GoPro Awards: On a Rocket Launch to Space 

Hey love your videos

Suuhh dude

+TheVolitionSociety They didn't "forget to turn off the gravity", they're in NEAR space. Aka, Gravity is still acting on the rocket. But what do I know.

+Jeremy Burne You missed the joke, m8.

+dante42lk shit I hope that's true. I've seen too many fucktards on RU-vid who are completely serious saying very similar things to that!

lol...always

+Brandon Garcia What, you rather have royalty free music?

i know right why dont they play drake - marvins room

+dj stankdaddy ok gonna go there.....; Why not Darude-Sandstorm?

Because space is dramatic

Can we have the gopro footage from launch to "being in space" or are we gonna use a fisheye lense at earths outer orbit

​@@MrViovasviGoPros have fisheye lens so... What are you asking for?

@@MrViovasvi Yes you can. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-GlURVCK5ujo.htmlsi=y40iloIzGKhdLzak

@@zeendaniels5809 for it to be uncut footage from one gopro fisheye lense. start to finish. launch to landing, is it not possible?

This is fake! You can see and hear how the rocket hit something, and then it was edited to a fake rocket in space. 😮

What? CGI?

​@@tankthelord1178 name a video cgi producing program. go ahead. you clearly did your research

@@Robert99909 NVidia for one - it doesn't take a program it just takes programmers to do it.

@@tankthelord1178 People like you are the reason this world isn't advanced.

@@C0ncep1t Yeah right, you are the fool for believing something that is not real.

WAIT WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE LMFAYO yeah mate it is indeed really cool

Young Schlatt Young Schlatt

HI SCHLATT!!!

Oh wow it's jschlatt from 4 years ago

NASA IS A BIG FAKE IN THE LIFE

NASA IS A BIG FAKE IN THE LIFE

@@nextplay2134 this is not nasa wtf

@@RobertoHerrera-bm4pl that just shows you how stupid and ignorant they are.

Imagine not adding the SD card.

Imagine forgetting to charge the cam

but its a hoot to see the idiots

ksp

Its because of that shot, that it won the gopro awards

Straight from a sci-fi movie

why would they freak out?

@Paradoxic Knox inverted earthers

@Paradoxic Knox damn!!! The earth ain't round, the earth ain't flat... The earth is a ring. WAIT... THAT'S ILLEGAL!!!!

That's what we do here

Indeed

it is horrible too.

@@Jack-kx2lv true but that's not the case

AGREED!!!!!!!

I'm pretty sure the gopro wasn't just stuck to the side of the rocket. lol

@@falcoperegrinus82 Seriously? I think double sided tape is that strong :) Mach 5 is nothing for double sided tape

A gopro on the side of the rocket would be a plastic residue by the time it reached space. Also would cause drag, unevenly.

Because it still inside the earth atmosphere, below the karman line. Nothing much change with the temperature and pressure

@@falcoperegrinus82 Part of it does have to be sticking out, though, to get a straight shot down the length of the rocket to the engines. If you put the GoPro all the way inside the rocket so it was flush with the side, we'd only have a view from looking straight out from the side into blank space and a little of the earth at the bottom, but no rocket would be in the frame.

hahahahaha

When it's centered it's convex. Why cherry pick?

@Mutsyti because there's videos when it doesn't change at all...

@@joshallotta9450 If you're saying that in those videos the horizon doesn't curve, that is because they aren't high enough. You're again cherry picking, why in the videos where they are too low to see a curve you believe those but in the videos they've gone high enough to see the curve you don't believe those.

@Mutsyti it's never high enough lol

I remember from mw2

Interstaller

Ghost

Launch the Focken Nukes

too much...

+Fabien White haha, exactly what I was thinking.

+Fabien White me gusta

yes me gusta

+Fabien White I wonder if the spinning was on purpose or a tolerable side effect of the go pros

+Ethan Schoen It's spinning on purpose, it's for gyroscopic stabilization.

This one’s better. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-xEIG9NiTTwk.htmlsi=Luw1ZsIFqUA4Dtlv

Yeah it's phenomenal that part!

