Reminds me of a local cop in my town. He was responding to a non-life threatening call and was doing at least 70 in a 25 residential area. He broadsided a car and spun it around and into the side of a house, seriously injuring the driver. I heard the crash in my apartment; it was 50 feet from me. He had had two previous wrecks and had just completed a driving course for police. But it gets better: he also sexually assaulted a woman in his squad car while on duty. He did several years in prison.
I’m more surprised he didn’t get a promotion seeing the way these street gangs- Oops, I mean government sanctioned mafia- Oops I mean “police officers” operate.
I know you're talking about a completely different officer.... But in the report, did you read where this guy was homicidal and making threats to law enforcement and others?
In Miami-Dade county Florida, they had a cop that had 9 crashes still on the force. The news did a report on him, while they were following him, he was doing 80 in a 45. The first question they ask was, why does this cop still have a job?
Well, the #1 reason in that case was that he was in Florida. He's a Florida Man, and that always explains everything internally, even if it leaves the rest of the nation scratching their heads.
@@thecivilrightsguyintxkCall it like you want, I call it Free Masonry..... Judges, Lawyers, Politicians, Civil servants and Buracrats.... They all look after each other....
"Sure, our officer was doing 107 mph, but our internal investigation has determined that--despite the obvious circumstances and reality--our officer did nothing wrong and you were actually at fault. Now you can't sue us!"
@@dvferyanceyou don’t have the right away if you are going 50+ over the speed limit. Looking left and right is completely irrelevant when someone’s driving 110.
@@natedawg1007 Still the driver that pulled out should have been paying attention. It's your responsibility to look for oncoming traffic. And yes I do agree the cop was driving too fast. They both were in the wrong.
My sister was hit by police in intersection. They gave her a ticket for inattentive driving but she says she couldn't possibly move out the way fast enough to avoid being hit.
That's a good thing... it means the forces of the initial impact were much lower for both occupants, especially the cop. He "clipped" the front quarter of the Corolla, far from a T bone which would've very likely fatally injured the Corolla driver at driver's side.
Or they come up with cover up that they can sell. AND make sure there is no video floating around that will debunk their "version" of events.@@matthewronsson
There are countless cases of cops causing accidents because of their own carelessness or just outright disregard for the safety of the public and the victim in the case always gets wrongfully blamed.
@RAGE AGAINSTMACHINE AGAIN....LISTENING TO AND BELIEVING THE SENSATIONALISM OF THE NEWS. HE WAS DOING. ( 77) AT IMPACT. NOT. 107 LIKE THEY HAVE. Y O U BELIEVE. THE OTHER DRIVER DIDN'T EVEN. TRY. TO STOP.
Did you watch the video? The officer had 2 charges. 1. Driving too fast for conditions. 2. Seatbelt violation. He was also put on leave. Personally I think he should be fired or at the very least take a pay cut and put on desk duty as he already has a record of different driving offenses.
Driving at 107 miles per hour in response to a "disturbance" with "no weapons" mentioned. Sounds like the officer lacks some serious decision making skills when responding in such a manner.
I get where you're coming from, but here's a good atory from personal experiance. I once got into a car accident, minor speeds, only plastics and steel were hurt. I decided to get into oncoming traffic (20m max) before the junction to make a left turn, because it was a traffic jam and no one was in the oncoming lane(traffic light was red in the further juction). A girl with her dads car jumped from that turn i was making, to this day i remember, she was looking the opposite way when making the turn, not stop and take a look around, but stop at the walk way and foot to the floor out of the junction. She was to blame for that accident, the reason was she had to yeld to any traffic from the street she was leaving, she didn't. I got a fine for going in the opposite lane and her daddy payed for my car repairs. TLDR - if you're required to yeld you yeld, otherwise you pay the price.
back in 85 the local police had Chevy Citation cars for their fleet and I outran one on my motorcycle. they couldn't catch me because their cars were slow. I never forgot about that
Funny, but true. I was following a police vehicle at about 90 in a 60 that was not running its lights, staying a good distance back. After 10 miles he slows and pulls to the right toward an exit. I slowed as well, until matching the speed of vehicles around us. Seconds later he pulled back onto the road and turned his lights on to pull me over. He asked me why I was going so fast. I responded, "I was following you, since you weren't running signals. If 90's cool for you, I mean, right? Shall we trade citations?" He mulled that over for a bit and walked back to his car and then simply left. Only the did I notice that the cop wasn't even from the city, or even the county, we were in.
@@ianvader4697 Chump ass boot licker. The cops WILL do what they are paid to do or they can kick fucking rocks. If they don't like it, cant do it right, and/or cannot comply then they can find another job. Its as simple as that.
@@FA_213 And guess what? That’s exactly what’s happening. Police retiring early or quoting In mass with shortages nationwide. “Don’t like it, don’t do it” apparently leads to no one willing to do the jobs necessary that we as a society ask of them to do.
