Gloomhaven 2nd Edition Play-through with Isaac Childres 

LMFAO that’s a good one!

I think it's a change from Frosthaven actually

youtube.com/@kaviel

Didnt he say he counted as one attack?

@@Circus1943 You are right, my bad ! Was not aware of this rule, good to know

I think the base only includes standees & then you can buy the enemy mini packs separately (or in a bundle; several on the BackerKit link in the description).

Seems like you have made the game harder for yourself than intended since I am pretty sure thats wrong if the card don't say move +/- x or attack +/- x then the monster don't perform that action.

@VGPorage yea i played my first few scenarios very wrong lol

How was it a mistake

@@Michael-og7js Enemy is not moving next to its primary focus to maximize the target numbers and making the attack to have disadvantage on it (in case of a ranged attack).

​@Zoleeca it didn't have line of sight. So move was correct. There is a doorway and thus can only target you through doorway hence the movement and disadvantage since it has to move there to maximise target numbers and would only have disadvantage on unit in doorway. You're wrong.

@@TheOnlyTata Ok, so based on FAQ. So maybe I interpret it wrong? 1st priority is loosing/avoiding disadvantage on the focus. After determining focus, how exactly does a monster chose its destination hex and how does it maximize its attack on its focus and any additional targets? It will determine its final destination hex (the hex where it can attack it's focus) by using the prioritization rules below at the beginning of its turn. The evaluation is first done using the monster's current movement range. If the monster can't reach a hex from which to attack using the movement it has this turn, the rules are re-evaluated assuming infinite movement. Also, the monster uses its current attack when determining its attack/movement options, even if it may have a different (or no) attack when it eventually reaches its destination hex. If there are multiple hexes that meet the criteria, players decide ties. 1st - Attack its primary focus, losing/avoiding disadvantage if possible 2nd - Attack as many extra targets as possible 3rd - If there are still multiple attack locations with an equal number of different extra targets, use the focus rules (least amount of movement points*, then proximity, then initiative) from its starting position to determine which secondary target (in addition to the previous target(s)) should be included in the attack (repeating for a tertiary target, etc.) and select the attack location which includes these targets. 4th - Lose disadvantage on the extra targets (all equal priority, players decide ties) 5th - Use the least amount of movement points*

​@@Zoleeca See page 42 of Frosthaven Rule book, if you have it ; "When a monster performs ranged attacks on multiple targets, it moves to attack the most possible targets (including its focus), with the fewest possible disadvantaged attacks while using the fewest possible movement points". As you can see, it doesn't matter if the focus is the one that is disadvantaged or not. What matters is 1. Maximizing # of targets 2. Minimizing *total* number of disadvantaged attacks 3. Minimizing movement

No, it is always one draw for each enemy, also in multi target attacks.

@@keineangabe8993 Not always.

@@xtraplayer7281 in which case should that not be the case? Notice that i would call a draw with advantage/disadvantage or with rolling modifiers still one draw.

@@keineangabe8993 i thought SPellWeaversa fire orbs card attack was a different draw against each target ?

but Brute cards ( Leaping cleave, or Sweeping Blow ) are only 1 attack modifier.

What do you expect to reuse from the 1st edition? I think almost everything is changed.

Well if a lot changes I think an upgrade kit would have cost a lot either way.

don’t care didn’t ask

It's YT doing that, not the channel.

Shaaaat up

Yeah it's pretty annoying eh!

Hey there! Thanks so much for bringing this to our attention. This was a new default RU-vid instituted that we were not aware of and have now fixed. We so appreciate your alerting us!