play WT for joy, I never expected it to be 100% realistic or something.

Grendizer Go yea ok. I mean the damage is somewhat realistic in war thunder but you can repair everything an unlimited amount of time almost.

That is exactly what I did! Cost alot of GE though.

That might work, but you might not even be able to pen most if not all top tier tanks

@@frostblght You are able to set the engine on fire for most top tier tanks. It's pretty much impossible to set the engine on fire for the russian tanks though.