GAME SINS | Everything Wrong With Dying Light 2: Stay Human 

Holy shit my head just exploded

I can’t tell if that’s clever, dumb, or maybe both.

@@Deadspace123100 I call it lazy naming 😆

I'm surprised more people didn't comment this.

@SNEEDman [Formerly Chuck’s] Blame Capcom for thinking that RE7 was “too scary”. I can’t imagine what kind of moron would want to dial down the horror aspects of a horror game.

Fuck yes,that's a solid idea. Because this game is dogshit

@@stickydickrick The story*

That's a great idea!!!

Bro you out here creating jobs!I would be great at this.

We call this a writers room and it sounds like Techland fired them

IKR? I actually believed she was purposely setting the player up to learn something and would then explain it later. Nope! She just wanted her shoes and was actually PISSED that we learnt the truth in the process!

I’d rather get mama chocolate in the first game than that. Damn.

@@Sarah-qx4vz ha! So true! At least that was believable.

@@mrwog82 the game heavily implies lawan uninvertidely wanted to let aiden in on to who she really is, but at the same time, didn't. She was conflicted about finding the right approach ever since hakon, it doesn't take 2 brain cells to figure it out, yall actually thought she gave a shit about the shoes

@@lm_slayer1 As I said, it did seem that she wanted him to find out with her obvious set up, but was still mad later because she told him not to touch anything else. As if him finding out was some big accident despite the photo of her and Hakon being in the shoe box she sent him for. I guess since the game tells you she was too emotional to join the night runners, my response would be "damn straight she is!!"

I was constantly hoping we'd be able to use his transformation powers at will eventually, even if just after we finished the main campaign. I wanted to use it in free-roam, but I feel like the best we'll ever get, is maybe a 1v4 multiplayer mode, or those meh side games that take place in a bubble.

I feel like that was originally intended with the Butcher, because if I recall right, the demo that was shown some years ago WAS the mission getting into his compound.

@@denverarnold6210 Yep I definitely recall that too, although the room the Butcher was in may have been a boss fight during the demo

@@sufferordie3412 i believe it was an option to fight him.

@@denverarnold6210 Ah, that sounds right

I still can't forgive them the fact that zombies didn't fall of the building edges...

Dude he gets sucker punched in the jaw nearly every cutscene as well.

@@JudeTheRU-vidPoopersubscribe especially in the final boss he passes out after every phase

@@Tainted_Twan it's probably a way the devs used to set up the next scene outside of the players vision or to warp aiden to a different location. The one part that made me laugh is when you are running away from waltz and lawan closes the door in your face every time 😂. Man this game can be hella scuffed but I fucking love it

Bro just beat the game. I noticed that .

I stopped playing after the intro

They were talking about the faction system when you give water towers/electrical stations which ends up with the faction you choose to control that area + you get certain structures/guns within that area that you can use.

@Alexandry Dumass Yeah the main reason I got dying light 2 was just for the really good parkour. Tbh I didn't expect anything too crazy from Techland since a lot of that time was development hell and people getting laid off.

I think people tend to forget that making one BBB game that did unexpectedly doesn't mean that you go from indie developer to ubisoft overnight and every game you make subsequently is going to be the witcher and skyrim meets GTA 5. It's pretty difficult to make an open world game full stop. Tbf the story was shite, but so is the story for valhalla and a lot of games. Ubisoft cranks them out every 18 months because they're a giant company and they just use them as money spinners. Ffs it even took Rockstar 5 years between GTA 5 and RDR2, and they've been making AAA open world games since 2001. Edit: As I said the writing and story is absolutely trash, but I don't think that issue has anything to do with the length of development cycle, some of the best games ever made storyline wise were rushed buggy messes when they released, whereas other games that took years had unbelievably shit storylines (mass effect andromeda for example). So I don't think 7 years guarantees you a good game story wise anymore than waiting for 7 years for a film sequel means it'll be well written. Two different things entirely imo.

It wasn’t fun at all

Yeah but then there’s no fear factor for night, you know?

@@Sarah-qx4vz besides the endless volatiles

@@Midra_LoFF assuming he can be a volatile in darkness, the rest of the infected wouldn’t take notice

dude that actually sounds awesome

@@Midra_LoFF they won’t be endless when they’re one shot

It’s pushing the idea upon us that guns are useless, which is in fact, not true, sometimes games like this program us to think a certain way, it’s just bullshit, guns could have and SHOULD have been in this game but they weren’t, and I strongly believe it was because they just flip flopped so much with what they wanted to put in the game

@@diemitrimoran2963 They didn't push any ideas about guns. They knew what their strength was in the first game, and it wasn't the fucking guns. Guns in 1 felt like ASS and were obviously very strong. They needed a better reason for why there wouldn't be any, but the fact they're not in the game is good.

