Gun Control Abroad vs. The United States | The Daily Show 

Me too, bruv. I'm in South America and feeling much safer, and I'm saying that in Medellin where you can't go to a park on the outskirts because people get robbed at gunpoint out there and you can't go on a tinder date because you might get drugged and murdered. I still feel way safer here than I ever did in the United Stupids of America.

@@johnrussell-bk7lv bruv? what is that?

@@johnrussell-bk7lv Yet far more murders in south america! LOL Especially the country with not a single legal gun!

What was the immigration process like getting into Aus?I’m starting to think the “love it or leave it” crowd might be onto something

@@westcoastseattleboy784 Too late they have let in the muslims and blacks!

We have over 20,000 gun laws local and state and over 300 federal laws. We have the most gun laws in US history today.

None of which have any teeth, unfortunately, unlike Australia's...

@@S1D3W1ND3R015 Where do you get your statistics? Do people in Texas and FL even know what a gun law is?

@ULTRA1BOB Just because ban and confiscate isn't in the state laws doesn't mean they don't have laws. This just proves your ignorance. Every single state has state laws, on top of federal laws. Every single city has its own local laws too.

@@S1D3W1ND3R015 -"We have the most gun laws in US history today." Ever heard of quality over quantity? Doesn't matter how many laws you have, if they are as useless as gun free zone laws then they won't have an effect. -"Every single city has its own local laws too." Yet most states (especially the ones with loose gun control) have preemption clauses regarding gun laws that limit the power of the city to enforce any laws that conflict with state laws.

Lets say they passed control today it wouldn't remove firearms from people that actually want to commit crimes with them. It wouldn't fix anything. 400m firearms in circulation already. The scope is entirely different.

@@1911GreaterThanALL Yeah it would take long time to put most of them out of circulation so f*ck it, let is stay like it always was and mass shootings aren't that bad after all

@@Nickxxx85 That also assumes that majority of actively participating people want that. This isn't the case. Furthermore it would be wildly Unconstitutional which therefore is illegal. Bruen decision states 1791-14th amendment that gun controls laws must satisfy text history and tradition of the time. There was no gun control law banning firearms by type.

@@1911GreaterThanALL the key problem is in your brains, brainwashed with some serious bs

​@@Nickxxx85I think you forget the concept of Rebellion

Every Republican: Guns are people and have rights to exist! Also every Republican: Women aren’t people. They’re just vessels and should be put to death for controlling their own bodies! Psychopaths

Neither should be allowed in voting places

@@bobbobberson5627 and people with too many bs in their name

@@bodybalanceU2 Mass shootings and oppression are american core values and cultural markers.

Totes body balance

Our problem are the people. Even so-called liberals do not have think the US can stop mass shootings. Death cult America will never respect guns in order to have a non-death cult society for business and peaceful living.

@@bobbobberson5627of course, why not risk being shot at a supermarket?! you do you, america 😂

@@bobbobberson5627 Yep, not enough Americans dead yet, for safety to be a concern. Of course, death cult America would celebrate American deaths, so they would consider shootings to be desirable, and celebrate all the gun shootings and deaths.

@@bobbobberson5627 because aspiring to improve things at home is absurd?

​@bobbobberson5627 such a childish take, lol.

I think RESPECT (the arms n more importantly people) comes in handy too.

Im all for common sense gun control the issue I have is the ones making the laws cant tell me the difference between said guns and instead want to ban everything.

@@impopquiz The USA doesn't respect the sovereign rights of other nations. It has a loooong history of interfering with and invading much smaller nations at whim It demonstrates minimal respect for its own citizens - most notably the children who remain at risk of being slaughtered in their kindergartens. Americans, as individuals, demonstrate minimal respect for their own laws or for their fellow citizens - most notably the children who are at constant risk of being shot. Both the USA as a nation and Anericans as individuals are insular, self-centred and arrogant. It's foolish to expect the USA as a nation or Americans as individuals to have respect for firearms.

@@frondreadz789 "the ones making the laws cant tell me the difference between said guns and instead want to ban everything.". Can you show me where any lawmaker has advocated banning ALL guns?

@@user-yy7fn9gz1w semi automatic is like 80% of guns sure bolt action and revolvers most don't say they will ban. The fact is civilian rifles look similar to military but the mechanics are far from the same case and point the AR is not in any way shape or form the same as a M4. Also do you live under a rock? Plenty have outright advocated for sweeping gun bans just like what happened in Australia and Canada. Curious the same countries that locked down to China esque proportions during flu season. 2nd amendment is a right not a privilege homie our forefathers cemented this for a reason.

Very true!

And they were Germanic rules, which are the best sort 😂

@@danielnarbett What is the definiton of that?

Yeah and i love it sometimes 😂

Europe was community oriented* American mainstream- and social media infested European children's minds.

