GAMING SINS Everything Wrong With Grand Theft Auto: Vice City 

RIP Ray Liotta (Tommy's voice actor)

Cortez tipped off diaz about a deal and they set up tommy thats why cortez was trying to keep diaz quiet at the party and get tommy off the boat with his daughter

You forgot to sin the reason to race Hilary to hire him as a getaway driver. Him having abandonment issues is silly, why not have him demand Tommy to earn his respect and impress him by beating him?

in my game I had multiple npcs fall through a bridge. it was funny till one car blow up and killed Tommy

The biggest sin was using the Definitive Edition

Vice city! Hell yeah

Great video

I'm surprised you didn't sin Don Forelli for basically the same reason you sinned Dimitri.

I am i big fan of yours

THATS THE REASON I BURNED THIS GAME.. i set it on fire way back.. 14:48 best day ever

I just discovered your channel, and I love your sinning videos! They're great!

Say syi infinite we're gonna to be doing gay tony

16:14: *Another colon after This* Are you fucking serious, man? The whole point of Candy knowing what Tommy was gonna do was because she's the bait used to take embarrassing photos of Congressman Shrub. Tommy and Steve talked about this while Candy was in earshot of hearing them while she was doing one of her "scenes". Tommy even asked Candy if she and Shrub do anything kinky when they're together. Were you distracted by the poontang act in the mission cutscene? Was that because you didn't hear Steve calling for a camera to give to Tommy for the pictures and because you were focused on Candy's moans to actually notice her being a part of this setup? For your last, I really think you were focusing on the poontang in your mind because you ignored Candy's glances at them and you're also overlooking the big possibility that she went along with this due to her being able to hear them, assuming if she was looking at something else. So you want to know how she knew Tommy was there taking photos? I use two things with my head called paying attention and common sense. With the help of those two, I got this obvious answer: SHE WAS IN ON THIS. If this confuses you, I'll use something simpler: SHE HELPED TOMMY KNOWINGLY AND WILLFULLY. 16:27: *If you wrote Oh, why the hell would you say Eh? If you know you drive through one window in this mission, why the hell didn't you remove the plural form of it?* So let me get this straight: the reason you think this deserved a sin is because it has Tommy using an elevator of a building with his bike just to jump from one building to another because that's how the mission's set up and also because it's a little humorous because what are the chances of that happening in real life and also, we can hear a fart going off in that elevator? How anyone can find you humorous is beyond me. 16:39: Which Lana "Rhodes" are you talking about? The Brazilian actress or the porn actress that has her name spelled like this: Rhoades. Either way, you deserve more demerits for being unspecific. *You don't need to use Movie when you used Film first. Where's Just between Tommy and Go?*. So how boring do you want this mission to be then? You want a mission that can be finished in 15-30 seconds? Thank God you weren't part of the creative team 'cause you failed to appreciate how exhilarating this mission was. Other gamers got excitement when they jumped building to building 'cause we didn't think it was possible. Well, this mission made it possible. The only drawback with this is that if you mess up, you'll have to go back to the elevator to do it again. However, there would be staircases unlocked if you reached the buildings they're on. Your last one: Real fuckin' clever, genius. How the hell was anyone supposed to get up there? This is another example of you leaving suggestions without solutions. The only way you can get up was by riding the bike through multiple buildings until you reach the last building where the staircase OF that building would finally be released. If you were in charge of this mission, you'd ensured the players would get no payoff from this. You wanna talk about a mission that REALLY SUCKS? Go play Did Somebody Say Yoga from GTA 5. 16:50: Well, if it isn't the pot calling the kettle black. Only a sadist would make terrible points on a game that wasn't warranted. You make another RU-vidr named GCN look less like a douchebag with the way you're doing this video. Who said you had to stay there for 5 minutes? You obviously didn't pay attention to the little notice on the top-left screen that said "press O to leave". That was your stupidass choice to stay without you knowing about it. Syi forgot again, who knows how many times, that he's playing a REMASTERED 2002 GAME. By "inflatable tubeman", Syi outs himself as a simple guy, which explains his simple non-critical thinking reasons as the basis for the majority of his sins. 19:02: *"How about when he called you to say this?" What about how lazy you are at writing sentences with extra words that you don't bother to WRITE THEM IN!