@@diemitrimoran2963 First game explains it. Gunshot attracts the faster, stronger zombies, and they are enough to swarm you no matter how many guns and ammo you have

@@BapiBoozle as someone that never bothered with guns in 1, it's pointless to say that when you can take out hoards just by standing on top of cars or on top of spikes (in the spikes case you just drop down and it pushes all the zombies behind you into the spikes. Combat is easy in general and dying at night in endgame only really amounts to being swarmed. It's not that guns make it too easy, the game itself is too easy. It's really fun don't get me wrong but it's an easy walk in the park. I cleared out the bridge for luls with melee weapons on my last new game. Also I didn't like using guns in 1 because you kept getting the runners.

Guns will almost certainly be the focus of an upcoming dlc. Its been hinted at that there was a massive stockpile of weapons somewhere in the city and I wouldn't be surprised if they become the focus of a story dlc as it would be insanely powerful for whichever faction got a hold of them. I'm guessing the reason they didn't have guns in the base game was to incentivise engaging with the improved melee combat because at a certain point in the og game it was easy as hell to clear out anything with a decent shotgun and that would remove much of the challenge from this game (which is already much easier than the first dying light due to nights being a lot safer). My assumption is that the player will be able to get a decent variety of guns however they will cause volatiles to chase you at night or attract large groups of enemies during the day

Pk actually helps tbh

You can also have an ending with renegade taking over the city with Juan and Colonel in charge, probably the worst ending.

@@Doomguyalsotheslayerthey don't tho they only care about thier own group, if they control the water and power they will only allow the majority for them instead of allowing anyone to use as much as they want, they also are very authoritarian and have strict laws to the point they will torture u in public just for trying to loot a house for food cuz your starving. They also force survivors to give a majority of thier food and stuff to them for "protection" yet they don't do alot of it, considering I saw 2 dumb pks standing around while a guy got mugged. They will search people's homes without warrant and against thier will and take anything they see as too powerful or dangerous. They also will murder people just because they don't agree with them or because they had powerful weapons. The pks are worse than the survivors, and act like Rais did in the first game as compared to the average Joe's who are just trying to survive I can't blame thier actions for being "rebels" because they are just trying to survive. The survivors are rebeling against the pks cuz the pks are forcing thier ways on the people and are protecting people who don't want thier protection and thus expect them to hand over thier stuff for payment. The pks were literally evil side as Matt knew about the chemical strikes and didn't warn the people and tried to kill frank. He had his agenda for control over the people while the survivors just want to survive. Tbh can you blame a bunch of "rebels" for wanting to fight back after being oppressed by another faction that basically represents an authoritarian government? Tbh they don't need the pks order neither because the survivors literally have thier own way of order like trial and evidence and do things like the old world used to not in a barbaric way like the pks do. The pks aren't understanding at all, while the survivors are and pose lenanent punishment compared to the pks.

@@crazydynamite_1003 Even though Dartigan said you couldn't side with them

@@crazydynamite_1003 how is it the worst? At least the colonel wanted to save the city from Waltz

There are tons of things like this that makes me think the narrator didn’t even play the game

@@talentkid234 why would he? Horrible game

@@LuffyxNamiisathing Bc he’s reviewing the game ??

@@talentkid234 agreed

@@LuffyxNamiisathing You haven’t played it either 💀

Same. One of those "thank God it's finally over" games.

i got the bugged boss fight and it sucks . made me restart

@@cicl1680 mines wasn’t bugged, but the boss fight was still horrendous. Especially the part where he just runs around in circles, charges at you, then just endlessly swings his arms around so awkwardly. I’ve never felt so dissatisfied with a game’s ending.

Good for you atleast you got to finish it mine is walts is OP he kills me in 2 hits his attacks are AOE and the room is dark with the chemicals closing in on us .

@asta v2 i play souls and souls like games . and my experience with my bug in dying light 2 boss fight is not part of the game

The logic is worse for the survivors in the beginning. It went: 1: Help survivors with the water tower 2: find evidence in the leader's brother's hidey hole 3: not wanting to pick a side or escalate, return to the bazaar to talk. 4: 5: blow the fuck up a windmill. He just goes along with their plan for no goddamn reason. No choice led me to that, beside not being "Fuck you guys, the PKs know what they're doing."

Chill out

I had the same problem

It’s not worth playing when you can’t affect the story. Same reason rdr2 was bad. Honor system on dictated between 2 convene options and you can’t play how you want at all

Yes please house of ashes

Because unlike Kyle Crane or Aiden, Mario is too iconic to remain hidden by the first person view. You gotta keep Mario visible via third person camera the whole time. That, and third person makes platforming easier.

@@TrueMentorGuidingMoonlight that sounds like Mario odysey smh

Well, there was Yoshi's Safari.

@@anthonyrios2311 And Mario Kart. Even though it’s not a jumping game, you still have to see Mario onscreen every time you play as him. No point in playing that kind of game in first person.

They truly gave up on any realism, they should add a secret zombie with teleporting abilities that just likes to screw with the main character for the next zombie game techland makes

@@The_Archer-he2ft true lol. I am able to fly around the city on a fucking broom 😂

Honestly after what I've seen they may as well make the game's tone a comedy like Sunset Overdrive. At least with those they can excuse the weird stuff with some sort of goofy tech or something

If he dosent read the comment then how are we supposed to vote anyways?