You mean self centered and selfish

@@paulanovelli258if that’s how you want to put it

@@paulanovelli258 exactly! We are trending narcissistic.

europe is a lot more left wing.

look how the turntables

Its almost like they learned the wrong lessons from the conquerors.

9:45 You learned from a mistake and you made an improvement in the law. That's so European.

Uh...Switzerland is far older than USA. And they kept that attitude.

I think it’s a pretty terrible outlook.

Most people technically break gun laws by accident because there are so many. It's all arbitrary and made up. All gun laws are malum prohibitum. Only illegal because we make it so. It's not objectively wrong to own a gun.

Do you follow all those simple rules of society?

Why should you have any constitutional rights?

@@dogfaceponysoldier This is the question most anti gunners don't understand until it is a right, they care about.

After the events of the last three years there is no way I would give my guns up

Here in America, we think New Zealanders and Australians are cowards.

​@@yodaddy82daddy70 Who is "we"? You and your January 6th friends. We saw how people "standing up to the oppressive government" fared 🙄

@@duncanbryson1167 better than cowering like you

​@@duncanbryson1167ah Projecting like a idiot,

@@yodaddy82daddy70 "Here in America, we think New Zealanders and Australians are cowards." This coming from a people too scared to go out their front doors without a gun? You need it to cope kiddo lol.

Ban public schools.

When there are metal detectors at schools, something is very, very wrong.

American culture doesn't condone innocence shot and killed.

agreed, i live in the UK. we dont even consider our kids will be attacked in school, let alone shot.

@@kanedNunable There are other dangers in European schools tho, such as bullying and bad teachers. Homeschooling is safest, but that’s illegal in my country😡

Cool story bud. Shall not be infringed.

⁠@@yosefshekelberg5433 Read up on American history re what Madison actually said. Not just 3 or 4 words. There’s more he wrote. * There is not a single word about an individual’s right to a gun for self-defense or recreation in Madison’s notes from the Constitutional Convention. Nor was it mentioned, with a few scattered exceptions, in the records of the ratification debates in the states. Nor did the U.S. House of Representatives discuss the topic as it marked up the Bill of Rights. In fact, the original version passed by the House included a conscientious objector provision. “A well regulated militia,” it explained, “composed of the body of the people, being the best security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, but no one religiously scrupulous of bearing arms, shall be compelled to render military service in person.” Though state militias eventually dissolved, for two centuries we had guns (plenty!) and we had gun laws in towns and states, governing everything from where gunpowder could be stored to who could carry a weapon-and courts overwhelmingly upheld these restrictions. Gun rights and gun control were seen as going hand in hand. Four times between 1876 and 1939, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to rule that the Second Amendment protected individual gun ownership outside the context of a militia. As the Tennessee Supreme Court put it in 1840, “A man in the pursuit of deer, elk, and buffaloes might carry his rifle every day for forty years, and yet it would never be said of him that he had borne arms; much less could it be said that a private citizen bears arms because he has a dirk or pistol concealed under his clothes, or a spear in a cane.”-- There’s more, go find it, it’s very interesting reading .

@@bernadettelanders7306 Read Federalist Paper #46. An armed population serves as a check against the potential of tyranny imposed by a standing army. Hamilton explains how the existence of localised governments combined with an armed population serves as a counter to a larger centralised tyranny. Examine the following quote... > Hamilton notes how a "tyranny surrounded by legions" is able to be overthrown by an armed population coming together as a militia. Hence his statement that, "governments are afraid to trust the people with arms." Australia has no such counter to tyrannical centralised authority, nor does it have the cultural mindset to develop one. This lack of a cultural mindset to resist is one of the reasons why the Australian people so readily submitted to ad hoc unlawful proclamations regarding business closures, drug mandates, detainments and speech infringements during the pandemic of 2020 and 2021. Culturally the USA is much more skeptical as it pertains to the authoritarian and arbitrary use of power by the state, hence the higher levels of non-compliance.

I love Jim Jeffries take on gun control. Comedy but with a lot of truth. Warning Aussie style swearing. More guns mean more gun deaths That is a fact.

​@@aussiemiss1442Well if you look at the Switzerland part thats not strictly true. Gun regulation is the strongest force. Anyone can have a gun when they can prove they can use it responsibly, like a drivers license. And you can't just sell a car/gun without registering it with the new owner.

Imagine understanding how media works. While these fools are fools, they do not represent the masses. In the 2016 election, Did Not Vote won by a massive landslide. In 2020, Did Not Vote won again but by a smaller margin because people were voting against Trump.