* Screw your sin down to the bowels of Hell. Tommy has EVERY reason to be surprised by Lance's betrayal. We, the gamers, can surmised what Lance may do to us based on his insecure phone calls to him, but Tommy, however unwise, didn't believe that Lance would stab him in the back because they saved each other when it counted. Tommy believed he could give Lance the benefit of the doubt after those phone calls due to their history. How the hell is him appearing out of nowhere make him suspicious? He even explained to Tommy when they first meet that he wants to help find Tommy's money and Lance's cocaine, not to mention his slight at the end when he said he'll be watching Tommy along with getting more info. You forgot already the numerous times they helped/saved each other? Here's a quick recap for your forgetful ass: #1-Back Alley Brawl=Lance saved Tommy, #2-Guardian Angels=Lance helped Tommy. #3-Phnom Penh '86=Diaz partnered Tommy up with Lance, #4-Supply And Demand=Lance helped Tommy, #5-Death Row=Tommy saved Lance, #6-Rub Out= Tommy and Lance partnered up to take down Diaz, #7-Cop Land= Tommy helps Lance. With all those times of helping each others' asses, did you really think there was ANY indication of cause to suspect Lance? You saying all that in the first part is rendered moot by the known fact you played this game FOR THE 1ST TIME before making this video. What he said at 20:28 should've hinted you of a tie-in of why he's being like that, one that Rockstar Games decided to expand on with the 2006 PSP game Grand Theft Auto: Vice City Stories. 20:32: Are you lazy or stupid? Why was this sentence not before you cut to the phone calls? Here's 40 sins for you: 20 for not placing that before the phone scenes and the other 20 for not correcting this before putting this video on RU-vid for shoddy work. If you got proof of how predictable this game was for you, show some better proof because those two clips you used as evidence could easily be discounted by what I wrote to counter that, not to mention the KNOWN FACT that you always play these games before making your videos, hence your "knowledge peddling of future events" cliche. 20:37: *Where's So between Wait & How?* Since this is the final mission, you're gonna pull out all the nitpick stops. The game DECIDED that Tommy should begin his last mission in his office to give you a fighting chance. Do you even pay attention AT ALL to the surroundings? Lance won't show up until halfway into the mission and what kind of idiot makes a simple statement that has a simple answer already? Lance being on the 2nd floor with his Kruger was a DESIGN CHOICE by the frickin' developers and it serves a purpose to lure Tommy away from the safe. 20:54: *Why did you say Is when you wrote Was? If you wrote This, why would you say That? Put an apostrophe between Popeye and the S* What do you mean? You're the one that killed him like that. If you weren't busy confusing your audience with your camera handling, they would've seen the flames etch over to Lance, engulfing him in fire which led to him being burnt to death. Don't you mean WHEN they became partners? How hard is it for you to pick up a dictionary to figure out the kind of grammar is needed for this? Your 1st, 2nd & 3rd mini points can be explained in simple terms: IT'S A FUCKING OPEN-WORLD CRIME GAME, NOT A GODDAMN JAPANESE ROLE-PLAYING GAME. Syi wants his action games to have emotional tendencies, thus negating the ACTION aspect of a game centered on crime. 21:14: Padding the same bullshit for the 2nd time and again Syi downright ignored the effectiveness of molotov cocktails. YOU beat Forelli WITH THE EASY WAY. Fires from molotov cocktails SPREAD. Forelli was burned to death because he got caught in the VICINITY. You want a challenge from him? Kill Forelli without using any projectiles and without any glycerin-induced throwables. Let's see how long you last against him the HARD WAY. 21:27: *Numbered points go like this: 1:, 2:, 3:, etc. and after that, capitalize the first letter in each. Why did you say Was when you wrote There's? Again, you have an asinine habit of writing words that you don't bother to say it out loud, mainly out of sheer laziness, case in point: And before 3 * Fine, I'll go over this in the same manner you just tried and failed at. 1: He was hiding, dingus, from the firefight. Rosenberg wasn't taking any chance standing up after it was over, believing whoever was left would get him too. 2. He was crawling with his head facing down, hoping a potential goon wouldn't see him. These two actions are IN THE SAME GODDAMN SCENE YOU'RE SHOWING, MAN. FUCKING GO BACK TEN SECONDS IF YOU'RE TOO BLIND TO SEE IT THE 1ST TIME. 3. Use your head like everybody else, Goddamn it. This is a kind of question posed by kids, not adults and you're well over 12 years old. The living room or the blind spot by the staircase are probable places he would be in. The fact this video got you 4,000 people watching it made me question how many of them take your lies at face value and how many called you out for them? Syi Infinite's tally for Grand Theft Auto Vice City: Valid points-7 Bullcrap points-94 Sentence= The Scarface treatment, courtesy of Tommy himself (7:31-40).

