@@heeeydevon8262 I own both iPhone 15 Pro Max and Galaxy S24 ultra, on days when I don’t have much work and I’m sitting on one of these phones I have to charge them by the end of the work day. I have yet to own a phone that would last me a whole entire day of heavy usage.
@@SundersBurritounfortunately Apple has an almost monopolistic control of the market which leads to a lack of improvement as no matter what people who already have iPhones will most likely still use an iphone Edit: for those commenting against me I would like to make it clear that I am talking about the US. I know it is different in other countrie
for me last 10% to 5% on Samsung can last a little less than an hour if doing only light task like watching video, scrolling reddit, etc but then the last 5% to 0% takes about just a min.
I sometimes got 4 hours on 1% when I still got my iPhone 6s some months ago. Not very much in use during nog those hours but enough to check my plans and time
Seems like samsung does better at general browsing and video watching. Apple does better at loading and running social media apps. Which makes sense since many social media apps like snapchat are specially optimized for Apple.
Go check out the OnePlus 12. Everything about the OnePlus 12 is neck to neck and the camera on the OnePlus 12 has been reviewed plenty times to be better than iPhone especially night time photos but are on par if not a little better than the Samsung as the OnePlus is more natural and with a price range of around $800
@@SNS-np1ri I know that’s my point, phone battery life doesn’t matter as long as it lasts until you go to sleep, so 16-18 hours, any differences in battery life over that time doesn’t seem to matter, at least to me.
Being an android lover myself, I got a feeling Apple is about to get their big lead back with the 16 pro max larger battery, more efficient display, and more improved 2nd generation 3nm n3e
@@tullo5564 Apple has always been ahead of others for battery life. They improve and then wait off a few years. Look at 12 pm… Samsung was catching up and others were catching up and people though the 13 pm was going to be worse due to pro motion, but it gave them a head start for at least 3 years. Still, Samsung can’t beat iPhone 13 Pro Max. Only one plus or honor
@@tullo5564 plus they have a new thermal system with the metal battery along with new chip that’s actually thought out about and not rushed like a17 pro along with the bigger battery, I’m sure 16 pro max is getting at least a 2 hour boost this year
it is kinda cool that both being from fundamentally different processing technologies, hardware, software, manufacturing, design, etc etc, manage to end up being the same when it comes to battery
I'm a firmware developer and I can tell you percentage battery means very little. Battery remaining capacity is detected as the battery voltage. But the voltage doesn't drop linearly, and this discharge curve changes depending on temperature, age, and general variation from battery to battery. It is more a vague indication than a "oh i have 50% left so i can use the phone as much as i have already again".
I think that is the case. My power usage is mostly from the YT app and most days my S24 Ultra can last all day watching videos and maybe twice per month the app would go haywire and my battery would be out by noon.
@@azielaugust8349not lower refresh rate lol…. Samsung just isn’t there with apples level of optimization yet but they’re going in the right direction though. They’re improving every year
People say apple is expensive because, unlike samsung/other androids, they don't have many options. For example, samsung has phones at every price range.
its because samsung has every phones of price range. While apple only release phones with expensive price. Thats the reason apple seems expensive in the eyes of people
that's only in us. outside the us iphones are more expensive across the board. here in india, s24 ultra is 130k inr vs iphone 15 pm at 150k inr. that'sa pretty substantiala difference.