Lol

You'd probably make someone mad and they would pull out a gun cause you disagree with them lol

You'd get shot

Who are you John Lennon? Image all the people, living life in peace ah ha ah haaaha

Prideful 😂

I've recently made a post suggesting that Americans compare their healthcare system to that in Australia. I got more than 40 replies only two of the 40-plus people said that they had made a comparison and were able to make comments !!! The rest responded with that prideful ignorance and anger !!!

Fact

Swap that word with ignorant and you're most of the way there. As the Swiss Ex-Prez said, 'It's your problem!' Deal with it or not, the world continues. Just fact

Many Americans are interested in better ideas including gun control. Our politicians are bought and paid for by gun lobbyists and other corporate interests. Most Americans are worried it might be too late to get back our democracy. We need prayers, not condemnation.

The Swiss are 90% white.

​@@ulthanesmorkums U.S. is 75% white. What's your point?

@TJ-fe7rr No, it isn't. Arabs, Latinos, and many non European groups are designated white. The non hispanic, European white population share of the United States is 56%. Find a proper comparison instead of a European ethnostate.

@@ulthanesmorkums is that the reason why the swiss have a more mature mentality? Because they're 95% white and the U.S. is 56% white as you claim?

@TJ-fe7rr If you want to phrase it that way, sure. Find a 90%+ white Town/City with a third-world homicide rate. They have the most guns per capita in the country, yet their homicide rate is staggeringly low. The United States doesn't have a gun problem. We have a demographic problem.

😂😂😂

I also did not see that coming. :D

Bring the Nasi Goreng when you come, eh mate. You can keep all the Australians taking over Bali though, we don't want them back.

Now it's China at your doorstep 🤣🤣🤣

Hi! Australian here! Here's why people were concerned about invasion by Indonesia (keep in mind, this is the Australian perspective): 1996 was during the Indonesian occupation of Timor-Leste, a situation that held a lot of weight in the Australian consciousness. 5 Australian journalists had been kidnapped and executed by the Indonesian military in 1975 while reporting on the initial invasion (at the time, Indonesia was denying they were even there and the rest of the world seemed to be turning a blind eye. The Indonesian government's official position on these deaths is that they were killed in 'crossfire') and this event, plus the Aus govt's response to it, coloured the public's perception of Indonesia as a whole for decades. You can google 'Balibo Five' for more details. There's probably a really interesting sociological thesis to be written about the impact of that one event on the Australian psyche. Australians were angry and terrified-- people thought Indonesia was an aggressive, expansionist regime. That they would not stop with Timor-Leste and they (1996 population: 201 million) would come for Australia (1996 population: 18 million) next; what would that conflict look like if the rest of the world decided to take the same approach they had to the invasion of Timor-Leste? We would be slaughtered in our homes without significant international aid. These are the sort of things people were thinking. (I can't tell you what personally, was thinking. I was one year old and so probably not thinking anything of import.) And, as often happens when people are angry and terrified, a lot of racism was the result. In turn, that racism contributed to making gun reform more difficult. TL;DR --1996 was a pretty terrible time for Indonesia-Australia diplomatic relations and a pretty terrible time to be an Indonesian living in Australia. (apologies for so many sidenotes in parenthesis...)

Don't forget the kangaroo 😂

Love the traditional Aboriginal one foot stance. He did it well.

He needs his own show!

As an Australian, that was my one critique about that story when I first saw it. He was so close, sooooo close. And then he did the white-guy walkabout while talking about blooming onions... And it felt like it really undercut what he was trying to say by making the entire piece feel less researched than it surely was. Talk about tripping at the 5 yard line (I may be misremembering this American saying but I also feel like me not being bothered to look it up is kind of appropriate to my point).

Chicago is northerners not southerners. Of course you're are always free to escape to Cuba. In broad daylight.

what😂

Same in the UK, got rid of guns after the Dunblane massacre in 1996. Whilst it doesn’t completely take away gun crime, it has significantly reduced it, we barely hear about it here now, very rare. The next mass shooting however will inevitably be around the corner in the USA….they love their guns too much.

@@Tylerd838time to grow up rusty

@@Butterratbee yep, you need to except it’s not a problem

I blame hormone pumped beef, the only reason for the current madness

THIS. It’s genuinely hard to explain to non-Americans the extent to which violence and cruelty are valued by our society. Americans seem to think taking care of each other is somehow sinful Edit: forgot to mention the paranoia

@@westcoastseattleboy784in 1774, 250 years ago, England banned guns/gunpowder in Colonial America!! Attempted gun confiscation by the English army on April-19 1775 started that 8-year war for American independence & England almost won that war!!

@@RonSafreedand we’ve been waiting 250 years for you to mandate that ammunition be kept separate from firearms so we can use our secret teleportation technology to seize America back before you can load your weapons.

@@RonSafreedbut in all seriousness, that is partly the problem. In 1774, a well-armed population was a critical thing for the US to escape tyranny, and the echoes of those foundational experiences last a long time.