whats important is whats in the game not how long it is.

0:34: one of the things I hate about Tommy's character model in this game is that they made him look kinda chubby. Also, it would have been good to mention that in this version of Vice City, certain songs were cut from the game's original soundtracks (Michael Jackson's Billie Jean, for example) all because Rockstar didn't want to bother with having to pay for the licenses for them when they shouldn't have to since this is a remaster, not a new game. *Also Syi, you used the wrong mark when writing the word "we're"*. 2:26: * For numbered points, try it like this: 1. first point, 2. second point etc.*. I disagree with you there, Syi. Nothing about this scene says "ridiculous". Ever heard of something used in pop culture called deus ex machina? The man that was shot first was NEXT TO Tommy, not behind him. That man took the brunt of the bullets being fired at them and if you look at the scene again, Tommy reacted instinctively to the sounds of gunshots by crouching while everyone else hadn't had the reflexes to do so, thus making Tommy the sole surviver. 2:39: Why in the flying fudge would you bother pointing this out just to ding this? You just made a point in your first one that this game is a 2002 game that was remastered using today's technology. How is that sinful for a game to have THAT? You played GTA 3 before this, which means you've seen packages, items, money and weapons floating in midair, yet your video for that doesn't seem to mention it. For you to sin this is simply trivial and I think the reason you would do this is to pad your demerit counter. 3:01: * If you're gonna start with the word "Translation" first, one should put down the : mark after to emphasize, for example, Translation:. Also, another error in the text. It read " the family doesn't owe a thing" and yet, I heard you say "the family doesn't owe YOU a thing"*. Tommy knows this already because he spent those 15 years without any help from them. Speculations from fans believe that Tommy was set up by Sonny that caused him to be sent to prison because Sonny believed that Tommy was becoming a thorn in his side. Once Tommy got out, Sonny figured that by sending him to Vice City, he would get over what happened and not get wised as to why it happened under the supposed premise of welcoming him back to the fold to avert suspicion over that. 3:18: * Rule of Thumb: if you want to describe more than one when it comes to NPCs, you don't need the apostrophe to write the acronym "Als". "AI's" like this is used to describe possession of a singular object i.e. the AI's pattern, ok? *. Yes, both Rockstar and Grove Street Games deserved to be ridiculed for this. Rockstar for handing a respectable title to another company that did more bad than good on one of their titles before and GSG for butchering this like it did with the PS3 version of San Andreas for it seemed with the definitive edition, the players were exposed to a heap load of glitches than what they originally got from the originals. 4:45: Some characters we'll work with, others we'll not. Tommy will work with Cortez, Mercedes (as part of someone's mission along with Candy Suxxx), Kent Paul, Avery Carrington (with a young Donald Love attached to him in one mission only), Jezz Torrent (along with other members of the band, Love Fist), Steve Scott and Diaz. You can throw in Ken Rosenberg because this cutscene is from his first mission. Congressman Alex Shrub, we won't work with along with BJ Smith (though we can buy a property from him). Gonzalez and Pastor Richards too. Since you too, Syi, were also not aware that Ken Rosenberg explained about this all to Tommy in the first cutscene, it falls to me to write out what Ken said to Tommy in that 1st scene. "There's this retired colonel, Colonel Juan Garcia Cortez. He's the one that helped me set up this deal well away from Vice City's established thugs, ok? Now listen, he's holding his party out in the bay on his expensive yacht and all of Vice City's BIG PLAYERS are gonna be there, ok? I have an invite, of course, I have an invite". What you're doing with this sin is misleading your viewers on purpose. 