Glen Rabenberg - Soil Health 101 - Eco AG 2019

Подписаться 23 тыс.

Просмотров 13 тыс.

50% 1

Glen Rabenberg, CEO Soil Works LLC, presents on the basics of soil health at the 2019 ACRES USA Conference. Glen discuss what makes up healthy soil, how to stop soil erosion, and how to build healthy soil. THIS IS NOT YOUR TRADITIONAL COVER CROP, NO-TILL, SOIL HEALTH PRESENTATION.
For more information and resources, visit www.soilworksllc.com or call us at 605.260.0784.
Glen's Tools (penetrometer, EC Meter, BRIX Refractometer): www.soilworksllc.com/home-too...

Наука

Опубликовано:

12 июл 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 23

@federicosolanocon3068 Год назад

As a plant grower I tested this and it is indeed true, Glen gave great info, it works! Thanks a lot.

@elainesteinbrecher6220 2 года назад

Frank Olagaray is our tenant. We are so proud and blessed to have him farming our 3rd generation farmland. Thank you, Glen for getting the word out to save our soil, save ourselves. So grateful for your dedication and sharing it with us.

@brendengood482 Год назад

Very exciting to hear!

@laszlodiczko2192 3 года назад

Thank you and congratulation!

@jasontucker3295 19 дней назад

I say, use what works. That land slide might be your precedent. No till cover 365 is the camp I'd like to be in but I will do what works. Putting sugar into my ground and his product has made me smile thus far.

@johnboykin3128 3 года назад

Love ❤️ this lecture

@jenniferg6818 3 года назад

I love Glen.

@Coolbeans-gz7md 4 года назад

Thx For Sharing This Video!

@timshirk6261 Год назад

Glen has some strong points and I find him very interesting but I also object to something’s. #1 never work raw carbon into the soil, nature never does this other than extreme cases such as landslides. Carbon is meant to be on top of soil surface with a green plant growing on top of it year round to take in the CO2 as the carbon is breaking down. This carbon soil surface residue needs to have a C:N ratio of about 30:1. Glen is correct in that the soil needs to be aerobic and alive and does not need much N applied. I only apply N if my C:N ratio on surface residue if off, never to feed to plant directly. This surface residue is all important to keep soil covered just like our skin on our body’s.

@jeremylange8498 27 дней назад

You have a lot to learn

@paulbraga4460 Год назад

"THIS IS NOT YOUR TRADITIONAL COVER CROP, NO-TILL, SOIL HEALTH PRESENTATION." for sure but i object to saying that cover crop is a loss of carbon. i don't think Rabenberg has done the math. so much of the carbon is what is deposited in the soil by the cover crop. which doesn't mean i don't use the products of soilworks..blessings to all

@jordanross3369 Год назад

A good point. the vast major the the carbon created by the cover crop is in the form the the root exudates secreted into the soil, not in the actual biomass of the cover crop itself.

@jeremylange8498 27 дней назад

No carbon on to goes up carbon in the soil goes down. You have a lot to learn. Most no till guys use lot of spray for things like weed control pest control and fertilizer which harms all the microbes that you are trying to save

@paulbraga4460 27 дней назад

@@jeremylange8498 i know many, indeed most, no-tills are forced to use weed/pest control of the worst kind because they don't know how it should work. doesn't mean my point is mistaken...blessings

@sean3223a 2 месяца назад

Though his intent is presumably good, most of what this man is saying is false. He's incorrectly parroting the true information that he's obviously heard from others who actually do know what they're talking about. Unfortunately, he does not, and his incorrect parroting is thus grossly and inexcusably misleading to any producers in the audience who are not properly knowledgeable agronomists and/or soil scientists. Respectfully.

@robertodonoghue4100 Месяц назад

What is incorrect? Can you give an example of two?

@sean3223a Месяц назад

@@robertodonoghue4100 , Yes, many more than that. Almost without exception, whenever he is making an incontrovertible scientific statement, his phrasing is most often within 80% being being technically correct while being technically incorrect because of the incompetence of his scientific knowledge as he is (apparently) trying to best parrot that knowledge as best as his competence will allow. As a farmer, I have no doubt he is actually a farmer. As a scientist and agronomist, he is incompetent, though he is trying his best, and because of the incompetence of his knowledge and ability to articulate it, he is actually being incredibly more unhelpful, than helpful. He needs to do himself and us all a favor, and stop speaking, given his total scientific incompetence. It's harmful, not helpful. It's misleading, not leading. I know he's trying his best. He needs to limit himself to shoveling shit with a pitchfork, as well meaning as he is. It is all he is capable of. Let me know where I lost you.

@robertodonoghue4100 Месяц назад

I asked you for an example of his incompetence? Can you give a specific example? Thank you

@sean3223a Месяц назад

@@robertodonoghue4100 , I answered your question, Einstein.

@robertodonoghue4100 Месяц назад

@@sean3223a Respectfully you have not cited anything factual but instead an arbitrary appeal which has failed. Your reference to Einstein, though an attempt at a slight, demonstrates a lack of emotional control in response to a respectful challenge.