House of ashes is so good 👍

He should be expected to read the comments. We keep his channel “in business.”

No

It's a biomarker not a bracelet. Lol jk call it whatever you want

My guess was that since Hakon was a Nightrunner and Nightrunner famously used Inhibiters to increase their strength. I assumed that Hakon immunity was higher.

@@mindstouchworlds808But how did they get the inhibitors? Every inhibitor you find in the game needs to be opened with a GRE key and Aiden is the only one with the key…

@@SharkmanAdidas prob before the down fall or when he was with the night runners they stacked them

Only if you have a very rudimentary idea of horses, and a poor idea of how to care for

@@SATELLITEDOWN7735 Well think about it, if you forget to pack anything that can be used, and have no quick way to get back home it's more humane to kill it there instead of leaving it to suffer for several hours.

I think asking your little grandson to kill it is the psychotic part.

Exactly horses can't get cast, this guy who does these videos doesn't do research. All he does is whine like a baby

@@SATELLITEDOWN7735 you have never had horses that is painfully obvious🙄 when horse breaks his leg they have to be put to sleep, dummy the can't have a cast

I swear, at the end of the game Aiden probably has brain damage by the amount of times he's fallen over and gotten bashed in the head

Yeah I literally was like "you're not joining the night's watch, fuck off" when I saw that part.

Bro what are you on? Cyberpunk did better? ☠️

? Hakon will remember that

@@Baheloo Cyberpunk did do a better job with story, they just failed at literally everything else.

I mean Cyberpunk was so overhyped than Dying light Sure Cyberpunk did a better story than Dying light 1 and 2 but was the hype all that worth it? no all we want for dying light was parkour and drop kicking CD Projekt Red was known for witcher 3's story TechLand is known for their parkour system Did Cyberpunk did a goodjob in story telling? NO Did TechLand improve from the first game? Meh (Yes but not too much, still bland) But did TechLand Disappoint players with their parkour? For me no, some might say yes but i'm still satisfied

Dying Light 2 definitely had some pretty trivial choices, however some choices actually mattered IMO and you could do 2-3 playthroughs and all of them being pretty different. I do agree though it's very underwhelming compared to the marketing

No?

Different groups of people believe in different way of governing/problem solving. When they can’t come to terms/agreements, war is very likely to happen. The last of us and dying light are both setting in an environment that the people are used to the new norm (constant zombie threats) and progress as human societies, and eventually comes to the point that other groups of survivors might be more dangerous than zombies, just like normal societies we currently live in.

The classic illusion of choice lol

You forgot the DLC where parkour, one of the main points of the game, is basically ignored in favor of a buggy.

Ok ok no need to repeat yourself

Ok ok no need to repeat yourself

Yeah but dl2 feels better in everything else beside physics

Yeah but dl2 feels better in everything else beside physics

I love it lol it’s got lot of hate but it’s good

It’s cool. Though it is more floaty

I liked the first one better. I quit the game before reaching the ending because of numerous bugs and glitches. I really wanted to like it but it has so many problems.

It all depends on what you liked about DL1 really. The combat is fun, but due to the character spending years fighting zombies and parkour-ing their way through wastelands (and other spoiler reasons) they start off much better at fighting and Parkour than Crane did. The environment is also a lot more bland, but that's because it's been years since the zombie outbreak, so the city has become overgrown with plant life, and everyone lives on rooftops and in walled off sanctuaries. Also Parkour became the only way to survive, so literally everyone can do it now, even children. The zombie AI seems a lot dumber now, and volitles while stronger, are much rarer, but I don't have an explanation for that. There's also a LOT of reusing of assets, by which I mean you'll find a lot of dark zones that are identical to each other, differing only by the path you have to take through them, and you'll find a LOT of courtyard areas that are identical to each other. As for the story, I couldn't really say....the bugs were so bad, that 90% of the cutscenes had to be skipped, so I ended the game having barely any idea wtf was going on. So if you do decide to play it, but aren't desperate to play it right now, wait till Techland fixes their shit, and releases a LOT of patches. As it is right now, the game can be borderline unplayable, and there's no New Game+

Definitely wait for sale

because he just got infected, maybe it fucks up your strength no mater how many inhibitors you have taken previously

But.. the only reason why he was outside the walls in the first place was to find his sister so that doesn't make sense

Also dying light 2 only has like 20 hours of content

@@kap6457 100 but yes

@@kap6457 i mean it's unfair to compare a game with 7 year of dlc and content updates to a 1 month old

@@AImightywoIf737 definitely not 100. Copy and pasted night stores or copy and pasted gre facilities doesn’t count as “content”.

@@idkneededtomakenewacc2575 Well, it is 100 hours of content, but only worth about 40-50. The 500 hours only works if you replay the game 5 times for all 5 different endings; getting 100% each one.

Only in the ending and they still attack you

@@kap6457 That's because that's waltz's group, not the butcher's.

I think the rules of the city are that you need one or everyone would just want you dead.

@@JudeTheRU-vidPoopersubscribe is that not what I just said?

It wasn’t even in development for 7 years they restarted in 2019-2020