Maybe it’s the mantle that’s shifting,,when it comes to the Milankovitch cycles,,what leads the spin,what has more inertia,,the inner core +liquid or the mantle ? how does a dynamo flip polarity?
What generates earth magnetic field, is the earth core a permanent magnet or electromagnet? If it is an em, where does the electric current come from? How do we deduce there is an iron core or magnetic core inside the planet? From the energy balance point of view, there must be some energy input to enable earth rotation or earth inner core rotation. Where does the energy come from? Gravity or from the sun?
The AI, US and Russian Governments are all betting on Doug Vogt being right. Diehold Foundation, series 4, watch them all. For a modelled demonstration of a polar reversal of the kind we are about to witness, see MarkoPL100 - his 4 minute demonstration video gives an insight into what happens to our planet. ESA SWARM meeting in Copenhagen April 2024 - discussing the weakening of the magnetosphere as we continue to enjoy the lecture…
What about interactions with the sun‘s magnetic field, which flips every 11 years or so? Can the dynamics of a magnetic flip be influenced by the sun during a period when the earth’s magnetic field is meta stabile ?
Appears as if it's influenced by The large scale galactic current sheet. we travel through that zone every 12,500 years or so. Their is a ton of evidence that it influences our magneticfield, orbit, spin direction, vulcanism and plate tectonic disturbances and our core directly. It Sounds crazy huh? Specially if you arnt at all familiar with the evidence of these cyclical occurrences and the seemingly catastrophic implications. You should take a look into the subject.
i don't understand how the reply you received from REX MUNDI is relevant to your comment. i especially find it difficult to put much value in a reply from one who doesn't know the difference between there and their. this value is further diminished when i discover the lack of knowledge of how to contract are not as aren't. i would like to hear the perspective on this from someone who went to the degree of effort as that Maurice Cotterell has done to find an answer for this phenomenon. ✌️🐝➕️
During the initial phases of the arrival of the full effects, communication with your chosen affiliates is going to be advantageous - crucial, as nothing can be completely planned/prepared for and you can bet that most things will have unexpected set backs and/or unexpected problems. Now presuming you're in a lucky location that is spared from the more devastating consequences, I'm wondering which modes of communication may still be temporarily feasible? Ie: Any Radio bands/frequencies expected to possibly hold up under the massively disrupted ionosphere?
How does this model account for variations in the actual structure of the inside of the earth. For instance the south Atlantic anomaly - core mantle located 1800 miles beneath southern Africa?
@@GwladYrHaf So their is another blob phenomena under china? its very interesting to know that the magnetic fields of the earth is strongly influence by the movements of this blobs. what could they be, is part of evolutionary process of earths layers?
A man o faith, is a man with freedom. A man fighting for his faith, is a martyr. we stand, we fight, we never let go, because our lord gave his life for us, and we give our life for the lord. His time is coming, and we pave the way not with bones and lies. but with truth, the gospel, and his promisies revealed to the saints and all reborn in him. in sin or in holyness we hang on, weather were dirty or clean, we seek his plight. We are the true ancients, generations to adam and eve, not in the flesh or blood, but by the same spirit the carried christ up into the clouds and beyond the heavens. heathens will mingle with the seed of man, but their spirit shall not cleave with the words of god.