Because the camera has more weight than the strings

Calm down homie

spacex just changed the system lol. they have a live feed and land their boosters for footage.

@@ethanbuno-an8002 Pre recorded live feed that sheep like you believe in, nice religion.

Did he receive money for the reward? Crazy to imagine going out there...

@@lennartherrmann3057 he didn't receive anything, only a piece of cake 😔

@@lukie2588 TF are u talking about

@@Andr14nt0 r/woosh

RIP

+Michael Montes Oh yes!

Agreed

+Michael Montes Dam and GoPro has a dope 360 camera too. They dropped the ball on that one!

+Michael Montes It Is Not Permitted. They Are Hiding Our Real Plain.

+We Are USURPER GROUP United. DM1-L13 FHHH HLLC Our real plain bagel?

Tregeta this is disturbingly devoid of explosions and rapid unplanned disassemblies.

Tregeta I think they forgot to turn on the SAS mode. It's rotating so vigorously.

Gokul k anil lol like this tiny rocket is going to have SAS. if it was in KSP, though, it would 😛

Flat Kerbin theory

I wonder why this didn’t explode... That’s pretty... unusual...

The earth is not a ball of bendy water though 😊

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-xEIG9NiTTwk.htmlsi=Luw1ZsIFqUA4Dtlv

@@whatislifebro yeah, it's a sphere of rock instead

@@CarlosAM1 with bendy water on it? Last time I checked water sits level. No matter how large it is.

@@whatislifebro bruh you gotta be trolling

yeah like wtf

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-WxYH5CXbpYA.html

outer space? didnt look like that to me, rocket goes up...falls back down.

@@alchemistreaction935 goes up into outer space

outer space = outside earth's SOI i think

+M3TR0P0LiS Media That is the best part! wow, absolute luck indeed

+M3TR0P0LiS Media I was amazed, thought it was fake at first!

Carl Hancock Perhaps they just had like 6 cameras around it in a ring so it was guaranteed that at least one would be pointing it. Probably better for weight distribution too.

+M3TR0P0LiS Media I know I did. What a serendipitous bit of good fortune!

+M3TR0P0LiS Media What's so great about that clip?

That’s a fish eyed lense

​@@osamasufian24 there are other version with no fish eye lens

@@osamasufian24 The reason is that the camera has a wide angle lens (you capture much more than you would with a standard lens.) which offers a much wider field of view. The consequence is that objects that are more towards the periphery look curved. When the edge of the globe is in the center of the frame, much less is captured

Fish eye lens, the Earth goes convex when it flips Earth is flat

@@osamasufian24incorrect

+Capitão Brasil it's Call Of Duty Ghosts

+Capitão Brasil Gravity.. In CoD Infinity Warfare u can see ships .. Here nothing ..

+Teámo I thought he meant Ghosts until i found out there really was a CoD infinity warfare

...Duh. This is Infinite Warfare 2.

Bel andung.

Bep t Belppp

@@maxilbdg1370 learn English fuckwit

Yea man, see ya

Yeaahhh

+DALLMYD IKR, I was just thinking "What are the chances of the camera being at just the right angle to see that?"

+DALLMYD so epic! makes me regret not choosing physics-oriented degree to study

Great fish eye ..

highwayvagrant1 No hope for humanity? You mean like create microprocessors so that you can spout random bullshit? Lmao

highwayvagrant1 Thanks, it's the tail number of a plane I used to fly. And absolutely. Crazier shots have been taken. The fisheye lense has a very wide angle therefore a shot like that is much more possible. You can see the over-exaggerated curvature of the earth caused by it.

This video was posted 7 yrs ago

But we're afraid of a balloon ahahahahhahahahahahha

;)

***** LMAO

How so? They just made the camera that was used..

@@Julmaa87 because this was 6 years ago and I was really high. Plus the music is chill. Now I have children and am drug free. Life is so crazy.

@@nasem7470 So it was, 6 years doesn’t feel that long.. oh well..