5:26: Really? A ding for that? Dude, Ken has every reason to be anxious. He's a lawyer for the Forelli mafia. The drug deal that happened on his turf that went south along with the money that got stolen was Forelli's money. Both he and Tommy are in a pickle. If they don't compensate Forelli in any way at all, Tommy and Ken will be dead, courtesy of Sonny Forelli himself. 5:48: You can't be serious? Out of anything you might want to ding that for, you come up with that? Here's a simple answer to your simple question: who the hell cares? This is an open world crime game, not a Sims simulation game. 5:54: That's probably because the chef has served out his purpose for that part in the game and so, the software deleted him, like it does for every other NPC you kill. 6:03: "Just when Lance arrives, these chefs show up"? It has been 33 seconds since Lance showed up when the chefs make their entrance. Have you been not paying attention to the exact length of that part? You know what's more convenient than what you asserted in your last statement? The fact that this part now has you having a gun and instructions on the top left side on how to use it and to top it off, you have 3 chefs in front of you to use for target practice. 6:09: I got two theories why it went like that: 1. It could be that they outnumbered him 3-1 and whether or not Tommy has a gun, they would take their chances jumping him thinking he won't have the guts to shoot them. 2. I mentioned in the last point that this sets up a gun tutorial on how to use weapons and these guys are merely practice targets to use it on. 6:16: I recall you sinning another like this in GTA 4. Just like how I explained that one, this one is the same thing. The game wants Tommy to know where he could find guns whenever he needs them as well as to be familiar with other parts of the city. For your last one, are you playing stupid or are you really one? Anyone can simply imagine Lance scootching over to the driver's seat as soon as Tommy got out. Even if you don't see Lance scootching over, you should always keep in mind that this is a remastered 2002 game which means that it had been made on a budget which means the designers took certain shortcuts that wouldn't cause a big deal. 6:46: I know you got the $3,000,000 number from the mission cutscene of Keep Your Friends Close, however even that's wrong because Tommy said $20,000,000 when the subtitles say 3. You give Rosenberg far too little credit, he merely expected Tommy to find out who it was that screwed up their deal, so they could start getting their stuff back. About your last statement, don't you get the reason why Tommy needs Rosenberg? Rosenberg is a local of Vice City which means he knows how this city operates and being a lawyer, he's connected to much powerful people which comes into play in the game at certain parts. In fact, the manual for Vice City even points out that getting a lawyer should be the first thing you do when you come to Vice City. 7:07: Considering he saw Tommy smash up his car with a hammer, the juror assumed the worst in thinking Tommy was now gonna beat him with the hammer next and that's why he ran. The 2nd juror is no different. Whether you choose to assault him before you go after his car or not, (which you did as evident by what you showed), his car can take a little bit more time to mess up, so it should come as no surprise that one car takes more time to get messed up than the other because that's how this mission was designed. You know what? You pointed out a valid point here. The fact that the first car doesn't even look all that banged up and somehow, it was accepted by the game to let you continue on toward the next one. In the original, the car had to be really banged up to go on to the next one. 7:14: * Your first sentence had the word "gate", but you said it as if it had an S. Instead of saying "those trucks", you said "the trucks". You also said "right" after you were finished, but didn't bother to write it in*. Why do you think those red barrels are there for? They're there to make it convenient for you to use to blow up the trucks. In fact, it's even instructed by the game for you to do that.

