The rotating bezel on the classic acts almost like a built in screen protector. because the display is slightly set in you will be less likely to break or scratch your screen. My family has 4 of the original galaxy watches with this similar design. All of the screens are scratch free.
I bought the 2 active and went with a screen protector and an aluminum bezel to cover the screen edges. The watch still looks absolutely flawless 10 months later after wearing it every day, everywhere. Granted that watch is stuck in a bootloop now :( I'm torn between the classic and the new "active"
This is excellent. One thing I care a lot about is the face size and it's a maddeningly difficult feature to compare when choosing a watch. Within the first few minutes you answered that question in the galaxy 4 series. I had assumed getting a bigger watch meant a bigger face. I'm creating a spreadsheet of features important to me and it's just silly that manufacturers don't offer a COMPLETE feature list for ALL their watches for the nerds, lol. Thank you for the excellence.
I picked up the Classic after using the Active 2 for the last year or so. I much prefer the Classic with the rotating bezel. I don't see Samsung getting rid of that anytime soon. It's a standout feature.
I just wanted to clarify something that seems to be causing a bit of confusion in the comments. The Watch 4 Classic and Watch 4 have the same battery and screen sizes for the respective size variants. For example, the 40mm GW4 and the 42mm GW4 Classic have the same screen and battery. Those are SMALLER than the screen and battery seen in the 44mm GW4 and 46mm GW4 Classic. That is all I wanted to clarify for now. Thanks for watching! mikeobrienmedia.com/Galaxy-Watch-4
I'm glad they went with Silicone straps on the classic. Overall it would be more comfortable wearing it for longer duration and the leather straps on previous watch3 were of the worst quality ever. It felt cheaper than the cheapest Chinese straps..
I have recently started getting interested in smartwatches. I always thought they were silly gimmicks but I began seeing news of how they can be useful and even help save lives with how they can report irregular heart rates and send a SOS with the fall detection and it got me interested. I bought a Watch Active2 just a couple of months ago on a big sale and I really enjoyed it so I decided to give it to my mother and just got me a Watch4. I did like the smaller 40mm version more though, not only I think it looks nicer, it feels like it doesn't get in the way as much.
As someone with significantly irregular heart bests due to a heart condition I can confirm the heart rate sensor isn't very accurate. And I'm not talking about maybe 5 beats off. It's sometimes up to 20 beats off! I still use them tho lol
The silicon band on the Classic watch makes more sense. It is a workout inspired device whilst being a timeless piece of art. For me with the watch 3, I had to immediately buy a silicon band since the leather band started to deteriorate in just a few weeks.
I've not had that problem. I workout about 4 times a week and do a physical job and to be honest I rarely ever swapped out straps and a year later my leather strap is still going. Give it another year or so and the constantly having to remove it to go through security then it will eventually go like on my old watch 🤔
I'd rather have a metal band. This is my first watch without a steel or titanium band, but fortunately, the silicon band is comfortable, so I'm not planning about replacing it for now.
Just a heads up, there's plenty of leather out there that's treated for water resistance.. A lot more pricy but personally, I love the look of leather over rubber. You could also switch the band before heading to work out...
I had the Galaxy Watch 3 45mm and upgraded to the new Galaxy Watch 4 44mm. Tried the Watch 4 Classic 46mm and it felt to bulky on my wrist. I already own luxury wrist watches so didn't need the "premium" look of the Classic. I do miss the rotating bezel though.
I upgraded from the watch 3 to the watch 4 classic, this watch definitely feels way smoother, more premium, and just way nicer in every aspect. The battery life still doesn't beat the og galaxy watch (it was like 5-6 days for me!) But it's been about 36 hours which is still pretty good. My favorite improvement that Noone talk about is when you have samsung pay set up, you only have to put in the pin every time you put the watch on or take it off, makes for way faster and easier payments while still staying secure
@Xrie The Watch4 is pretty much the 'Active' with the digital touch bezel. The Classic has the physical bezel. The Classic is 2mm bigger on both sizes than the normal one, but they both have the same specs. The normal is Aluminum and the Classic is stainless steel. The Classic is around $100 more I believe, so it's really down to personal preference.
