Germans Were Shocked To See The American Landing Craft (Ep.3)

Подписаться 4 тыс.

Просмотров 24 тыс.

50% 1

(Part 3) Join us as we explore the epic story of D-Day, June 6, 1944! Discover how the Allies launched a massive amphibious assault on the beaches of Normandy, in a pivotal operation that changed the course of World War II. We'll dive into the extensive planning and coordination among the United States, Britain, and Canada, and relive the intense battles at Utah, Omaha, Gold, Juno, and Sword beaches. Hear personal accounts from soldiers that highlight their incredible bravery and sacrifices. Despite facing rough weather and strong German defenses, the Allies' determination led to a crucial victory that helped liberate Western Europe from Nazi occupation. Don't miss this gripping and informative journey through one of history's most important battles! #worldwar2 #ww2 #warstories #audiobook #wartales #easternfront @WW2Tales @WorldWarTwo
If you're as captivated by this account as we are, don't forget to subscribe for more compelling tales from the front lines.
Link of Playlist • Memoirs of D-Day
Link of Part 1 • Astonishingly, America...
Link of Part 2 • Germans Were Shocked T...

Опубликовано:

13 июн 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 30

@WW2LiveHistory298 11 дней назад

(Part 3) History enthusiasts lets dive into the dramatic events of June 6, 1944, as we uncover the heroic Allied invasion of Normandy. Discover the meticulous planning, intense beach landings, and personal stories of bravery that defined D-Day. Witness how this critical operation shattered Nazi defenses and set the stage for the liberation of Western Europe. Don’t miss this thrilling recount of one of WWII’s most pivotal moments! Link of Playlist ru-vid.com/group/PLVvCA4vUrfdBy2JslIUFzxp_RxBiXm0SR&si=0KJ14ttnmTR_CsUZ Link of Part 1 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-1ks9qpqjEnY.htmlsi=mug8IcS7WyeWJJrq Link of Part 2 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-morfhOof5G8.htmlsi=FXPMec6aQvF2cjSC

@allenzophy4262 День назад

Higgins boats were mainly plywood. They also had a shallower draft, and could land and depart for another run faster than other competitors designs for the navies contract.

@j.granger1120 9 дней назад

I was told the US Navy rejected steel landing craft because of fear of magnetic mines. Higgins boats were made of plywood. Is that true? Please, anyone who knows reply.

@tomgoodwill5675 8 дней назад

Yes

@stephenkunst7550 8 дней назад

Yes, Higgens was a master in designing and building small boats, esp landing crafts. He was a difficult person, and ran a small-fry factory, but his plywood crafts proved to be great at their task. While plywood was used for furniture before this time, the glue was water-soluble animal hide glue. New Casein (milk based glues) had been developed and with better enamel paints a boat could be feasible, even for a short period of use.

@lawrencewiddis2447 7 дней назад

By whom?

@dirkusmaximus9268 7 дней назад

It was, google it and you find an good pancarte.

@JamesBrooke-co7od 6 дней назад

Wood was chosen for a variety of reasons 1) Existing small boatyards were experienced in making wood boats. 2) Wood was plentiful, steel was used in many other areas thus less available. 3) Wood is lighter thus easier to transport 4) Wood is easier to repair (more of an advantage in the Pacific) 5) Wood is less likely to set off a magnetic mine (there was still a bit of iron/steel in the engine , scfews, rivets, etc.)

@Tonetwisters 4 дня назад

I doubt the Germans were shocked ... they didn't even have electricity.

@Be-Es---___ 9 дней назад

English, Canadian and Americans

@99somerville 8 дней назад

Poles too.

@bookaufman9643 11 дней назад

The narrative does not mention The landings in the south of France except for one time in passing but I was wondering whether Eisenhower was running both shows at the same time or if there was somebody else leading the show down south?

@boframk8283 9 дней назад

😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😅😊😊😅

@mmkkggggoodd2315 10 дней назад

All hail the algorithm!