This is such an ignorant comment. Officers being placed on administrative leave is standard procedure while an investigation is on going. Though I know more and more people are growing less found of this thing called “due process” that we have.
I took an evasive maneuvering class in the Navy. It was 5 days and the best training that I have had to this day. Even though you have lights and sirens, you are responsible for safe operation. I only run them when absolutely necessary because of liability reasons. .
You stay within liability reasons, and will always act in fear of ever doing something that will get you in trouble for anything. Like speeding in a 25, 35, 45, or 55 mph road...... I guess you can't chase after an escaping suspect, after they go faster than the local speed limit, correct ???? Just like ambulances in Chicago can not go faster than 25-35 mph....and people wonder why more people die waiting for the ambulance after a shooting, and expect police to save them while they hate cops. 🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️
@@thefucrew9865 I think it's a Democrat thing. the Democrats don't care about the Black people that shoot each other every single day in Chicago. they advise the ambulance service to take their time when they are headed to a shooting in Chicago
@@popwarner1526, the reason why the ambulances "take their time" is because the same dumbazzes complained that the ambulances were going too fast through intersections and people couldn't hear them (due to the loud stereo systems in peoples' cars). So, they told them not to go faster than the speed limits. And, no, the Democrats have not left them in their neighborhoods. They have stayed there because they want the government to support them....regardless of political party in charge...which the Dems have been in charge of Chicago since 1931.
@@thefucrew9865 My neighbor who happens to be a cop rolls through stop signs speeds in our neighborhood all the time. On and off duty. Why should I respect the law when it's obvious he doesn't ?
This is out of hand. An officer almost killed myself and my wife going to a shoplifting call one day last summer. He was going almost 90 mph in a 35. This needs to stop
@@fireboltaz I have never called the police in My life and I never will. Ever. I can protect my own family. Driving 100 mph in a 35 or anywhere for that matter , is just flat out ignorance.
Instead of an apology from the police department that person got a ticket, broken leg, arm and now has to get another vehicle. That’s how you build relationships with your community.
@@Cablegh0st sorry for what? The other person didn’t even come to a complete stop and 99% positive didn’t even look both ways before pulling out into oncoming traffic!
All she had to do was to stop and look both ways you could see the lights coming towards her and I’m sure the siren also unless she was wearing ear buds which we would never know she’s who can answer that question why she didn’t even hear the siren
Disregarding a siren, not knowing driving rules, not yielding in an intersection till it's safe, not coming to a complete stop. Not able to avoid a police or anything else is negligence to the fullest and shouldn't be allowed to drive, ever!
He "outran his siren"? Speed of sound is around 800 mph, or 1122 FPS. Sound travels 4.7 miles per second, depending on environmental conditions and obstructions.
No excuse for driving that fast for such a low priority call. After hearing about his background, he needs to be fired and charged with reckless driving/ assault.
Read the rest of the report they showed of the call log.. it says the kid was HOMICIDIAL and making threats to law enforcement and others.. Something the news conveniently left out.
@@wolfmantroy6601 Your right all cops should just do 35mph next time a kid drowning call comes out or if a person is shooting up some place .. no need to try to get there in a hurry.. hell guess by your logic they should all just get bicycles and ditch patrol cars all together.. no need for fast response times in your delusional world.. lol
@@Executiveinvestments- I was paying attention. And I stand by my statement. The cop was driving stupid. When I worked with Highway Patrol just because you put your lights and siren on did not mean that you don't still have to be careful. He was coming around a blind bend that cars from his right only have a short response time with a car approaching . He was way above the speed limit, and therefore not giving cars entering the traffic reasonable time to react.
@@johndoe-ss9bz he could have killed a lot of people? So, let's ban cars and get a horse, there will be less dead, oh no wait, also horse can kill. Jk. I mean, training will NEVER be enough, also if you spend billions for every officer, they will make mistakes because they are humans like us.
with the lights and sirens what that car have been able to see the police car? you mean while the driver's running to stop sign? this is negligence on his part not the police officer. you can distinctly hear sirens and lights from very far away especially when they're approaching. every time i hear sirens approaching I always stop and look at the road before I take off.
There is no doubt that the driver ran the stop sign but that is a contributing factor, not the root cause. If the driver had stopped, looked down the road, and taken off just before the cop came into view, there would have been a crash. There is very little time between the cop being visible to the car, and impact. The cop was traveling way to fast at 107mph to avoid a collision.
@@localasian Cops constantly break the law and have killed many innocent people why is it that states have passed laws for cops to end pursuits of non high risk individuals, hell deputies in my Parrish run around like convoys of drunken federalies
You much be a fake Leo wannabe. Cause normal people on the road are already driving 15 to 20 miles over the limit. So how the fk is a police with siren driving same speed as normal folks? Then you wouldn't need lights and siren for going that slow. Smh
I used to drive ambulances, both for companies, and the local small town rescue squad. We were technically not allowed to break the speed limit, even running a code3 call.
