Graham Hancock: Beyond Ancient Apocalypse | Presentation @ Logan Hall, London 

He sounds like a really down to earth man. Hell yeah. It makes me happy reading these stories.

He did the same thing in St. Louis several years back. Stayed all night long because of the massive turn out and gave everyone their time, even gave me a big hug!

Wow! That is impressive!!

What a legend!

It's such a pity, all the old hard-drives, and ram chips, rusted away?😅. (If only the code, were written in stone?).😂

Love how he always has time for people and you know he appreciates it too.

That is so awesome!! What a blessing to meet him and his lovely wife.

Solid evidence ,and cover up of 250,000 years old human settlement in North America > ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-AGWK9yT5mXw.htmlsi=fQiI-47R2MU15dHm Why Graham Hancock don't talk about this case which have a lot of real evidence scientific evidence and not like all his stories which are mostly speculations, thats why he's a fraud

Art Bell on Coast To Coast AM radio use to interview him back in the 90's and early 2000s. He always stayed the full program.

That’s so cool

absolutely!!! I totally agree!

That is absolutely beautiful.

There is a sucker born every minute.

@@patrickmontie9583 you are right, so when were you born?

@@patrickmontie9583 Do you have any original thoughts, or are you only able to parrot what you've already heard? Congratulations on your Dunning-Kruger status.

I can't wait to get to his part about you, about ten years ago my first far future idea actually centers around the Aboriginal civilization... basically in a world where humanity forgets how to survive off the land due to relying on AI and computers, an apocalypse due to the malfunction of technology leads to more than 95% of the world's population dying off. Primitive cultures whose religion and way of life is tied to the land (Aborigines, Native Americans, First Nations, tribal Africans, tribal Amazonians) are basically the only ones who know how to survive without technology. Humanity's future lies in those who did not go over fully to technology. Climate change made the equatorial regions so inhospitable that the very small amount of people who are left race to the polar or extreme northern/southern regions of the Earth. Australia, an 'island' exclusively out of that area, is the best place in this regard. However, it takes tens of thousands of years for tribal cultures to advance again and reach advanced technology of an entirely different sort - that which works WITH nature rather than against it. Humanity 'industrializes' again, but this time not against the planet.

Much love n respect to you n your beautiful country can you tell us what happened to the Tasmanians?

​@@Awakeningspirit20 you know it's theorized that this has actually happened before. There's ancient architecture that we can't duplicate.

@@Awakeningspirit20 90% of Aborigional people could not find water , food or survive in my harsh country these days. They have become the 'money handout" experts, more than 35 Billion on 3% of the Aborigional Australians per YEAR now. I have seen them in action. The lies they come out with about their 'deep past ' has/is being invented as they go . They say they have a 'connection with the land', yet how can a 1/4 cast white looking person have the nerve to say that.

​@@toreano3160 The British empire successfully committed full genocide in tasmania .

Shiny things get you too?

I doubt it very much. Look how 'woke' their programming and the PR associated with it has become these days. Do you think given this that the white supremacy associations with one of his 'guests' on Ancient Apocalypse made Netflix executives happy to have funded and published the series? 😅 I've not a single doubt that the History channel execs who approved Ancient Aliens for umpteen seasons would trample their first born children to get an audience, but Netflix are walking a more exalted path than that in their own minds, if not in reality. If they actually greenlighted a 2nd series I would be very surprised, unless they personally vetted his entire list of associates next time. To say that was a blunder is a massive understatement. Even a basic Google search could have revealed his guests rather.... unsavoury opinions.

5,6,7,8,9 and then some! 🙏

completely agree. I would love to see more seasons of his show. Already own one of his books and love it, too.

I strongly doubt that there will be a season 2, let alone more beyond that. There are obvious signs of nepotism at work in Hancock's series getting bought by Netlfix owing to his son being an executive in charge of programming at the streaming company - something which came to light shortly after its release. On top of that Netflix is perhaps the "wokiest woke streaming service that ever woked" to quote an overenthusiastic RU-vid commentator on their last 6-7 years of ever more liberal content. Once it became apparent after Ancient Apocalypse was released that Hancock chose to give screen time on the series to a known white supremacist author I think it extremely unlikely that company that leans so obviously hyper liberal in its messaging to the public would continue to even give Hancock the time of day, let alone further fund him for future seasons. This is the same company that was feminising The Witcher before it even started filming season 1 - literally pushing the male titular protagonist out of the story from the start to give it a more liberal edge for the single mothers they know make up a huge percentage of their subscriber base. If Netflix actually do give Hancock a second chance..... well.... he'll be so gelded, and his script so sanitised that you wouldn't even recognise it as the same series. All Netflix has to do is do a basic historical search on the highly racist and xenophobic origins of pseudo history and they will peace out faster than a speeding bullet. There is always the possibility that Netflix want to just sell out and push schlock for profit like the History Channel did with Ancient Aliens (cue ITS ALIENS gif), but given they have already sunk several highly monetisable IPs like The Witcher to chase this current path, and wasted potentially $billions in the process I highly doubt that they will do that for Hancock when they wouldn't do it for Henry Cavill who has a thousand times greater brand recognition at least.