Wait you're really going to sin the entire last of us 1 and 2? Can syi even do that?

how are they supposed to introduce anything? its always going to annoy someone but stories need that.

syi infinite. God of war ascension in 2 weeks, or next month?

First!

syi infinite. You ready to do god of war soon?

everyones eyes are tiny

you're going to sin Tlou 1 & 2 separately right ?

Man why you always bashing Popeye biscuits lol?? It's KFC biscuits that are dry bro lol!!!!

syi infinite. Let me know when you're ready to start god of war.

11:14: * Put this symbol : after Explain This To Me. Helping and Out are placed in wrong spots in your captions. Fix it or say it as it is. Don't you mean "heard a sniper shot"? You don't need to put the word miles with a capitol and where the hell is the word "away"? *. The reason is because they're too busy kicking the crap outta each other, Syi, God damn it, man. That's right. Tommy is not 40 feet away. He's more 50-60 feet away. If you wanted something else to sin in this part, here's 3 that I picked up: 1. The blue shirts Haitians are not wearing their white caps and white pants in this version. 2. These dead Cuban gangsters never had bright yellow, green and red shirts. It was always tan yellow and white colors they rocked with. 3. Watch the computer version of the mission Dirty Lickin's. You'll see that certain people was mentioned in that dialogue that Rockstar had omitted in its censored versions on consoles. 11:27: What constitutes common sense in a GAME to you? The fact that this mission has Lance's health decrease little by little should've told you already that it's a timed mission, one that rewards players by stopping time when you reach a goal. The real annoying thing about this mission is trying to keep Lance alive on the way to the hospital. 11:45: *Put a comma after No and Tommy to make it grammatically correct*. That's easy for you to say, Syi. You didn't listen carefully enough at what Lance said at 11:41. The guy Diaz had killed at the docks that arrived by helicopter was Lance's brother. Ever heard the expression "blood is thicker than seawater"? Anyone that would be in Lance's position would bide their own time to get their revenge. Lance had an opportunity to kill Diaz when it presented itself, whether Tommy was there or not. Obviously, it didn't work, but you could, at least, understand why Lance jumped the gun on Diaz. The fact that the obvious was not in your demerit again shows lack of attention. 11:54: So what? After you passed the timed part of this mission, Lance will walk and run like he wasn't tortured. The real sin here is his knack of dying while trying to get him to the hospital. 12:01: The agents that are on the boats that make up the blockade were like that in the original, so there was nothing Syi said that warranted a counterpoint. However, the sin he should've placed was for the agents on the dinghies because they were supposed to move towards the yacht, but a glitch was in the works, it seems. 12:13: So while you "shot the soul" out of Diaz, we can clearly see him not being affected by any slugs as if the bullets were redirected from him. Why didn't you sin that alongside your other reason? *Where's the -n't for "couldn't" when you said it? Where's "of" before Laziness?* You're not one to talk about laziness after being busted at 10:15 where there were things to demerit that you didn't do. In fact, here's one you didn't ding, despite it being shown: Lance is wielding a Colt 45 when in the original, he had a Desert Eagle. That's a sin on Grove Street Games for that unnecessary change and for Diaz' expressionless face. The guy is about to be sent to the afterlife and he looks like he's gonna find out what his surprise is. The original had him look like it's the end for him. 13:07: Even if Tommy doesn't come back within 5 minutes, that's hardly the point. I found another thing to sin other than your stupid point and that was Tommy's face: it's expressionless. Did you played the original at all before playing this piece of crap version? You wanna know why Tommy busted up the mall? Listen to what Lance said between 12:55-12:58. Since Syi won't show it, I have to point that in this mission, after destroying stores' windows, Tommy would shout that he's the new king in charge of Vice City, that's how he got the recognition Syi neglected to be specific about. What do you mean about your last one? You mean the money Tommy gets after completing the mission ($2000)? If so, that's frickin' weak because that's COMMON or you mean the money you receive after completing all the protection racket missions? That's what you earned for your protection of those stores. Which is it that you're confused on? 13:15: *Enough with shortening "developers" and