Genesis, this movie entirely made by AI, 4K 

Well, not actual "people."

So... what are they?

@@grazynaczyjt7162 There is no “they.” It’s just generated image.

​@@grazynaczyjt7162 faces made by ai.

Its AI made by AI

Wait till this time next year. People don't understand exponential growth, we're almost at the singularity.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-q07JOe7hFr4.htmlsi=VAcDG_cdbBt5zwpy

Uncanny Valley

I dont know. Humans by themselves have done endless atrocities to other humans for eons. That was pretty soulless. I consider this an upgrade

​@@a-walpatches6460no we're not. You don't understand.

Too late! "aI evolves and..." Is told "kill all humans" is how that sentence ends.

Too late. 🤖🤖🖖🤖🤖

​@@calvingrondahl1011 Seems to be Unfair😢

I think you got that 1000% backwards. This is actually AI giving humans ideas and vision. The only thing which freaks humans out is the ominous music. If it was replaced with happy music, then humans would completely chill on this great idea.

​@@paultoensing3126 Especially cinema is made with comprimises, the soul and the skill of every single people involved in it. A.I is just making it poorer as the industrialisation impoverished architecture.

Here's me looking for the cameraman's reflection in her shiny suit.

correct. also: it sucks

@@SometimesYouNeed It must scare the industry.

@@SometimesYouNeed that's my whole point

Read this in calvin's voice

haha spoke too soon

AI movies are at its infancy, this is just the beginning

@@Anonymous-iw4hx Actually, it's not the beginning. There are no A.I. movies. This, is shiny crap. The generated text is Pure Drivel. Shifting (obviously) generated voices doesn't help to disguise that much. It's not "realistic" in the sense of "photo realistic." It look like CGI. Which it is. But it's not designed and produced by people, using CGI film making technology. It's a realistic-looking imitation of THAT, for a few seconds at a time. But it get more unrealistic the more times it runs out of "compute" power, and has to switch to another "realistic" looking imitation of "real" CGI. But it's not the infancy of AI movies. It's the stretched limits. Being patched together. And faked through. Just to reach a barely sub-trailer/teaser length, but running out of "convince" before reaching the first minute. And that is stretching the limits of what can be powered. The root of the problem is that while companies like AMD and Intel have managed to roughly double the performance of their CPUs and GPUs every 2.4 years, and companies like HPE, Atos, and Lenovo have achieved similar gains roughly every 1.2 years at the system level, power efficiency is lagging behind. Citing the performance and efficiency figures gleaned from the top supercomputers, AMD says gigaflops per watt is doubling roughly every 2.2 years, about half the pace the systems are growing. Assuming this trend continues unchanged, AMD estimates that we'll achieve a zettaflop-class supercomputer in about 10-years give or take. For reference, the US powered on its first exascale supercomputer, Oak Ridge National Laboratory's Frontier system, last year. A supercomputer capable of a zettaflop of FP64 performance would be 1,000x more powerful. To AMD's credit, its estimate for when we'll cross the zettaflop barrier is at least a little more conservative than Intel's rather hyperbolic claims that it'd cross that threshold by 2027. What's more, the AMD CEO says such a machine won't exactly be practical unless compute architectures get drastically more efficient and soon. If things continue on their current trajectory, AMD estimates that a zettaflop-class supercomputer would need somewhere in the neighborhood of 500 megawatts of power. "That's probably too much"... "That's on the scale of what a nuclear power plant would be." "This flattening of efficiency becomes the largest challenge that we have to solve, both from a technology standpoint as well as from a sustainability standpoint." Part of the problem facing chipmakers is the means they've traditionally relied on to achieve generational efficiency gains are becoming less effective. Echoing Nvidia's leather jacket aficionado and CEO Jensen Huang, Moore's Law is slowing down. "It's getting much, much harder to get density performance as well as efficiency" out of smaller process tech. "As we get into the advanced nodes, we still see improvements, but those improvements are at a much slower pace," referencing efforts to shrink process tech much beyond 5nm or even 3nm. But, if we do get to a nuclear power plant-fueled, zettaflop-class 500 megawatt enabled post "infancy" "AI Movie," it will still be only about two minutes closer, from what THIS is, to an imitation of this: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-hoW_ZLYNb2M.htmlsi=M97AcubRpc0fRCHe

​@@AxVxIyes it is literally the infancy of ai movies just like the infancy of ai images which turned into now indistinguishable from photographs. LOL. "stretched limits". are you smoking buddy? sora from open ai is laughing at your sorry ass. 😂. it destroys cgi. some videos look like it was shot on a camera. get back to sleep before you spew bs.. you are one of the ai deniers that will keep getting debunked over and over.