Did you even watch it? The fisheye lens was making it look concave half the time, while in the middle where it creates no distortion it was perfectly flat. So, yeah...

@@istvantoth9647 1:50 There is a curve. It's not the result of a fisheye, otherwise the rocket would be distorted as well.

@@Error-yv8ec I did, that's how I know it's not real curve.

@Social Phobic Royalty Instead they're watching fake space videos because that's much more productive...

@@A23xander The rocket is distorted, but it's so thin along the line of the fisheye effect that it's barely noticable.

maybe years? WHOLE LIFE OF MANY PEOPLE YOU IGNORANT

years? this is planned for maybe a month. it's a test rocket they have hundreds of them ready

It's just luck you can't stick RCS to an amateur rocket to control it's turning.

It can easily be done with the series of rapidly spinning wheels that use inertia to rotate the rocket without expending any fuel. They're called reaction Wheels.

@@iantaggart3064 add the weight of that system

People are blind, and only believe tv

super fake globe dung

@Ivanhoe ॐ lol

Look pass that and you'll see no star's... how is that? Total darkness.

@@524enaud because of the camera

@@iliilil5761 cameras can't capture stars?

@@524enaud if you film the sky with your phone the stars probably cant be seen

Too bad it's entirely CGI. I proved this in a comment on this video 7 years ago, and GoPro Channel deleted it.

@@adamchurvis1 its not cgi, it was a mission for nasa ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-AEwKOeCj0jU.html

@@adamchurvis1 : LOL, sure you did, champ. So you're claiming a craft can't go up 73 miles? Why? Magic? Don't you flatters claim it hit the dome? So does this claim of yours not destroy the FE claims of so many others? And here's some 411 for you, son. Make your own video showing your proof. Who would delete it? You? But you won't, because you're just too lazy to. That's ok. I'm sure you feel big and that's all that matters, right?

@@adamchurvis1 Then do it again

@@famlrnamemssng Why, if they're just going to delete it again? I spent over an hour explaining the finer points on that post. I wish I had saved a copy in Notepad. But one part that is easy to see is around 1:44 with that rocket that comes into view. Do you expect me to believe that you cannot tell that the "separation" sequence is CGI? That sequence is a cleaned-up version of the original one I commented on but was deleted. In the original, if you had the Eagle Eye you could see an animation mistake where one part of a stage magically imaged over another by sliding into place while it was semi-translucent, if I recall correctly.

boi Thats wahatijdifuasfdsh

*sees comment* *subtracts two years from the current year to see if comment was posted in 2016*

nutella oh stop 😥 scary thought. You'd be dead in minutes

You couldn't you would vaporize if you did

Have to tell you this. Santa brought me a massive jar of Nutella

that will be fun. But where do you hold on? XD

Light Man only ate a spoon full. Was great

All 17 of them

JAJAJAJAJJAJAJAJA TRUE!!!!!😂😂😂😂

+Moto Canada (Spirito Diaboli) Even they'd love to see someone reach a fairytale land.

pauahahahahah no it is the Fish eye of gopro ahahah the world is cubic

+Jay Cea And bastards that don't think we've developed space technology and believe it's all lies. I hate 'em.

yeah

For multiple cameras, it would be a very long video. Like, VERY long.

+M3TR0P0LiS Media would be better for me anyway

+GeStealth HD just what I was thinking. A little too many gaps, jumping from one altitude to another without explanation of what happened in between. Would have been better to have a consistent uninterrupted time line. I like the slow-mo bits, but they could have done some fast-mo bits to fill-in the blanks.

+Seb Gibbs exactly!

Go back to sleep

Sleep, you need to wake up

@@301gobluehailmich1 aahh but you are for a real psychiatric hospital, you want to ruin the research of hundreds of thousands of professionals around the world for decades with those arguments of a primary school child, really, seek to study physics, astronomy, mechanics classical, particle physics, atomic physics, thermodynamics or quantum mechanics, so that you get out of such ignorance, in truth, for the good of those around you.

