Hardest Atheism Questions Answered in 1 Minute! "Biology Debunks Atheism" 

Dear brother I have watched a lot of your videos but this video is a gem ❤ I want to become like you insha'Allah may Allah make it easy for me this journey ❤️

thankyou for sharing to the channel. and give us light. alhamdulillah may Allah bless you, and give you strength to keep spreading the message of the one true religion, islam. amin

nothing logical about flyinghorse, or 309yrs cave sleeping, or 27m human, throwing big stone with small stone, throwing dvil with stars. skip reli gion go learn science, meditation, mindfulness and yoga.

​@@richarddawkins4607 May ALLAH SWT guide you in the right path

​@@richarddawkins4607Everything is logical and possible when there is a God. You believe in the biggest miracle of all: something coming out of nothing

He has his own channel

Mee too Mashaa Allah Allah has given wisdom to his chosen ones for counter arguing/stating facts for the Kuffar Al hamdullilah 🤲🏻

@@rakhee_aishabhai he uses his wisdom to create a god ,give this god magical powers and in return this god creates the universe and Adam…by magic…haha

​@@Hitchens-k9syou missed the first question. The existence of God is not optional. It's essential for the existence of the universe.

​@@Hitchens-k9sSaying that everything came from chance or nothing, sounds more like magic to me.

In your doubts you asked the wrong questions then. Because an atheist would not ask these questions. Or at least not in the way they were asked.

@@DividerLPwaw i found the representant of atheism right here lol. speak for yourself

@@toshio-tamura I’m only saying that the questions are flawed and won’t turn any religious person into an atheist. They are straw man arguments.

@@DividerLP so you are talking about academic atheisme, here it is clear these are atheism of common people questions. so no straw man, if you want arguments as why do evil exist then refer to mohammed hijab's video on it, or even beter the video of hamza tzortsis on it. anyways how can one stay an atheist after this video? I love the following quote of subboor ahmed: "The inconsistency is explained by the fact that people don't want to believe in God"

@@toshio-tamura oh not believing is simple. Can you prove it? No? Okay then it’s not important and an invalid argument. Science can tell me why evil people do what they do. That’s basic psychology and sociology. There’s quantifiable proof, studies, experiments, collective data. Unless you have that in your thesis, we have nothing more to discuss.

Multiverse is a misconception of what means Univers. Uni- means One. And verse means Side. There is so much misconception about the arabic words, corrupted by the translations. Al Alamin is not about univers, nor world, but what a mind can grap from the reality. The ghayb is not part of A'lamin. This kind of Da'wa in english in a street, it's bag of fishbones. Arabic describe with so much precision the ALamin. The study of Allah's name is a way to Heaven.

@@victoremman4639 mashallah - if only people, especially Muslims, can grasp the impossible beauty of Quranic Arabic - no one would blink an eye about it's linguistic miracle if they truly understood it

@@basedmuslimbooks Seems we have to make da'wa to the ones making da'wa. English is corrupting slowly but surely Allah's words. The rabbies and christians got this desease, corruptions. We need to explain what is أعجميّ and what means عربيّ opposed in meaning, toward the muslims, from mashreq to maghreb.

literallllllly every theory has a counterargumentttt

Go name them

@@baileylaurie6787 No, I said that as an general statement.

@@_dybaIa I was talking about him to refute them, it’s quite literally against the laws of physics and science for something to come from nothing let alone from our own understanding that everything has to be designed

@@baileylaurie6787 ok sorry for the misunderstanding

Probably just trying to appeal to a wider audience - to get more views. People probably aren’t talking about this because they’d rather discuss what was said than say he went overtime.

bruh this is what you take out of this video?

@@toshio-tamura That they establish a rule and break it for only one of the guest and that guest spews absolute bs? Yeah that’s about all there is to take.

God doesn't need you to believe! It's you, who needs to believe for your own benefit. It's even mentioned in Quran that Allah doesn't need your prayers or worships but it's for the humans to pray and worship Allah so that they may succeed!