@@W3TFART hard to justify Samsung or apple when the tic watch pro and Huawei have battery that can last for literally a week or more even with the display always on.
@@Seasniffer69 no it’s not hard at all Huawei uses some random os that’s useless and tic watch has poor build quality and isn’t in Samsung ecosystem. Apple is just shit if you’re not a Apple user . Oh and tic doesn’t get 1 week it’s 5 days as smart watch . More if you don’t use those features but then it’s pointless . It’s also rated only 1.5 m depth so no good for swimming . Whereas Samsung is 50m And if I’m really that worried about battery life I’ll wear my citizen watch instead
The battery life has been pretty good so far. I've slept with it forgot to turn on the snore or sleep detection but didn't really feel it. Got through the day almost died around 11-midnignt
After owning a frontier and galaxy watch 3 I was craving for a new look, something fresh so I got the sporty looking watch 4, looks good in silver and is much sleeker and futuristic looking than than the classic.
Thanks Mike , but I think the classic watch strap looks brilliant the way it fills in the area near the bezel and a lot better than a flat , straight leather band .😊👍😁
The problem is standard bands will be narrower than the bezel horns and fitting another band could look weird. Or maybe not ? It would probably strongly depend on the design. A bit of reflection subject : the black band looks much nicer than the light grey one, and maybe a black (or dark) band would better fit the silver watch model. The silver bezel isn't bad, but the light colored band makes it stand out too much and the 46 mm classic watch looks gigantic. The all black model doesn't give the same feeling, and watching some pictures or videos where the 46 mm silver classic model having been fitted a black band comforts my opinion about the light grey (almost white) band beeing a bad idea with such a big watch. Well, I strongly advise you visit a shop in person and try the different versions before buying, because just watching videos won't help you realize how they look live... Really, try them on before decide, else you could be disappointed. The 46 mm classic doesn't seem as big as you could fear in black with a black band, because they blend seemlessly and it really makes it more discrete. You really have to try first... Actually, the 42 mm design is much nicer (and blends in more elegantly with the band), but the screen is not only smaller, its resolution in pixels is also weaker (hence why I can't understand why they're priced the same) and the battery is smaller weaker too, resulting in reduced autonomy. In addition, the band is so short you'll probably hardly be able to fasten it if you're a man (this is knowledge from trying it on at the shop). Well, maybe the 42 mm is provided with two bands, I don't know. My 46 mm was only provided with one, and it's not an error because it matches the contents described on the box. I've read many people complaining they got only one band, and maybe the second one is only provided with the smaller models ? It would make sense, since the larger bezel would help using a shorter band because of the added length, and maybe the two bands provided with the smaller models actually explain why the prices are the same ? I'm not sure, you'll have to carefully check the contents for each version to know if that's actually the reason. Anyway, I'm quite happy with this watch, so don't hesitate to give it a try if you can. BTW, I'm not swapping a smartwatch for another. I usually keep my devices for years, or even decades. I finally had to change my 25 years old titanium G Shock watch because it suddenly started to consume the battery within a couple of months instead of years, so it was a good time for a change... :p
Should I upgrade from my Steel Active 2 44mm? I bought it this Jan only, plz do a mega comparison beginning with Gear gear s3 frontier (which I have still, since 2016) all the way to galaxy 4 & do share the upgrades and who should upgrade & to which one. It’ll surely relieve many people’s doubts!
i say that you keep your steel active 2 because wear os 3 is on early release and has some bugs, body composition is quite inaccurate and theres not much difference apart from a new operating system
Both watches have very many case covers & strap choices from third party suppliers. These allow better physical protection, better color selection for fashions, clothing, & users choice.
