How do we know the Injīl isn't Matthew, Mark, Luke and John (or anything else)? Easy. Allāh says in suwrah al Mā'idah, verse 46 that he revealed the Injīl to 'Īsa.
Qur'an 3:31 Say, ˹O Prophet,˺: “If you ˹sincerely˺ love Allah, then FOLLOW ME; Allah will love you and forgive your sins. For Allah is All-Forgiving, Most Merciful.”
Boy... you missed the part where the quran's proof of that revelation is muhammad, and the proof for muhammad's claim is the quran. So in the end boy...your god is muhammad's misunderstanding of the Bible. Congrats boy.
As a Revert, I think ppl don't know how to articulate the statement that the Quran is the conformation of the Torah & Ijeel. Do fight abt it. Learn to explain it. Why that is said. & Be clear what is the Ijeel cos Christians think its the whole New Testament. The need to understand Peter's Teaching is not part of Ijeel
Hadiths were written even during the era of the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, but the first book committed to collecting authentic hadiths was 200 years later. In any case, one who denies authentic hadiths is not a Muslim according to Muslim consensus
@@الحقيقةالمغيبة-خ9خThere is a sahifa of Hammam bin Munabbih, who died In the year 101 AH, Written in the first century AH, Muwatta Malik wroten in the middle of the second century.
Dua to Protect Us from Shirk الَّلهُمَّ إِنِّي أَعُوذُ بِكَ أَنْ أُشْرِكَ بِكَ وأَنا َعلَمُ وأَستَغفِرُكَ لما لا أَعلَمُ Allahumma inni a`udhu bika an ushrika bika wa ana a`lamu wa astaghfiruka lima la a`lamu ‘ O Allah I seek refuge in You from knowingly associating partners with You, and I seek Your forgiveness for that which I do not know.’
Juwairiyah (radhi Allaahu anha) reported that one day the Prophet, peace be upon him, left her apartment in the morning as she was busy observing her dawn prayer in her place of worship. He came back in the forenoon and she was still sitting there. The Prophet, peace be upon him, said to her, “You have been in the same place since I left you?” She said, “Yes.” Thereupon the Prophet, peace be upon him, said, “I recited four words three times after I left you and if these were to be weighed against what you have recited since morning these would outweigh them, and these words are: سُبْحـانَ اللهِ وَبِحَمْـدِهِ عَدَدَ خَلْـقِه ، وَرِضـا نَفْسِـه ، وَزِنَـةَ عَـرْشِـه ، وَمِـدادَ كَلِمـاتِـه Subhaanallaahi wa bihamdihi: ‘Adada khalqihi wa ridhaa nafsihi, wa zinata ‘arshihi wa midaada kalimaatihi. Glory is to Allaah and praise is to Him, by the multitude of his creation, by His Pleasure, by the weight of His Throne, and by the extent of His Words (Recite 3 times in Arabic) Muslim 4/2090
Ya Muqallib al-quloob thabbit qalbi 'ala deenik يَا مُقَلِّبَ الْقُلُوبِ ثَبِّتْ قَلْبِى عَلَى دِينِكَ “O Controller of hearts, make my heart firm in Your religion.”
The Quran states in multiple verses that it came to confirm the scriptures that came before it. Here are some key examples: "And We have revealed to you (O Muhammad) the Book (this Quran) in truth, confirming that which preceded it of the Scripture and as a criterion over it" (Quran 5:48). "It is He Who has sent down the Book (the Qur'an) to you with truth, confirming what came before it" (Quran 3:3). "And believe in what I have sent down (this Quran), confirming that which is with you" (Quran 2:41). "And when there came to them a Book from Allah verifying that which they have" (Quran 2:89)
@@foottiebanter1913 History for what lmao? You're concluding the bible is a reliable source of history? What you concluding. Bro the answer has been given to you paulian pagan crosstians so many times I care to remember. If you don't understand the 1400 year understanding and scholarship of the Quran then I can't help you.
The Quran mentions that it is a detailed explanation of everything in several verses: "Shall I seek other than Allah for judge, when He it is Who hath revealed unto you (this) Scripture, fully explained?" (Quran 6:114). "We have given them a scripture that is fully detailed, with knowledge, guidance, and mercy for the people who believe" (Quran 7:52). "This Quran could not possibly be authored by other than God. It confirms all previous messages, and provides a fully detailed scripture" (Quran 10:37). "In their stories there is truly a lesson for people of reason. This message cannot be a fabrication, rather it is a confirmation of previous revelation, a detailed explanation of all things, a guide, and a mercy for people of faith" (Quran 12:111). "We did not leave anything out of this book" (Quran 6:38)
The dude is saying that since the Quran confirms what was before him, there is evidence that it was the gospel that shows the Quran has been corrupted. Listen to the argument.