@@M.Aamir. then why send us to hell for not

Because whenever a human disobeys Allah, that person does something which goes against an ideal action and it causes problems in the fabric and functioning of society. Whatever is sin in Islam harms human itself. That's why if we don't believe and don't do the required things, we would be the chaos creators and this warrants punishment in the afterlife!

@@M.Aamir. ok let’s give you that why eternal punishment?

​@@M.Aamir.If God is self-sufficient & lacks nothing, why did he create man to worship him? If creation is for our benefit, then what is the benefit to those who will burn forever? Why does God test us for a finite period but punish infinitely? If it is because he knows disbelievers will disbelieve infinitely. Then what is the point of this test? If the justification for infinite punishment is God’s knowledge of what disbelievers will do rather than what they have actually done - then this test is meaningless. God might as well create humans and put them straight into eternal Paradise or Hell since it is his knowledge that is the justification for eternity. Not finite actions. Can a being who creates humans he knows will fail his test and be tortured without end, be called The Most Merciful of those who show Mercy? If God wanted us to freely choose to worship him - then why threaten us? Does someone with a gun to his head really have free choice? Why does God cause so much suffering to humans? Is it part of God's test to prompt them to turn to him in desperation? Isn't that like a con-man who causes a problem then offers to fix it for you? Why would God give humans the ability to reason - then punish them for rejecting beliefs reason cannot comprehend? Why does the human body look like it was the result of a long cumulative process of evolution resulting in imperfections and vestigial organs and genes - and not the result of the instant and perfectly planned creation of Adam and Eve? Who is worse? The imperfect creation who commits evil or the perfect entity who created evil? Is being good because you fear God, really being good? Why did God send all known prophets, miracles and books to one area of the world and at a time when people were superstitious and gullible? Why did God only protect the Qur'an from corruption? Couldn't he have protected the Bible and prevented billions claiming he has a son? What was so special about Jesus that God made him born to a virgin? Took him up to heaven before he was crucified? And will bring him back before judgment day? Do you believe it's acceptable for a husband to hit a rebellious wife? Why do so many characteristics of Allah like anger and vengefulness seem like human ones? Why does the Qur'an say don't ask questions about things when the answer would trouble you? Should followers of other religions also not ask questions about their religion when it might trouble them? Why will God never forgive Shirk? What are they really guilty of? Ignorance? Being born to the wrong family? The quran criticizes idolaters for following the religion of their parents. Are you any different? You believe other people are following false, corrupted or unfounded beliefs? Are you certain you're not also?

the universe is still bound by clear laws even if they're complex. God isn't, He is the creator, not the universe. the universe has a beginning, God doesn't. also watch what he says about everything being left to chance. the universe itself doesn't have "intelligence" or "wisdom" to be the designer, sustainer, creator, n doesn't have any of God's attributes that He describes Himself as in the Quran. we don't describe God as anything worldly, so no idolatry, God describes Himself by His attributes, and doing everything/anything the Quran tells us is the same as worshipping Him, with one requirement, believing in Him, aka submitting your will to your Creator, being a Muslim (one who submits).. because if u dont even believe in Him / reject His existence, reject that there's Heaven /Hell, whats the point of following, if u r not doing it for God, for ur afterlife? anyway, I'd recommend u looking up linguistic and mathematical miracles of the Quran here. there r scholars who dedicated their lives in researching them n there are books about them too. u can look them up, fascinating stuff even for Muslims. start off by reading the Quran first, with explanations, if u actually are kind of philosophical and want your questions answered. whether u want to believe comes later. also dont be misguided by the western media's perspective about Islam, all stems from their own agendas n propaganda as Islam rejects many things that are rooted in their economy. atheists don't have a say in moralities as it's all subjective from their perspective. watch Muslim lantern's channel for simple logical explanations to questions u might have about Islam. also look up Nouman Ali Khan if u want extensive explanations/ understanding of different topics, all from the Quran and Hadith. our lives in this world are very short. this world is just a test from God, if we can follow the clear signs and guidances He gave us, believe in Him, repent for our sins, we will be granted Heaven, and if we reject God and only follow our worldly desires fanned by satan, well u know.. ig thats all im gonna say. May Allah guide us all.