I live a few minutes from this location. I actively try to avoid making left hand turns across this road at intersections without a light because it's a very busy and chaotic road. I can't imagine doing even 60 or 70 on this road. 107 is completely insane. This road goes right through the middle of and old part of town and there are so many side streets coming from all directions, forks in the road, lanes merging, etc. On top of that the road is nothing but curves so you can't see very far ahead. He was coming from the most dense area of the town and already doing those speeds. It blows my mind. And to top it all off, this idiot is a "traffic enforcement" officer in a small town that is best known for giving out tickets to everyone that drives 5MPH over the limit on the nearby highway. He shouldn't even have a license himself much less a badge and patrol car.
the footage from the angle it's shot from, gives the impression the blue car could both see and hear the approaching cop car. In reality, there appears to be a slight bend before the straight. Car stops, begins to move to the correct lanes, bang, cop hits her. Possibly if she's stopped an extra second or two, the collision might have been avoided, but, there's a very real possibility the cop would not have made it around the next turn
2 of my best friends were almost killed by a Melbourne police officer who T-boned them at 88 mph with no sirens or red and blues. She wasn’t even responding to a call. They still ultimately blamed it on them and about 2 years later they’re still waiting on justice.
That's just wrong. It shouldn't take this long, but unfortunately since a cop was involved it seems they blame your friends and stretch it along. I hope your friends are ok.
I have to say, those lights in that truck's dash cam footage are really noticeable from quite a distance away. The car that the officer hit, was even closer and because they stuck their nose out, actually would have been able to see and hear that cop car coming. So I think it is VERY valid for both the officer and the civilian to be cited in this situation.
Yeah that driver rolled the stop sign which is extremely dangerous for motorcycles. She deserved a ticket and he should face serious consequences for breaking protocol plain and simple.
Holy shit this is stupid, it’s like you didn’t even watch the video. When a car is going 90mph+ with its siren on, it’s outrunning that siren (which was directly stated in the video). It seems to me you also miss the curve the cop came around at (and let me reiterate this) 107 MILES PER HOUR, meaning the civilian would look left, not see or hear anything, look right and see a gap, and in the time it takes them to lift their foot off the brake and look left again, the cop is already hitting them. No excuse for 107mph, trying to blame a victim and say it’s valid for them to receive blame when the only “infraction” they committed was slowly pulling out is just really not correct in the slightest. Do you expect every driver to have their eyes glued to the left and expect someone to come flying around a corner with low-profile emergency lights, instead of what every normal driver does, which is look both ways before entering a road? Trying to blame anyone but the officer is embarrassing. He nearly killed someone due to his negligence
@@Theuglytruth1776 The Toyota driver had a stop sign, the officer had the right of way, was running with lights and sirens, and was clearly visible. Everyone talks shit about police and could have always "done it better," or the "cops are all crooks" bullshit. Anti-police = pro-criminal. I have never encountered anyone who was anti-cop, not a piece of shit or a criminal.
@baddriversofmontana8811 But that's irrelevant. He ran a stop sign which is usually automatic fault. I highly doubt the person even looked if they couldn't even be bothered to come to a complete stop.... Also he was going 77 not 90+....
Wow, I hadn't thought of that. That 84 did stick out as not nearly as agregious as all the other stuff he'd done behind the wheel. I'd bet my bottom dollar that's exactly what happened.
The police report is always altered to protect the officer. I've seen it several times while working at a major PD. Many times when the officer was speeding over 100 mph it was changed to somewhere 70-80 mph.
@@ratagris21 I wouldn't say "always". Because there is video evidence to the contrary. However, I agree that protecting those IN the tribe of the "thin blue line" illegally IS far more common than not (very maddening). And THAT changes them from a law enforcement agency into a gang/mob, and those actions will lead some to commit greater and greater crimes.
@@dodgeplow I'd actually bet you could make a point out if it with a good lawyer. Like "how am I supposed to believe he knows what hes talking about with a terrible driving record showing he doesnt know or respect the laws."
@@mikeg6285 you're talking credibility in front of a judge. His driving record won't affect that. If you bring it up, all he has to say is "yes, I too have had traffic infractions" and your case goes down the drain. This is about honesty, not hypocrisy. You should sit in on a few real court cases and see how witness credibility is vetted.
It doesn't seem to make sense but i got passed by a cop driving a high speed with sirens on just a couple days ago and I didn't hear them until he was passing me.
@@ashleyhill6697 thats because you were driving away from the sound so he had to get closer. also that combined with the sound of the wind and the car while it’s moving on the road makes it harder to hear the sirens. if you were stopped at an intersection like the guy in this video, you definitely would have heard it way sooner.