@@thomassacrato8662 aahh but you are for a real psychiatric hospital, you want to ruin the research of hundreds of thousands of professionals around the world for decades with those arguments of a primary school child, really, seek to study physics, astronomy, mechanics classical, particle physics, atomic physics, thermodynamics or quantum mechanics, so that you get out of such ignorance, in truth, for the good of those around you.

The money shot.

That was supposed to happen.

@@benpickens9918 But not on camera.

Arpan Akash Ray Actually yeah, it was probably even planned this way, since it is a very important stage of the rockets re-entry into the Earths Stratosphere, so yes, they would’ve wanted to document it.

BetaPotata Wow you are dumb. *sigh* ok, how do I explain this to you? i.ytimg.com/vi/v184lSB2LHI/maxresdefault.jpg Look up information about what you are attempting to prove before you make yourself look even more braindead.

You are lucky

How close to the launch site does the "junk" land? Are you at a risk where you live?

@@OldJoe212 there's a big space for all that stuff to fall to, the most that they do is shut down the highway for an hour or so

@@DesertDweller1776 Thanks for the reply.... Be Safe.

Can I be your friend

HEY SPACE NERD......ITS ALL ''SPACE SCIENCE LIES.'' PLS GET THE JAB. WE DONT NEED IDIOTS LIKE YOU

@@Guitarman7133 Oh just shut it. We have mounds of evidence to what we say and you have none.

@@generalgrievous5452 please for the love of god let me see your mounds of evidence you are referring to.

@@theBomified Your original comment isn't showing. What did you say that I disagreed with?

I love a minute in, when the rotation almost stops, loses speed, decline altitude, then the next clip space. Almost as good as Nixons phone call to the moon before cordless phones, 😂

🤣😂🤣 I'm dyin

Haha

Flat earther

*Yeah, Like Your Head!*

Loo

Liam O'Dowd When Neil Degrasse Tyson appeared on TV and did his little rap show, at what altitude did he calculate curvature was visible from? Did this rocket attain said altitude? Mmm...no...cuz you're dumb...lol

Liam O'Dowd 36 thumbs up their butts lol

Liam O'Dowd This flat Earth nonsense is getting out of control

sonnyblack0870 we are making a good job :)

I have a question what did the rocket hit 1:00

It's amazing to me how much evidence there is from SO many different sources, yet some people out there are still dumb enough to believe it is flat. They really think they're quite special.

​@@AlphaRaine يا اخي الامريكين نشرو عقلية المؤامرات عند العرب لقد اصبحو مجنين جدا بعض منهم يكره ناسا بشكل كبير جدا لدرجة التعصب يحولون ان يربطوها بلدين حتا ينشرو الفكرة اغبياء حقا 💀

Sm00th TV you mean 1:52 ?

+Gamesmaster 3000X ikr..hahah

They don't Dislike the video, they just hate GoPro

+Zyxo No, they dislike the video.

+Josh g no they just think the earth is flat

+ThreeWrap I disliked it because it's edited in such a way to show something that didn't really happen the way it really did. The slow motion speed they shot at made things more dramatic and seem to "float". Meanwhile thats not what happened, the entire ride was violent, they just slowed the footage down so it looked like shots from movies. Much more of a faked look than what was really happened. Thats why.

its made to look like a cinematic stop being buthurt cause it looked cool

Soon we'll have amateur payloads in orbit haha

@@eve_avery soon... and still soon

Don't hold your breath....

Yet reddit will downvote you and claim "we've never been to space!"

@@ThatBillmanGuy we haven't. You're telling me they "lost the technology" and "can't get it back"? That's retarded. It's been pretty much 80 years and they haven't gone back to the moon? Give me a break.

me too!

lol

+Duct Tape lol I saw one from a concave earth believer

Me beweve in qubic wurld naut phlat m9

same

Purlee100 CGI troll

Purlee100 But it’s a fisheye lens being used, isn’t it?

Joel Tunnah yes it is thats why it goes round back.n forth

plusmetal rise Well according to Nasa every "picture" they have is a composite. Meaning they're all CGI

Joel Tunnah so is every lens thats took footage of earth from space a fisheye lens? Thats convenient for you.