the last one is multitask its draining the Android because you can still open the first app you open using alot of ram usage but in iphone they need to reopen the first app for ram usage and battery health
@@MrSunamix simple, Ram or random access memory is a temporary place where a file can be transferred to cpu faster and better than from rom directly to cpu although its not as big and persevere like rom
and my point is iphone cuts some apps from ram for battery health because ram is fast its so fast it can generate heat and heat ruining your phone(or battery in this situation)
Buddy, I know what RAM is, when I said the previous sentence I said it fundamentally because you don’t know how ram management works on android / iOS. On android you are basically running a sandbox environment continuously, each app is sandboxed, thus the need of having large pools of memory, you also need to account for a continuous garbage collector that has indeed a role of why android has overall 2x the ram size compared to iOS. For contrast iOS memory management works by compressing and suspending the application in cases of which the app hasn’t been open for a while, iOS doesn’t use a garbage collector, it uses what in the industry is called ARC and for that reason as well, it requires a far smaller pool of memory to function. To summarise, and I say this with quotes as it’s an overall simplification, “android apps are partially written in Java, Java needs a large pool of memory to work with mainly because of the garbage collector, iOS apps are made with objective-c this having a closer access to how the apps manages its memory usage”. Hope that clarifies, as most people don’t understand the reasoning behind each platforms decisions but blindly saying bla bla one is better more ram, other one is bad bla bla less ram…
@@thegameslayer33think what you want about certain products but i don't believe blind brand loyalty is the right way to go about it I mean sure the iphone has... 2 minutes more in this test but samsung has 50% more RAM, has a larger screen with even higher pixel density and also runs on an open source program so i'd say the S24 ultra is all around more energy efficient Apples phones does of course also have benefits. The first one that comes to mind is that the closed source nature of ios makes iphones more accessible and safer for the consumer which can be a very good safety net for less tech experienced people (and old people) (But i really hate how apple kinda tries to push it's consumers into their apple ecosystem)
It's hard to imagine. Samsung has 4nm processor and iPhone has 3nm processor. But then again Samsung has bigger battery and iPhone has a smaller battery 😮
I love how now that iphones wins every samsung fan boy saying its only 2 minutes but when samsung would have won that 2 minutes would have been night and day for them
What we will actually see: Smasnug: whomp whomp, i still didnt have a camera fix, my battery is dying because of overheating, my owners eyes are red because of my shitty amoled
@@thegameslayer33 Most of the videos that are out there show the Samsung beating the iPhone, real world tests and videos like these, it's not really that much of a difference between them tho, Samsung beats it by 10 minutes or so, since iOS is made by Apple, they can optimize everything how they want to for best battery life or best performance but since android is open source it's not easy to do that so the iPhone gets really close even with a smaller battery.
@@nil3sh37 yea that’s a huge reason why many ppl like iphone. It’s that everything is made by apple and the ecosystem and stuff like that. It all works way too well and I love it
Meanwhile my Samsung Tab 3 Lite that held to 40% change for 3 years: True story by the way, looked and it was last used 2-3 years ago, but it help its charge! It was my great great grandmas. So man, that thing survived like 10 years, and it still holds a charge perfectly.
Actually they have have little difference in charging because Samsung have a 5000 mah battery with 40w charging where iPhone have 4400 mah with 27w charging
This usually means two things either the android apps are not that much optimize and the A17 Pro chipset is more efficient snapdragon chipsets are always in gaming mode so they take more battery snapdragon does makeup for its lack of efficiency by its processing power the base clock speed of the snapdragon is 3.3-3.4Gz an apple immediately closes the background apps then when you try to open the app again they just loaded back so it takes less battery both phones have 120 hz refresh rate but samsung has the higher resolution so it takes more battery i'm not taking either side my device sucks all right i'm just here to prove a point just buy one of these and you'll be happy either way thank you for going to my ted talk.
@@Chris_GD69 Yeah either phone is absolutely great. But where Android excels in functionalities and flexibility, Apple excels in efficiency. Both are great phones.
Using a 2 and half month video as a story and uploading it now is definitely lame. Please do an update video for this comparison (and NO, I'm not a Samsung fanboy)
@@snyzerxryzen what we actually get when buying sssuq s24poop: flickering issues, Locked bootloader, because of knox. Camera that even after 5 months hasn't been patched. Bad repair score. Bad battery life. CPU that throttles to 55% of its performance. iPhone is just better, because it's cheaper, has better battery life, better display, better sound and DAC, better throttling performance, better ram management, and you can also repair it everywhere.
Everything is done via automation on this page, don’t know how the Samsung is on a higher brightness. Fanboys are delusional when their phones don’t win lol
Not really, all $1K and more price tag phones are a scam, overpriced with no charger included, and developers intentionally slowing down their older phones so people but their newer models, plannned obsolescence all over
I’ve owned expensive and cheap androids. They all slow down after a year. Ive owned my iPhone for the past 3 years, still as fast as the day I got it and the battery is good.
Let me tell you about the LG Power. I was given that thing for work a few years ago, I don't know what magical rock they had in that thing but the battery would go for a solid week of heavy use without me charging it.