I prefer the Watch 4 Classic look and feel. For the price, I feel consumers should have the silicone straps attached for active wear, and then an additional more premium strap included for 'classic' wear. Hopefully Samsung will take note of this in the future to help justify the price difference. As is currently, I think no more than $50 extra is justified.
Just purchased the watch 4, I had the Gear S2 classic for years and stop wearing it because it was just to bulky on my small wrist. I love that the watch 4 is smaller and it looks and feels better on.
Samsung's intention to give silicon bands is to protect it from sweat and water. Which is not possible with leather, as leather has tendency to deteriorate after getting in a contact with sweat and water. Even I like that silicon band on Watch 4 Classic.
I really do like the look of the Classic better, but not enough to justify an extra 100+ USD. I'd really like to see your hands on take of how the Ticwatch Pro 3 GPS and the Fitbit Sense stacks up against these new Samsung watches. I'm also curious what way Google will go with the Fitbit Sense. With some tweaks, it could really contend with the likes of even a Garmin Venu 2.
@@muhsin_sultan Mine lasted till just a month ago. I liked the minimalist bezel on the Gear S2. It was great to have a sleek look and still have the physical bezel.
@@LolsAtLance The Watch 4 is WAY different. The home and back buttons are swapped, and the new Wear OS hybrid is very different and to me less efficient than Tizen for the Gear S2. And the home screen isn't really even a home screen. And not bezel controlled. I kinda hate it. The bezel doesn't scroll lots of screens. I hope the Tizen bezel control and home screen get added as updates come out. I do like the new sensors, and having Android apps like Google Maps is probably good. But if I were buying again I would go for the Watch 3 instead. Also, my Gear S2 would still last 2.5 days on one charge, even in the last months. The Watch 4 dies way faster. I'm very surprised. Granted I have heartrate measuring more frequently, but still. And the 4 charges *super* slowly.
Would consider to get the 46 Silver Classic, but the 20mm strap is a letdown. The 20mm band on a 46mm watch will look out of proportion.. Also, the S3 Classic came w a 22mm leather band, and during a promotion they added an extra set. For the price this should come w a leather band.
I just got a 46mm Classic but I feel the strap size is quite about fitting. Had it been a bit wider the whole watch would look bigger as it is already big with 46mm. So its got a fine balance with 20mm strap. It kinda adds a sleekness to the look. JMOP (Just my opnion) :)
I've had the GW and then the GW3, and both have had bezel issues after about 6-8 months. Whether it be from sweat and gunk buildup causing rotating issues, or the watch just not responding to the bezel anymore -- it does eventually become a prob. Removing the bezel to clean under there, and replacing the gasket as well as the 4 magnetic springs and bearings is a pain. Although it is a more attractive piece IMO, I'll be opting for the GW4 (w/o bezel) this time simply to avoid a future headache.
I love the stainless steel 46mm classic version. I think the band that it comes with was actually a good choice. The rotation bezel is really cool and convenient.
The Galaxy Watch4 is the sportier version out of the two until you fit it with a leather strap and a classic watch face. Then it becomes the more classic out of the two models, because of it's cleaner / slimmer design.
The market may have changed, but they tried pretty much the same thing with the Gear S2. Only the S2 had some funky strap attachment and the S2 Classic had a normal one (both had rotating bezels, but the S2's was pretty much hidden with no notches. They ended up going with the Classic design for several years.
I think Samsung needs to get rid of the digital rotating bezel and apply it into the UI so that when not rotating on the screen, the bezel disappears allowing for a larger bezel-less screen
I had the original Galaxy Watch. I did like the rotating bezel but it was heavy, clunky, & huge! I switched to the Active 2 and loved it! The digital bezel, to me, was not much different than the physical bezel. I just got the Galaxy Watch 4. I did have a little problem with the digital bezel, but getting a glass screen protector solved that. I also bought a different band because silicon bands give me rashes. I didn't even consider the Classic because at 44mm or 46mm, it would probably be like the first Galaxy Watch. I love ❤ my watch! I can't wait to get my Z Flip 3!
