Want to learn more about the Technological Revolution? Watch our playlist here: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ENWsoWjzJTQ.html - ALSO - Become a RU-vid member for many exclusive perks from exclusive posts, bonus content, shoutouts and more! subscribe.futurology.earthone.io/member - AND - Join our Discord server for much better community discussions! subscribe.futurology.earthone.io/discord
What is it with technocrats and their obsession with cubes/hexagons? I can't help make the connection with a certain number mentioned in Revelation 13 along with transhumanism/biotech being a plausible candidate for the *,image of the beast,* also mentioned in the aforementioned Biblical verse.
I really don't understand how your channel is this small as the video quality and freshness of information is top notch. I just found out your channel by cheer luck and am now going thru your older videos and the quality is just superb! Thanks yet again.
Graphene has no energy gap; it behaves more like a metal rather than a normal semiconductor, which limits its potential for transistor-type applications. There’s a lot of research on other two-dimensional materials, like Indium Selinide (InSe) or hexagonal boron-carbon-nitrogen (h-BCN), that have large bandgaps.
Look at "“Graphene based materials: Past, present and future,”" viewable here ; wwwgu.ftf.lth.se/courses/FAFA10VT/Protected/Graphene.pdf . In the introduction section on page 1181 it states "a distinct band gap can be generated as the dimension of graphene is reduced into narrow ribbons with a width of 1-2nm, producing semiconductive graphene with potential applications in transistors" . Whilst it might not be either the first , the long term, or even a replacement for silicon, it does have the basic properties necessary to do so. Note that there are things graphene is not optimal for, or is only optimal with a lot of finagling or trade offs , ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-pSSEFX6b4Eg.html , but it is not quite as simple as is being made out in the original post. Additionally further methods are being investigated to increase the band gap , www.chemistryworld.com/news/graphene-band-gap-heralds-new-electronics/9000.article , with graphene base having 0.5ev whereas silicon is ~1.14ev.
in addition to what sarogo posted, a new field called "twistronics" just recently sprung where you can change graphene from either a resistor to a superconductor by merely changing the angle at which 2 stacked sheets are in relation to each other. this is fucking crazy and i don't know how that could be put into practice, but there's a lot of potential.
Yes, excellent production quality, and content. Wish though, that the voice volume was a little higher, and the narration speed slowed down just below aspie levels. Can see these vids going mainstream!
A FLOP isn't a measurement instruction per second. IPS is the measurement of instructions per second however it doesn't work very well for modern high performance computer. This is mostly because newer systems are designed to perform more than one floating point operations in a single operations. Also, no bets are being placed on Carbon replacing Silicon. To make a graphene transistor, you have to control both the chemical and physical structure; we can hardly make a single transistor in lab. Whatever replaces Silicon will have to work with photolithography otherwise we won't be able to manufacturer it no matter how much better than Silicon it is.
Yes please!...more graphene electronics and photonics, at wich point is research and development right now and when will we have portable supercomputers. That terahertz numbers on cpus just blew my mind, as a 3d artist I'm excited thinking of how in some years the barrier between realtime and offline rendering will vanish. Realtime pathtracing, simulations and much more!...man I'm going to have a heart attack 😃
Incredible video, as usual! Your timelines are just slightly off - we'll be getting 3nm transistors in 2021 (likely either GAAFET or MBCFET), not 2025; we also won't hit zettascale in 2030, more like 2033-2035.
Exactly! Late 2020 for the exascale (with the Chinese beating the American Aurora project), late 2021 for the 3nm node and 2034 for the zettascale are my bets.
Mate, speak a little slower. If you talk so fast, most of what you say will just go over people's heads. There's no rush, you have all the time in the world. So please speak at a more comfortable speed for the viewer, not like someone trying to win a rap battle.
Click the little gear icon at the bottom of the screen and set the speed to 75%. I've found this to be a vital skill if you intend to self-educate online, because a lot of these dudes talk really fast!
