Einstein's words are not remotely true. I believe there have been at least three men, far more extraordinary than Gandhi: Shakespeare, Da Vinci and Lincoln. There may have been more. Gandhi may indeed have been an extraordinary man. But to say that no one else was as extraordinary as him, remains incorrect. Even on a relativistic basis.
@@rohankelkar8860and your judgements/perceptions are clearly proof that it is based on somebody's Appearances & the stories narrated by others to you, and that you value people by what others thought of any concerned person, rather than their, an individuals' thoughts, volitions and actions from your own personal analysis. Because, Shakespeare & Da Vinci were artists whose Stories(basically Literature) through Words, Poems, Arts & Paintings, which were time and again marketed, sold, once again and again auctioned to keep its value very high, while Lincoln came from working class of people to become politician, while Einstein's contribution was towards Science & Scientific Research predominantly the Theoretical Aspects of Physics, and when you look at similarities, English is the connecting Language, which is deep rooted now in the Indian Education System. So, yes it had been well narrated work of literature & arts combined with story telling tactics to twist your thinking style. Are there any Truths in what Shakespeare had written ? Or was it Romantic, Dramatic, Poetic & Gave Pleasure to the Senses to its readers to forget Reality ? Now, tell me, what is your Mother Tongue & Father Tongue ? Have you ever asked your Biological Parents, what Life was like for them, that is, before you were born, or during their Childhood ? When you do experience the past through the Life of your own parents eyes, you will realise what a Great Man Mahatma Gandhiji was, because every moment he breathed for the welfare of Human Beings and Humanity, through this planet.
@@rohankelkar8860😂😂😂 what are you on about? Shakespeare? Da Vinci? One was a playwright other was a painter both geniuses in their own right but did nothing to ever change the system they were born in and used their genius to play the system for personal gains. When did either of them do anything that was against their interests for people around them? Also Lincoln might be close but still falls short if you really read about the details around civil war, his backroom politics, real motivations for fighting the south had nothing to do with slavery and his actions with the press of those times. While I agree Gandhi may not be the greatest but atleast give better alternatives.
@@rohankelkar8860Bro wtf? I'm not a fan of Gandhi but your selection is laughable. DaVinci and Shakespeare? 😂😂😂😂. Even the British and Italians won't agree with you. There are many great kings, generals, scientists and scholars who are far better than them.
How can anyone in their right senses hate this great man who embodied the virtuous values of truth, sacrifice, honesty, holy struggle and non-violence glorifying humanity.
abe o angrej ki aulad tere ghar par ya family par bhi koi hamla karega na to surrender kar diyo or boliyo main ahinsa wadi hun apko jo karna hai karlo main to apko hath tak nahi lagaunga ok gandhi and nehru were only puppets of british thats all thats they dont want sardar patel to become prime minister if he became the prime minister then the india would be free of muslims and christians
I am looking this Film No.of times Since 1982.The Great Movie.No Words.I Salute to All this film Production Units always.Jai Hind.Jai Bharat..Bharat Matha Ki Jai..
I watched this film for the first time in the year 1982. As a 13 year old Indian Teen As A Class VIII Student . Kendriya Vidyalaya Hebbal Bangalore What a Movie 👍👍👍👍❤❤❤❤
Hi..Bittoo.. same here ...I saw it when I was grade 6... In Bombay....How can I ever forget this movie....tears still flow when I see this movie...even..now
@tonyantonio8956 and somehow, Gandhi was the one who starved himself to end the independence riots. He wasn't responsible for the riots, Jinnah and the Hindu Mahasabha and the RSS were.
illiterates are incorrigible, what can you do? Start being wise, my dude. Maybe you see some sense in your nation's truth after all 😂, I have no hope for prejudiced people.. You tried to be altruistic by hiding behind Subhas Chandra Bose while dismissing Gandhi as a fake freedom fighter. I simply put forth some truth that you had hard time digesting. 😂 Learn your own history but not from Whatsapp 👍 Its for our own good
@@Morphysince94 Dumb@$s leftist here are the facts to stop your verbal loose motion. - On December 30th, 1943, Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose, the Supreme Commander of the Azad Hind, created a historic moment by hoisting the Indian National Flag for the first time on the soil of Port Blair - 14th April 1944 is a significant date in the history of the Indian Freedom Struggle. On this day, the Indian National Army (INA) hoisted the flag at Moirang, Bishnupur district, Manipur - Tamil Nadu Governor RN Ravi said that Mahatma Gandhi's Non-Cooperation movement had little impact, but it was the military resistance of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose that led to the exit of Britishers from India. - When Clement Attlee visited India after independence, he told that Bose and his INA were responsible for India's independence, to Phani Bhusan Chakraborty as he asked him why did the British left India so soon. Attlee said that Gandhi's contribution was m-i-n-i-m-a-l, that is nothing. Netaji angrezo ki le rahe thay left right and center.