@@lkyuvsadEngland was never really comfortable of the colonists having guns, but at the same time saw them as a "necessary evil" because of protection from indian attacks & hunting as well as fishing & gathering wild foods supplemented the agriculture of that time!! Remember land had to be cleared of trees & brush by hand & draft animals before it could be farmed! There were also periods of "temporary gun-confiscations" in America's colonial history (1607-1776)!! Guns were stored in the gunpowder houses built of stone & strong brick away from urban areas because the gunpowder was more unstable back in that time 250 plus years ago!!

That's some fantasy you have!

Completely incorrect. Mental illness is on the rise at a very alarming rate.

@@drakecarter1780 And making guns readily available in that environment is like pouring gas on a flame, you know?

You have to learn that the actions of a third party have nothing to do with me.

@@kendallsmith1458 And why is that a fantasy? But maybe you as an american consider 540 mass shootings inbetween January 1st and August 27th of this year to be totally normal!

The second amendment enumerates and protects the ability to address tyranny with violence. This potentially means violence against the state. Do you think Americans would need such firearms to address violence against the state? I believe so. I also believe that such weapons are in common circulation and even if it weren't the case I would want the most effective options available to me in terms of self defense. What happens when you have multiple armed attackers? I would especially want a rifle for that situation.

​​​@@1911GreaterThanALLi believe if you even tried to fight a tyrannical government you'd be on reddit with a drone dropping a grenade on you within a week, gun aint helping you in your weird fantasy

@@1911GreaterThanALL how many times did you protect yourself from a hoard of shooters??

@@osvaldomedina173 How many shooters operate in gun free zones?

@@1911GreaterThanALL where i live , basically every place is a gun free zone...

Also at 3:58 Ted Cruz says "Gun control dudn't work". It's pronounced "doesn't" you hillbilly. It almost makes me as mad as when people pronounce "fentanyl" as "fentanol".

Exactly.

Its very key to point out right now a great deal of the work is done by his writers and crew. Oliver delivers it well with a style of his own but the difficult work is often done by crew.

He's an entertaining guy at times, but a fairly weak journalist. There have been instances on his show where he astonishingly ignores glaring facts or makes a very dishonest argument or comparison of an issue to something else, and he uses appeals to emotion rather than logic quite frequently. So not technically great journalism, but he's not the worst either and I think he wants to help society

@@gforce9596 he has never said he is journalist in his show

Are you talking about general civilization or Christians?

@@holzmann-Some Christians do, some Christians don’t. Just like every other demographic. There’s nothing special about Christianity.

​Obviously fellow citizens, it's a secular society. It's why we have Medicare, gun restrictions, and a broadly functional electoral system.

"In australia we have more guns now than before the 1996 legislation." that's not true: "Alarmingly, the number of firearms reported in Australia in 2017 (3.6 million) is now higher than pre-Port Arthur levels, prior to the 1996 National Firearms Agreement (3.2 million firearms)" I got this quote from the anti-gun website australiainstitute The key word here is "reported" and the post was very biased. Why would gun owners report their guns if they didn't have to and why would they before a possible ban? The article goes on to use that unverifiable data as a fact.

So Rob you assume a pre 1996 gun, which can't be worked on by a gunsmith is still operational?

It's common aussie knowledge that we have more guns on aus now then in 1996. We have more ppl now so more ppl have guns. We don't have a gun ban we have sensible gun laws. Even an ar15 can be owned...IF THE HAVE A VAILID REASON. A farmer with a feral pig issue for example

boorring... lol.. kidding.. I wish here in America had the same value for human life.. I do love this segment of the daily show though.

And when you have a low chance of actually using the gun for self-defense, even trained police are more likely to shoot themselves or others by accident.

Why would border security need guns? They gonna fight against whales?

@@Andreas-gh6is That's right. More kids are killed by guns than anything else in the USA! Our cops have tasers and access to guns if needed.

NZ had christchurch. I believe The NZ police had firearms then eh?

It’s always “me vs the others”.

The cowards are the ones who leave the defense of their home and family to others .

@@impopquiz true

WHY? BECAUSE WE CAN.....LOL....DUNNO IF COMMUNIST COUNTRIES THAT PRETEND THERE FREE CAN SAY THE SAME..... COWARDS GETS THERE GUNS TOOKEN AWAY.

😂😂😂😂😂😂

America is the problem.

Exactly

And Australia was a consolation prize for England when American guns revoked their visiting privileges..And didn't England take Australia by force from the Aborigines ??

@@4catsnow So you can't see the difference between an army, and widespread civilian ownership of guns? That's why you have 10k+ gun deaths every year, and the UK rarely goes above 20. But then, British lives are worth a lot more than American ones. Guns. Fighting against health care. Pro death penalty. Against environmental controls. Against food safety. It seems that the only life that many Americans care about are foetuses. But once they are born, it doesn't matter if they die so long as it makes a profit for someone.