That last quote from the police officer is on point. Can't help people if you're now the person who needs help. Now you have done more harm and no good.
The person in the Toyota is the one who put the public most at risk.... STOP signs are put in place for a reason. You come to a COMPLETE STOP, look both ways and make sure it's clear, then you proceed. They would've seen the cop car if they had stopped completely.
@@sludge801beats bull shit! There's zero reason for the cop to be driving 107 mph. The civilian certainly didn't blow the stopsign. The knuckle dragging cousin fucker cop was living out his race car driver fantasies for a no weapons involved domestic disturbance between and autistic child and a parent. 107 mph?
@@eelnoops5200 you're completely right. He shouldn't have been going that fast. But the citizen also should've used the stop sign correctly. They are both in the wrong.
I’m pretty sure if they had clear video evidence of you rolling a stop sign and causing a wreck, you’d get a citation, whether it was a cop that hit you, or not.
@@jonmason8234 I’m not disagreeing with you that it’s a shame. The cop shouldn’t have been going that fast, no doubt. But regardless, there’s video proof of what the other driver did, and if they would’ve given it one more second, they might’ve been enough time to see the cop. I see idiots rolling stop signs all the time, and have almost hit those idiots on several occasions, as I drive a lot. I don’t have any more sympathy for that person than I do that cop. They both learned a lesson and are lucky to be alive. Hopefully the cop gets fired, because it sounds like he’s a repeat offender.
@@LESLASLESLAS It was almost a complete stop. It looks like the police car came from a curve. No way to see it at 107 mph even at a complete stop. I wonder what the limit is at that curving road?
This officer wouldn't have been allowed to drive for Uber - with that record! That being said; I put more blame on the other car: The flashing lights were plainly visible. The other car just rolled thru the stop sign. The analyst saying it was "a low profile car" apparently didn't watch the video. The lights were NOT only on the inside - they were all over the front of the outside!
It's always the civilian driver at fault when there's a car accident with a police car. Finally this proves that a police officer's driving can be reckless.
I was rear ended by a Washoe sheriff. He taaapped my bumper. Car pulled out of shopping center right the fuck in front of me. I skidded to a stop. Cop couldn't stop as fast since he was tailgating (he is a cop). Literally didn't scratch my bumper, zero damage to my truck. His push bumper bounced off the hood of his SUV and left a significant dent. Reno police had to come write it up. Sheriff immediately admitted fault. I never heard about it again. I agree with your point, i just felt like I had to play devil's advocate since i have a personal story.
If you know how sue him for reckless endangerment , take his badge as he’s not responsible for his actions. Sun the PD and the city or county he works for before he commits vehicular homiside
@steve jette Most officers don't use their seatbelts because it won't fit over their firearm, stupid. Ever think about that? NO! If the seatbelt won't properly fit around their equipment, then what? And when the belt goes over, thus covering the firearm, how can they quickly access the gun IF IT'S COVERED BY THE SEATBELT, thus taking two to three actions prior to actually pulling the firearm out of the holster, genius.
Driving 107 MPH on a state highway at 9 am is reckless, officer Jackson needs to be fired, he is a danger to the community. Lights and sirens on that police car are not enough of a warning at his speed.
@Jordy H. for something so egregious, he needs to be fired, he has a history of driving like a maniac, started before he was hired and he should have never been hired in the first place. Haines City is a little Hick town, so it doesn't surprise me, they hired him and tolerate his dangerous driving, that puts the community at risk.
The call was for a dumba.ss kid trying to break a window. But what if it was a call about a child drowning? You wanna go 100+ to get there asap. The woman rolling to a stop sign and didn't stop to check both ways and proceed should be jail.
most places dont respond with full lights and sirens blowing through red lights anymore due to crashes. The required call for it has to be pretty serious and even then a lot wont go over a certain speed etc
@@johnrambo1349 thats a ticket not jail. people dont go to jail for doing a rolling stop. blasting through it is a different story but she didnt do that
Speaking from experience, having worn the badge for almost 15 years, I can say that people aren't always paying attention to the left and right of them. And if what's coming at you is displaying their lights and siren to a car with music playing, no windows rolled down to let in the sounds around you, you develop Tunnel Vision and no amount of flashing lights or a siren is going to penetrate that Bubble you wrap around yourself when you're driving. Everyone should get into their car in the city and reach over and turn off their radios/music when they're within City Limits. Leave the turns off until you reach the outer edge of the city. You've already got kids screaming and arguing with each other, other drivers skirting the traffic laws to contend with and then you're going to roll up your window because you've got the AC on and then turn on your music to defeat another one of your five senses, your hearing. Bad mistake. Your little rolling coffin is not going to save your life when a dump truck, tractor trailer or train finds you not paying attention. Driving Safely only takes a few seconds of preparedness. Give that gray matter between your ears something to do and Think. And the officer, with his driving history should be driving a desk, not a patrol car. He's an Unsafe driver. And at 46 years of age at the time of this video's airing, you're not going to teach him anymore than he already knows. He thinks he's the most important driver on the road. He's Thick Headed. And you're not going to change that with Training, no matter what he says. He'll tell you what you want to hear and then in a few months when you forget about his dangerous actions, he'll finally kill someone and you could have stopped it from happening by telling him to lay his badge, ID and sidearm on your desk because he's finished. That's how you fix this guy. You can't fix stupid.