They actually hold interviews with atheist. So these questions are based on what’s mainly heard

Wow. What a lie.@@ponderwherearewegoing

@@ponderwherearewegoing In my point of view there is only ONE atheistic question: Can you demonstrate that your god is more real than all the countless other gods? No? Ok, bye!

​@@darnmarrwhat are your questions?

​@@hitman5782yes Allah is real And the evidence is quran

Let's go to the beginning of biology. How did life arise. Evolution was known for thousands of years. Darwins model was new but even if we would accept it, the problem just gets moved backwards. Abiogenesis is an insane question because even the simplest cell in itself is as complicated as the living thing as a system. Sure you be like "yh but that doesn't prove God" but you didn't give an possible explanation for no God at all

Suboor here is known for his debates in Speakers Corner UK and his debated with his peers and academics in Universities. This is simply the format of this channel, the pinned comment has his YT channel where you can find the debates. Now as for your claims of fallacies, they are utterly false: 1. From witnessing multiple live debates with Atheists (in SP Hyde Par for example), many atheists claim that *they* don't need a creator. They also claim the Universe does not need a creator. Just because you haven't seen this common claim, it doesn't mean it's not a common claim. This is an *Argument from ignorance* fallacy from your part. 2. By proving that it is rational to believe in God, it also proves that it's *irrational* to NOT believe in God thus proving the existence of God. The law of non-non-contradiction. He didn't change the format of the question at all. By proving why God must exists rationally is not changing the question. And no, biology nor genetics haven't shown how any complex system develops Evolution and NS by itself. In fact, no where in science is it claimed that anything started developing by itself. The origins in the context of science is *unknown*. What you just described it the process, not the actual cause. Your claim here is quite literally saying the development is *random* and *by chance* since neither Evolution or NS are couscious beings. All you just showed is a poor knowledge about the subject in every way possible.

@@mohamudahmed6554 barakallahu feekum akhi

@@mohamudahmed6554The definition of atheism is not believing in God or gods. Whether atheists “feel a need” for God or gods may be true in some cases, but it is not central to the definition of atheism. If there is no proof of God, then either believing in God or not believing may both be rational; these are not mutually exclusive; it is just a reflection of not having definitive data one way or another. Indeed, not having any proof of God is why these debates arise in the first place, and it is why people rely on “faith”.

@@Fanboy1222 Barakallahu fiik akhi!

pretexts.

Anything which begins to exist is not God. You yourself is an evidence. So just find answer to simple question sincerely without arrogance. Are you creater of yourself or you came from nothing. May Allah help you to become sincere

This was so stupid

It was anything but insightful.

Then there's the argument regarding how humans received the intel to write religious texts, would a god necessarily be present to do this? No. I can schedule an email for a future date for example. If I want to write a message to someone but don't want the info to reach immediately but later on, I can do that now. If technology allows for this, surely a universe creator could put mechanisms in place to allow for this same concept.

😂

But I guess there are a lot of things that we shall come to know only in the other life

No it does not, think about it

The one question is simply "how was the universe created", which both science and religion cannot answer properly with an answer agreed by all. its sad to see the world divided on beliefs and not united by them, there will never be respect as long as u hav a opinon ij9j9j9j9j9u98fwe9ewfwe

💯

nothing logical about flyinghorse, or 309yrs cave sleeping, or 27m human, skip reli gion go learn science, meditation, mindfulness and yoga.

@@richarddawkins4607 You miss the point. It's not the How the true reality, but the Why, destination. I see you as ignorant, but here you show also arrogance. Their is deep science in torah and quran words. But you need to study these language. Or keep beeing what you are.

​@@victoremman4639Don't waste your time with him, he's just trolling

@@richarddawkins4607 Palestine or Israel ?

like what, vrgns mrket? wine river? white palace?