The entire construction of this lecture is predicated on a belief, and not on an empirical fact. Mathematics are so easy to make pyramids of untruths with, and it is very seductive to allow the subconscious mind to be drawn into this fantasy especially as it tickles the vanities of both mathematicians, and theorists . May I suggest that there is at least one way to begin this sort of lecture, which will not drift into the unreal, or the theoretical, but will stay with feet firmly on the ground of the empirical, and practical , and not allow the lecturer to float off into vanities constructed out of the mere simulacrum of truth, and that is to conduct a definitive ,scalable, repeatable, experiment. We are assured by those who profess to know the truth, that at the centre of the earth, there are materials undefined, which are the cause of magnetism, which manifests itself as moving compasses on the surface of earth in certain manner. In simple terms, the compass points or directs us towards a " north" or "south" and all points between. We are told that the reason for this is that the earth has a magnetic field, which the compass needle follows, wherever it is located. Furthermore, it is said that the metallic elements contained at the core of this earth, are molten, or at very high temperature, which in itself causes some sceptics to argue that molten metallic elements can not set up a magnetic flux of any kind. If we were to take a gobbet of molten iron, and pour it into a hollow ceramic globe, which could be suspended from a filament and this could be spun at any speed whilst magnetic sensors were placed in situ that would detect a magnetic flux, then the proof would follow the experiment. Why is it that this has not been done under impartial observation, and repeated to prove the theory, which until proven can not be referred to as a fact. When fact proves a theory, then we can call the experiment successful, but until then, these ideas are nothing more than informed opinion, and the world is presently saturated with informed opinion, which is in many cases not worth wasting time listening to, but it is entertaining to witness the act of tapestry being woven, even if it is full of holes.
Yes, minimal effect,but not as important as the solar wind forcing down on our mag field, and the suns magnetic fields forcing or entangling themselves to our magnetic field. The fact that this guy did not mention the Suns effect on the earth and other planets magnetic fields, as well as the effects of our galaxy's magnetic fields on our solar system, makes me doubt his premises. But all in all, this was a good enough presentation to get me to wonder and research on my own
question. he said when astronauts fly over the south Atlantic anomaly that they can see stars and a few other things. does eye sight improve or is the brain affected by this region. what changes are taking place when we fly over this area ?
I'm sorry, but there is no need for currents on the order of giga amps to produce geomagnetism. All you need to do is have moving electrical charges. A recent scientific publication (2023) on the "Origin of Geomagnetism" shows "A New Hypothesis to Fully Justify the Generation, Maintenance and Behavior of Geomagnetism". Just search.
Four billion years ago the Moon was around ten times closer to the Earth than it is today. I wonder what influence the ancient Moon's tidal force had on magma current flows within the early Earth?
I had a hard time finding this link. It is the SETI talks Archives sorted by topic. This should be easier to find: www.seti.org/seti-institute/about-seti/weekly-lectures/subject/31
The electromagnetic field of earth it's in constant interaction with the electromagnetic field of human beings, flora, fauna and atmosphere. Less oil Less temperature, inside, cities specially big ones concentrate a lot of electromagnetism. We should measure that, location, flows, interactions. Etc
You need to visit the Thunderbolts project.......I enjoyed the video but Mars does have a field ad the only reason Venus doesn't is because it still thinks it is a comet.....wait....
This is bunk and this man knows it professor Robert Coe of Santa Cruz university discovered in 1980 from Stein Mountain that the last polar reversal only took 80 years and again a team from France, Italy, Columbia University AND BERKELEY UNIVERSITY IN 2014 rediscovered the exact information that professor Coe did in a dried lake bed in Italy the paper on this can be found in Berkeley News issue October14 2014 author Robert Sanders , earth magnetic feild could flip within a human lifetime is the title of the article .
@@CherishedChristianLife what's terrible me calling out this charlatan, the lies this charlatan is putting out or that in about 2011 NOAA declared that we officially started a magnetic pole shift and knowing that it could happen in as little as 80 years is a scary thought because there is evidence now that there can be extinction level of geological upheaval with such events ! I'm not sure what you are referring to as terrible ?