Agreed with your thoughts - I had the Galaxy Watch Frontier 46mm. This was a massive piece of equipment and I felt it when sleeping and active. That's why I'm getting the normal/active, despite loving the look and feel of the classic.
Thank you for your review. You've aided me in my decision because as someone who runs a lot, I was wondering if the classic would feel comfortable while running as I like the rotating bezel, but since the 44mm has the same battery and os, the rotating bezel is merely a gimmick to me now. The normal watch will be a lot more comfortable.
@@Babybabim I have owned the Galaxy S3 frontier and the Galaxy 4 watch and the slimmer profile is definitely a nice change, in fitness yes but sleep tracking most of all.
I still have a Samsung Gear 2. When the watch was rather a boxy James Bond gadget than a watch, stacked with gadget features: camera with video recording, IR blaster, optical HRM. When suddenly the massive Gear S (curved housing and display) came out, only half a year later I was not amused. This was even more like a mini Galaxy S on my wrist than the Gear 2, with its own 3G connectivity. Fortunately it had no longer a camera nor the IR blaster, so mine was still the better (1970s) James Bond watch. The Gear S2 was the first one with a rotating bezel and fortunately they kept it. I never understood why Samsung never went the full distance by putting the actual number indications on the bezel as on aviation/ navigation and diving watches. So it can be used as such a watch, measuring elapsed time, setting time adjustments to the local solar time, as a tachymeter and compass, just with the rotating bezel and the anologue hands. Such (really costly) watches are amazingly functional, easy to use that way as analogue wrist computers with instant results at just a glance. The current markings (on my Watch 4) do not rotate with the bezel, and the bezel has no markings at all. Missed opportunity, I think.
Debated trading in the Watch 3 for the preorder, glad I didn't. The Wear OS support is the main thing I want from the new lineup, but the differences between W3 and W4Classic aren't enough to justify the $160 upgrade. I hope the upcoming versions will maintain a rotating bezel, and once some big upgrades are made (battery size, screen size, trackers) I'll shell over the cash.
I have the Active2 and don’t use the haptic bezel much because it isn’t that pleasant to use. Using your finger around the bezel is clunkier than turning a bezel in dial fashion, IMO. It sure does look like the raised classic bezel will better protect the screen. Thanks for those and other observations, Mike!
I would like to know how long the batteries last between the smaller and larger. I only use it to respond to notifications. I got the 4 classic 42mm and so far I'm getting a day and a half. With my original galaxy, I got 2 full days. I'm debating on trading in the classic for the 44mm flat screen if the battery lasts longer, but I also don't want it to look to big on my wrist. They won't let you take it out of the box either, so how is someone supposed to try it out without paying a restock fee.
do you have the bt or lte one? i cant decide which size to buy. 42mm or 46mm. my wrist are kinda small lol but i dont want to have bad battery life either if go for the 42mm. do you have all the usual settings ON?
@@canson1988 The Galaxy Watch 4 40 MM = 247 mAh Battery 44 MM = 361 mAh Battery CLASSIC 42 MM = 247 mAh Battery 46 MM = 361 mAh Battery ... 44 MM & 46 MM ...both Same Size Battery ... 40 MM & 42 MM ...both Same Size Battery
I had a Gear S3 for a long time and just recently decided to get a new model. Sadly I couldn't get the 5 because it has no version with a mechnical bezel, so I ended up with the 4 Classic. I hope they bring this back in the future.