It’s definitely both

Yup in the UK you just get stabbed instead.... Although to be fair you have a better chance surviving and a guy with a knife cant mow down tens of people in 1 min.

@@joshbhoy and how much stabbing is there in the UK number wise? Compare that to gun deaths in the US

@@NiekNooijensdeaths related to stabbing - in the UK: ranges from 220-282 every year over the last 3 years US - estimated number of firearm death excluding suicides: just over 20,000 in 2022 alone, a slight decrease on 2021. Add in suicides by firearms and those numbers double

@@joshbhoy You've just underminded your own point. Bravo

@@joshbhoy And even with all those guns to 'protect' themselves, the US has a HIGHER knife homicide rate than the UK...

2 different world idiott We have more people & way more crime

@@GarrettGuerra True, 'Muricans are much more criminally minded. Just look at the incarceration rates, the so-called 'land of the free' has the most incarcerated population on the planet... :D

@@GarrettGuerra Would you like to try that again in English? When you do try explaining why the US has way more gun deaths PER CAPITA* then the other countries mentioned here. * Can you look this phrase up yourself or do you need me to explain it to you?

@@ratofvengence Not just incarceration. Look up freedom index by country and then for fun world rankings for gun deaths, healthcare, dental health, poverty............ All useful when someone claims 'merica is the best at everything.

@@finbarrsaunders8688 Indeed. Every quality of life rankings too. It seems everyone knows this except 'Muricans lol.

Bye.

I so understand you. I left 40 years ago.

This makes me incredibly sad... This should not be part of childhood memories, man... Switzerland is also a great way to see how to responsibly enjoy gun ownership. One thing that was not mentioned in these clips is that Switzerland has a very peaceful culture. For example, it's illegal to make excessive noise past 10 pm, before 7 am, on Sundays and on holidays. We value each others' freedom, individuality and right to a peaceful, private life. I'm sure that that plays a role. On the whole, we feel safe too. Sure - there are always nutjobs and drug-addled, aggressive people, but it's the rare exception - not the norm.

Come to the UK. I'll even take you shooting, I have plenty of guns.

@@user-yy7fn9gz1w your ipa says otherwise, you are not even near uk lol and no thanks, i got plenty of my own guns passed down 3 generations xD

In 1774, 250 years ago, England banned guns/gunpowder in colonial America!! Attempted gun confiscation by the English army on April-19 1775 in the colony of Mass. started that 8-year war for American independence & England almost won that war!! Then England came back for the War of 1812-1815 & burned down Washington D.C.!!

It doesn't wash out the undeniable damage he did to this country, but it is something we can be forever grateful for. Only a popular conservative leader could have done it, and even they couldn't do it now.

Americans love their guns more than their own children. In the USA guns have more rights than women.

Or wives

I would argue some people own guns to protect said children... and wife(s).

@@PewPewLookout If one have to own a gun to protect his people, this a really dire life... 😱

@@gePanzerTe I can't tell if that comment comes from a place of sheltered privilege or ignorance. I'll just give a few examples for why one would need a gun to protect their family. In certain areas of the country, things like coyotes are known to attack small children. It's even happened in suburbs a few times so it's not exclusively a rural thing. Another, more likely, scenario is a dog attack. Last year a man in Philly shot a pitbull that was attacking an autistic child. His mom was unarmed and helpless. Another example would be attempted abduction or assault on your spouse and/or child. Because that kind of stuff is happening EVERYWHERE these days and not just in the high crime areas like it used to.

You dont have kangaroos so it wouldnt work .😋

@@Maverick21491 yes, but we could certainly have people in roo suits.

Please don't........

americans just need to be more educated on how other countries are run.

​@@kanedNunable too many people in America are too arrogant to even consider respecting people from other countries, let alone learning from them.

You think the cartels buy the guns from… the NRA?

You mean when the Obama administration sold weapons to the cartel, full auto ones at that? Ones that ended up killing a border patrol agent.

And that can't be changed?

@@i.sodeikat8397 not when the NEA has the people they can change it in their back pockets. This is known as corruption in Mexico, but in America we just call it lobbying.

Sounds like ATF doesn't do their job they're too busy knocking on some old man's house with a pistol brace. If ATF border security DEA and coast guard actually targeted the real illegal firearms being sent into the nation I'd be more open to the idea of gun control. But by every metric the responsible citizen is who they want to turn in guns...why? DEA budget gone up every year the amount of drugs imported has only gone up...they literally don't do their job unwilling or unable why fund it if it don't work?

He is Finnish.