Fighting what and who for truth ?

​@@GroberWeisensteinYou

@mahaxlord nah, I prefer actual evidence. Faux journalism rewriting scientific data to promote ones own narrative is dishonest, especially when it aims to dupe and entice gullible anti-establishments. Enjoy your delusions.

Exactly@@mahaxlord

@@GroberWeisensteinyou don’t know? You should by now

Humility isn't fabricating some mythology about how an entire institution is silencing him bc they fear his ideas. That's the opposite of humility.

Definitely not honest and not humble...He literally admitted to cherry pick data in order to push his pseudo-scientific idea, which coincidentally makes him quite the money...

It's called grifting. I like his stories but he's slowly going insane

​​​@@MrAchile13I responded before reading your comment. I agree. I like his "stories" but like Erick van grift again. They are just spreading lies based on some facts. He's a snake oil salesman. I do like his books though, I just have critical thinking skills, so I can see when it's grifting.... its almost always grifting. My degree deals with this content btw. He lies a lot

@@bookerwills8649 hearing his talks is painful to anyone who actually studied archaeology and sees how he dismisses the science and cherry picks the information. But even for those who haven't studied the topic, in America Before chapter XIX he is arguing this lost civilization of his, had psychic powers. How is this supposed to be a sane idea?

No evidence supports his hypothesis. Independent or otherwise

What evidence? Did you find the magical Atlantis crystal Lazer beamz!?!?

Ironically the opposite is the case. As the years roll by evidence increases that no such 'cataclysm' occurred when he says it did during the Younger Dryas. Sea level rise during this time was gradual, no sudden extinction event occurred. Megafauna died out because they couldn't cope with the relatively rapid state of climate shift from warming -> colder -> warming again in just a thousand years. Everything else survived including humans whose habitations during that period is documented before, during and after with no observed disruption. The larger an animal is, the less it can stand a significant shift in environment like that because its requirements for life are greater than something small - which is why wolves and humans managed better than the megafauna. The same effect caused mammals ancestors to survive the extinction of the dinosaurs. They were small, rodent like burrowers in the Cretaceous who were highly adaptable to environmental change.

@@mnomadvfx very well put.

@@mnomadvfx Stop poo'ing on GRAHAM Poo Poo Face!!

His "research"

Absolutely!

google "galileo gambit"

I'm perfectly willing to question anything as long as you back it up with science not theory... Hancock knows how to bluff evidence better then a politician bluffs border security.

He's absolutely correct. thats the whole basis of science, question everything. However this dude just peddals nonsense and isn't to be taken seriously on this topic in any way shape or form. he's a massive joke to anyone in the community

If?

Ya protect him from the aliens. Now that he's spreading their secrets they will be out to get him...;-)

"The welcome... The ovation b4 he even speaks! Protect this man" You could have described a cult leader in exactly the same words. In fact I'm sure someone HAS described L Ron Hubbard in exactly the same words at one point.

...there wasn't any standing ovation before he spoke.

Original and not overused

❤🙏❤️

Yeah a pseudo scientists mind. Hahaha

@@johnbeans2000 I guess that you think that the others aren't. They are worse.

@@johnbeans2000And you, it seems, were gifted with a closed mind. How do I know? “Only the closed mind is certain.”

@@somethingintheair5373 "only the believer believes"

​@@johnbeans2000and what name for "scientists" who choose to ignore 800 ton foundation blocks and matching simultaneous historical narratives?

Yes but maybe you should challenge everything with actual substance and not just stories and dreams ? Why not discover the beauty in real history and nature?

It inspires nutjobs and weirdos.

His work lies to millions

@@drummerdad80 prove it or go away

@@ixhilkalaskiiver792 okay, we have a build up of knowledge through gobekli tepe, and karahan tepe, that shows a build of skill, we also know at gudung pudang, his carbon date of 20,000 years was just a dig to natural samples, none were proven as man made, so yes he lies, he is a salesman, and you buy it

​@ixhilkalaskiiver792 his gudung padang dig of 20,000 years was just organic material, no man made evidence, and karahan tepe shows a build of technology, so he can admit that and get out of the scene as he is a fool

He could be wrong about a lot of things, that's for us to decide..

@@duellingscarguevaraOn the other hand, he could be right.

"So you're saying there's a chance!"

@@somethingintheair5373 Look at the tsunami of evidence that has more likely explanations for almost all his clames. the only people who don't look at this evidence is his readers and he himself.

