Are people incapable of going to a show without filming with a phone? These shows are all professionally filmed and shown to the public soon after, yet audiences seem to feel the need to watch these events through their phone view finder. Weird
No one else, apparently, is bothered by the camera work here? The long, pointless close-ups of the models that don't show the designs, then multiple tiled pictures at once that are impossible to examine? I know the whole aesthetic is meant to be "elevated," but they need to succeed at showcasing the garments and accessories, not just their "artsy" camera work. The videographers must understand it's about the clothes, not their coy film-school genius. Perhaps I'm the philistine, but if my choice were this fancy camera style or a still camera, I'd choose to keep the camera still and let the models take their turns walking by. Sorry. It aggravated me. Some amazing clothes with poor showcasing.
Sometimes the camera work was ok, but the 9 grid was egregious, as was the shots that followed three of those models without changing pov at all. Still way better than some things I’ve seen at Alexandere Vauthier and Alaia previously, but it amazes me videography at fashion shows seemed 100x better two-three decades ago
Camera person seems particularly entranced with a few of the models. The colors are dull and the camera work isn't helping. I like a few but only a few.
I've always loved the Jacqueline Kennedy style. Some of these pieces reminded me of that and of the well crafted, tasteful, slightly over the knee length, all black brocade dress I bought for an important college dance over 50 years ago. I splurged $30, now $280 at a high end department store. It had a fitted, but not tight bodice, seamed at the waist with a pencil (but fuller) like skirt. Other than changing knee lengths, that dress would never be out of style. Of course after childbirth, it was impossible for me to wear it ever again. I donated the dress and I'm sure some waif like young lady loves it today just as much as I did back then.
GUCCI has been caught by the short fringe, finally. What was once is no more because for the past many years Gucci has been built on wretched excess and overly done everything, sometimes to great effect, but no more. With very few exceptions this collection is a disappointing bore. So many houses are doing a more modern look so much better. Even the momentary glimpses at glamor seem pretentious and self conscious. IMO, of course...
Tbh she was just being a fox. : LONDON the two of YOU! I could not tell you exactly because I knew you would of gotten upset. but eventually you would of understand which would of made you feel worst. Therefore LONDON is smilimg for you.
bring it into the UK 2025 store s like tesco clothing and amazon UK also the jewellery s as well store s like amazon uk and claire accessories as well this also the best so far as well 😀 love corrinne friend butterfly 🦋 ❤️
❤ France algérienne Paris iltone ❤❤ chances baraka Allah engel ❤❤ Pink diamant rubis or ❤❤❤❤❤sir Ronaldo univers prince sultan ❤'❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ empire allah ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤all
Italian Gucci once known for it's chic maximalism is now doing richly-hued scandinavian/stockholm style. I'm a fan of both but this doesn't feel like Gucci. And I wish they'd stay on a model long enough to see the deets of their entire outfit before cutting to the back of a different model's head. The pacing of the show and the camera work didn't align.
Gucci codes aren’t really chic maximalism to be honest, AM took it very maximalist but rarely chic, and prior to that it was a luxury chic house but rarely would I have called it maximalist
@STKTSTKT I disagree. Alessandro Michele's style was chic apart from maximalistic. It was chic in an unconventional way.Chic is not only the classic lines. And Gucci with Tom Ford was maximalistic in terms of sexiness. This collection looks like Celine and Cloe.Everything looks the same and boring. The girl above described it very well as Scandinavian