I enjoy the pace and amount of information, and dislike how many RU-vidrs spend 5 minutes saying what this guy can tell me in a few sentences. Smoke a joint, it will help. I love getting super baked after work then watching SP
the 100 to 4000 mhz increase on the CPU is because of the efficient cooling techniques were introduced, moore's law was more consisent based on transistor size. There were barely any fans on processors back in 1995.
I'd like to see a video on the global graphene Supply and how that relates to are current trends of Technology I mean do we have enough to sustain the current trends will it be able to scale up to this massive technological boost in the direction it's going? And does that mean it would just be a total necessity to start a mining operation on Mars?
Bro i spent like the last hour or so watching a bunch of your videos. You use computers everyday but rarely do you ever stop to think how it all actually works. You just know it does work so your questions stop there. Its cool to see how it all works together. Awesome vids!
Love your video, but would be even better if background music was lower and you slowed down a bit. Very hard to follow at times, had to watch a few times. Awesome content and graphics. Kudos to you.
3:19 It is always _"either or",_ *never* "and". Your very own text about the IBM claim states that ("Or, more interestingly..."). Smaller fabrication nodes provide a higher power efficiency, which means that CPU and GPU companies face a trade-off between higher performance at the same TDP (i.e. heat, which is derived from how much power is consumed) _or_ the same performance at a lower TDP. Or, of course, they can opt for a combination of the two. For instance if a new node can provide 20% higher performance (at the same TDP, and thus the same battery life for mobile phones, tablets and laptops) or 35% lower TDP (at the same performance) they can sacrifice some of the performance and target 15% higher performance and ~25% lower TDP. According to the first preliminary data about Intel's first couple of Cannon Lake CPUs that have been spotted in Asia, they have ~15% higher performance due to the transition to 10nm, despite having no architectural difference. That performance edge is due to the 10nm node's higher power efficiency, which allowed Intel to add a 10% higher clock to their base clock and the rest must be due to longer boost clock times and +1 MB of L3 cache. Yet their TDP is the same as the previous generation, which means Intel sacrificed their entire TDP gain in exchange for merely 15% higher performance. That does not paint their 10nm node in a very bright light, which is presumably one of the reasons they delayed full volume production until next year. Nope, despite your exascale and even zettascale projections the road to them is nowhere close to "this increase in computing performance doesn't show any signs of slowing down". The industry requires either new materials like III-V semiconductors or a replacement for CMOS.
a very fast sculptor sculpts a rock say 100grams per second. if you come with a hammer and start chipping at the rock at 1grams per second, you are slow, so what's the solution? get a bigger hammer, and chip 20 50 60 75 then 100 grams per second. the rock is smitherines, doesn't make it a sculpture.
Your videos are amongst the best and most understandable by normal people without background knowledge about computers ( me 🤕) keep going you are helping many people . Now it's ramadan I am a Muslim and I am gonna do prayers for u 😊.
all the tech shown in this video was created 10 years ago or more its just that the computer industry worked with silicon and improved it and wont change to a better material because it will have to change its entire assembly line to make them now that they can no longer do that, they turn to material scientists with stored ideas from over a decade ago to improve computing!
So with graphene have they been able to make transistors with graphene? Because by itself isn't graphene just a really good conductor? That is different than Silicon which is a semi-conductor.
Graphene would be nice but we can only make 400 tons a year. If we really want to have a graphene age we need to make over 10,000 metric tons a year to find a niche market. Silicon was made in quantities around 7.2 million metric tons a year.
if you simulate the human brain with transistors it wont be as efficient dedicated neural units maybe better but som1s gotta make and design them you could train them on a standard computer so they learn faster then move them onto dedicated hardware
So this means in the not too distant future we will have cell phones and laptops made 90% out of hemp. Hemp processors, hemp batteries, body and screen hemp plastic. Would be awesome to see.
