Help to support us by joining the New Culture Forum's membership scheme. Please see: www.patreon.com/NewCultureForum From only £3 per month you'll receive a range of perks and benefits, including exclusive content.
Starmer has been questioned about the WEF publicly and clearly stated he thinks Davos is more important than Westminster so he’s not exactly hiding it. That said, I agree completely that he should be taken to task over it publicly as we approach the election. As far as Blair goes he’ll never admit to it even though we all know it’s true. Dreading Starmer gaining power!
Funny that you say that because the French revolution was started by the Jacobin club, a club that is very ideologically similar to the WEF. They also sought to reorganize Europe's political and cultural structures. And by that I mean get rid of Christianity and decentralize power so that no leader would have enough power to go against them.
Starmer wants the french revolution. At the end of the 1980s, Starmer joined the Haldane Society of lawyers when everyone knew it was a cover organisation for the british communist party, the old CPGB. Starmer is a Trojan Horse. Just like his master Blair.
I am dreading Labour getting in with a large majority. Ideally, they don’t win OR a very small majority that they will lose over the parliament. Just look at Wales, Scotland or London what Labour will do when they get IN. Also look at Angela Rayner, David Lammy, Emily Thornberry, Diane Abbott, Shabana Mahmood, Liz Kendall, Ed Miliband, Thangam Debbonaire, Lisa Nandy, OR most Labour front bench etc. None of them have any experience of life. The Peter principle applies.
It's more of a Left that cares more about pandering to the WEF, and cares very little about the plight of the ordinary working class people, as it thinks it knows what's 'best' for us; better than we know! Arrogance dressed up as Benevolence'!
Garage works for the US corporate empire, sucking the life out of all our communities. No thanks! Reform us just another mask to hide the same face. It's being lined up to take the place of the conservatives so the duopoly can continue. We need an ACTUAL alternative to the system, not more of the same.
Unfortunately things in this country need to hit rank bottom before things will get better and for all the betrayal of the Tories, we still have a ways to go before enough people are willing to turn their backs on the old, corrupt system in favour of something new.
That's fine, but your premise does unfortunately run close to the tenets of the WEF's 'Great Reset'.. and nobody (apart from those that the WEF consider to be 'elite' - i.e. the already powerful and super-rich..) in their right mind would want that anti-human atrocity to be our 'something new'..
We are way beyond voting. In fact, there is NO voting our way out of this. And by "this" is meant what the hostile elite of the West is really up to. They want it all. Full Spectrum Dominance. Nothing less. It's Freedom vs Tyranny. Talk about anything else is just chatter, which is the last thing we need.
It will be hard with a lefty Marxist MSM that can’t stand reporting things without spin or bias. This type of news coverage is more like psychological warfare aimed at an enemy public, not your own people 🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️ But they do it everyday without failing. This is what societies that are in decline look like….
What did the British people expect when electing a former head of MI5 as prime minister? An ideal spokesman for the little people? A man that also has declared his allegiance to the WEF above the parliament. Britain is cooked.
@tomatobrush3283 unfortunately lots of people are either ideologically wedded to or stupid enough to blindly vote against their own best interests. I colleague of mine yesterday said ‘I’m going to vote green because they are promising to tax the rich more to pay for the NHS.’ I’ve gone beyond shock now that people don’t realise taxes are through the roof, that migration is the main issue impacting public services and housing and that flooding the country with millions of people dilutes both our culture and our individual votes. I have come to the conclusion that you can’t educate pork.
@@pickleperryemz Can’t you persuade them out of it? The greens are bloody awful eco-fascists! I’ve heard similar nonsense from people wanting to vote for the Libdems. People need to pull their heads out of their arses!
Almost Prophetic, 1 month later, it's carnage around the country & it's getting dramatically worse with each day that passes, with startlingly obvious two-tier policing in favour of the invaders; and Starmer is off on holiday while Britain burns
From his wiki 'Starmer was editor of Socialist Alternatives, a Trotskyist radical magazine. The magazine was produced by an organisation under the International Revolutionary Marxist Tendency (IRMT)'
When Climate became an Emergency, the quality of the weather station network recording the data decreased. That's a sign that Scientists are not at work. Yes, the gods aren't Everywhere, at all.