It's not just having music on- one problem nowadays is that car passenger cabins are so extra insulated to keep out road and ambient noise as a creature comfort to the driver, that they also block out police sirens. It doesn't even have to be a luxury type car- just about any typical vehicle nowadays has quiet cabin amenities.
@@sblagg527 if you’re a vigilant driver you’re never in these types of situations that guy at the stop sign didnt come to a complete stop and look it wouldve taken one second for that car to notice the cop coming
What a load of horseshit. You’re backing the blue. The idiot cop was at 100 mph plus. In this area it is unforgivable. This is why civtizen review boards are needed for almost everything cops do. Because when cops investigate themselves the outcome is sadly so predictable…
Officer was at fault and it is illegal to drive that fast above the speed limit regardless of lights and siren. He was the problem that day not having windows rolled up and music playing. Tell the truth about this crash.
3:40 a friend who was in the Highway Patrol for many years never wears his seat belt either. It's definitely odd considering all the horrific accidents they work over a career. *edit* same friend also constantly texts while driving, and has had a few serious accidents too
@@mr.robinson1982 firefighters joke that cop's badges make them invincible because they'll strut into a dangerous situation (chemical leak, etc) without wearing proper PPE (protection). With my 4 years of experience as a volunteer firefighter I'd say that's about right lol
@Malcolm X it's extremely important to wear one. Close to 50% of vehicle fatalities annually involves people not wearing thier seat belt. Turns out begin ejected through a broken windshield is worse than being held in place 😅
Maybe drive a marked police car and people might know you're a police officer instead of trying to be sneaky in order to write more petty traffic tickets.
The car was marked? Lol. Even if the car wasn't how do stickers on the side of the car avoid situations like this? Gotta think before you just blurt out silly comments.
@@JesusIsTheWay59 lol your comment doesn’t even make sense? So you’re saying if this cop car had a roof mount lightbar this accident would of been avoided?
@@Goober10584 likely not even then since I always see police officers driving at excessive speeds with one hand on the wheel and the other on their radio talking to dispatch.
@@Goober10584, did you not watch the video? The accident investigator told you in car/in grille lights aren’t as noticeable as top mounted. Accident wouldn’t have been avoided though, because cop was going too fast to even react. Did you see brake lights on in any of the video? I didn’t.
Of course the cop’s charged the hurt citizens. Didn’t stop at a stop sign. She checked both ways and it was clear, but 107 mph is like a fast train coming! He need to be decertified and his drivers license taken. He’s a danger on the roads.
As a former cop, I can tell you that you never respond to any call at 107mph. If you do, you are likely to create an additional call focused on you and you never make it to the call you were responding to. You only respond to a call with judicious urgency that allows you to arrive without putting yourself and others at risk. As we were taught, lights, sirens and speed don't give you the right of way....it only requests it.
@@JesusIsTheWay59 I only said that because that exactly what cops did in another similar case (not as fast) and they breathalyzed the victim to try to give the cop an out.
@@poppacapps5573 I watch those shit daily and i barely saw "corruption, lies, brutality", i watch from PoliceActivity, Real World Police and Video Leak police and some other sources, provide your source please, if you are seeing corruption lies and brutality everyday then it's weird af.
@@mattfoley6082 why are you calling yourself a snowflake? Kinda odd. But goes with the other beaut of a comment you made. Tell your mommy to look before the bitch pulls out next time. Ok skippy?
@@Executiveinvestments- Oh boohoo, your parents didn’t hug you enough. Who cares, everybody’s got problems. Pull on your big kid pants and get over it. Go to therapy, drink some water, and do some yoga like everybody else. Everybody sees right through you, you aren’t fooling anyone. 🙄😒 Edit: Oh wow, you’ve been doing this for years, huh? Holy crap. Dang, you’re sad as hell. You’re not even worth my or anyone’s time, really. 😂 Muted.
I my state, the Highway Patrol were using the "new" 5.0 Mustangs until they finally crashed so many they decided to replace them with Crown Vics. The last "5.0" was estimated to be traveling in excess of 140 MPH when it disintegrated into the back of a log truck. I can't remember where he was trying to go but I know where he went. For months afterwards, people would go to the scene to see the longest skid marks you've ever seen. That trooper new his fate way before it happened but couldn't stop. My state also used Javelins in the 70's. They were the high powered ones and it's on google. Self inflicted vehicle accidents kill more cops than anything else.
