GPNVG Ground Panoramic Night Vision Goggle 

Right im just here to know cause i used 7b and pvs in the army lol

@Emmanuel Goldstein it’s not quite that simple. Systems like this and the other L3 systems was developed specifically for DoD contracts. Whoever told you that cost does not know what they’re talking about lol

@Emmanuel Goldstein a big DoD/GOV contracting company like L3 puts a lot into developing these types of types products. When you factor in R&D, new materials requirements & cost, etc etc they’re going to charge accordingly and these costs are not commercial user friendly lol

With 40,000 us

@@elatoles3842 Is that all? Costs more than my car.

Soon will cost only a fraction of Bitcoin or a couple of ETH. If TNVC accept cryptos, I'll be getting 1 no doubt...no payment credit bs.

That wont work in pitch black environments

@@bolshoibooze8010 lol

Can’t lie it definitely does 😉

@@NITEWALKER-NIGHTVISION trex arms did a good video on them as well, really wish they were articulating somehow and not so heavy and expensive lol

@@jubalgilbert7681 That was a great video.

@@jubalgilbert7681 well what do you want for the bargain price you get? 😂

@@NITEWALKER-NIGHTVISION how do you get a job with TNVC ?

lol

Holly crap 40k and only a 1yr warranty that's crazy.

@@freddietellez8737 yes and no. It sounds weird but there’s probably a good calculation behind that decision.

I still regret not doing that

You can have a pano set a lot cheaper either by SLA 3D printing your own and installing tubes, or by buying a chinese kit and installing tubes. Comes out to about $6-10K that way.

That price almost gave me heart attack lol.

Don't even bother, just buy more land, guns and bullets.

hey there are other quad tube options out there besides L3, and with nice l3 filmless wp tubes you're looking at like 20k ish

Thanks 👍

Lol, 3k is pretty standard for gen3 night vision thats worth a damn Edit: lmao in what fucking world are panoramic nods standard, I'm talking about PVS-14s so calm down with the "iTs AcHTuAllY 40k" I know panos are 41-43k

@@GiskardRevenlov bro its 40k

40,000 wow....

Y'all GPNVG18 40K

@@GiskardRevenlov it's 40,000.00 usd

*Bravo Six, going broke

@@DontMatter7 NVG so expensive lmao

@@mafiahalo93 I have a homemade set. I used SLA printer. There is a Korean guy on youtube giving the files for free. Ultimately cost about $6k for my quads, and I also bought a kommandostore quad for about 10k.

@@DaveSmith-cp5kj hey how do you like the QTNVG from KommandoStore? I am nearly there (3months) to having all the money for the Elbit SLG white phosphor qtnvg unit. Are they rugged, clear, etc...?

@@santanagamingcinema perfectly clear. Rugged? I don't know. I'm not about to slam them against the ground and find out. :P The build quality is good though. AFAIK kommandostore only sells the housing now, as they have run out of tubes, and I advise buying the housing direct from china and save a few thousand dollars instead of buying it through KS. The maker is Lindu Optics and the price for the housing alone they quoted me was $4000. Here on youtube there is a guy who posted the STL files for an SLA printed housing which I also made using spare tubes I had lying around. This makes the price of housing essentially free although it is not as good as the real deal because it lacks a prism to merge the image. It's not that big of a deal as long as your head is in motion (to negate the black bars of blind spot.) Lindu also makes bino and monocular housings if you can't find them. My only real complaint with buying from Lindu is that you are supporting the tech development a communist regime that is trying to kill us (seriously, read their company mission statement). They are deep China, not even Hong Kong.

My brother once told me: "Lottery is just a way to taxe people with no money". ^^ And i know it was just a joke from you hehe.

I guarantee there's gonna be a budget nvg market by 2040

@@manscapedgrinch1427 BET

@@manscapedgrinch1427 Maybe if those new SPAD sensors live up to the hype. I don't think analog tubes are going to get much cheaper any time soon.

Thanks Hugh 👍. You definitely notice the size & weight but the extra FOV is awesome

government cheese

Government demand driving the price up?

Same as hi pwr ir. It’s mil/le only, which means your gonna have to pay more.. But I agree it’s all bullshit..

nobody actually pays that except civ users, msrp is 40 grand, but departments never pay that much.

@@corncob2244 DOD contracts are done with fixed prices, so companies majorly hike prices in order to maintain their profit margines even after years worth of inflation. No your Aimpoint is not worth $930, they call it the military industrial complex for a reason.

Thanks, I appreciate that. You and me both! lol

Lol

Nick Chen already did that. And he put ECOTIs on all the tubes just for shits and goggles.

or get psq 36 fusion goggles

@@iansorensen1790 those are going to be the next new flex

@@maximilianavdeev7363 i mean theyve been around since the mid 2000s

Solid reason 😂

🤙🏼

@@NITEWALKER-NIGHTVISION got my PVS14 a few days ago. I got the TNVC L3 thin filmed GP. Nothing fancy but I’m having fun seeing in the dark. Can’t wait to get an IR laser & illuminator and start taking some classes👍

@@wildcat8598 right on 👍🏼👍🏼🇺🇸

More like "Bravo Six, going broke."

I don’t have the sheets with it. The commercially sold GPNVG’s are 1792+ min.

@@NITEWALKER-NIGHTVISION Thanks for the reply! I figured they would have the same tubes as the L3 31’s.

@@NoQuarters the ones I demoed do 😉

You’d do the same things as you’d do with a PVS-14 or binos. Hike, hunt, shoot, drive, etc. This video is meant for civilians because the MIL/LE restrictions have been lifted and they are now available for purchase by US Citizens exclusively through TNVC. It sounds crazy to some that people would spend this much money but since we’ve already sold more than we expected

@@NITEWALKER-NIGHTVISION if I'm going to spend 40 grand for night vision driving... I'll just buy a car that has it built in for that price lol.

