это видео долетело до Москвы. Шикарно. Я просто сидел, слушал и получал удовольствие. На кульминации мурашки прошлись от макушки до самых пяток. Большое спасибо. Dieses Video erreichte Moskau. Wunderschön. Ich saß einfach da, hörte zu und genoss es. Beim Höhepunkt überlief mich eine Gänsehaut vom Scheitel bis zu den Zehen. Herzlichen Dank.
Le souffle coupé, on retient sa respiration ...Pas de mot pour exprimer ce que je viens t entendre. Cette version du Palladio...Magnifique. Merci, Merci, merci
Nein es sind echte Aufnahmen des Orchester, wenn man genau hinhört hört man klappern rauschen und klänge die beweisen es ist keine Midi Datei@@leothemetal
Blidschnitt: erste Klasse :-) Musik: hervorragend gespielt und meisterhaft arrangiert :-) sympathisch, freundlich, künstlerisch wertvoll. Ein Kunstwerk aus der Steiermark!
I've seen many arrangements of this piece, and some just don't work, but I enjoyed this a lot. I don't think I've ever seen a guitar glissando before. (Decent production values for the video.) But I do wish there were more performances of the entire three-movement work.
1:56 ... sicherlich kann man einen Ton spielen, der nicht mehr auf dem Griffbrett liegt und den Lauf, der sehr präzise klingt mit einem glissando machen, das nicht mal gegriffen wird xD Also zwar hut ab, dass ihr euch die Mühe gemacht habt ein Video aufzunehmen, aber jedem sollte klar sein, dass man im stehen ohne Gurt nicht wirklich spielen kann und eine richtige Aufnahme wäre sicher auch drin gewesen und keine Mididatei drüber legen ;)
The visuals are a bit awkward... and it sounds a bit too mechanic. Its a shame he didn't take the effort to record the actual guitar orchestra, instead of just using a computer.
It's disgusting so many people thought this was midi. It's definitely guitars, and if you know guitar (I play), you can see that they are playing the right notes. This was painfully done with scenes from different performances, synchronizing with the music of one recording, although just before the 3 minute mark, the synchronization is off by 3 notes! I can't think of a worse comment than claiming this is midi! And to those who said you can't play a guitar standing up, didn't you notice that the guitarist had lifted one leg, and was resting the guitar on the lifted leg? Fooey on the lot of you with those comments!
Guitarist here, too. This wonderful orchestra really can play - and that´s why some of us wonder why anyone would ever chose to put the midi (meant for home practicing) on this post?! Maybe the video editor used it for alligning the clips and forgot to mix it down before posting? Or he is not really into classical guitar and cannot hear the difference... Any way, it´s still a fine arrangement and an enjoyable video - though I still wish for the ´real´ audio to be remastered onto the performance.
@@jensthunbo So you also are claiming that the soundtrack is midi instead of guitars? WHY? It is obvious a single performance soundtrack was used, but as I noted, the music is synchronized visually with the motions of the performers except for one very short section when the finger motions in the left hand were off by three notes. To say it was midi instead of guitars is basically to call the orchestra's performance fraudulent. Do you REALLY think this fine guitar ensemble would do that? Really?
@@PatGoltz Hi Pat, no I am NOT hearing ´midi instead of guitars´ - I definately hear live recorded ensemble playing, and really nice sounding, too. But at SOME places I hear a more thin/metallic/midi-like tone quality. At first, I thought it could be caused by a few higher pitched guitars (tuned in G or B, or even octave guitars), by thin strings or ´naily´ plucking. But listening to the smoooth DIATONIC RUNS starting at 1.55 while watching the players clearly making a fast chromatic GLISSADE - I can´t find any other explanation than someone has added a midi part into the mix. Sometimes the recorded sound is more prevalent, at other times the midi is more overt. AND like you, I can´t really wrap my mind around it - why would they?? One option is (as I mentioned before) that the editing technician thought it was a good idea. But it is clearly an artistic choise, so it is more likely the conductor/arranger who wanted to include the scales at 1.55, even though they were not playable in a live setting. But again, then why didn´t he have a couple of the fastest players record it as an overdub - this could have be done at a slower pace and then sped up? It definately would have looked a good deal cooler on the close up at 1.55! It would have sounded more guitaristic, too - and we (and the fine ensemble!) would not have no need to feel deceived... ALL THIS SAID, I can still enjoy the video. I probably would have chosen to keep the glissando in the final take - after all, it IS an arrangement. (I certainly will if I ever play this with my (much younger) music school orchestra!) But this video is their statement (or their conductor´s), their version of the piece. And luckily we are free to enjoy a fine recital, even though we do not always agree with all artistic decisions along the way :)
@@jensthunbo Thank you for the explanation. I take back that part of my comment. That said, I've never tried to play a glissando on the guitar (or the piano, for that matter). Too hard on the fingers, especially on the piano. But I'm wondering if the fact there are frets on a guitar would result in the chromatic sound you are observing. It sounds more like the string striking each fret instead of a chromatic sound per se, although I can imagine individual frequencies/tones. There's absolutely no break in quality/timbre of sound otherwise, as I think there would have been had a midi been used.
Midi was absolutely used in this recording. Examples are the continual semiquavers at 0.34. The glissandos at 0.56. Semiquavers at 3.43. It's mixed in with the guitars so there are places where it is very obvious and places where it is not. I play this piece in a guitar orchestra and I k now it very well.