@@CherishedChristianLife fuzz this is a YT site that has a tun of good information on the subject is he right 100% no but the most informed that I found . It's not guaranteed that it will be a disaster there apeers to be a thing called an excursion that the poles do from time to time that has no real effects I personally believe that they have traveled to far for it to be that we will know for sure in the next 4-5 years as to how drastic it may be . The magnetic north pole has just about a year ago past the geological north pole and is heading towards the Indian Ocean where the south pole is heading also . If we start seeing drastic problems in the crust then my suggestion is to locate the nearest cavern system in a set of old mountains not young ons they may not be stable and make your way there . Must be in mountains because the size of possible tidal waves could be stupendous we are talking flowing over cities like you step on ants and there is evidence of this type of activity in the past . So there's no reason to be worried about it if it happens have a plan you may survive you may not but there is absolutely nothing we can do to prevent it so no sense in worrying about it . This is why the fake global warming is pushed to keep us occupied and focused on something that they tell us we can do something about so that we don't panic. So don't panic it will do no good . Stay calm get informed make your best plan hope for the best and maybe it will be all for not .
minimum 2 things, that do not match the model: 1) Magnetism: if there would build up magnetic dipoles because of convection, there should be rejection as well as attraction, meaning, that if the typical flow of liquid ores is to the outside, most dipoles should point to the outside as well - but their end then must reject/repulse each other thus that the center would be hollow. The earth should be hollow! 2) Liquid core? How? The more you get further to the earths center, the higher is the weight/pressure on the whatever matter. Because liquid ores are lighter (less dense) than solid ones, the inner core must be solid if consisting of iron (remember: water is special, a exception, behaving reciprocal, it is liquid in its most dense state, while all other matter is solid in its densest state!!!). If the inner earth is liquid ore, the more dense and thus heavier crust must dive into the liquid core, the lighter molten/fluid iron should flow on the crust, on the tectonic plates and flood those, because it is lighter in weight - the plates should be buried under the liquid iron/ liquid ores!
I'm a hollow earther,aside from my beliefs I do believe the most current theory is that the core is a bunch of iron-ish crystals. That move with eachother.
Earth's magnetosphere is a general relativistic phenomena. First; 2:43 good illustration showing that matter stratifies by density within a gravity well. From the our atmosphere to the center of the core. This is very important. it puts all the dense matter at the core, much of it iron, cobalt and gadolinium (ferromagnetic elements and also very dense) 3:30 "By virtue of the planet's rotation and the low viscosity, the kind of convetion you get has this sort of helical structure and I think we'll see... that this is an important ingredient for driving magnetic fields". Close, but the Earth's magnetosphere is a General Relativistic Phenomena: First, Matter stratisfies by density within a gravity well, the aurora does a good job of illustrating this stratification in our atmosphere, but it continues (by elemental density) all the way to the earth's center (or core) The greater percentage of the heaviest and densest elements will be found there. Much of it ferrous. Back to Einstein and general relativity. It comes down to time / acceleration and the understanding that the earth is a gravity WELL with its deepest point at the center and not some newtonian ball of equidense material that's weightless in the the middle. If we have 2 identical clocks, one in deep space (unaccelerated frame of reference) and one clock on the surface of the earth (9.8 m/s2 acceleration). The clock on the surface runs more slowly than the identical clock under no acceleration. Not many scientists would argue with that as we have done experiments to prove it out. However, if you place a third clock at the center of the earth, you would note that it ran MUCH slower than either of the other two clocks. Here, time is slowest and acceleration is at it's greatest. What this means is that for a planet like the earth that rotates (not tidally locked), the deeper you go from the surface into the core the slower the time will be and the greater the acceleration. What this translates to is a body who's core rotates faster in the direction of the planet's rotation. and this all takes place in spite of immense friction AND in the vacuum of space. It's more likely that it's a lot of spin (faster rates of rotation the closer you get to the center) but it's this dissimilar rotation of dense ferrous material due to general relativity that causes our electromagnetic field and certainly every magnetic field on a planet in our solar system including the sun.
The models are 10 orders of magnetude off from reality, but, "That isn't to say they are no good". Not a scientist speaking... How about after more than two decades of trying, no one has been able to build a working model of this model? On the other hand, using CIV to generate plasma has replicated the actual effects! Perhaps that model is much better. Party on Dudes, be good to each other.
Without benefit of cursor or pointer, the illustrations were difficult to synch with the professor's explanations. In essence, this was a frustrating waste of time.