We just learned that your a lier, there’s something called a core? The earth is round

r/woooosh

@@Minecrafter6818 Dude, are you serious? we can CLEARLY tell thats a donut.

Minecrafter6818 yes man it’s huge donut 🍩 🤗

you know "barrel distortion"?

Ye

😂😂😂

+BugSplat lol

Leave now 😂😂😂💀 I'm done

you misspelled rock it.

Stephen McAllister Lol xD

+BugSplat sorry I had too 😃

Who complains about it? It allows to capture wider shots

You can choose Linear FOV in the camera options for the footage to self-correct without the wide lens look.

Why do you guys insist on coming here with freshly created accounts just to repeat the same bs over and over?

@@grandpatoothless8162 Your mom doesn't exist.

@@grandpatoothless8162 found the dummy

@@grandpatoothless8162 shhh it's time to take your sleep medication

Flat earthers know GoPro's use a fish eye lense

@@IFentonito And the proof of distortion is right in the video itself when the lens line up the horizon in the centre of the camera and you see a straight line.

@@UToobUsername01 I know! When the camera is level the horizon is flat, explain that, this camera surely has to be like 25,000ft up and the horizon is still eye level

At the minute 1:46 the earth is a globe and at 1:56 the earth is a donut... how stupid can the globbard be... stupidity has no limits with you. This is the fish eye effect stupid stubborn ...

Fish eye

oh shit... nice perspective

Now that you said that, i see it

Indeed the earth is flatxD

Yeah haven't notice yet

Lmoa yeah

Also nothing but CGI

@@fgpt4828 don't be ignorant please do some research and study, OK?

Stevo Actually, no it doesn't. Although that is a very intelligent way of thinking about it. Their design of that rocket is aweful, the body flex, the rotation, I'm assuming they kinda went cheap on the design, or they just don't have much practice with high power rocketry. I've been building rockets my whole life with my dad, he's a level 2 certification through Tripoli. Working on level 3 but he's afraid of electronics lol Regardless, I've seen O motor rockets at LDRS, FAR, BALLS, pretty much all the fun launches, any great high power rocket design doesn't need to spin, in fact it's not desired whatsoever, because the faster it spins the more centrifugal force is applied to the fins. My thoughts about why it spun so violently is because they most likely didn't get one of the fins perfect. Watch some videos of LDRS launches with cameras on board, if it's a perfect design, it won't even rotate 90• The fins apply all the drag needed for stability, even within the very thin atmosphere. I'm amazed that rocket held together with how much stress it was under. Hope you understand I'm not trying to start a keyboard soldier war with you, just trying to enlighten someone who I judged as intelligent by a very great comment... Truly, watch LDRS on board videos. "Welcome to High Power Rocketry, and bring your check book!" ✌️

Stevo nope, they spun it to make it easier to edit the video from real footage to fake round earth footage.

legit sarcasm

The rocket doesn't spin at all that's the earth spinning make me dizzy

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin-stabilisation

😂 🤣

Worst feeling ever.

Ha ha ha

I open my eyes after that to snap out of it lol

They messed up the editing tho and we have a lot of sheep watching... at 1:53 they forgot to keep earth curved, and curved the other way lol

@@benan7852 🤡☝

⁠​⁠@@benan7852 Its called refraction. Atleast im pretty sure it is, the speed of light changes as it goes from vacuum to air, and as the light you see is passing through different densities of atmosphere, that also changes how the light refracts. So the light bends depending on the optical density of a substance. Meaning we see the change in curvature And before you say anything about flat earth you’ll need to explain why gravity is different at different locations at sea level, and why gravity has less effect the further you move away from earth. Basically, prove that GMM/r^2 is false

@@Mystic_Voidbro you kept them quiet 😂😂

@@Mystic_Void This is how I see these arguments always go> lol idk prove that GMM/r^2 isnt false. You cant ask people to go on a 20year math jounrey if you dont go first being the one to bring it up. The answer: go read what they claim in books. Go into the institutions and get indoctrinated by all the other "supporting" math and theories.