YES!! It’s quite credible, that he presents evidence, & in context-which far too many, don’t. Detractors of course, will try to denounce his work, conclusions & theories, because he flies in the face of entrenched academia & those who ..don’t.. have anyone’s Life’s best in mind-until they cannot deny them anymore. -or, until detractors destroy or hide enuf evidence (as has been happening for very long time) & it becomes impossible to prove either way. “There are more things in heaven & earth, Horacio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy!” ~Hamlet (Shakespeare).

I excellent 🎉🎉

Creepy.

@@johnbeans2000”Only the closed mind is certain.”

@@somethingintheair5373 "only the weirdo nutjob believes without evidence"

​@@somethingintheair5373Tell that to Hancock. I am sorry, but he's a pseudoscientific hack. He elevates himself by attacking mainstream archaeology and selling his unevidenced pseudoscience to the gullible. He has proven nothing.

baa baa

Said no one who has actually had an institutional education in archaeology. Stop bleating as if you have any idea what you are talking about. You don't, and neither does he - in his own words he admits as much!

And keeping us interested and wanting more.

@@mnomadvfx name an educational institute that has reached MILLIONS of people to change their perceptions on the history of the earth? Opening minds into thinking freely and not just being told what to think about our shared past! Graham freely admits he may not always be right, but the evidence is amounting in one direction…

Yeah, he blew my mind too, until I simply figured out he ignored the last 20 years of scientific research on his own subjects. I mean how stupid can one be?

@@mnomadvfx "institutional education in archaeology." Lol. You people are nothing if not overly predictable caricatures.

These bastards will receive their karma for causing harm and pain.

HISTORY = His - story…😂

You can LISTEN to some of his books1

Such a brilliant man. Why is it the powers that be try to keep the truth of our history???

@@Auntiehoney217 it's control always. We are more than what we are told about ourselves and our past. We are more powerful as people with knowledge and the self elected few keep our potential and birth rites from us as well as divide us with malice.

is there any irrational nonsense you saw on youtube and didn't believe?

I would posit the view point the Human inability to accept their established perception of reality being either inaccurate or just plain wrong is pathetic and if the species does not survive adolescence it *will* be because of this fundamental weakness.

Even really dumb ones, like was there a super hi tech lost civ that liked to move big rocks around for...reasons...but vanished w no evidence bc it got wiped away by a convenient flood!?

Not Like, minded easily fooled, a journalist knows the truth, but all trained people lie yeah okay

You opened your mind so far your brain fell out?

​@@eeeaten Why not go waste your time elsewhere, my love? Don't bother the adults.

@@lindasue8719 did you watch flint dibble's deconstruction of hancock's atlantis nonsense? hancock is obviously not a scientist and does not use actual evidence to support his wacky theories. it's just fantasy.

Not A Doctor

Lectures on his unproven fantasy stories?

​@@ickebins6948yeah

And what except for copium and fever dreams makes you have this opinion ? Asking for a friend.

Seek and ye shall find.

that's how you keep the book sales rolling in

Well if he would behave like one at least he would not be lying. Hancock is just a lier. Nothing more. Doesn't want to look at scientific research from the past 20 years. He is an idiot. Fooling people into beautiful stories that are not true.

shut up.

It got him more out there..( the more they hate, the bigger he gets?😅 that's comical)..there is something strange about Australia,,,the hoppity critters, and there are some strange theories, all birds originate there...(that is a strange one, I admit),. The place was ocean floor, (at some stage..opals at lightning Ridge, attest to that).. It's good to be around at this point in time, (Even if if just for a pedagogical exercise?). Truth will out!..

Sadly, probably not - have you seen what they are teaching kids these days? 🤷‍♀️

Yes every day we slip closer and closer to Idiocracy

No evidence for any of it. Doesn't even rise to the level of psuedo science.

you didn't do well in science at school huh

Ok don't go overboard.

Plus other people have researched and arrived at the same conclusions before him. I've known these things for decades before it was popular and was on the fringes.

Ok he is pretty inspiring and excites the imagination. 😊

Well I am sorry to disappoint you, but he did not bring any evidence, just completely nothing. Just google 'DNA evidence of global civilization.'

@@blueskythinking6674 other people yeah but not archeologists, you mean Erich von Daniken, well he had actually a better theory then Graham. It is simply not possible there not a shred of DNA evidence of a global civilization 12.000 years ago. Just nothing nada... a global civilization is visible in human DNA... but human remains of that era has no DNA that refers or is in the east containing markers of a global civilization. Just nothing.

Should have known you were Ozzie, our instincts, tell a different tale..there is polygonal masonry in the blue mountains, I've heard...like footpaths.. (If things go to 💩 again, the old coal-mines there, would be the place to be?).

Is here any irrational nonsense you don’t love?

Stop pretending your vacations are research! You bring no new knowledge to the table

@@JB-jm6lo bro what