Тёмный

Geometry Problem: Find the Area of the Intersection Between Two Squares 

The Phantom of the Math
Подписаться 931
Просмотров 1,6 тыс.
50% 1

Explore the intriguing challenge of determining the area where two squares intersect in this geometry puzzle. While the solution may appear simple, there's a surprising twist that isn't immediately apparent. Join me as we unravel this geometric conundrum, offering a solution that's both easy yet not obvious. Whether you're a math enthusiast or simply curious about puzzles, prepare to test your problem-solving skills and discover the unexpected intricacies of geometry!
Visit our channel 👉 / @thephantomofthemath

Опубликовано:

 

12 май 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 5   
@quigonkenny
@quigonkenny 2 дня назад
Draw perpendiculars from the center of the smaller square to the top and right sides of the smaller square. This gives us three polygons inside the smaller square: two right triangles, one shaded and one not, and a shaded quadrilateral between them. Given the equal length of the two segments we drew and the 90° angles at the top and right sides of the smaller square and the corner of the larger square, it is simple to show that the shaded triangle and the unshaded triangle are congruent, and thus have the same area. Our red shaded area consists of the quadrilateral and the shaded triangle, but the unshaded triangle and the quadrilateral combine to form one quarter of the smaller square. As the triangles are congruent, these areas are the same. Aᵣ = s²/4 = 2²/4 = 4/4 = 1 sq unit And the side of the side length 3 square isn't entirely unnecessary. This only works if the rotating square has sides of at least a specific size, that size being √2 times half the length of the static square's sides. That's s/√2, or in the case of this problem, √2 in length. If the sides of the rotating square aren't at least this long, then all of the area of the static square between the rotating square's adjacent sides won't necessarily be overlapped. Note thst the "larger" square doesn't actually have to be larger.
@STEAMerBear
@STEAMerBear Месяц назад
My intuition is that it is always exactly 1 because they are obviously 1 when the corresponding sides are parallel and 1 when they are at 45°.
@user-ow4oj1wk2o
@user-ow4oj1wk2o 25 дней назад
DUH (2x2)/4=1 but your thumb tag was very misleading.
@sdsomar1
@sdsomar1 Месяц назад
You’re solution only holds true if the corner of large square lies in center of small square . The problem never stated that fact . U assumed the corner point was centered in the small square
@ThePhantomoftheMath
@ThePhantomoftheMath Месяц назад
Actually...I did started with that fact. Check: 0:14 😊
Далее
Geometry Problem: The Value of the Blue Shaded Area?
9:31
Sinfdosh xotin 7😂
01:01
Просмотров 1 млн
Olive can see you 😱
01:00
Просмотров 13 млн
Why slicing a cone gives an ellipse (beautiful proof)
12:52
Math Olympiad | A Very Nice Geometry Problem
8:31
Просмотров 8 тыс.
Numberphile's Square-Sum Problem was solved! #SoME2
26:37
Deriving the Dirac Equation
16:34
Просмотров 84 тыс.