It’s true and I strongly believe in gun control and that things in US are totally moronic but there is a huge difference between US and other places- the fact that there are 300m guns here already. Even the most optimistic agree that confiscating all weapons is never, ever going to happen. So gun control starts at that point - not at the point it did in Australia or UK or Norway- where there are only a tiny fraction of those weapons. So the approach and immediate results cannot be compared to those countries. You can’t just say “do what Norway or Australia or UK did” - because it’s too late for that. Again, that doesn’t mean that the US shouldn’t be moving forward with the most effective controls it can.

​@@CK-ri7ufFreedom? Lol, both Norway and Australia outrank the US in EVERY freedom index do let's not pretend letting any fool have access to firearms makes you more free 😂

@@CK-ri7uf How so? What freedom are you talking about? Sometimes gun activists (and btw, i hunt and support hunters) hijack the 'freedom' thing. You aren't talking about freedom as a whole. You are talking about your freedom to own a gun without background checks or rules. Is that freedom really more important than safety? What about the freedoms we should have to go to school or college or the mall or theater, without the fear of being gunned down?

@@ratofvengenceno they don’t 😂

@@Tylerd838 Oh, you challenge that kiddo? Name the recognised freedom index that the US leads. Or, we'll see if you have the integrity to admit you're wrong.

Because it's true. Americans aren't as free as they think..

We should restrict women from entering polling places then.

Nobody has more rights and benefits than women.

@@Deezy_Ankh go away.

​@@einienj3281lol. That's your answer. Nothing of value. Did I hurt your feelings?

IDK about all the states but theres a written and practical portion to get a hunting license in the west coast montana etc. IDK where this was or if you dont know the laws.

Unfortunately the problem is they made all the laws up at 11.44. The guy they interviewed isn't even Swiss and had no idea about Swiss laws. He states you can't have a gun with a criminal record, which is untrue (you can have one non violent offence every 10 years), I don't understand how they can make stuff up like this. We literally have no training requirements to own a gun. We don't have waiting times (they claim it's two weeks - not a thing), or mental health checks (they made that up), ammo storage requirements (made up), unloaded when not in use (made up) etc etc. It shocks me they can literally just made up stuff and tell americans it's true when it's not. Don't believe me just check the laws yourselves.

Having worked in the Aus public service, this is the part of the story that blows my mind the most. Christ, people must have been working 100 hour weeks.

This is why legacy news is failing in the US. They are failing us because there's always a bias or an agenda. I disliked guns because of how they were portrayed in the media. It didn't help that I had a mother who believed it and sold all my father's guns after his death while I was too young to understand. Now I'm a licensed concealed carrier because I separated my mind from the brainwashing.

Fear comes frorm insecurity - Europeans have had millenia longer to learn who they are and what they stand for. The US is still at the hormonal teenager stage by comparison, coupled with mass indoctrination of USA=always best and ultra-capitalism with regulatory capture preventing reform. Oh, and one point everyone skirts around - the 2nd AMENDMENT was added to the Constitution, so why can't be REMOVED?!?

GOP =Party of hate, trumptards, conspiracy theories, racism, homophobia, sectarianism, demagoguery 🤡😈👈

The problem is NOT the American media, because all it's doing is giving the American viewers what they want; the problem is the American people. News that teaches us to "be concerned" is considered preachy, spineless, BORING. News that teaches us to "BE AFRAID, BE VERY AFRAID" is considered hard-hitting, brave, important, and comforting (in its reinforcement of our paranoid worldview). America needs a mass enema.

This comment sounds like it was written by ChatGPT

*knew

@@seshigcreative in my rendition they’re still there but you do you…

Why do you think everything American is a GLOBAL treasure…they are your writers not ours…Americans need to get over themselves…

"We can't control our negative impulses?" Most of us can and do and those who don't are either immature or need therapy. We can change this part of our society, as we now wear seatbelts when in our vehicles, don't smoke anywhere and everywhere, we videotape police officers doing their jobs in case they cross the line, etc.

Let's see, with an average income of @ $140k and average home price of @$1.2 million, I'm betting that same demographic in the US has similar crime stats. Switzerland's actual answer to crime is: If we make it too expensive, they won't live here. That's the farce of doing these types of comparisons. To put it in perspective, the US has somewhere in the neighborhood of 47 million people under the poverty line. The population of Switzerland is 8.8 million. Switzerland's answer isn't an answer at all. You could remove most gun restrictions there and they'd still have little to no gun crime.

It's totally and utter garbage. Literally everything they say at 11.38 is totally false and made up. It's incredible they can get away with it!!! If you actually want to know what the laws here in Switzerland are watch the youtube reply for swiss gun owners. "The Truth About Switzerland's Gun Regulations: Not The Daily Show's Fake News Version"

And I suppose it has nothing to do with gangs or drug affiliations that create violence? You think it is solely the guns eh?

