Mostly...seen one episode where criminal tried to rob this woman who was undercover with a gun an luckily they rolled up on him so fast he got scared. Only one iv seen that was like wtf...
Hey Jeff you know when you said that guy was a dumb ass? well i think that was a bit harsh because if you watch him when hes in the tunnel he thought you were gonna pass on the right so he moved over then you pinched in between that truck. Also when he apologized he sounded so innocent XD
why would he think Jeff would past on the right when clearly when an officer is code they are to past on the left. Not to mention Jeff was on the left when approaching the highway patrol why would Jeff last min want to past on the right hand side. That highway patrol officer should know protocol
+Champ JJ I don't know about you, but based on my knowledge an officer drives down the middle of a two lane one way when responding to something. So maybe he was thinking that and moved to the left when he heard the sirens to open up the middle. At least where I'm from that's how they respond to things. But I'm curious to know, do they follow California law and stuff since the game is based on California? Or rules and etc from a different department?
Those unmarked CVPI's by Bxbugs123 are my all-time favorite Crown Vic's. They handle perfectly and are my go-to vehicle when I want to use an unmarked CVPI. Excellent detail on these models.
exactly. he didn't have to. Jeff asked for him causes he is on a stop, the guy clearly didn't know he could refuse since he was not the driver. On the other hand, a BOLO vehicle for drug trafficking may provide a different set of rules considering he could of been transporting then. I am not a cop in the slightest but thats my take on my experience of Jeff playing lspdfr, DOJ, and watching cops and other such things
I still dont think they can require the passenger's identification unless they have the passenger leave the vehicle and in the search of the vehicle find causation for further investigation of the passenger (like weed under the passenger's seat or something along that lines).
RU-vid Google That's called entrapment, the suspects have to be the one's who engage the officer with the intent to commit an illegal activity first.... they could rev their engine and try to get them to do it on their own or do the three honks, but they can't directly challenge them. Unless it's just to race without arresting anyone.
they definitely need a more accurate police department in gta.. you'll get a wanted level for touching the police car with your car, get shot and killed.. lol
I'm not sure if this is what the guy was going for when he asked "do we have a reason?" @ 1:30 - but officers can ask for a "reason" or "circs" when directed to search for vehicles or people. For example, I would ask to know the reason the vehicle is wanted, could be violent crime/assault police/known to run etc. all handy to know if you're about to make a move. I ask every time. :)
FYI, in the US, only the driver of a vehicle must show their ID and any proof of insurance. They are also responsible for any crimes committed in the vehicle. At no time does a passenger have to identify them self’s, even after being asked.
Every part of that statement can be false depending on where you are and what's happened. blanket statements are not good when talking about police work
