GoPro: The Electric 'Monster' Tajima - Pikes Peak 2013 Electric Class Winner 

I do agree!

Ikr

It reduces 99% of the aero thanks to that gomediocre cam.

No

So your experience with vehicles comes from a video game? That's a sad life.

helen mike And you get off trying to be a smart ass on RU-vid? Sounds like you only need to look in the mirror to see sad...

Yea I'm sad that I buy a new car for my wife and I every year. Its an extremely sad life.

helen mike Remind me why I care?...

Hammer Studios Gaming Then you will love to hear that this year this car has 1500hp and 1500nm. :)

easy to drive with a wheel controller, though.

Wow, It's Captain Obvious ! ;)

@cole Thanks for clearing that up :)

Um, zero? Don't you know anything about electric cars? They don't lose HP at altitude.

Will Davis Mr. Tajima said it himself. Near the end, the batteries were nearly drained because racecar.

in breaking the "10 minute" barrier

+Derrick Snelling just a low ratio single-speed transmission because they have huge torque at low rpm :)

the best part is the car is full electric

As you increase in altitude, air density decreases therefore Bigger aero surfaces are needed to achieve the same amount of downforce as a smaller splitter at sea level.

No, this is what electric motors sound like. For all we know he probably charged this car off the mains, which most likely means coal was used to power it. Are people getting dumber lately?

Will Davis "which most likely means coal was used to power it." 1. Coal isn't use everywhere in the world. Where do you live?? Fact is in most developed countries it takes up 10-20% of their total energy production tops. It's being *phased* out. Pretty obvious since it's getting harder and harder to come by. We're living in 2015 not 1915. 2. Last time I checked nuclear power (which is emissions free) is widespread in developed countries so he more likely charged his car from this energy. 3. The emissions from a coal plant for energy produced is several times more efficient than the equal amount of energy produced from the equivalent number of ICE-cars. In other words you get *less* emissions from *even* a coal plant producing energy than the emissions produced by ICE-cars of an equal power output. And that's not including the cost of transporting the petrol to the stations (with trucks), tanker ships, pipelines, refineries (you can't just use crude oil) etc. But in your one-dimensional flat world it's all the same. Yep. No difference. Who's getting dumber again? Cretin.