The size on the wrist was the main reason i went for the 4 and not the classic, research before hand had mentioned this may be a concern to some people. I didn't want it to look like i was wearing big ben on my wrist After 24 hours i more or less have the set up completed, it's a pity there doesn't seem to be a way i can install Instagram, twitter, despite plenty of browsing unless i am looking in all the wrong places.
i loved the rotatig bezzle!! that was my selling pointon my old rose gold galaxy watch that ive had for the last 3-4 years! but ive noticed it beingkinda slow and battery fading quick so finally upgrading this year... as much as i want the physical bezzle i ended up with the galaxy 4. mostly due to price. its giving me def more apple watch vibes but if i had the extra money i wouldve boughtthe classic
Hi Mike, thanks for the video, I'm a fan of your watch reviews and have been following along. What are thoughts on Lte on the watches this time? Is it worth while considering the cost, any battery concerns with use?
Great video, main thing I was trying to figure out if the actual screens were the same size. I like the bezel but dust always gets under mine and causes it to get gritty and stuck everytime I wear it on my dirtbike
I'm still stung by getting a Galaxy Watch 3 Titanium less than 6 months ago, then Samsung stiffing us on the trade-in value of the Watch 3 Titanium, offering LESS for the Watch 3 Titanium than they did for the Gear S3.
The UI no longer needs the bezel, you just swipe though clusters of apps now. The Watch 5 should remove the digital bezel and make the screen edge to edge. Same size watch face, but a significantly larger screen. This is inevitable, and it will be beautiful.
Hi Mike! Thanks for your review, I've got a Galaxy 3 45 mm and an Active 2 44 mm (both with 340 mAh batteries), now, due to the "unfortunate" choice of the new straps (way less flexible), both the new 4 "big" options don't work for my relatively small wirst. I'm worried that battery life for the new Watch 4 small ones (40 and 42mm) would be really worse, having only 247 mAh batteries! Am I wrong?
Pre-ordered watch 4 44mm but cancelled it and got 46mm classic in black.. I used to have the og gear S3 frontier and loved the physical bezel and have read on some reddit forums of complaints of the digital bezel and not working well on the regular watch 4. The physical bezel is so satisfying once you use it to navigate. It's hard to go backwards and use a smartwatch without one. The stainless steel build too will withstand dings and scratches better also in the long run than the aluminum of the non classic version.
ironically i have a the Watch 3 and while i love the look and physical bezel if you play sports outdoors and fall on the ground if dirt gets on it the bezel stiffens up and no longer has that nice feel that's why i'm taking my chances in the regular one
I haven't received it yet, but I ordered the regular Watch 4. The rotating bezel looks better to me and I think I'd enjoy that more than the touch bezel, but it's not worth $100 more. Maybe $30.
I have GW2 classic and a GW3 classic as well as an active. I decided to go this time with the standard 4 because although I love the rotating bezel I felt the design was much like the other classics so I wanted something a little different.
Rocking the Galaxy Watch 4 and it's a total game-changer! Crushing my fitness goals with those progress rings - gotta catch 'em all! Notifications and texts on my wrist are a lifesaver, and the battery keeps going all day long. The only snag? My clumsy self keeps bumping it, putting little battle scars on the watch face. Thinking about suiting it up in a GadgetShieldz screen protector with a self-healing layer. Apparently, these things fix minor scratches on their own - mind blown!
Wow, agree on couple things. Postings on Reddit are saying how horrible the bands are. These are being immediately switched out. Also postings of nicks on the aluminum GW4 case. It’s appears Samsung is putting inferior materials on these watches... No way I’m upgrading from the GW3 at this point. Actually wouldn’t recommend upgrading right now from the beautiful battery life of the GW g1. My plan is to wait until way into next year for better prices before upgrading. And might go for the GW4 rather than the Classic as it’s less bulky, but then that huge bezel. Maybe a bit undecided at this point, ha.
I wish they'd get rid of the 4s touch sensitive bezel and just have it be a swipe only allowing for a larger display and a cleaner design and are the displays on the 44mm regular and 46 mm classic the one on the classic definitely looks larger
I have the OG Galaxy watch and while I love it, I am always concerned about using it while working out so I am keeping it for it's looks and I brought the Watch 4 non classic 44mm for my workout watch.