There's no such thing as a high powered Javelin....lol. 😆 kidding That would've made a pretty cool looking cop car though. Better than a Dodge Polaris that's for sure 😀
@@nealhead7673 you don't know shit because you don't do some research. There WAS a high performance model of the AMC Javelin. From Wikipedia "The optional "Go Package" included a four-barrel carbureted 343 cu in (5.6 L) AMC V8, power front disc brakes, heavy-duty suspension, dual exhausts with chromed outlets, wide full-length body-side stripes, and E70x14 red-line tires mounted on chrome-plated "Magnum 500" styled road wheels. A 343 Go Pac Javelin could accelerate from 0 to 60 miles per hour (97 km/h) in 8 seconds, had a top speed approaching 120 miles per hour (193 km/h),[21] and could run a quarter-mile in 15.4 seconds.[23] The largest engine in the first few months of 1968 production was "a 5.6 litre V-8 that delivered 284 SAE bhp, which made the car dangerously fast."[24] In mid-1968, the new AMX 390 cu in (6.4 L) engine was offered as a "Go-package" option with a floor-mounted automatic or manual four-speed transmission. "Its impressive 315 hp (235 kW; 319 PS) and 425 pound force-feet (576 N⋅m) of torque could send the Javelin from zero to 60 miles per hour (97 km/h) in the seven-second range."[25]
That’s what he was responding too. “We got a confused ole’ lady on First Street. Going code JUMBO on her. ALL OFFICERS INVITED. REPEAT, ALL OFFICERS INVITED!”
@@jrftworth the emergency he was attending was an autistic kid acting out!! Social workers or psychologist should be addressing that, not cops! You can't go that fast even if it was real because another emergency can be caused in the process. Totally irresponsible, even if somehow it's not illegal, it's common sense not to do do.
@@jrftworth Have you heard of a term called “due regard”? Probably not because you’re an idiot. This is the term that is used in civil litigation for such an occurrence. The nationally excepted response for any, let me repeat any emergency vehicle is 20 miles an hour over the posted speed limit. Also an officer, firefighter, paramedic EMT must have control over their vehicle at all times. As tall in the fire service speeding and driving reckless makes fairy little difference on your response time especially if you don’t get there and during the response you injure or kill somebody. I anxiously await another dumb ass comment from you!
For what, it is a traffic accident. The utilization of emergency lights and sirens is to create an environment where other motorists are aware of your disregard of traffic laws while responding to an emergency.
For me, one of the scariest things about this video is at around 2:00 minutes when it was said that a Polk County Sheriff's report said that the police car was travelling at 77.5 miles per hour which is likely a lie of about 20 miles per hour. These are the people who are taken as true witness's against the general public.
30 mp/h, 30. 107 - 77 = 30. That, is a massive discrepancy and a blatant lie. There's a very serious problem when cops lie, especially when there's no need to lie If they can't be honest with details, then it's hard to believe their 'honesty' regarding any other details and cases
Going over 100 low priority call no seat belt. This cop was sitting on his brains. Hard to think when you are doing that. Not the first time either. Make note of his name if you ever get caught for going 10 miles by him.
My friend is a cop somebody recorded him with a dash cam doing 85-90 on the highway on his way home from duty man he got into major trouble the person posted it on FB on a live stream
I don't expect anything but this type of conduct from cops anymore. Most cops think that they are above the laws of everyone else. Just like the cop in Seattle who was speeding 2 1/2 times the speed limit and ran over a woman and killed her.
Florida drivers are to stupid for that great important reminder. They still have no clue what that means. Fact only after experiencing getting into a wreck because of that very thing they still likely have trouble remembering. So in the mean time Im still T-Boning the fuck out of all the stupid ones hopefully they learn. Because my insurance is going sky high.
I've never seen a cop drive with a seatbelt on. I asked a friend (cop) about it and he said it's standard practice not to use them as they need to exit vehicles quickly and they hamper that. They shouldn't give the "safety" speech when they stop citizens then and issue an expensive "no seatbelt ticket". Do as I say, not as I do!
I own a 2016 Ford Explorer Police Interceptor the drivers side doesn’t even ding when I don’t wear my seatbelt the light comes on for a short time after starting the car then goes out. The passengers side is normal it won’t shut up when I haul my fat friend around.
I would like to see the statistics of how many cops had to exit their car so quickly that the 0.5 seconds it takes to unbuckle a seat belt was a factor. My guess would be never. It's an ego thing. Does unbuckling a seat belt quickly need to be part of their training? I can see it now, 5 full days practicing, repeatedly, unbuckling a seat belt. Maybe they could have national competitions? Yeah, I'd watch that!