Healthcare problems, not gun problems

Guns aren't the problem. They just make the problem worse.

Yup

BINGO!

And less "us vs them" pitting in politics too. Everything in the us seems to be about this conflict and picking sides constantly, its all very tribal, not really much about finding compromise and solutions.

I refuse your pesky facts .

and now he's American!

We also have guns. I have......quite a few.

As an Aussie…I thought the same thing…

Not after 2019. You couldnt pay me enough to go to the prison colony

@@frondreadz789 Geez, what happened in 2019? Mass shooting?

@@Mububban23 Some who only get fed their ideas from far right wing 'news' think that we went all tyrannical when covid hit, instead of just taking sensible actions to prevent having over a million of a our people needlessly die, like the US did.

Sounds like Australia has a pretty bigoted immigration policy. I’d be happy to write you a letter if it would help you move out of my country. Please reply your address.

@@bobbobberson5627 That's kind of you, helping him move to a nation with a better quality of life and higher ranking in EVERY freedom index :)

Im wondering if he is actually from Finland because his name, Mikko Leinonen, is typical finnish.

@ingalappalainen Yeah not sure. He said he grew up in Switzerland but parents could be Finnish. He has the look.

@@jmd1980 yep. That viking look

@@ingalappalainen thought the same immediately when I heard the name.

He sounds more Finnish than German/Swiss.

Whats ironic is South Africa has more gun crime then we do but whatever. Also I didn't know women have over 20,300 laws against them just cause they are women, have to be locked up in safes, have to be licensed and have a background check etc etc. This is the silliest disingenuous comparison ever.

he had nothing to say to that. Thats a checkmate

In America, women and men are equals. So, I guess you are saying that guns have more rights than its citizens.

​@@shanepallette Looking at it from the outside of the US, I would say no, men and women arent equal in the US. They may have similar rights in many cases, but parts of you society and some of your lawmakers still see them as "second class citizens". That being said, that probelm is not exclusive to the US.

@EdwardDragon96 Please give me an example of what you see from the outside that doesn't make women equal to men in the USA? We have the 14th Amendment with equal protection and rights. Before you give biased based media answers, I'll bring up Abortion rights. #1killer of children in the USA is abortion. Over 620,000 unborn children were killed last year alone. Guns killed 1600. I'll bring up pay. Look at the jobs generally women take in the work field, medical insurance used, and time off requested compared to men.

This is what I mean. People call this content old, but not everyone has seen it. It's interesting to see how this was covered in the past.

@@boringperson-zb8vy Not to mention a lot of older content is still relevant thanks to the GQP and their sugar daddies

Absolutely everything they say in this entire video is wrong about Swiss gun laws. They just made stuff up.

You are subjects, Americans are citizens. There's difference.

@@1stsampan Nope they are citizens too kiddo. Citizens with a fraction of the US homicide rate.

And yet in Scotland you get arrested for mean comments on Facebook. The UK has no human rights or freedoms.

@@Moose_King_05 You can be arrested for telling the wrong joke on social media or in the wrong place in the US, let's not pretend that's not the case kiddo 🤣🤣

World Cup?

IN 1774, 250 years ago, England banned guns/gunpowder in the 13 American colonies!! Attempted gun confiscation by the English army on April-19 1775 started that - year war (1775-1783) for American independence & England almost won that war!! Then England came back for the War of 1812-1815 & burned down Washington D.C.!!

Sadly you are correct 💯 and that's just one reason why my wife and I are moving to Costa Rica next year, no crazy gun nuts and no insane military industrial complex

@@Doran_Krotann - Oh, for pity's sake.... hundreds of children murdered *every year,* and you're blathering about some supposed 'tyranny' that *hasn't shown up in 247 years*... ... are you in therapy for that maniac paranoia?

@@Doran_Krotann -"We prefer dangerous freedom" Yes, nothing says freedom like indirectly giving the government your hard earned cash so that they can keep you paranoid with rhetoric and convince you that you shouldn't expect them to do their jobs. Fun fact, the US does not even make it into the top 10 on the freedom index, while Australia and Switzerland do. So much for the guns = freedom argument.

​@@J.M.-nb4gwHell yeah! That way you can rest on your moral high horse while exploiting 3rd world workers firsthand!

Switzerland, another great example of strict gun regulation and legislation that works. Your watches are also brilliant. Hello from the U.K. We also have very strict regulations and legislation that works.

All the Swiss laws are simply made up. At 11.44 none of them are our laws. The guy they spoke to isn't even Swiss. Yes you can have a criminal record (one every 10 years - non violent). We have no mental health checks, no two week wait, no ammo storage laws, no training requirements, you don't have to write and ask permission. I mean they just made the stuff up. It's quite shocking really.

I'm pretty sure no one said there are no guns!!😂 another made up "thing" for you people to freak out over😂

There isn't a country in the world that banned guns!