@@Thegoldenchild415 I was worried about getting it scratched up but since my reply I actually returned the Galaxy watch and got the classic in silver and have had no issues with scratches and I wear it to the gym and don't baby it. I love it.
@@Thegoldenchild415 the active was nice but I was so used to the physical rotating bezel I couldn't get used to the digital one. This is my fourth version of this watch and the last two had the rotating bezel so it was a habit. It's about preference.
I like the sleek all glass black design but I am so afraid of it when my arm or hand bumb up against a wall or something rough while doing something. It could easily get deep scratches or shatter. So the only option for me is the classic. The rotating bezel protects the display. I own the gear s3 frontier and I am telling you. The bezel is scraped like scratched metal. As I also fel with it on asphalt while riding a bike
I had a new galaxy watch 4 classic for Christmas and I love it, the bezel always been a thumbs up for me, it also has soooo much more on it. I do have the old gw too but this one is by far the best.
I definitely like how they changed from the Watch vs Active nomenclature. Makes more sense this way, and makes the regular Watch 4 feel more premium. As for me, I'm a big watch guy, and kinda clumsy as well. So the Classic makes more sense for my usage. Throw in the amazing pre order trade in deals, and it didn't even cost too much! Winning!
It was quite confusing that e.g. Active2 and Watch3 were of the same generation. Now with one number 4 it's quite clear. With smaller wrists the 46mm looks quite bulky but the bezel is such a goody that I'd wished they created a 45mm bezel model. Would cost some battery but should be worth it. Maybe next generation...
I have been using Samsung watches since the first Galaxy Watch came out. I had the smaller Galaxy Watch 3 and decided to take advantage of the $250 credit Samsung offered when pre-ordering the S22 Ultra to "upgrade" to the Galaxy Watch 4 Classic 42mm. Unfortunately, the battery life of the 4 was miserable compared to what I would get on the 3. I got less than a full day's charge on the 4 classic 42mm vs my 3, on which I could get at least a day and a half. That was with all the exact same features enabled/disabled, watch face, and apps loaded. Therefore I returned it to go for the larger watch with the larger battery. I really liked the rotating bezel on the 3 and wanted to keep that, but the 46mm size of the larger one just seems too bulky for my wrist. I like look and durability of the stainless steel on the Classic vs. aluminum, but I can't get past the size. As much as I will miss the rotating bezel, I've decided to go with the regular Galaxy Watch 4, 44mm after trying them both on my wrist. It's amazing how much of a difference that extra 2mm makes.
I have a 7" wrist. I tried the Galaxy Watch 4 Classic 46mm and it was just too big and bulky. The 44mm non-classic turned out to be the sweet spot. It's thinner, lighter and smaller just a tad enough to look balanced on my wrist.
I just ordered the watch 4 classic today. I'm excited to get it. I wanted a smart watch but I wanted one that had a premium watch aestethic and so thats why I chose the classic.
The major reason I’m going with the classic this time is because the screen on my GWA2 came off after 1.5 years of use. I could get it repaired, but for me this one is just too big of an upgrade to ignore. I plan to keep my next smart watch for longer so classic it is.
Just received my new watch 4 today. I love its simplicity, with the wear OS software, I don't feel the physical bezel is absolute. I owed a Galaxy watch for 3 years before getting the watch 4
I am still confused, tried watch 4 i noticed that i have less control over the bezel but i also noticed that i might end up using the touch screen more...any suggestions
@@techbasics6142 I use touch screen often and i turned off the virtual bezel. WearOS has a much efficient way to present all the apps in one place, it's WatchOS-ish.
Hi Mike Love your reviews. Change of name is agreeable but change of strap width concerns more because I already have couple of 22mm watch straps. And watch 4 case doesn't look as glossy finish as watch 3 from videos, does it?