@@shriharikulkarni2305 And he starved himself in a city where riots took place, all so that the riots stopped. Stop saying shit, he never incited one riot.
@@shubhnamdeo2865 He asked hindus to submit before muslims if they attack . It is same like bhuddist monks get beheaded by Bhaktiyar Khilji in Nalanda . It's against natural human instinct of defence. He was indeed an agent of British. British found out dealing with very easy and Gandhi fooled people by his half baked knowledge of Vedic Philosophy. He said he won't accept Bhagwatgeeta as whole since it talks of Kshtriya dharma . Despite all the bla bla of ahimsa two million people where subjected to violence
strictly as a film ..it is a good movie...I mean acting direction camera editing and so on... but this movie doesn't tell the whole truth about gandhi.. I read the disclaimer given at the beginning that it won't be possible to cover it all... I will elaborate... there was violent revolution going on parallel.... mostly unsuccessful. but youth was getting attracted to such movement.. people like bhagat singh , chandrashekhar azad etc.. so while describing non-violence why didn't director mentioned what was the violence that gandhi was opposing and insists on non-violence.. not a single scene about such huge movement going on parallel.. britishers used gandhi to divert attention from revolutionary movements.. gandhi was parachuted leader ..didn't born out of soil..he traveled extensively on the behest of mr gokhale and understood the pulse of the nation.. he had good knowledge about the british laws.. he knew it very well where it hurts to government and so where to a pinch...all said.. britishers also knew their laws and playing chess moves ... who won and who lost ?? I leave it up to you to decide...
LOL, GANDHI ONLY GAVE HATRED TO HINDUS AND LOVE TO MUSLIMS, WE ARE STILL FIGHTING WITH ENEMY CREATED BY GANDHI OUTSIDE INDIA AND INSIDE INDIA. WORST THING FOR SELF-RESPECTING HINDUS, WAS GANDHI.
i watch this movie oct 2and Jan 30😊😊😊😊.in fact every so often although I disapprove of him at many places like khilafat ,his sex experiment with young women in latter part of his life .and more ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Those people who praised netaji, they should know about Japanese history in ww2 or what happened in andman and Nicobar. Then they should talk about it. I am not against Netaji. But I think captured whole india militarily is impossible. It required money, manpower, weapons against most powerful empire at that time.
There was no other alternative. Hitler lost. Stalin soviet union was very apathetic. Rest of global south was weak and poor. The white people were ruling the world that time and they are doing today as well. Why haven't things changed. When will the underdog rise.
@@GN-ek9dtStay away from Whatsapp, I know it's already impossible for you. 😂 Please don't stay clueless about things and make remarks regarding that thinking you know something that the row doesn't know 🙏
मनीनिय मोदी जी ने इस मूवी को 2024 में देखा और बोले गांधी को इस फिल्म से पहले कोई नही जानता था , जिस व्यक्ति को अल्बर्ट आइंस्टाइन , चार्ली चैपलिन ,नेल्सन मंडेला ना जाने कितने लोगो ने गांधी को जानते थे और उन्हें समझते थे और ना जाने कितने देशों में मोदी जी खुद उनकी प्रतिमाओं पे फूल चढ़ाते हुए दिखे हा कुछ खामियां गांधी में जरूर थी पर इंसान कोई हो वो मुकम्मल नही होता वो एक आदर्श व्यक्ति और महान इंसान थे ....
Tagore nicknamed Gandhi for his character, Mahatma / great soul, AND Gandhi in return nicknamed Tagore for his philosophies, Gurudev / above Gods in heaven! P.S.: 1)1980 jag., truth revealed, and remembering 1978 Kraftwerk / Ecoeat, divided blue, Gandhi film made; 2)NDTV Monidipa Banerjee, 1980 jag. woman substitute, also 'The Statesman' newspaper for it was ex-CM Jyoti Basu's supporter / Pronnoy's favourite CM, got a chance in the above electronic media...even ABP Ananda Sumon De is Rocky-Ricky(latter, child abuse) uncle Bapi's substitute / tabalists Samta Prasad-Kishan Maharaj,- Maa / mothers give birth, made career... Calcutta Judges Avijit / J.C.Bose, Sinha / Dipankar Sinha(Gasper U Horey Sinha), Delhi Judge Chandrachur / SXC Chandrachur Bhattacharya(Mr.Samajpati's chanachur)... actually Blamegame / Ecoeat 1978,- Man revealed / revenge infinite!! "Jobless-ed, blue base-BOX". Kolkata, India, & SHARE globally.😢😢
It's so sad, that not even once, the great Netaji Shubhas Chandra Bose was shown as a character in this movie.. And finally for whom, India became free along with other real freedom fighters.