Just rewind it, though you are right. However.. you're not going to want to miss what it shows, so it's a really good idea to rewind it to catch everything, for sure. Also check my other channel called Technology Research, watch the video all the way through on the home page that's there for now, a minute long. Go to the "created playlists" after that and save that to your favorites, only be on the created playlists, scroll down to the bottom of the created playlists and start there, work your way to the top by watching all the Graphene types of playlists, the STL and Time Crystals playlist, and all the Quantum Technology playlists.
check my other channel called Technology Research, watch the video all the way through on the home page that's there for now, a minute long. Go to the "created playlists" after that and save that to your favorites, only be on the created playlists, scroll down to the bottom of the created playlists and start there, work your way to the top by watching all the Graphene types of playlists, the STL and Time Crystals playlist, and all the Quantum Technology playlists. Though forget about electronics and go with Photonics, use Graphene Spintronics and Graphene Twistronics for Graphene - Photonics, now add Graphene aerogel made in space to revolutionize the way we explore space to the Graphene - Photonics also. Again please follow the steps provided to find the "created playlists", and start at the bottom, do not just click on a playlist at the top for your convenience without following the steps, people make this mistake a lot and cherry - pick through it!
I'm an idiot please disregard the following paragraph under the dotted line.. As I miss heard you, having said that.. You seriously need to slow down your ranting, yes ranting is what it sounds like.. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sorry but I am adamant that graphene is not carbon nanotubes, My understanding is that graphene is actually a single layer of carbon atoms, a somewhat 2 dimensional Mass, I say somewhat as an atom is made up of standing waves or "Particles", Anyway I digress, So yeah: Yes.. Once a tube is formed by a sheet of Graphene, it is only then best to refer to that Mass or Structure as a Nanotube, I am guessing maybe that's why you received so many thumbs down, which BTW I haven't.. Mind you I also didn't give you a thumbs up..
The assumption that one could increase the Clockspeed of a CPU to the 10^12 Herz just because heat generation sinks low is false. This is due to the fact that the wavelength of the electromagnetic waves becomes too small for the chip to remain controllable. There is a reason as to why CPU are as small as about 4cm, while the wavelenth is about 6cm at 5 GHz. At THz the CPU would have to be smaller then 300 micro meters.
Ya but the display is actually 90% of the battery drain in smartphones! We need transparent displays already with all the components in the bezel. (Yes, bring bezels back in exchange for see-thru screens) Apple needs to get on this first or they will fall behind even further lol!
You speed up my learning abot 10 times faster than other media.I´ts so wellorganized and syncronized so I wonder if you are a person ore an AI.(ment as an compliment)
Even though Summit currently runs at 200 petaflops, they too say that their upgrades will be around 1 exaflop around 2020 so that's right in line with this prediction.
It's funny how you animated a clock speed going up to 1 THz. Just due to the speed of light limit the entire processor, with all of the logic gates, control circuits and internal memory, has to fit within a sphere of 150 microns diameter just because of the speed of light limit (assuming the signals travel at that speed and the logic gates don't slow the signal down more than that). Technically, yes, you can make a processor that fast but it wouldn't really be able to do anything that useful except for doing some small number calculations that require the operations to be executed in a specific order that that is already done in normal processors in operations like addition that can be executed in a single cycle. But the clock rate for the whole processor has to include all the interpretation and execution of the instructions and one of the main limits is how much internal memory you want since it takes up a lot of space but if you have it externally it is much slower. So, yeah, you can get high clock speeds for specific tasks but not much higher for general purpose processing.
So basically, if we manage to create a commercial CPU using graphene, even with today's IPC levels, we could boost the computation power by hundreds. Wow.
Great video very informative and up to date, just a couple things, first the audio, I don't know what it is but it sounds like you're muffled or something, and second I know its a lot of information for 10 minutes but sometimes I think you went a bit too fast. Keep it up hope to see more!
Really great content. Although I don't have trouble keeping up, you should consider slowing down. This is not the only video of your to have many comments about you talking too fast. I'm only saying because maybe you could get more subs. On the other hand if that's just how you talk... meh. Anyhow you have a new sub
Great video & great channel. Would love to watch a video explaining blockchain & cryptocurrencies (bitcoin, ethereum, etc.), it's impact on big data and why there is a hype about it these days.