I current have the Gear S3 it's an amazing active watch. I recently bought the regular Watch4. I can't wait to see what it's like. I definitely agree with you about the rotating bezel that's going to be an adjustment for me, but I think I'll like it since my wrist is on the smaller side. I will leave an update I've I received the watch because it's currently on backorder.
Got the 44mm in black and i love the design. Had galaxy watch 46mm for 2,5 years so i got tired of that design and wanted to try something new and the classic didnt feel that much like new on the outside.
I am mostly very pleased with the 40 mm 4, but the battery is a bit weak. I started with al the bells and whistles and flashing lights enabled, and the battery wouldn't last the day. Disabling always-on display and always-listening Bixby and it can get through a day.
Hi Mike I’m in the uk 🇬🇧 and I bought the 4/40mm yesterday. I’m going to be using it with the Pixel 6 Pro when it arrives next Tuesday. I’m not in to all the sports and health things on the watch, so the fact some health apps won’t work doesn’t bother me, it’s really for calls messages etc to save me getting my phone out of my bag. I’m looking forward to setting it up next week, I’m leaving iPhone 12 Pro Mac and Apple Watch 6 behind me… cheers 👌🏻👍🏻🇬🇧🙂
Bought the Galaxy Watch 4, had always loved the touch bezel since the Active 2. Also don't understand their new straps, huge gap on my wrist and was not comfortable. Switched it to my own watch straps immediately!
Another great review Mike! Can I ask: 1. Is the battery life any better in these new galaxy watches compared to the Active 2 LTE? 2. I can get WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger notifications on my Active 2 watch, can the Apple watch get this too, out if interest?
I want to get the classic cause I like the look. But I'm new to smartwatches, what does the 42mm and 46mm measurement refer to exactly. I thought it was screen size but I guess not. I will definitely be getting a nicer strap. BTW I do have bigger wrists, so will that make the 46mm a better choice?
Go for the 46mm classic, especially if you DON'T have small wrists. You can think me later. I have the 46mm Frontier Gear 3, and the 46mm Galaxy Watch 3. I'm using my Gear 3 as the trade-in and keeping my Watch 3. Getting the 4 in stainless and changing the band to a stainless bracelet. Keeping my black Watch 3 with the leather band. My absolute favorite watch face is the TERRA MECHANICA, by URARITY. It is only available for Tizen. That's why I'm keeping my Watch 4, which I could have gotten 50 bux more for trade-in. Hopefully URARITY will offer it for WearOS in the future...
@@sidneycooper but I'm still confused, what does the 46mm measure? I mean since they have the same screen size. What on the phone is 42mm or 46mm? Thank you.
@@S41t4r4 but the screen size stays the same? That's what the reviews I've read said. That confuses me. Bigger watch but same size screen and internals? Don't see the point for the higher price, other than aesthetic.
Man! I've been a HUGE Samsung supporter, but had to drop them because EVERY single one of their devices had crapped out on me after very little use! 5 things! I actually played with this in the store the other day and was blown away! Been thinking to get it. Don't think I will though. There's a log of things that I have read which make me think 'no way!'. BUT IT'S SOOOO NICE!!! LOL I'm STILL confused! Which has the mechanical turning bezel? I loved the way it felt!
I was sooo ready for the Classic, but I think the numbered area between the rotating bezel and the display destroys it. Looks stupid with these numbers when wearing a digital watchface, or a watchface containing the numbers already. Why oh why could not the display size have been increased to 1.5" to stretch all the way to the bezel...
I'm a woman with small wrists, I find the classic 4 great. I'm going to buy a different strap to help it sit a bit nicer on my wrist but I don't find it uncomfortable!! 👍👍
@@MikeOBrienMedia Between these two, the regular, non-classic model looks nicer. But TBH I actually liked the Galaxy Watch 3 in terms of design. The Watch 4 has these "square" buttons which don't really make sense in the "classic" design. I get they need to be like that because they're sensors. Also, I also have the feeling that the whole "switching to Wear OS" thing was more like a marketing stunt. Other than Google Maps, we aren't getting much. Even the Google Assistant isn't working at launch. Samsung still wanting their own walled garden so much.
