Greenfields vs brownfields: Expert on Auckland’s future development | Q+A 2023 

Such an important issue imo when so many of our problems are due to our urban layout being so inefficient. Nats plan to repeal the bi-partisan Medium Density Resedintial Standard is sad given that looked to open up those Inner city suburbs where we'd get much more bang for our buck as a country, plus that brief moment of consensus was refreshing. Like all broad sweeping policy outlines there were problems that came along with the MDRS but it seems like those could've been addressed by building on it rather then throwing the whole thing out.

Why did the economist not directly mention the most important thing. Its by now well understood that green field development is subsidized by more intensively developed land. Ie increases in intensity, where people need to live, is far more economically viable than suburban sprawl. So if you want to pay less rates allow intensive brown fields development. And rate the socks off the special character areas because why should they be subsidized when they are wrecking the city for everyone else?

House on stilts in flood zones. Auckland has a few golf courses that current cost the city millions to run at a loss, that could be converted into those green/brown field mixes. Would help fill the city's coffers and part of the money could be used to invest in new courses on the edge of the city where the land is cheap and undeveloped.

It seemed like Shane was hesitant to answer the questions, or needed more time to answer, because he was worried about offending us Kiwis? Just give it to us blunt, mate. Our Governing bodies haven't done a good job on housing and still continue to fk around while more people become homeless.

Nz needs to get with the program... Auckland, wellington.. needs to GO UP! BUILD UP! its easily solved if we build apartments! UP UP UP... 30 story apartment buildings.. can easily accommodate 50.000 - 100.000 people. look at ASIA! its the only way... time to change the skyline!!!!!

Heritage homes need to be viewed in far more practical terms, moving forward, theres know need for 20 thousand homes to be all Categorized under the same umbrella, Not all need to be protected equally, give room for future scope! Then possible land can be developed.

Housing is a big problem and as someone who worked for a big developer overseas the planning of infrastructure/doctors/schooling etc needs to come first before any place is allowed to be developed and also working with the people around you - i live out of town in a farm area and big money brought next door for cheap and is putting housing on it but under current law don't have to notify anyone not even to say for the next 2 years you are going to have constant construction noise - yet people closer to town can't sub-divide on similar land (its like this building 3 storey houses next to a 1 storey house and killing there gardens/privacy/sun) - we need housing but i always believe communication is a big thing and it needs to be community based not cause someone has money or is able to pay the right people to do it (as council members etc get paid to much for the little they do (old boys club style) - we have a "But" clauses added in a legal document wtf)

In other countries I've seen Housing on bamboo Poles over a River. Obviously we can't grow Bamboo in New Zealand ... It's a Point of View - either we can or we can't - once you get past the can't and find we have to you'll find the We Can

Do we need rapid population growth.Does everyone benifit. Maybe we do. Question is not really asked though.

Just stop listen to whoever planned AKL until now ... these dudes have no idea

Here's what I'd do with this xmas tree flood area. I'd open it up for the owner to sell Bamboo Stilt homes on the land and sell them here for 3 years before opening the market up to Vietnamese

Yo I saw him in real life

If the Government started building a very very fast train service from Bluff to Cape Reanga (Sp?) like the have in China and Europe, people could live the life we always have had. They could get to the cities if they wanted but the little towns would prosper and the infrastructure need would be gradual.