@@richarddawkins4607 why do we exist? Is there afterlife? Why are we even here in the universe? Who created all the things? what is actually really good and bad for the human? There are way more things than that. You can search and look up for yourself. ;) good evening!

No, that should read: Islam makes up answers for questions that science cannot answer. Atheism has nothing to do with it as it is just a rejection of theism.

@@richarddawkins4607 What do you give as meaning for Virgin ? This is the mean purpose ; you'll reach what you are thinking the things are. So meditate in how strange are these objects, the Words. They lead you. somewhere.

The problem of atheists is not these questions or answers

Why dont you read the Quran and its meaning, its there if you reasoned and use a little logic

This is a truly underrated comment, how does this have only 8 likes?

The questions that you have raised are really good. I had similar questions but these are already answered by many scholars. You can try finding their answers one by one and listen to the pov of different scholars. I hope you find the truth.

Just to answer one of the questions, Allah does not need our worship. Worship is for your own benefit, someone who truly believes, when they pray, it alleviates your depression, your fears, anxieties, etc etc. Its like a phone manufacturer in it's instructions, will tell you the phone can only be submerged 20m in clear water. You can choose to take it 30m deep in Sea Water, but the creator knows the limitation of it's design, and by you doing that you risk damaging your phone. Same with us as humans, we have consciousness, this is divine creation from our creator, and our creator knows, you'll never fully find true peace unless you maintain a connection with him. Why does God put on earth to test us, for a finite period. Because if he was to simply cast us to heaven or hell, we would scream it was unfair, we never got a chance. Your life on this earth is your chance to demonstrate you deserve to be among those closest to the creator in the hereafter, Allah is the all knowing, the all wise. It may not make sense to us now as humans, but in the next life it will make sense, and I'm sure Allah will reveal to us other things that we cannot simply comprehend as humans on earth. You say Allah shows characters of vengeance and anger, that is far from true. As humans we are very simple, we have two motivators, that being pleasure or pain. That's why there's a heaven and hell, you cannot understand heaven without hell, or vice versa. We learn what things are by their polar opposites, you cannot know happiness without sadness, you cannot know life, without death, you cannot know peace, without war. That's simply how we are, so going back to why God threatens his wrath to the wrongdoers/disbelievers, it's the only way we as humans can learn. Like for example just look at parking, there's rules about parking, you can park here, there, but not there. If parking rules were not enforced, what do you think would happen, people would park anywhere, at any time. What's stopping people is the fear of consequences. If government announced that none of the rules of the land are going to be enforced, and society also agreed we would not judge, punish, cast out people who don't follow the rules, what do you think will happen ? Women would be getting raped, people getting killed, people stealing whatever they want, society would descend into anarchy, why ? Because people would know seeking out their pleasures, come with no consequences. I was once upon a time an atheist, I had all these questions too, but trust me if you are a sincere person who wants to know the truth, you will find it. Hamza's Den, Muhammad Hijab, Mufti Menk, Bilal Assad are all good places where you can start to explore finding the truth. But once again I'll tell you, you will only find the truth if your sincere, if you have that arrogance within you, whereby you believe you already know, or you don't want to believe in what you don't agree with, no amount of evidence will sway you. So drop all of that, have an open mind, read, listen, study, critically think, and you'll find the truth, and it will be soo clear and obvious you won't believe how you've missed it your whole life. May Allah guide you and help you open your heart to finding the truth. All the best

@@abdulqadirali7240 I have read the Quran, hasn´t helped to answer any of these fair questions. can you answer them?

Bhai that’s your ignorance..he has not been able to prove existence of any creator,nor does he know when was Adam created,where is jannat or jahanum located..how does a donkey fly in space,how is a moon split and how was the universe created in 6 days…haha…his answer would be by MAGIC…haha

0:59​@@Hitchens-k9s

@faysal18597 I hope you wake up one day 😢

​@@Hitchens-k9sI can tell all of this.

@@L-Lawliet14 go ahead..you will win a Noble prize

The very questions pressuposes something was created, instead of caused. "Created" pressuposes a creator, I would expect God to not ask a loaded questions that pressuposes the very thing he is trying to prove, which leads to a circular argument fallacy. I would also expect God to not pose false dichotomies.