It was once global warming...this is the coldest year i have experienced in my lifetime of 30 years, 4 years ago it was a hot summer, this summer is very cold. Seems to be seasonal, not totally of overall warming. Most of the wild fires are created by removing the control of the farm land that had been baned of burning the excess silage. Controlled burning of silage keeps farm land farmable, its been done for thousands of years, but now banned in some countries and caused massive wild fires because its not within the farmers control.
@@CraBundy I am double your age and apart from a couple of winters which dragged on into May it is pretty much the same here. Certainly the coldest July-August period of them all.
@@sabineroach5486 it's interesting because their dissussion of scientism is meaningful in terms of legitimate science, but totally irrelevant in the case here of a corrupt science. through this discussion they foist climate science into the realms of legitimate science and thus are advocates for it, ironically, so i hope they don't know that.
@@turquoiseowl the message here: no scientific research or evaluation is either right or wrong. It's always provisional ( based on model). This guest Callum knows quite a bit. I do too. I'm old enough to have been aware of it as an educated, curious adult since the 80s. And yes, the CO2 part is fairly irrelevant but measurable, thus so important in the political narrative, fitting well into the scientific models. That's why the powers that be can pay lip-service. It's really about water cycles and soil, about Nature which humans are a part of but in our modern hubristic culture are too far removed. Ou will find that there are no technical solutions just a different way of feeling and experiencing the world Politicising this is stupid and destructive. Humans need to be open to discussion. And yes, for that we don't need science the way it's understood now and popularised. Anyway, I imagine that you're young enough to experience and use your judgement in the decades you will still live through. I'm old and near death now😊
I'm mostly left (but do like to hear the views of of the right, too, abd don't always disagree). Even us lefties have no time for starminism. His government will be a disaster for Britain. The Workers Party of Great Britain had the most sensible manifesto, but msm froze them out, even though the leader was an MP. Unlike farage, who got far more attention than he deserves with no seat in parliament. Totally bias. Starminism will be utter technological authoritarianism with the continued profit of the top few.
If voting made a difference you wouldn’t be able to do it. Does anyone even complete any of the tasks given in manifesto form. Why have things gotten worse? WEF no matter which side you vote for 🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️
And thats why everyone should vote reform, the 2 party government is over, we the people have had enough of broken promises from lab and cons both with the wef
@@susannamarker2582 I had a lovely evening thank you, I sat at the river at the bottom of the garden and watched as the young salmon parr dashed forwards and backwards exploring their surroundings whilst the kingfisher who lives in the opposite bank looked on waiting for an opportunity to feed. The smell of wild garlic blew across the water and the rumbling tones of Duncan’s tractor could be heard on the hillside above out cutting haylage. It’s where I come to escape the madness of the world and it reminds me that the Britain I grew up in with its wonderful countryside, history and culture is still very much alive, for the time being at least.
I’m positive some knew what was going to happen with migration 30 years ago. The numbers back then were tiny in relative terms. If having a larger population is important for gross GDP (not GDP per capita) is inversely proportional to climate change
Good chat fellas. You’re spot on about personnel/HR. In a previous role I managed a team of 6 that grew to 12 and the deck was stacked clearly and I think intentionally in favour of complainants. I disagree about your guest’s confidence about science and Covid. Take for example both face nappies and the modelling for starters.
Успокоение в Господе это то к чему придем, к сожалению весь пар амбиций уходит в военное противостояние чаще чем хотелось бы, сейчас это особенно глупое действо для всех, кроме тех уже потерял легитимность и внутреннюю и историческую и они отвлекают внимание на выдуманные военные угрозы
MSc in environmental science + years in the Amazon + raised on a farm. Wish I’d been a part of this conversation. People who spend their entire lives in cities can’t help having a stunted perspective. COP30 is being held down river from my house. Keen to connect with anyone going.
