" Gender Equality: A Fascinating Interview with Jordan Peterson 

Wonderful 👍

Me too

@@maryandmartinwood5407I would love to spend the night with him 😍

❤️❤️❤️❤️👍

@@newmindset20 The woman looks at Jordan Peterson like a child who doesn't have any idea what the adult is saying. Priceless!!

@@autodidact537 🤣🤣🤣👏

She looks at Jordan Peterson like a child does when it has no idea what an adult is saying.

Exactly LOL! and this is the case in most interviews he gives. People are trying desperately to find a flaw in what he's saying and most of the time it's because they don't understand what he's saying. Like here, the concept of equality of outcome was not fully understood and led to empty arguments.

Yes and your ability to question is evident through the doubt in your spirit of the comment but certainly not of any help positive or negative

Goes to show how much she DIDN'T have to do to get to where she is.. She thinks it's just a matter of "encouragement".

I think in this case the problem was mostly language, with a smidgen of doctrine. Its a calm and reflected conversation, I believe they were talking a bit past each other. Everyone obviously believed that equality of opportunity was a good thing, but it can be challenging to part equality of outcome from that. Also, the focus on equality in scandinavian countries is so heacy, that I am sure a lot of people "hear" "but most girls should be nurses", when Peterson is talking. Which is not what he is saying. Statistics and data can be hard, and you have to know it to understand it. Also, its particularly hard to keep an open mind when you are talking about something that might go on accord with your own personal morals and/or beliefs.

🤣

Luke Franklin...So Cathy Newman's first language is not the purest Queen's English?

@@sivaratnamasabaratnam8946 Cathy Newman wasn’t there. It was a Scandinavian audience and panel. It appeared to me, they thought he was against giving women equal opportunity, because he is against trying to force equal outcomes. Women, generally don’t want to be brick layers, electricians or plumbers. This panel seems to feel it has nothing to do with biology.

No. It had nothing to do with any language barrier. We understand English perfectly well in Norway and Sweden. The problem is that the interviewer is simply not very bright. The Woman is a radical and narcissistic Swedish politician who can never admit that she’s wrong.

@@Carl_Isaksson You certainly know better than us. I used to look at your countries enviously. Was life too good there that these radicals decided to make life more difficult? I didn’t know how deeply wokeness infected your countries. Not yet as bad as the US, where a transgender man pretending to be a 11 year old girl has a meeting with the President.

@@Carl_Isaksson thanks for that ‘insider’s’ perspective. So she was intentionally not willing to buy into his unequal outcomes theory. Interesting !

It's not that they don't understand, it's that they just aren't listening. They think it's just his opinion.

They stare at Jordan Peterson like children do when they have no idea what an adult is saying.

🤣🤣🤣🤣

It was fair that she was given a chance to speak though.

I think I should raise my kids to become trees 😂

@@newmindset20 and sue whoever says that they won't be able to grow apples from their ears if they wish to

@@reinaldogomes8666 agree 👍

😂😂😂😂 I don't know

Probably because she actually has seen a decent man for the first time in her entire life... and thus, realizes that everything up to this point in her life was not as amazing as she thought!

Programming malfunctioning

This Swedish woman was virtually in tears because in just a few minutes Jordan Peterson completely demolished her ultra-liberal, left-wing, neo-Marxist, WOKE world view on the so-called, tyrannical, patriarchal, issue of gender inequality. She lives totally within the bubble of the most socially engineered country on the planet, Sweden, which has done everything conceivable, by law, to eliminate the differences between men, & women. Then, Jordan Peterson explains that 100% of the available research, conducted in virtually every industrialized country on the planet over the past 25 years (to include Sweden), said research executed according to the best scientific principles known to exist; *ALL* comes to the same conclusion. *MEN* & *WOMEN* are *DIFFERENT,* and no amount of social engineering, nor laws passed, nor quotas mandated; can force the average (98%) woman to choose a career path whereby she will choose to work in certain, male-dominated, jobs. The 1%-2% of women who do choose to work in those types of jobs are statistical outliers, and simply cannot be held up as an effective argument for the liberal WOKE ideology concerning gender equality. To further demolish the myth that women simply need a chance to be educated, and participate in jobs that historically have been occupied by men; he chooses two jobs that utterly destroy the liberal argument regarding gender inequality. The first job is nursing where men, at least in the United States, are often paid substantially more than women due to their superior upper body strength. Yet, statistically there are very few male nurses. In the United States the percentage is 9% of the nurses with actual nursing degrees. In Sweden, the percentage ranges from 12%-13%. In the most socially engineered country on the planet, only 3%-4% more men are *WILLING* to become nurses, than in the United States with its significantly higher number of nurses. The second job is engineering, where a man's superior upper body strength plays no role at all. Engineering is an intellectual job, not a physical job. Yet, in Sweden, only 25% of engineers are women, while in the United States the percentage is actually just slightly higher at a 28% average across all engineering fields. Both examples offered by Peterson in his rebuttal to gender inequality show that men won't willing choose to work in a profession for which they are tempermentally not suited, regardless of the pay incentives. The same thing applies to women, who are simply not tempermentally suited towards certain professions. The temperment issue completely ignores the superior upper body strength that gives even the shortest, slightest, lightest, and weakest man a distinct advantage over a woman. Which, is why it should be illegal for *ANY* biological man masquerading as a woman, to compete in women's sports. Thus far, no female teenaged athlete, once puberty sets in for both girls & boys, has been able to successfully compete against her sports peers that are males. The advanced musculature, the bone structure designed by GOD for the attachment of heavier & stronger muscles, and the testosterone flowing though a boys bloodstream make him a superior athlete when competing one-on-one against a similarly sized girl.

And it’s all you have in convoluted situations.

On the contrary, I think you’re right. Still, many other programs Jordan has been on has featured at least one person who has tried to paint him as some sort of bigot, so to those of us who know him well it shouldn’t be surprising that this interviewer might’ve seen him as a potential threat to his map of meaning. I think the same goes especially for the lady.

noticed 😂😂 thank you ❤

because its stupid (just like the sub titling software) lol

Interesting 🤔

Tests evaluating the GENERAL TENDENCIES of males and females show a marked preference and aptitude toward certain tasks which are at least in part BIOLOGICAL and part SOCIETAL. Simply meaning that although each sex can adapt and develop certain skills they would not normally possess it does not mean they can perform them equally well in all scenarios.

Yes some boys are encouraged to behave like women and end up mentally ill

That is the test he was referring to. That is exactly what they did in the Scandinavian countries.

I think the differences between you and your husband are the exception not the rule. If I look at all the close friends I have had in my life and their relationships with their significant others, all in traditional heterosexual relationships, what Dr Peterson describes is the norm without a doubt. In your case I might surmise that your husband is more effeminate than the average male as one possible explanation. It's an interesting discussion regardless.

😂😂😂😂 agree

Absolutely right

They are all sponsored by King Karl Gustav,Rockfeller,Lyric Thompson's foundations! They don't stand on their own feet,only by proxy!