Netaji had his own struggle and most of it was independent of Gandhi's involvement. Why would he be shown here then? There is a separate movie that depicts his struggle and in that movie Gandhi is likewise not glorified more than what Bose himself did.
strictly as a film ..it is a good movie...I mean acting direction camera editing and so on... but this movie doesn't tell the whole truth about gandhi.. I read the disclaimer given at the beginning that it won't be possible to cover it all... I will elaborate... there was violent revolution going on parallel.... mostly unsuccessful. but youth was getting attracted to such movement.. people like bhagat singh , chandrashekhar azad etc.. so while describing non-violence why didn't director mentioned what was the violence that gandhi was opposing and insists on non-violence.. not a single scene about such huge movement going on parallel.. britishers used gandhi to divert attention from revolutionary movements.. gandhi was parachuted leader ..didn't born out of soil..he traveled extensively on the behest of mr gokhale and understood the pulse of the nation.. he had good knowledge about the british laws.. he knew it very well where it hurts to government and so where to a pinch...all said.. britishers also knew their laws and playing chess moves ... who won and who lost ?? I leave it up to you to decide...
Opinion may vary, one may like gandhiji or dislike him but By the time movie concludes, surely we all would not like seeing gandhiji walking out of the birla bhawan and suddenly being killed... Rest in peace gandhiji 🙏💐 May you always be remembered. Sept. 16,2024 @01:32 am
Do anybody know it was a 5 hour long movie.....i still remmember.....so many scenes cut short....and also searched in the internet nowhere to be found.....such a shame.....it was worth every second...they should have kept it 5 hours long
please tell me You know what you are talking about. Because most political idiots I've seen, are clueless about Netaji. Do you know about how he valued Gandhi? do you know anything concrete about their respective struggles and their relation as Free Men?
Those people who praised netaji, they should know about Japanese history in ww2 or what happened in andman or Nicobar. Then they should talk about it. I am not against Netaji. But I think captured whole india militarily is impossible. It required money, manpower, weapons against most powerful empire at that time.
@jaygagare4333 Brother Lakhs of Indians died during Bengal famine and Partition, Lakhs got displaced (Whole population was merely around 30cr ) , Lost their everything , Who was responsible for that ? And you are still concerned about the cruelties that could have done by Japs If they concurred India .. Hypocrisy ka bhi seema hoti
strictly as a film ..it is a good movie...I mean acting direction camera editing and so on... but this movie doesn't tell the whole truth about gandhi.. I read the disclaimer given at the beginning that it won't be possible to cover it all... I will elaborate... there was violent revolution going on parallel.... mostly unsuccessful. but youth was getting attracted to such movement.. people like bhagat singh , chandrashekhar azad etc.. so while describing non-violence why didn't director mentioned what was the violence that gandhi was opposing and insists on non-violence.. not a single scene about such huge movement going on parallel.. britishers used gandhi to divert attention from revolutionary movements.. gandhi was parachuted leader ..didn't born out of soil..he traveled extensively on the behest of mr gokhale and understood the pulse of the nation.. he had good knowledge about the british laws.. he knew it very well where it hurts to government and so where to a pinch...all said.. britishers also knew their laws and playing chess moves ... who won and who lost ?? I leave it up to you to decide...
This movie doesn't mention or shed a spot of light on Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose and his efforts to Free India..He was the one who made the British understand that they can't remain in power in India any more. This movie ignores Netaji to its entirety...which is harmful omission facts and distortion of history.
Movie showed us why he is called Mahatma Gandhi. No one in our country understood us Indians as Gandhiji did. He used his popularity to stop the riots and unite people 🙏🙏🙏 Great leaders, great people, and what a great generation that was.
1982. Film. Gandhi. Released . Got best film award given by Hollywood/Oscar award. Salute to sir Richard attonbourgh. 22 years he was busy making this Gandhi film. Great efforts . I saw this film with family in poona (maharashtra). Rahul 70mm. Theatre. Some angles till I remembered well .art director top. Make up man. All actors . My salute. Vk. Thanks. 19. 8. 23.