I can tell you from my own experience with the NHS , they seem to follow "if there is not a blood test for it, it does not exist". They are very reluctant to give a diagnosis if its not immediately obvious. It might just be a sign of how run down it is. But yes GPs are not given free reign. They follow NICE guidelines. I know alot of my symptoms come from mercury poisoning, but they refused to do the blood test on the basis that they don't have a treatment plan in such an eventuality. "if we don't have a treatment for it, it doesn't exist". This is also demonstrating the tick box nature of the modern NHS and doctoring. There is a lot of wisdom that is totally missed: Dr Bernard Jensen, Dr max Gerson, Dr bircher-benner. Old school wisdom lost. Also lost is the idea of lifestyle change. The NHS is not prepared for this, too much time required and money. Real health comes from lifestyle, food, nutrition etc. all hard work and takes time and dedication. The NHS operates on tick box diagnosis and issuing drugs. Totally stupid.
I’m watching for ‘pinch points’ . The first one was fining boiler makers. The so called ‘clean heat market mechanism’. It’s all very well passing legislation, but if the tech isn’t ready then ..? Same with electric cars. Where reality meets administration
There is more to life than breathing. The constant vehicular traffic on ever more roads and housing estates roars all 24 hours. Children can no longer walk to school by themselves, play outside with their friends in the countryside (which scarcely exits in many cities; and yes, it should.)
Never forget Starmer's answer when asked 'Westminster or Davos?' He chose Davos, and then tried to justify it. Anyone who votes Labour must own the consequences. It's going to be a nightmare.
If they voted Labour they weren't bright enough to appreciate there might be consequences - to them! About voters think the world is against the, that they are entitled to money they dont earn etc And pollution is always someone else's fault. The politics of unconsciousness. The lemming party.
It was once global warming...this is the coldest year i have experienced in my lifetime of 30 years, 4 years ago it was a hot summer, this summer is very cold. Seems to be seasonal, not totally of overall warming. Most of the wild fires are created by removing the control of the farm land that had been baned of burning the excess silage. Controlled burning of silage keeps farm land farmable, its been done for thousands of years, but now banned in some countries and caused massive wild fires because its not within the farmers control.
The Technocratic approach to Nature & Agriculture is epitomised by Mr B. ill G. Ates; very much Data driven, and lacking in real world experience and empathy! Now the biggest land owner in the US of A.
"I can't prove it to you, but it's sciatica" One thing that AI does, is it brings some of this intuition back. We need to make sure that there's room for human intuition a well, though.
I think their main interests were to get the tories out,that didn’t go well enough.i myself voted independent,so I don’t feel guilty to this pantomime.
● “In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill….All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.... So, in order to save the planet, isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?” (Maurice Strong and the roots of the 'Great Reset') ● "Tomorrow, C40 cities chair London Mayor Sadiq Khan will address the UN Climate Summit. The ambition of C40 is to "usher in a new era, one devoid of fossil fuels". In their report, 'The Future of Urban Consumption in a 1.5C World', they state their new agenda. It demands that by 2030, people should take just one short-haul flight, of no more than 932 miles every three years and calls for a BAN ON DAIRY AND MEAT by 2030."