drop the S after Players if you're not gonna use it, jeez. Where's Up after Pop? Put an S after Mission if you're talking about more than 1, genius. If you're gonna use "so long", don't be a lazy ass with leaving "a long time" in it* Don't you mean property segment? You can't have a business without property, numb nuts. I asked this question on another video and I'm gonna ask it again: Are you a liar or an idiot? You wouldn't have to wait for that or remind yourself of what you glossed over if you'd simply PAID ATTENTION to the frickin' scene you're showing RIGHT NOW for this bullcrap demerit. Minus the protection racket, there's 8 businesses Tommy can run after buying, but Syi is not being specific if he means 6 for the bare minimum to continue the story or 6 for the amount of property that Vice City has, so that's on him. There're 4 properties that have the same mission, the other four has more. Syi has a problem with a game being long, despite it serves to show more depth to a story and could very well answer questions he had if he'd paid attention since the beginning. 13:38-13:39: Syi contradicts himself two seconds after complaining about the length of the game. Did you even hear yourself on your last sentence? How can these protection racket missions in a game centered on crime, on a character who's trying to rule the streets and with missions that further the journey of his takeover, created by game developers who took time to create, design, implement and play these missions to have it be a PART of the main story where the gamers get another look into criminal enterprises and your only gripe about it is that "it's long"? If you were in charge of this game, you'd be cutting corners more than Grove Street Games ever did by shortening the length of this game down to an hour at the most making it a demo instead of a full game. 14:07: *Where's Them before Jump?* An obvious glitch which you knew from playing this that this game was loaded with them. If you played the original, this wouldn't happen. 14:24: *You said Bodies correctly, yet stupidly kept in Body and you don't need the S after the word Disappear*. At 5:54, I already explained why the game makes them disappear. How the flying hell does that mechanic makes it "worse"? 14:32: *This may be a nitpick of my own, but it's due to annoyance. Stop shortening Developers*. The real sin was you blowing your cover due to whatever stupid crap you pulled without explaining why. Even if the developers came up with a design for this, would you have bothered to look in 5 seconds? 14:45: What in the flippin' hell was that? Were you screwing around again for the purpose of scoring another cheap sin? There's a difference between screwing around for shits and giggles and screwing around for making a BS point. This was of the latter because no player would screw around like that in a mission. Another failed attempt at scene manipulation. 14:53: *Where's To between Switch and Your? If you're gonna say "just to", switch the Goddamn words before you put it out*. Finally, a valid demerit. The last valid sin you made was back at 3:18. If this is the amount of valid sins you have for this game, then the actual length should've been less than 3 minutes for this video. 15:19: Thanks for explaining what we can see also. It's not a sin if Rockstar creates a character that unhinged for laughs. 15:24: *Put a colon (:) after Drugs* Both the cutscene you showed in the last sin as well as the instructions of selling the product ALREADY EXPLAINED it to you had you just paid some Goddamn attention and not cut offed conveniently. The last owner said this "The ice cream is a FRONT. We distribute other NON-DAIRY products". The instructions clearly stated that the more transactions you make, the more police attention you'll get, meaning they could be well aware of the operation the factory is secretly running. You having to ask questions doesn't negate what you could've learn by PAYING ATTENTION. 15:44: *Where's the "one" in Someone? You mean "clipped" some guy. Xbox should be capitalized. Where's Not between I'm & Lying?* You already know the cause of these absurdities. Just get to the point. 15:54: *If you mean more than one, it's in plural form: spines. Another colon after Guess* You're complaining about a game that was released while you were still young for this when it was modern then? Motion capture techniques weren't commonly used then like they are now. Only a few games back then used it (Indigo Prophecy, Call Of Duty: Big Red One, for example). Why don't you ask Jenna Jameson herself, a real-life porn star and the voice of Candy Suxxx, if she and other porn actresses tend to walk like that? So far, the majority of the women in this game have that same exact walk..