​@@marcosbittar initially humans did not exist, and then they exist. So by definition humans are "created" So your comment is quite worthless at the end

​@@marcosbittar initially humans did not existed at all, then later humans were existing. So by definition humans are indeed "created" (by something which is either an Intelligent Creator, whether in a miraculous or natural way, either a purely non-intelligent natural process) So in reality there is no circular reasoning fallacy. And then the verse quoted is not necessarily meant to be a dichotomy; nowhere in the verse is it said or implied that the two possibilities mentionned are the only possible possibilities, and that this verse intends to be an exhaustive list. So at the end it looks like you try to misinterpret things in a bad way in order to see fallacies etc everywhere.. This doesn't sound entirely sincere and fully intellectually honest..

@@Adri-242 If something is caused by a natural process u can just use the word "caused". The word "created" does imply that it was caused by an inteligent being.

@Adri-242 when u say "Or A or B" that is literally one of the natural language form of an logical exclusive Or. What an exclusive or needs to be true, and the text is affirming it, hence, saying it is true, is that one side is necessarly true and the other necessarly false.

we believe the things are the way they seem to be in the absence of counter evidence. It is about falsifying, not resposing to tranquility in our own ignorance. The existential questions won't disappear just because you acknowledge your ignorance.

@@iznij3284 Yes but acknowledging your ignorance is humbling and will free you to finding out the actual answer to that question. There are plenty of answers out there, but because of people just believing these assumed answers on faith, they will never be open to hearing the actual answers. Rather than assuming the sun goes around the earth, if humans acknowledged their uncertainty on the question, then we may have discovered the truth earlier, rather than instilling a status quo backed up imagined authority from an all powerful being, and we wouldn't have been burning people at the stake for proposing a heliocentric model.

also phones record at 1080p, which is like 1million pixels per frame. 16million for 4k. humans can't

@@JackSack-w5h Could that be because humans are not limited to pixels, dude?

[As a Muslim], There was a constant usage of certain logically unjustifiable argumentative actions [fallacies] in the verbal responses asserted by the "intellectual" Subboor Ahmed. As an example, 7:41... He just specifically implied the human-oriented behavioural pattern revolving around the intuitive desire for actively participating in the materials we intentionally created and baselessly presupposed that the specific emotional desire of constant participation co-relates with the intentional actions of an External Being when that's a non-sensical presupposition that conceptually contradicts the specific understanding of an External Being he initially proposed cus the Neccesary Existence [based on the definitive charecteristics provided by Subboor Ahmed] is that the Being is the fundamental cause that's charecteristically different in any possible way or form from the materialistically observable reality created by him including their natural intuitions, desires and behavioural patterns. So, it's not conceptually possible for the two to be co-related in terms of their intuitions and actions.

@@mohithegreat7912 I don't think Suboor Ahmad is saying that The Eternal Entity must have completely different behavioral characteristics from his creatures. What he is implying is that "God's physical nature" is different, therefore he is invisible. As for the characteristics of a living entity such as having a will or being able to do something, this is valid according to his argument that the cause must be active. If it is not active, it will not produce an effect.

Yeah, I'm still waiting to hear that part!!

Guys you won’t believe it - I just found this phone on the ground that I’m using to type, and I can’t believe nature made it by itself! It had no designer - a tornado probably just tore through some wood and metal, and made it by accident. Isn’t that amazing? 🤡

@@celestialknight2339 No. It's not amazing and no, I don't believe it. But I do believe that the picture of yourself you so kindly included at the end of your comment is very apt.

@@celestialknight2339 Bruh, this is so lame. Just keep your head down and study the natural world. There is something called "Evolution by natural selection", something you guys will always ignore but can't refute because practically it is more sound than your Imaginary friend in the heavens!!!