​@@broziusentirely banned firearms? No. But banned enough to destroy all human rights? Yes.

Oh yes the country that was afraid of some truckers

Is that why over 170,000 semi automatic rifles went missing after the ban. Where do you think they are? That's an insane number for such a small country.

Yes, narcissism is strong within the left-wingers due to victimhood mentality and resentment of others

kinda racist. I mean I traveled all over europe and absolutely loved it. IDK how I cant respect another nation and disagree with its laws? I lived in Italy for three years and it was some of the greatest moments in my life.

@@FuckDemocrats. It's so cute you think the problems are only one side of politics :D

​@@ratofvengencehe's an American, what did you expect?

aussies arent terrified of their neighbours, unlike americans.

Let me assure you that you should have one before you die.

As a fellow Aussie...nothing that special

@@RapsCalorie New South Welshman told me Tooheys couldn't be beat. As a Victorian I highly doubted them. Tasmania and South Australia both had Tooheys beat. Moral of the story? New South Welshmen know nothing, why else was the national capital Melbourne and then Canberra?

They are a big, artery clogging, grease ball. You are missing nothing.

@@toonarmycaptain As an American--I couldn't agree more.

Everything they say about Switzerland is made up. They literally just made up the laws. Amazing how they can get away with it.

Absolutely agree. We don't even have it on tap here in my town. It's great northern super crisp for most of us here.

Found the same thing on visit to uk..they must think that’s the only choice we have…

@@sandrathompson1277it was the main heavily advertised aussie brand in UK. people have gone off it lately.

I only drink Fosters…love it

The germans had a rule about them during the war "Never go in"....

​@@4catsnow?

They literally made up the Swiss gun laws. We don't have mental health checks, red flag laws, we don't have to have a reason, we don't have to keep ammo separate, we don't need training, we don't need a reason, we don't have strict storage laws. I don't know why they made these things up.

I think that's the only swiss rule they got right. The rest were just made up. It's amazing how they can put a graphic up at 11.44 with loads of rules that aren't Swiss rules and then later claim it had nothing to do with Switzerland. Also yes you can have a criminal record and own a gun in Switzerland. You are allowed one non violent record every 10 years. Which includes felonies which is actually a lot more liberal than in the US.

Gun Control was created to prohibit FREE BLACK MEN from obtaining guns to defend themselves. Albert Pike, enforced it, he was the military arm of the Democratic Party, also head KKK, and head Satanist. One has to be a total ignorant scumbag to advocate gun control.

You hit that one on the nose. The firearm allows the wielder to intimidate others around them. Until the other fellow had the same idea and a gunfight breaks out.

@@SlinkyTWF So my 5'9" 145-pound self is supposed to do...what when someone decides they want my stuff and are willing to cave my skull in or shoot me for it?

@@savevsdeathyet the number of instances of guns being used defensively for protection or validly defending property is statistically so small to be almost insignificant.

⁠@@NotThatOneThisOneBetween 500,000 to 3 million times per year is insignificant?

Owning a Firearm is Constitutional Right here in America idiot, Logic says learn the laws

Yes in civilized countries

Yes, a constitutional right in a well-regulated militia @@GarrettGuerra

@@GarrettGuerra That’s a tautological argument, idiot…

Military service and training are mandatory: that's one reason why I'm glad I don't live in Switzerland.

A Finnish hunk living in Switzerland.. 😉

@@einienj3281 I stand corrected. All them northern European fuckos 😂

Yer he is a Finnish guy who was lives in Switzerland. He nearly had to move after this piece came out as they deliberately made all the Swiss laws up. It's amazing how they got away with just making all the rules at 11.44 up.

Or not give guns to those people..

This is always the hilarious thing with cons. “Guns aren’t the problem, people/mental health is the problem!” “Okay, so you’re saying that we should be investing more money in mental healthcare then.” “Woah there, let’s not get too hasty.”

you're talking about different shampoo for better brainwash. it doesn't matter where you begin. Initialize change. Guns are bad.

Oh for Pete's sake. How dense can you be? Guns aren't some freaking puppy. If we're keeping guns from people, then by all means, we can put you in a locker called prison until at such time your guns need you for their protection. If guns aren't the problem, and people are, then the same result applies and is to not give guns to people. And yes, that includes you.

That sounds like it could be a Stalin quote; a pessimistic worldview combined with contempt for the common person, while also pretending that you care about them

I read that England had conceal/carry permits for handguns until 1953 when they were banned & I wonder what caused the banning of them over 70 years ago// What massive crime in 1953??

@@RonSafreed Those were intended mainly for jewelers, and others who might be targets when transporting valuable goods. Not every change in the law requires an outrage. UK gun control is still sloppy and mass shootings still occur.