@@cptairwolf lol

Holy shit man, waiting!!!

They’ll work but the 4x CR123A’s are a better choice for 4 tubes. They’re essentially the same thing. The other listing was older when these weren’t available for commercial civilian sale

@@NITEWALKER-NIGHTVISION Thank you, do you have info on what the runtime is on the 4 CR123s?

@@janetbailey6727 I don’t have a number from personal experience (haven’t used them for a large length of time). I’d say at 20-30 hours would be reasonable based on that 1 CR123A will run a dual tube goggle for that amount of time.

Will at TNVC dot com

I mean given that the regular army is testing an augmented reality heads up display, with a wild stab I'd say the tier 1 guys probably have something a little closer to "ghost recon future soldier" than we'd like to tell ourselves.

Lol 😂

Good question and actually L3 did try different things before ended up with the quad tubes which they found to be the superior solution. Of course that’s considering a government customer who afford those desired requirements

Odds are low. Thanks 👍

QTNVG are his competitor, lol. That said, I do have one of those and they are G2G. If you are an IIT snob you won't like them as they come from Kommando store unless you import the housing only from China and supply your own tubes, as KS uses minor blemished tubes (completely irrelevant from a pragmatic POV though). The bridge is uglier than the real GPNVG bridge, but altogether functional, which is all that matters at the end of the day. QTNVG claims a slightly more expanded FOV but while I have used an ANVIS-18 before I don't have access to them anymore to make a direct comparison. If you want the bare minimum, there is a Korean guy who 3D printed conversions to turn an airsoft GPNVG into accepting real IIT. He posted the files for download. I had spare blemished tubes from previous bino repairs I did for people in our little militia, so I made one of these and while they work, they do not combine images so you get a black bar in-between images. This greatly reduces utility, but is still much better than a bino. Also I suggest dummy cording between IIT since 3D printed parts are not known for being super durable. I coated my housings in epoxy resin to create an impact resistant shield to reduce the chance of breakage. Also the airsoft dovetail is out of spec, so you need to bolt on a real wilcox dovetail, or what I did, cast out a horn interface so I can use direct on a Rihno II. Considering all the work, it is better to actually buy a QTNVG rather than doing the airsoft conversion unless you just happen to have a FDM or SLA 3d printer and spare tubes lying around like I did. The sole reason IMO to buy the TNVC offering is because of their great warranty. If you crash the QTNVG china isn't going to bail you out, and KS only offers 1 year warranty. Also QTNVG will take one full financial quarter to reach you, and while TNVC is a greater wait time right now, I'm sure they will get to a point sometime this year when they can bestow the quad life onto you in a normal 1 week shipping timeframe. I greatly doubt many people are fighting each other for standing in line for quads since few have tens of thousands of dollars in disposable income to blow, unless you are in a free non-shutdown state, or were in or owned a business that figured out how to profit from the plan-demic.

@@DaveSmith-cp5kj ha! Had no idea! Lol, thanks!

Will it work tho?

@@amutsam yes kommando store has them

Not anymore! Lol

1 em cẩm ly ra đi, con 4 mắt này đắt kinh hoàng

@@thienmai1602 Lul, lương dqtv không kiếm đủ để trả đâu, em còn học đh nữa có tìên đâu mà mua.

Oh it cost more than a car, might have exaggerated the price then, but yeah I won't be paying for something that cost equally to a Porsche.

Maybe center of gravity of the unit. That position may be the most balanced.

It's not bad. It puts them too close on my size L OC Carbons with a G24 but they were totally fine on an XL Airframe with a 24.

The BNVS aka dovetail is $40,400 and the ANVS aka ball detent $41,500.

So almost one bitcoin worth to buy these.

The helmet is an Ops-Core FAST Carbon with an Ops-Core FAST Mesh helmet cover.

@@NITEWALKER-NIGHTVISION thanks.

@@asuhdude1055 🤙

Polymer

@@NITEWALKER-NIGHTVISION thank you for answering. Rare to see a content creator do so on an old video. I have watched this video literally dozens of times. Excellent work.

@@santanagamingcinema Thanks 🙏🏼

Yessir you could say it’s a little “spendy” 😂

@@NITEWALKER-NIGHTVISION One day...heheh

Lol

Like $15,000. You're half way there 🤣

Negative

*Quadnods'*

It’s expected they knock off everything. They’re different buyers. The guy who can afford legit L3Harris GPNVGs isn’t going to consider the knockoff and vice versa.

@@mafiahalo93 these are available for civilian purchase exclusively through TNVC with a factory warranty and full support. I talked about it at the end of the video

Yup they're called the qtnvg and they supposedly have 120° fov

It's already been like 10 years and they are still tens of thousands of dollars, lmfao.

They use commercially available tubes.

The Moon was just coming up. This particular one has 2376+ FOM tubes. The standard is 1792+ FOM. Even before the Moon came up they are stunning. The effect of having 4 tubes projecting light to your eyes magnifies the brightness effect.

@@NITEWALKER-NIGHTVISION Nice, I just read the specs. I see, they managed to get unfilmed 18mm tubes in there. So I don't have to ask how much loss in detail the 16mm tubes cause.

The moon phase is the same everywhere around the world.

@@DaveSmith-cp5kj Percentage wise yes, the tilt depends on latitude. The issue is, that I don't know when the footage was taken. Not everybody edits at lightning speed or publishes before youtube did a review.

Thanks 🤙

😂

Then you’ll love the new video lol

Anvis 10s are 20k

@@Aaa._324 I would love a set but it’s too much money.

👊

40000 dólares

Lol 😂

At the price