Gandhi in a movie is like any other Hero who dodges bullets by ducking. If you think about it, Gandhi came to India in 1913 and was still struggling until 1945, when WW2 eventually made the British leave. But Gandhi is great photo ops material
Maturity is when you realise that Independence is not given ,but taken. No one has gain independence by non violence, It was Subhash Chandra Bose who led the Independence war and out the final nail in the coffin for the British Empire in India.. Let that seep in
India got Independence because UK was broke after WWII. Without the War, India would had gained independence may be way later in the 60s or 70s may be led by Netaji or Gandhi Whoever. People are right in hating him for favouring the Muslims, but saying that he didn't do anything for our country is utter stupidity. The fact is none of us have the courage to do even 1% of what He and Netaji did but it is easy to hate them.
@@sumanthasaha61he was half baked for sure Why He says he would not agree to verses of Geeta which asks to fight against oppression and injustice and kill anyone who stole ur land ur womenfolk and try to lit fire your house This is a universal system of justice and self perseverance He taught non violence only to Hindus and despite of all his postures muslims never agreed to this You hanged Godse since he killed Gandhi Who has to be hanged for killings of millions of people Is comman man's life is cheap than Gandhi's
@@nikhilhembrom8952 he left his civil service job and risked his life and made huge efforts And Nehru who could not get enough votes to be elected as leader of congress Blackmailed Gandhi for president post so that he can be PM
@@KaveriSangar woh toh jab lawyer tha south africa mein tab pehenta tha. 1915 se ardha-nanga ghumna shuru kar diya. Adhe nange hote hue bhi Paris aur London gaye . Tujh se kabhi ho payega yeh? Violence toh main karti nahi. Protest karna , hadtal karna yeh bhi non violence ka example hain. Indigeneous industries ko badawa dena yeh bhi unke acche vicharo mein se ek hain. Bandook lekar toh nahi ghumne wali bina license ke main😆 ya khali legislative assembly mein bomb fekkar wahi khadi nahi rehne wali.
@@PriyankaDas-gj5gs voh chodo Gandhi ji ko unke chamche puri india ki khbr time to time btatate the to jab Bhagat Singh , sukhdev aur rajguru ko fasi milne vali thi tb voh chamche kha gye the .... Voh chahte to bacha sakte the na chalo samja voh hinsa ko badhava ni dete the to ahinsa k dvara bhi bha skte the fir bhi kyun ni bachaya....🙄
he was NOT a mahatma or such. he was very much human with human flaws. the only difference is that he had the brains to see an opportunity, the feasibility of the former and its execution (or not).
@@baajey For that matter you are not going to accept that anybody is great. Even Einstein in your eyes is some chap who just happened to stumble upon the most elegant equation. When you or I couldn't, and someone else could, is what makes them stand apart from us.
strictly as a film ..it is a good movie...I mean acting direction camera editing and so on... but this movie doesn't tell the whole truth about gandhi.. I read the disclaimer given at the beginning that it won't be possible to cover it all... I will elaborate... there was violent revolution going on parallel.... mostly unsuccessful. but youth was getting attracted to such movement.. people like bhagat singh , chandrashekhar azad etc.. so while describing non-violence why didn't director mentioned what was the violence that gandhi was opposing and insists on non-violence.. not a single scene about such huge movement going on parallel.. britishers used gandhi to divert attention from revolutionary movements.. gandhi was parachuted leader ..didn't born out of soil..he traveled extensively on the behest of mr gokhale and understood the pulse of the nation.. he had good knowledge about the british laws.. he knew it very well where it hurts to government and so where to a pinch...all said.. britishers also knew their laws and playing chess moves ... who won and who lost ?? I leave it up to you to decide...@@baajey
@@yuvaraj80 strictly as a film ..it is a good movie...I mean acting direction camera editing and so on... but this movie doesn't tell the whole truth about gandhi.. I read the disclaimer given at the beginning that it won't be possible to cover it all... I will elaborate... there was violent revolution going on parallel.... mostly unsuccessful. but youth was getting attracted to such movement.. people like bhagat singh , chandrashekhar azad etc.. so while describing non-violence why didn't director mentioned what was the violence that gandhi was opposing and insists on non-violence.. not a single scene about such huge movement going on parallel.. britishers used gandhi to divert attention from revolutionary movements.. gandhi was parachuted leader ..didn't born out of soil..he traveled extensively on the behest of mr gokhale and understood the pulse of the nation.. he had good knowledge about the british laws.. he knew it very well where it hurts to government and so where to a pinch...all said.. britishers also knew their laws and playing chess moves ... who won and who lost ?? I leave it up to you to decide...