MovieLLM

hmm I don't think we need any help destroying ourselves, we've had that covered

​@@batterbatterswing ...we're still here, wise guy

Pretty much with much shame long remembered lol

My brother it's literally just copying people That's how it works

​@@BisexualPlagueDoctorJust stealing, stealing, stealing, smacking it together and pretending to be something new

@@joelrobinson5457 there's too much media to genuinely expect something brand new when it comes to movie tropes or ideas. Yes, a unique movie can be made, but good luck finding something unique to build it off of

@@BisexualPlagueDoctor there's a difference in inspiration, or ripping someone else's work

Give AI time. It's barely been born. Rome wasn't built in a day. Neither was Sy-RA-cuse!* *Shemp Howard

for now

Definitely not a "movie" as described in the title

Yes!

Klaus Schwab is Rothschild right ?

😂😂😂

AND YOU WILL BE HAPPY !!!

@@gabluz What does that even mean? Sounds like someone who is sore afeard.

@@paultoensing3126 yes, I noticed that in you. You can always go to a doctor.

@@gabluz Well in an AI world you can always go to a doctor. In a human driven world, where maximising shareholder value is the prime goal and medical insurance is out of reach, not everyone can afford it.

@@paultoensing3126 so go, since you live in an AI world. It should be easy for you since people who are woke usually live an illusion.

​@@gabluzif race and gender equality and prevention of war is woke, is that something you would be against? Kind regards from the Netherlands

exactly.

Precisely

It's the beginning. Look for Sora.

It's like any other voiceover video on YT

What?

nature is analog.

But it does, since we are part of it....

AI doesn't pay taxes, mourn the dead or feed a family

Just keep holding on buddy, just keep holding on.

You are right, That's the true purpose of AI-driven tools, to enhance and empower everyone. For the most part, technology benefited humanity historically.

and then visual entertainment will die, if it becomes so easy for anyone to do it

@@gregorybird7066 well video not kill the radio, tv still alive even with internet dominate. those entertainment industry wont die sooner, they will adapt for sure.

Да уж, это было бы здорово - в одиночку забацать свой полнометражный художественный фильм!

AI Family Guy is for you.

Uh no.

Star Trek isn’t reality. Humans and war is their culture. Humans that manipulate machines to complete that war. Humans are the problem. Another catalyst in the system of decay.

A.I. knows.... waaaaaat's uuuuuup!! 😄

Ai models trained by available data collected from humans, tell a lot about how humans think 😂

Why would someone want to listen to a song made by AI? As long as it sounds good to the ears right? Yeah, same to the eyes and the storyline is uplifting.

the new dlc and all the stuff they added kicks butt.

yeah and the the story is about humanity being destroyed and rebuilt in a way that concentrates wealth and control. Sigh.

Because this kind of "art" can only steal other peoples ideas and images and edits them, it does not CREATE NEW ART

@@gregorybird7066 all depends on training data, there was way too much female stuff in this data, so we get mostly robots with big tits. to get all the hardware in ? "the new adam and eve..." there were only eve's, kathleen kennedy's wet dreams.

then there is the fact there is 7 billion people. make ANY face and there is 10 people that look just like it. when i went to europe i seen countless people that looked exactly like people back home. boy was i surprised when my cousin walked into the public bathroom in belgium exact duplicate. just seen him before i left across the ocean LOL. how u get here! one is insane. in switzerland i seen 4 people walking. looks like exactly the same 4 back home that always hung out together, and one had a unusual features like 6.4 and very skinny, what are the odds 4 people exactly the same, with extreme features. couldnt believe it.

I wonder if they got permission of any sort to use the likeness of real living actors? This is what the recent Actors' Strike was all about.

the mixed memories of a surrogate ia de facto ...