Thank you. A good debate. Wittgenstein did say some sensible things... but his belief that Logic and logic alone was all, was a disaster. He did not understand, much like in The Age of Reason before, that reason cannot exist without at least temporary validity to contradiction. Unless you accept this, it is impossible to understand or use logic. This is another version of the first paradox of reason which states to reason you have to be unreasonable by breaking the law of non-contradiction, the key rule of logic that, by so doing you can understand logic and actually reason. (The first law refers to the impossibility of subjecting all sense and information input to tests of logic. Instead vast quantities that go to memory are as non-logic to avoid thinking and even the brain from seizing up on overload. In this respect we have to be irrational, but dismissing the law of non-contradiction, to be able to think, as well as understand, and use logic He also did the unforgivable in The Investigations which he said mended mistakes he made in The Tractatus. Observing how names are attached to objects as they are learned on your mother's knee he assumed that such a process rendered language relative because such a process was arbitrary passed on from generation to generation. He ignored the shared human physiology of perception, brain processing and structure which provide an absolute foundation to all human languages. That is why we can translate from one language to another. Unforgivable? Wittgenstein rendered humans subject to inhumanity because we are vastly more than what he assumed. His argument makes John Locke and his tabula raza look highly sophisticated. The result? Written out of popular history, perhaps because his philosophy is strangely inaccessible and flawed, Wittgenstein is the father of modern relativism now being used by politicians in a crusade to destroy societies and nations to replace both with state ideological control with all its inherent inhumanity. Deep down, the Woke are products of the absolute positivism of relativism. Question a relativist that they should apply its principles to itself and reason dies. Which is, with boundless irony, the intention of all ideology The Age of Reason, in one way, was a disaster. Failure to understand what reason is, it ushered in closed system philosophers such as Leibniz, Kant, (Descartes and Locke to a lesser extent), Hobbes and the disastrous Rousseau followed by the likes of Malthus and Marx. The inhumanity of Marx stems from denial of reason and, consequently denial of a key aspect of humanity, the use of reason. Things came to the ultimate conclusion with Wittgenstein resulting in the denial, in effect, of access to or reality itself in his Investigations and Relativism. This led to the implosion of respect for philosophy spearheaded by people who thought they were philosophers. Among others were / are ludicrous linguistic philosophers. The inevitable consequence of denial of the importance of contradiction is contempt for disagreement and reason which are at the heart of humanity because there are as many human natures as there are characters. End of frustrated shoutie stuff.
Wow, that was high powered! Loved it. I think I could follow most of it but even if I couldn't, I am sure others could and great way to move forward with our goals.
A bunch of sophists with a great grasp of the English language but not a lot of anything else. Thanks YT for foisting this aberration upon my video stream.
This discussion of a desire for the perfect environment for humans reminds me of Cowslip in Watership Down. Poetry read to each other by sleek rabbits whose food was provided reliably. Occasionally one of their group disappeared… rightly Fiver disliked and feared this and argued that the group he came with escape immediately. I find this comes to mind…
one of your guests is clear, concise, insightful and interesting. The other one is none of these. I wish you would not give space and encourage those who have more ambition than ability.
Amount of compensation that EIBSS has paid out = zero and it's set to continue to be! Been trying to find some benefit of the infected blood inquiry finally being done, but there's no indication of there being any benefit yet! Was kinda hoping there would be some especially now I've got to SVR! Turns out Benedikt Strunz was probably right & there's very little benefit from SVR.
Completely agree with Mr Nicolson. As a British teacher of 30 years I was rated by a group of 14 year old Italian kids ON MY ENGLISH!!! Never been so insulted and would never do summercamps again.
So this chap Callum must have said over and over that the climate science 'is good' - there are many scientists who would beg to differ. And that the covid science 'is good' - equally there are many scientists who hold a,strongly supported opposing view. His philosophical meanderings did not, in my opinion, provide a counterweight to what sounded like a closed mindset. I found Callum's contribution not so much 'nutritious' - though Mr Tomlinson provided some actual food for thought - so much as meretricious.
I found it all interesting in that it was a debate which has een sorely missing in the last 4 years. However then he got to covid!!! I then realised right the way through he was debating well but very cautiously and I was still waiting for some real opinions!!!
Someone admitting it went over their head. How refreshing. But bringing in Wittgenstein at 09:48 followed closely by Heidigger at 10:05 possibly reassured many that they were hearing valuable insight. I would guess that only a small number of people lapping this stuff up have read either of those authors and maybe dont have a ticket to a public library. But that is cynical. I've been listening for twenty minutes and haven't heard any proposals about how the world might be improved. At 19:36 we hear an obscure philosopher Oakshott quoted. This type of conversation encourages the listener to give up all hope in our society. Everything is bad. We are powerless. Nicely dressed, terribly sophisticated deep thinkers. Listen to us talking about things you personally dont understand and let us do the thinking for you.
I would have found it very interesting if you challenged the climate debate with respect to the temporal argument used by the activists. It seemed that was flatly denied at the start of the video and justified as a cultural issue later on, whereas I feel the activists state that we must act now, "based on the science." This was a really good discussion and it would be greatly improved with some challenge, rather than just smiling and nodding. As a viewer I really want to know how I can challenge an activist who knocks on my door rather than just a regurgitation of unsubstansive denials.