Ben Kingsley should have resided in India after doing this role since a great courage is required to disintegrate oneself from the character earned by this role. Gandhi is God.
25:30 this is the Toilet/Latrine used by all these people, living there as a community, isnt it ? And Gandhi explains, everybody who uses the Toilet/Latrine take turns in keeping it clean! Isn't it quite explanatory ? And it was his wife Kasturba Gandhi, who discriminates the work, taking pride in saying, it is the profession of the Untouchables ? Why ? And she says 'Gandhi is afterall a Human', is she not a Human then ?! Why must the Untouchables be it man or woman, clean other peoples' Poop, Urine, Vomits, Blood, Sanitary Napkins, Public Sanitation Facilities, the Dead & the Decomposed ? While the privileged class of people themselves, Individually cannot clean their own buttocks properly or let alone their Individual Families' or Communities sanitation facility clean !? Time & again, isnt this the problem, Cleanliness ?
1956 Lord Clement Attlee came to India for his tour & stayed in house of then acting governor of Bengal justice PB Chakraborty. PB Chakraborty asked that since 1942 Quit India Movement was totally suppressed & in 1945 Allied Forces emerged Victorious. Then why Britishers left India in 1947, the reason is the mutiny in Royal Navy & Royal Airforce & Army . INA led by Bose succeed to erase the loyalty among British Indian Soldiers that led to force Britishers if they didn't not leave India then there were the same circumstances as happened in 1857 revolt .
India, a country divided by religions, regions, caste, creed and social hierarchy, was 'united' and brought together for the 'first time' as 'one nation' where the poor walked with the rich, the Hindu walked with the Muslim, the untouchable walked with the brahmin, shoulder to shoulder, under the divine guidance of Mahatma Gandhi, to launch the 'largest human non violent- non cooperation movement' against the most powerful Empire in the World.
What more can be said about the tyrannies of the oppressively tyrant British Rule in the undivided subcontinent of India that isn't already known to the people of this country ? ! ! ! ! ! Let's Celebrate Our Freedom Today And Everyday.
Its coz of the British that India is inclined on moving towards a modern civilization today, they did more good than bad for India's intellectual progress
Why is this film edited ? and made shorter ? why is the first attempt of gandhi Killing removed from this which is part of Richard Attenbourg main film Main film
Gandhi Brahmachariya Experiment with Manu Behin who was considered to be his great grand daughter . Now why Gandhi ji kept on sleeping naked with her , i don't understand .
strictly as a film ..it is a good movie...I mean acting direction camera editing and so on... but this movie doesn't tell the whole truth about gandhi.. I read the disclaimer given at the beginning that it won't be possible to cover it all... I will elaborate... there was violent revolution going on parallel.... mostly unsuccessful. but youth was getting attracted to such movement.. people like bhagat singh , chandrashekhar azad etc.. so while describing non-violence why didn't director mentioned what was the violence that gandhi was opposing and insists on non-violence.. not a single scene about such huge movement going on parallel.. britishers used gandhi to divert attention from revolutionary movements.. gandhi was parachuted leader ..didn't born out of soil..he traveled extensively on the behest of mr gokhale and understood the pulse of the nation.. he had good knowledge about the british laws.. he knew it very well where it hurts to government and so where to a pinch...all said.. britishers also knew their laws and playing chess moves ... who won and who lost ?? I leave it up to you to decide...
A finely made film but very poor history. Essentially a work of propaganda much the same as Jud Suss. And like all well made propaganda it stirs emotions.
42:04 during the British Era, on what basis where human beings chosen/hired to work in the mines or ship building or manufacturing of machineries, tools and weapons ?
1:41:04 wow this was a Time period when people didn't know how to dispose old clothes and make way for new clothes ? because if the people hadn't done this historic act of burning clothes, the economy would have stagnated👀 and people wouldn't have found much work to do in the villages apart from agriculture/crop harvest/cook food/eat and repeat! Industrial Technology Revolution, what are you upto Teaching me now😑🤯! Come on people, clear out the old and make way for new things.
@@ungarbagebin murder is crime no matter what colour of skin or what nationality you belong to. There is no justification for killing innocent people who wished for freedom and wanted to treated as human beings
@@finnypaul7748 I agree. I was just stating why nobody remembers this. Indians back then were and perhaps still are very insignificant compared to the Jewish fraternity
@@ungarbagebin Indians insignificant? Half the British army who fought in ww1 and ww2 were Indians . Indians provided aid men to the so called western society..Britain industrial revolution was financed by the depredation of India . Great Britain became great because of India now it's just uk