@fighter8798 We can argue that Muslims should rely solely on the Quran as their primary source, potentially referencing previous scriptures where the Quran affirms them, rather than giving equal or greater weight to later hadith collections. The Quran is a complete and fully detailed book (6:114-115, 16:89). If it truly is complete, there should be no need for additional sources like hadiths. The Quran confirms previous scriptures (5:48) and instructs believers to uphold the Torah and Gospel (5:68). This suggests these earlier revelations should be sufficient alongside the Quran. Relying on hadiths introduces human interpretation and potential errors into religious practice, moving away from direct divine guidance. Even the Quran instructs Muslims to follow it alone and not to accept any hadith besides it (6:114, 31:6). This suggests reliance on hadiths goes against Quranic teachings. You have the Previous scriptures to tell you how to pray etc
By the time the Quran was compiled in the 7th century CE, the core Christian scriptures, including the four canonical Gospels and the New Testament epistles, were well-established and widely circulated. Manuscript evidence, historical records, and scholarly consensus support the presence and use of these texts during that period. The Quran acknowledges the existence of previous scriptures, including the Gospel (Injil), but also asserts that it is the final and preserved revelation from God. So Again we can only conclude the recitation of the Quran was corrupt.
The claim that the Gospels were compiled in the 4th century, written by unknown authors, and that there are 45 other Gospels is not supported by credible historical evidence. Dating of the Canonical Gospels Evidence: The four canonical Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John) were written in the first century AD, not the 4th century. Mark: Generally dated around AD 70. Matthew and Luke: Dated between AD 70-90. John: Dated around AD 90-100. Evidence: The traditional authors of the Gospels are not anonymous and were known within the early Christian community. Matthew: Attributed to Matthew, a tax collector and one of Jesus' apostles. Mark: Attributed to John Mark, a companion of Peter. Luke: Attributed to Luke, a companion of Paul. John: Attributed to John, the "beloved disciple" and one of Jesus' apostles.
@@foottiebanter1913 False. (Matthew 9:9) The author of Matthew writes about the Disciple but doesn't identify himself as the Disciple, The beginning of Luke will tell you that they just heard hearsay which they wrote, Mark (Who is Mark) no one can tell you who he is and no where the bible talks about him and the Ending of John is another example that these were people writing things they didn't even know about because only the Gospel of John the narrative changed to painting Jesus as God (Completed in 110 CE) and surprisingly no one knew these people although they were being read by people, no church fathers points out who they are. And you stop pretending like their ain't other Gospels attributed to Jesus's ministry Gospel of Mary, infancy, Barnabas among others
@@foottiebanter1913 And You are ignorantly speaking about the Hadiths which have the chain of narration to the Prophet 🤣🤣🤣 because we know who transmitted them by looking at the chain, their families, their backgrounds, and their age and here you are talking about heresies Be smart enough to know
@@kyleauthman Brother, The third caliph, Uthman ibn Affan, standardised the Quranic text and ordered the burning of other versions to prevent discrepancies. This suggests there were variations in the early manuscripts. Early church tradition strongly attributed it to the apostle Matthew. Luke does state he compiled accounts from eyewitnesses, but this doesn't mean it's purely hearsay. He claims to have "carefully investigated everything from the beginning" (Luke 1:3). Mark is traditionally identified as John Mark, mentioned in Acts 12:12, 25. Early church fathers like Papias attributed the Gospel to Mark. The ending of John (21:24) actually claims the author is "the disciple whom Jesus loved," traditionally identified as John. The development of Jesus' divine portrayal in John is reflect deeper theological reflection over time. Early church fathers like Irenaeus and Clement of Alexandria did discuss the Gospel authors, suggesting they weren't unknown figures. While other non-canonical gospels exist, they were generally written much later and were not as widely accepted by early Christian communities.
we have one quran 114 chapters from fatiha to surah nas that is preserved and recited even different sects agrees as the supreme book revealed from god almighty, now which book of the hundreds versions you have is the word of god
Sorry to tell all Muslims Jesus never prayed in the direction of the Kabbah, the trees, the moon 🌙 or the tomb of Muhammad Jesus never worshiped a man who can lie or have a son if he doesn’t have a girlfriend
Jesus may Allah be pleased with him would renounce all you Christians as idolater pagans. He followed the law of Moses Christians follow the law and religion of Paul the imposter