Great comparison Mike, thanks. I used to love the Galaxy Watch with the rotating bezel, but this new Classic looks a bit boring imo. The ex-active looks more appealing to me now. Do you know if they will finally work with Galaxy Tab's now, or is it still only compatible with a small selection of phones like the Tizen watches? That and the limited battery life was the reason I switched to Garmin earlier this year, still loving my Venu 2.
Ya I have the garmin venu 2 plus. With speaker and microphone. Garmin has way more battery life than Samsung. Also the sensors like heart rate and GPS are way more accurate.
@@volvoplz9209 they are small. The watch almost fully cover my wrist. Actually, I'm a little worried about the strap, because its construction and how it bends on sides because of the size of my wrist. I close it on the 7th hole, if count from the end of the strap. 46 mm are too big for my hands. And I'm a man, lol. I just like the bezel because it feels more conventional to navigate on a watch, and more satisfying to use, than swiping on the touchscreen.
I have the Galaxy Watch 4 - just picked it up yesterday - think it was a good choice. The rotating bezel is a differentiator for sure - but the non-classic does have a software bezel (so you can rotate using your finger) , just not clicky clicky - The Stainless steel frame would be the biggest difference to me
I came from the Samsung Galaxy Gear S and seeing the Watch 3 with the rotating bezel made me really want to get it, but since my mom had the active 2 and said she didn't miss the bezel, the watch 4 began to grow on me and I like that it is sleek as the Gear S is bulky when cycling and working out. Now, the Galaxy Watch Classic just looks grotesque. It looks worse and worse every time I see it and I just love the Galaxy Watch 4 44mm as I am always moving and with the black face and the black band, it actually looks way more classy with a prestigious watch face. When I am working out, walking, or cycling, I do not even notice it is on my wrist. I hate to say I do not like the design of the Classic, but hopefully they refine it. Moving parts have more of a chance to break down, so I know I made the right decision.
They really should have kept the larger sizes straps at 22mm its gonna look off having a watch that big with a strap that thin with a non tapered strap which look a lot better than the ones they come with
Great Video as always Mike, clearly explained the differeces. I personally this year like the WATCH 4 rather than the CLASSIC. The Classic reminds me allot of my Gear S3 Classic. One thing i dont get with Samsung the either go totally different design one year, then back to a design from 3-4 years ago lol they just jump around to much for my liking. From GW46mm bulky and rugged to the Stylish and semi rugged GW3 back to Gear S 3 Classic look lol. Either stay the same like that your watches are distinguishable like the Apple watch or keep moving fwd subtly in the aesthetics & not backwards lol. As per GW4 just by adding the chrome plates on the side make a HUGE difference from the Active, Active 2 although subtle and that is the path they should follow. My other gripe the GW4 Classic they go 20mm band ??? WTH Samsung what am i to do with all my 22mm Bands in every single style & design from my GW46mm & GW3 mm :-( In saying all this ive jumped ship 2 months ago lol, although i still use my Note 20 Ultra, ive gone Apple watch 6 paired with iphone 12 Mini. TBH i dont think i will ever go back to a Samsung Smart Watch, totally loving my Apple watch 6 because it just works perfectly & is a hell of allot more comfy that almost every other Android watch i own. Cheers and Stay safe Mike ;-)
I've had the GS3, GW, GW3 all of which had the rotating bezel but this time around I bought the GW 44mm silver. I like its modern look. For some reason the classic looks boring to me and gives dad vibes.
![GALAXY WATCH 4 vs GALAXY WATCH 4 CLASSIC [Samsung Has Changed.]](/img/logo.svg){kind=logo}
