Great Garrett Hands; Losing the Minimum and Bluffing 

Lol

Click bait should be a crime

Awesome comment lol

Yes

The grammar suggests that its all 3 of what the title says

gal must be regret not check raise the turn with two diamonds came in

Garrer must have picked up something because normally he fires with aa against a station like Gal.

Great captch!

Dude must have a giant skull

Lol ? Old joke

So would ya mum

@@cliffecliffe8358 and dad :p

Lol I think Garett could actually beat postle

It was obviously a good check by Garrett on the river, but I wouldn't say it's the greatest "losing the minimum" moment... he still lost like 190bb there

@@dok599 how do u lose less on this board with Aces without underplaying your Aces tho

@@DoctorHomunculous Yea rewatching this I think the 190bb seems like more than it actually was due to large preflop sizings and it being 4 ways to the flop. Garrett could possibly check back flop on occasion and lose less, and maybe 2/3 turn vs overbet, but I think his sizings are actually fine. The game just plays big

shhhhh tmi

yea that's an internal f bomb 😆

clickbait

Yeah, he's surprisingly a talkative guy away from the table. He's got his own youtube channel (like a poker vlog) and he talks a lot there.

@@painkiller5657 really?! What is it?

@@moemonte88 ru-vid.com

@@painkiller5657 bro you the man!

Probably the best..

Loooooool. If garret is the beat cash player you've ever seen you either don't know what you're looking at or haven't been in poker more than a few days

@@thebigcnel Garrett is definitely up there. I've watched a lot of his hands. Who are some players you like more? I've been playing poker for almost 20 years.

@@ShredHeadJHJ bonomo... buy I like garret he's just a favorite

​@@chsims12 bonomo is a tournament player... deep cash game is a different dynamic when you're not considering ICM and (typically)

The call depends on the opponent and your read.

He certainly does call a block sizing. Pots 39K if Gal lead for 12,500 (30%pot) he gets called making it look like he has 10 X. With Garrets overbet on turn i think Gal put him on a draw and by checking he forced Garret to bet his bluffs rather than allowing him to fold to a bet. Garret is good enough to bet 1 pair hands for value on the end there, its the overbet on the turn thats the inflection point.

He may not be able to balance that lead but the commentator is still right. If he doesn’t raise the turn with a set to build the pot then he can’t give garrett the opportunity to check back river. The check call on the turn overbet is so strong from gal so Garrett will do a lot of checking on the river with his overpairs and top pairs. He will also give up on some bluffs. there aren’t many hands that Garrett will bet river with that gal has beat which is why a donk lead is the best play to get max value.

@@conormountain6326 "If he doesn’t raise the turn with a set to build the pot then he can’t give garrett the opportunity to check back river. " That is not true. Garrett is the aggressor so he gets to do what he wants. Garrett has the overpair and straight advantage here while still having sets of 9s Ts here. Gal should check to have calls vs Garretts missed flushdraws/straight draws as checks with TJ become really uncomfortable with triple barrel. However, the river is still not great for Garretts hand (eg triple barrel with AT is preferred as he blocks T9 TT, so he checks and Gal can do nothing about it. Gal should raise turn sometimes but against an overly aggressive opponent trapping turn is not bad as e.g. against QJ or AXd he picks off triple barrels

Gal runs red hot most days. Good player too.

Because he has Aces which make alot of money over time and im most situations he would be losing vaule by not betting river( not against this exact hand but the range of hands Gal can have. He obviously loses to two pair or better but Gal can have many 1 pair hands that Garrett beats i.e. KT suited AT suited QT suited JT suited T8 suited) which makes his check all the more sick. Does that make it easier to understand?

@@lostintheshuffle6527 He overbet the pot in the turn planning to check the river. He should never bet three streets of value with an overpair being 1000bb deep. Either way losing 200bb is not losing the minimun. His face tells you that he is not happy with his play

@@cpasa798 agree to disagree. I dont think He is upset with how he played. I think he is upset that Gal has held over him in basically every pot they have played in the past couple months. I think he played AA there about as good as you can. I know you don't agree so let's just leave it there!

@@lostintheshuffle6527 with the overbet he is only targeting back door flush draws and some will probably fold, the rest of hands that call the overbet are beating him. I think that he didn’t want to get bluff in tv with AA and he played the hand in such a manner that Gal can never raise without looking extremely strong. Donk lead the river after an overbet in the turn doesn’t make any sense in a player like Gal

Lol ur not a smart cookie are you? I suggest you quit poker or you’ll end up broke

@@thamade Thanks, you make some very good points about my comment.

Because he wants to show down

@@Birdbussa wow, more great points.

I mean….calling a turn XR or river donk doesn’t make him dumb. I think that’s where your disconnect is coming from lol. When the commentators imply that he’s not gonna take the bait and bet river when checked to, that does not equate to “if Gal takes the aggressive action and Garret pays, he’s dumb”

Lots to say as you play .01/.02

what if when garret bets smaller there, he is more likely to get raised? he did lose the absolute minimum

@@albertjohnson3121 Nice try but your wrong

@@tubesox000 explain why?

@@albertjohnson3121 Well simplest thing is not over bet the turn. Pot bet or 3/4 bet it and by default you lose less money. Also we ( or at least I as a casual watcher of this vid) do not know how this dude with a set plays. He could be a trappy slowplayer or a fish caller, the dynamics would change.

And then checked the river, donk.

@@danklodowski he didn't lose the minimum.

do you want to go live and play at his table?

So you just like hating for no reason. Gotcha buddy!

@@saqob1779 post a link of any live game garrett sits with same avg stack as the other players....waiting patiently! you don't understand poker if you think the stack disparity isn't what allows him to do some of the things you're apparently impressed by. thanks for reading my original comment tho.

@@alexanderszabo1629 there are two kinds of fear in poker. 1.) fear of skill measurement and 2.) fear of losing money. both are handicaps hard to overcome. I don't fear garrett's skill is going to tear me to pieces. but I don't have the net worth to play the stakes he plays. so unless freerolling on a millionaire's dime I would not likely play at a table with garrett. but if a millionaire offered me the chance I would compete and likely profit against most these "high stakes" donks.

Poker isn’t about making “stellar plays”. That’s just FPS. If you’re generally balanced with your checking, calling, betting etc and have good live read skills what more do you want?