7:25: Oh really? You just showed the wreckage of the trucks as well as the rioters still beating each other up in the same sin. How does that count as " like nothing ever happened"? Scene manipulation is not your forte. * I think you meant to say "it's like nothing ever happened" for the last part of your sentence*. 7:31: Gonzalez is not that powerful a figure as you're making him out to be. He may be Cortez's right hand man, but it doesn't mean he's one to give respect towards. For your 2nd half of this sin, how you're wondering how Tommy can just walk in easily, you omitted the mission cutscene for Treacherous Swine. Cortez tells Tommy how he's been carrying Gonzalez for years and his incompetence has reached new heights. It was also suspected that he gave the details of the drug deal between Tommy and Victor Vance to someone who sent that 3 man team to ambush the deal. Cortez concluded that cutscene by saying Gonzalez will be at his penthouse, half drunk probably and gives him the chainsaw. If Gonzalez had any kinds of guards with him, Cortez would have told Tommy about that in the cutscene. There's your explanation. 7:37: 2 things you got wrong here: 1. the 2 goons that were talking to Gonzalez kept their eyes solely on him. Don't you think they would have said something HAD they saw him? 2. Gonzalez is not their boss. These two goons work for someone else and the reason they're there is probably because to extract info from him since he's suspected of being an informant (evidently, that was the case). 7:57: *Where's the word "that" that you used between "way" and "these"?*. There is such a thing as bugging devices which can be placed anywhere in that location and all those French agents had to do was hide somewhere and wait until they heard something that was indicative of their primary target. Also, why are you making it seem like you had no control over Tommy's actions when he got ambushed? The scene you showed obviously had you pull out a shotgun for Tommy to use and you used that weapon to shoot back at the agents. As I said it before, scene manipulation is not what you're good at. Tommy made it out because you got him out. 8:19: Dude, Diaz was too pissed off to even give a crap about whether or not he remembers Tommy. He must've lost a crapload of money on horse betting and now has to vent out his anger the way he knows how. Would you give a crap about bothering to remember something if you just lost a whole lotta money? In case you couldn't figure it out, Diaz being a hot head is called characterization and it does not warrant a demerit. Once again, you're using knowledge of a future event in the game before it has come to pass just to pad your sin counter. 8:35: That's because he might have been up on the roof before Tommy came up to his apartment and while you were looking through the window, he came down. 8:38: If there were others besides the targets you're shooting at, they would've called the cops on you and when that happens, you can bet your ass they'll screw up this mission and you'd be pissed. Be grateful. For your last one, it's bullcrap. There're movies and shows where something violent happens and the cops don't show up until the last minute or none at all. 8:47: That's also bullcrap. Those barrels show up in other missions to help you out for convenance, but you're gonna demerit it anyway simply because it's a game mechanic, something you pointed out as a bad thing. They're not in a corner, they're standing next to a wall. I like to see you give examples of other games that uses red barrels because without it, you're just lazingly padding your counter. 9:01: *It would help your case if you SHOW where you died instead of starting with the WASTED screen*. Ask yourself this on what would be better: to start over at the beginning of the mission or to die and be at the hospital and drive all the way over to the contact's place just to redo the mission? 9:19: Another DOWNGRADE of the result of cutting corners that GSG and Rockstar allowed with this "remaster". In the original, Tommy could sprint for 15 seconds max before jogging, then out of breath. *Where's the word "as" you said between "is" and "poor"? Where's "out" that you written between "take" and "an"?*. When has that happen? Give an example if you're gonna say something like that. Tommy, like everyone else, is human, not superhuman. For a guy that likes to complain about how realism is "not used" in this type of game, the developers' decision to make Tommy tire out from running is something you'll overlook or have it fly over your head because of your innate lack of attention to detail. 