@ericwilliams8475 8 дней назад

@terrysmith9362 9 дней назад

God what utter rubbish. Patton was a complete clown 3 months 12 miles 50k plus US casualities

@Salt_Ed_One1 8 дней назад

You’ve got it all wrong. Montgomery was the clown.

@terrysmith9362 8 дней назад

@@Salt_Ed_One1 if I got it wrong so did the US Army historian who described Patton at Metz incompetent as did the opposing German general. Stop your flag waving fictional nonsense

@terrysmith9362 7 дней назад

@@Salt_Ed_One1 if I got it wrong so did the official US Army historian who called out Patton as incompetent as did the opposing German general and I suspect that these chaps knew a little more than a comic book historian

@charlieyerrell9146 7 дней назад

The British army faced the German armoured division in their beach assualt. That is why they were outgunned and shot to pieces, The Germans were on the high ground and well dug in and camouflaged. People need to look up the TRUE battle of that area.@@Salt_Ed_One1

@JDDupuy День назад

@@Salt_Ed_One1 Yes the British were underpaid and under Eisenhower!

@howard9684 11 дней назад

Kinda makes one wonder!. If General Patton, Was a hot head, As they said he was..But yet once again, They used him, As a patties meatball.They knew full well, That General Patton was by far the best General of world War 2..And if old Montgomery, Was any good..I am would assume, That Churchill, Would of put him in the primary roll, To trick the Germans. MONTGOMERY wasn't nothing but a desk officer..And Churchill, Wanted, To used the American Army's. To do the hard work, And him and Montgomery, Wanted to roll in the glory..Everyone, Knew,That Ike was just a puppet..What ever ,Churchill wanted, He got. EVEN. Chief of staff. Gen. George C ,Marshall. Knew this. Even Marshall, Wasn't happy with the first D-Day plans..He gave, The British, Everything, But all they did was set on supplies..Look at how Churchill, Messed up CCF. CHURCHILL, didn't like Ike, Nor did Ike like him..

@alanadair4893 9 дней назад

F-

@Seagullias12 9 дней назад

I think you are a little confused. Eisenhower had never had an active service command. He was more of a 'desk jockey' than anyone else. Churchill and Montgomery had both seen action in various campaigns, including WW1. Monty had actually planned and conducted the campaign that led to the first real defeat of German arms during WW2. Monty was accused of being too cautious by American standards. Owing to his service in WW1; he had the opinion and attitude of not losing more troops in combat then he was able to inflict on the enemy. That's why insisted on at least a 3:1 ratio as a minimum. Op 'Market Garden' was an aberration in his usual standard; hence it failed before it even got underway. Patton was aggressive, no doubt, but he was equally aggressive on his own troops at times. Whatever faults these leaders of the time had: at least they managed to work together enough to lead to the capitulation of a vicious and insidious enemy. Lest We Forget!

@leeshackelford7517 8 дней назад

You are a bit wrong, if not a lot wrong. Churchill DID NOT get everything he wanted. He was worried about the Russians NOT leaving territory they took from the Germans.... After Italy was done, he wanted to go EAST... Hungary, Romania... Yugoslavia....that way .....NOT into southern France. Think how DIFFERENT post WWII Europe would have been if Churchill had gotten his way.......several SSRs FREE instead of being Russian Occupied areas.

@rdelrosso1973 4 дня назад

Ike was pursuing a "Divide and Conquer" Strategy. Ike broadcast, in the open, without any Secret Code, that Patton had been made Commander of FUSAG (First US Army Group), with its HQ in Dover, 20 miles from the Palais De Calais. It was a FAKE Army GRoup! The Germans were terrified of Paton and so that made the Gerrys think the Invasion would come across those 20 miles of water. It made the Germans keep the 15th Panzer Division at Calais, rather than Normandy, which Rommel wanted.