@@Siegfried527 Evolution doesn’t disprove God - it’s just a mechanism, which itself still needs explaining. Also, where did the first life-form come from? Abiogenesis is still a mystery. How did DNA form by chance? Remember that you need DNA for replication & evolution to even occur. How did Evolution form symmetry? (We have two eyes, two hands, two feet - all split down the middle in beautiful symmetry) And how is it that our universe has been discovered to have just the perfect starting conditions to even allow evolution & life to exist in the first place? The ~26 constants of the universe are so precise down to even the 11th decimal place (e.g. the force of gravity, the speed of light, etc.), that any slightest shift in their values would prevent the delicate stability of our cosmos that allows life to be sustained. So evolution itself doesn’t answer the whole question - it actually adds more questions, and points to an Intelligent Designer even more. No matter how you try to square it - we are here. And there is no reason for us three-dimensional, living, conscious, self-aware, morally-tuned beings with the sense of free will placed on earth, to have been the way we are. It all points to a Creator and a purpose in life. The signs are everywhere, including in yourself. But as the Qur’an says: *_”The disbelievers remain in denial.”_* ~ _Qur’an 85:19_

@Towards Eternity Video Publisher: Our brother is asking if we can possibly have sub titles of this video translated in Turkish language

I am afraid that is more your misunderstanding than them being unfair. As an atheist let me try and explain what is going wrong here. Science cannot say anything about the supernatural. It is a tool we use to learn about our reality (aka the truth). Other tools exist, praying, a coinflip, a magic-8ball and intuition are examples. But none of them have shown themselves as reliable as science (which also isn't perfect). So science cannot prove or disprove god. The thing is that no such tool like science exists for the supernatural. So we have no way of knowing if any supernatural claim (like that a god exists) is actually true. Since we can't, they are not part of the decision making process. Some god claims include that god acts in the physical world (christian flood for example). These we can disprove using science. But that just disproves the flood not the god. So when you say that science explicitly shows gods existence i highly doubt it. You are welcome to back up that claim with scientific evidence, but no1 ever has. But who knows, maybe you will be the first.

good knowledge of science ???????

But he doesn’t. He uses a type of speaking called hypnotic pattern to seem confident and honest but anyone who knows about the basics of science he speaks on will confirm he is either misinformed on what he speaks of or being disingenuous. He is very wrong on a lot of these topics involving science.

I've read some atheist arguments and can defy this guys answers. It's just made for those who actively trying to reinforce their beliefs. An atheist wouldn't ask like that and wouldn't accept such answers.

@@HEbr-rg2jz As an atheist I can confirm this.

Critical question actually.... Well you'll have to rule out in bulk for reasons and you'll end up with like one or two then start manually ruling out. First and most importantly: God cannot be more than one. Suppose God A (almighty) wanted to make a decision and; God B (almighty) also wanted to make the same decision.. Then here we got 3 states: 1- They Disagree on it then it either: -happens how A wants (B then isn't almighty then isnt God cuz someone is above em -Admin- 😁) -Or happens how B wants and A is excluded. -Or doesn't happen at all that'd make em both not gods :( Here you ruled out 99% of God's But our Christian brothers might say: God is one identity, One will. but 3 people... Well if so then even a single contradictory decision or knowledge that someone has over the other would make the whole argument false because then it's not one will at all (We see Jesus not knowing when the day of the judgement is, and Always asks God to do things for him; while he could just do it himself as he is still god.) Here we are back to god only being one. 👽 Alright how many religions do we have left? 3 ? Maybe 4? 😂 Cherry pick then

@@spooonpro614 Hey thx for your reply, at least you gave it a try and invested time to help me find an answer, but i am afraid your answer wasn´t helpful. That you CLAIMED that there can only be one god, is just that, a claim, not evidence for that claim to be true. You also could argue that it is way more likely that there are many gods, because in that case every god would have his fields. If the god of the bible created humans out of dirt or ribs, flooded the world, killed all the firstborn in egypt and so on, and we know that all this never happned, couldn´t we rule out this god as well? Do you realize that i just asked for a single rational argument and that you as well have not been able to present any?