@@Unborn-Lives-Matter @others When you're in your seat and come under active gunfire maybe you'll start to see the point. Cops that are allowed to enter high speed chases are subject to strict regulation and have had extensive training. The benefits of not wearing seatbelts far outweigh the downside for their jobs as 0,5-1 second is actually a big deal when you transition from a car chase to a foot chase. Cops are in some cases above the law but always to strict regulations and they can always get sued, reprimanded, fired, have internal investigations. Stop looking at groups of people (all cops) and judging them. Stop judging people you've never met. Stop judging people based in selective information. Stop judging people in fields you have no experience in.
@@Lasagnaisprettycool YOU stop judging people yourself. I have been in cars under such extreme circumstances and what you are saying is baloney. What's more they make safe dependable quick detach seatbelts. No, the cops are hypocrites and I'm sick of that crap. If they had a roll over crash that seatbelt could make the difference between staying in the fight or getting thrown from the car and they becoming worthless. So get off your high horse and start looking for some brains. The cops should be wearing seatbelts for OUR safety, let alone their own. Your comment was idiocy.
So what your saying if you needed HELP and fast don't come to fast? How do you know that call he was responding to did not call for that speed. Do you work for the police or are you a dispatcher? My guess NOT to both. I hope that something BAD happens to you and you need the COPS FAST and they take their time getting to you.............
It’s ironic that a police officer can site you for “breaking the speed limit” yet travel at literally 120 mph weaving through 10 people in traffic to catch up to you; and that’s just fine and dandy.
At 88mph you are "outrunning the siren"? The siren audio travels at the speed of sound, which is about 750mph. A patrol car cannot outrun that. I understand that he wants to say that the officer was going too fast, but don't make dumb comments as justification, please.
If the lady stopped at the sign this wouldn't have happened . No one's mentioning that. In the posts . Who ever thought it was emergency enough to the call the initial call. Hope they both recover from there injuries.
Thank you for saying that. I blame both of them. Plus they acted like the car barely had any lights. Even in the low quality video, they are flashing like crazy. Too many people roll stop signs. Cop was still going way too fast though
Probably the most egregious case I’ve ever seen was Christopher Manuel’s. He was off duty at the time, and was driving extremely recklessly in his corvette, slamming into a mother killing her 1 year old child and injuring all other occupants. He was driving at 94 miles an hour. The mother was charged with several things, Manuel was only charged with misdemeanor speeding. She had a shitty baby carseat that was improperly restrained according to the court (as if it made a difference being hit at fucking 94 MPH). Not having your baby in a proper carseat/properly buckled is bad, and is an offense that can be ticketed. It does not in any way shape or form absolve someone else from recklessly killing your child by slamming into your vehicle at that speed. In Louisiana, where this happened, if you do not have a child in a proper seat at all/improperly restrained the first offense is a $100 ticket. They justified the killing of a 1 year old by saying the mother ‘also played a role’ by making a $100 dollar mistake before getting in an accident she played no part in causing. I guess making a turn when you have a green and what looks like plenty of space should just be a death sentence for anyone foolish enough to try. It’s Sickening. Oh and the guy’s prosecutors took so long thinking about it they ‘missed’ the opportunity to even get him for the ‘misdemeanor speeding count’. He literally got off scot free with no repercussions, and though it is old now (2019) he wasn’t even fired or put on leave or anything. He just got desk duty while it was internally investigated. A 7, 9, and 15 year old were in the car, and up to 2019 at least, the 15 year old was wheelchair ridden. Manuel has sued and accuses the mother of causing the crash. Both had green lights, and it was impossible to judge Manuel as he was incoming, leaving no room for either driver to stop the accident from happening. If that doesn’t mean his speed caused the accident, meaning he chose to put himself in a position where he could not react properly to changes on the road, meaning he caused the accident, MEANING HE WAS AT FAULT. I don’t know what constitutes being at fault.
Some tv show tested that cross-country with a car going the speed limit & one going 5-10 mph over and the speed limit car got to it's destination before the "speeder". Identical cars, same route, same daily start/stop times to sleep. They stopped to get fuel/food when they individually needed too. They were told after x time stop for a meal. They did stagger the departure time though, and that was factured in to determine who got there first. The "speeder" did use more fuel and had to stop for fuel more often, not by much, but it had an effect.
he had the right of way double over. Driver he hit ran a stop sign and he is an emergency vehicle with lights and sirens on. good luck getting any court anywhere to rule that as the officer's fault.