9:35: "You said "soldiers" and "doing" in the same sentence and didn't bother to write them*. I can half agree with you here. I can agree that this tank gets stolen in the most common way the same gets done with stealing a car. The original version had the player be creative in stealing the tank, whether it's parking in front of it until a soldier gets out to put it to the side or wait until they stop in front of the donut place, so the passenger can get them. I disagree with what you said about the soldiers "not doing anything to stop" Tommy. You clearly showed a soldier being ordered to remove Tommy out the way and after the tank gets stolen, they opened fire on it and initiated the self-destruct protocol. You suck at scene manipulation. 9:44: *You wrote Go in your sentence, yet stupidly said Goes when there's no e-s in it*. Sinning the game for its well known mechanics again. You didn't have a better reason to sin this other than padding your counter, didn't you? 9:58: *Put an apostrophe after "game" in your 1st sentence and again after "talking" to implicate a sudden reference to your audience and proper use of writing*. You've clearly never heard of the concept of "sizing each other up". These guys are testing each other of talking the talk and walking the walk; calling each other insults until they get a clear understanding of each other. It's what tough guys do. If you were ever a tough guy, you would know already without saying anything. 10:15: That's good to point out the already visible cord because in the Japanese version for PS2 of this mission, they darkened the floor where the cord was, so as to not make it obvious. Sinning Diaz for characterization again because you couldn't find anything better to sin about this because you always take the easy route when I found three things to sin in the same cutscene. 1. Diaz has a stupid face he has throughout the scene you showed while in the original, he makes expressions to show how he's feeling. That's one sin on Grove Street Games for ruining his model. 2. In the original, he shoots the VCR with a Desert Eagle, but instead, he's got a Colt 45. That's another sin on GSG for that unnecessary change. 3. He's not even holding the gun right. It phases into his wrists before sliding back into his grip. You can sin that on both GSG and Rockstar for crappy, easily preventable shoddy work that neither company gave two shits about correcting before pushing this onto consumers. Jeez, if you're gonna sin a game, DO IT RIGHT. 10:30: *In your 2nd sentence, you have one "out", yet you said it twice. Where's the other one? Where's "know" between Lance and where?*. So while I'm watching Syi give another misinformed reason to sin this, I'm wondering if he forgot again what Lance said to Tommy in the 2nd mission. Lance said he'll be watching Tommy which means he's basically spying on him in order to find the money and the cocaine that was stolen in the intro. He could've been listening in on the conversation Tommy had with Diaz and it's very plausible since both of them were in Diaz' 2nd mission because Diaz hired them. Enough with your bullcrap assertion of plot demands. Had you let that cutscene finish, your audience would have heard Lance say this after Tommy finished talking: "I'm just saying you need to let me in there, my man. Now you can feed me all this "lonely tough guy" crap. But I know one day, I'm gonna save your ass and you're probably gonna wanna kiss me". Lance is there because he heard what Diaz was talking about and simply wanted to join in. That's no plot demand. Lance was included because the developers thought it would be fun if Lance was in the mission to shoot at rival boats while Tommy was driving and vice versa. 10:43: That's on you still because you knew this game wasn't done right and instead of trying to get away after that attempt to hit him, you dumbingly stuck around and got yourself caught. 10:51: That's not really a demerit since the npcs in the original were known to do that as well due to their AI not being fleshed out as much. It's not surprising that would happen in this version. 10:53: I'm not sure that comparison works very well because the thing with your girl is about you in the right and she's not whereas this doesn't make sense with the game owing you an apology for the mechanics of the toy plane. A correct comparison would be trying to fly this toy is like trying to control a paper plane while it's flying: You want to make it fly straight, but it sometimes deviates from the route by turning in another direction. I understand your frustration with this mechanic. This was something many gamers complained about before the announcement of the Defective Excrement version. 10:58: *Where is the word The between carry and little?*. The bombs are conventional, not atomic. Quit playing dumb for your audience. The bombs get replaced because IT'S A FRIGGIN SIMPLE GAMEPLAY MECHANIC. Are you one that would rather have the toy plane pick up one bomb and after it gets dropped, go back to where you are to pick up another one? You'd be demeriting that too for inconvenience.

Can't wait for San Andreas. Also, this game seems disappointing. I'm glad I didn't buy the remake now.

Can you do GTA San Andreas Please?