In my country I work as a volunteer rescue operator known as the State Emergency Service. Typically we deal with storm damage to homes... sometimes we might save a life or two from flood waters... and very occasionally we get called to a MVA because we have specialised equipment for extricating injured parties from wrecks. Safety First is drummed into us from day one. It is pointless to have us wasting valuable resources both as a party to an MVA or tying up other resources to assist us instead of the parties that needed help in the first place. If we break the rules and it goes bad for us... they simply refuse to have us in the organisation. We take that seriously and I've been involved in over 100 serious rescues in my time with the Service without incident and purely for the love of the teamwork that it takes to get the job done. It must be nice to be a cop and have so many protections AND a great salary. "Administrative leave" indeed 🙄
My cousin was just hit by one of these wreckless cops in ohio. Totaled her car and back. She lawyered up trying to get them to pay. They always say they not responsible
No reason to use your blinker if there is nobody within 1/4 mile or 1,320' That was as lame as Ruby Ridge... in slow mo it wasn't a full stop. OMG are they petty losers. Sue them and sue them again
That officer was coming around a BLIND CORNER! What if someone had been crossing the street, just then? They would have never had time to get out of the way! What if it was a mother with her kids?
It’s not as simple as that buddy. Wind also has an effect on the way sound travels. Driver’s education even goes over how sirens are not audible on the highway until they are a lot closer then they’d normally need to be. You’re talking about the SPEED of sound... what about the DISTANCE that sound has to travel and with what variables.
@@primordialsoftware9294 You have to have a very strong wind and very long distance to redirect the sound waves when the speed of sound is 700+ mph. Like hurricane speed winds.
_"When you're driving with your siren on, about 88 miles per hour you're outrunning your siren. People can't hear it"_ That's strange -- I thought the speed of sound was just over 760 MPH.
Police car sirens aren’t very loud to begin with. The sound is not discernible from a distance. A fire truck, on the other hand, is very loud, there are usually 2 separate sirens, mounted high and front bumper, and can be heard from way off!
Exactly - You can hear a siren from over a mile away when activated. Fucking idiot accident investigator statement and the moron media guy looking for an angle.
the siren really doesn't matter because you're legally allowed to drive while deaf, that's what those intense bright lights are for because it's illegal to drive while blind.
Not sure what the cop did wrong here. Aren't those 'give way' markings that the civilian vehicle rolls past without bothering to look? Seems to me like the car entering the main road is entirely at fault.
And remember he writes me and you tickets and impose fines for the state/county that he works in. If they continue to let that maniac be on the force than something is bork'd in the system.
He also keeps your neighbourhood safe from unlawful guns and comes visit your neighbours when their having a dubstep concert not allowing you to sleep.
I am glad they both survived. This now makes me wonder if it was a blessing in disguise. With him racing that quickly to an autism disturbance, i wonder how he’d have handled it once he got there. Idk. I’ve seen or rather heard of some very negative police responses to autism or other mental disturbance reports and those just made me wonder about how this one would have been handled. Anyway, i wish them both continued recoveries. Glad they survived. Please remember to drive for yourselves and others...and be patient. Stay safe.
The reporter highlighted "He had no weapons" in the statement, read the next 3 words he left UNhighlighted......they were "but was homicidal". The officer had reason to get there as quickly as possible.
@@Jeremy-zi6pi Doesn't matter, idiots will only see what they want to see. The civilian driver forgot to LOOK before they leapt. What do we learn as children before crossing the road? Look left, right and left again...
@@philonetic321 Yep. It's called the Florida rolling stop. I see it everywhere. Apparently the cop enjoyed speeding and had the record to prove it. The stars lined up for these two and they lived to tell about it.
@@JoeGator23 Gosh, I have seen this so many times. I live near the highway and cops usually sit right at the entrance into the highway. Despite this and the stop sigh there, drivers always do a rolling stop...and always get pulled over. It's crazy. And yes, it also in Florida. Lol
Should the cop have been doing? Probably not. But the other driver legally ran a stop sign and failed to yield, to an emergency vehicles. The end. Why are you making the guilty party into a victim ?
Your supposed to slow down at intersection as an officer when responding and that guy shouldnt have coasted through the stop sign. Both in the wrong and we need black boxes in every car.
or, if she came to a full stop and looked both ways, collision avoided. or, if she put it down and pulled in to her lane of travel with purpose and intent, no collision.
I'm doin' a hundred on the highway So if you do the speed limit, get the fuck outta my way I'm D.U.I. hardly ever caught sober And you about to get ran the fuck over Move bitch, get out the way Get out the way bitch, get out the way ~Luda
So you chose to take that literally, cool. It means going faster than people can react to the warning. Googled it for you just in case. Outrunning the siren just means that you drive so fast that people will not have had the time to move out of the way before you reach them.
@@thechumpsbeendumped.7797 Sirens lose effectiveness after about 50mph. But if you believe you know more than the people that have actually studied this stuff then you're good to believe whatever bullshit you like. Google is your friend.
@@gador789 Are you disputing the maths? Of course the effectiveness of a siren reduces with speed, from zero upwards, that’s how sound over distances works.
@@thechumpsbeendumped.7797Studies have shown that the effective range at an intersection like the one here, from within a modern vehicle, is only 80ft.