@@hitman5782 Yeah man, let's at least reach a sensible conclusion at last. About the the CLAIM: That wasnt a claim, I provided logical proof one by one. Evidence doesnt have to be physically held in your hand it can merely be of ruling out and logic. If it was more likely that we had more gods and every God would have his field then we come back to one of two conclusions: 1- Those are not almighty at all, as they cannot interact with others' fields, returning to my initial argument of almightiness.. 2- every god is separate from all the others in entirely different dimensions and worlds and they cannot even interact with each others at all; each in his completely different matrix and then every world would have it's own god returning to monotheism.. (The second scenario is still logically flawed, as all the matrixes are still a part of a larger matrix that Should have a source, that means that those gods still have a god higher than them... Which means that they are not gods which returns to the initial monotheism argument) How ever you try to think about it you'll always arrive to the same conclusion.. One god... About the latter argument: 1- It would not take a genius to know that we are not actually made of soil and ribs as in our biological composition.. and I dont think it's hard for God to manipulate matter to his own will turning any atom to any other. Being made out of soil was for us more of a remainder of what we will become 👽 2- There's nothing in Islam about god killing Egypt's newborn's.. that was the Pharo killing Israelis male newborns for a set period of time. Maybe you are confusing Islam with Christianity again. 3- Again.. no. In Islam each prophet was sent down to his own land's people, and when they get punished only they get punished... Meaning that the flood was not global in according to Islam.. rather local. Again idk about Christianity but I think that might be there. Again if you have any other arguments I'm here, and won't get bored as long as there's civility in our discussion.. Good day for you.

@@spooonpro614 That wasnt a claim, I provided logical proof one by one. (No, to prove something you have to DEMONSTRATE it. An allpowerful god who creates, knows and does literally everything is exacty as logical or illogical as 100 gods where every god has his specific powers and fields. One for dealing with the dead, one dealing with stars and so on.) Evidence doesnt have to be physically held in your hand it can merely be of ruling out and logic. (Evidence must also be demonstrable, and logic and gods do not really fit together anyways, because magic and miracles are nothing you can logically calculate. For example, logic tells us that it is IMPOSSIBLE to turn water into wine, because both consist of completly different molecules. But gods can do literally anything. Of course only in books, no supernatural effect has ever been demonstrated in the real world, but that´s a different theme.) 1- Those are not almighty at all, as they cannot interact with others' fields, returning to my initial argument of almightiness.. (Something like almighty is not logical in itself. Or can your god create a stone he can´t lift? I personally find it hard to imagine a god like Poseidon who only has powers over water, to imagine a being who is infinitly more powerful is something i can imagine even worse.) every god is separate from all the others in entirely different dimensions and worlds and they cannot even interact with each others at all (they can interact exatly as good or bad with people and each other like your god.) Which means that they are not gods which returns to the initial monotheism argument (And this monotheistic god needs no cause? Isn´t it more likely that he is the child of two other gods? And yeah i understand that this leads to the question of how his parents came into existence, but in my point of view this entire idea of gods make no sense ,so...! All we actually know from science is that stuff can not be created or destroyed, only formed. So if that´s true the matter of the universe must have always existed in some form. But i don´t think there is much sense in debating about the origin of the universe when nobody knows anything about it.) 1- It would not take a genius to know that we are not actually made of soil and ribs as in our biological composition.. and I dont think it's hard for God to manipulate matter to his own will turning any atom to any other. (I agree with you when anybody can demonstrate that this is somehow even possible. As long we don´t have a single case where something like that has ever happened, for me that´s just childish fairytales.) 2- There's nothing in Islam about god killing Egypt's newborn's.. that was the Pharo killing Israelis male newborns for a set period of time. (Yeah that was the bible) In Islam each prophet (Wait, what do allpowerful gods need prophets for? Or books?) Again if you have any other arguments I'm here, and won't get bored as long as there's civility in our discussion.. Good day for you. (Thx, you too have a good day.)

@@spooonpro614 "That wasnt a claim, I provided logical proof one by one." (You have absolutely no idea what proof is, right? You have to DEMONSTRATE that what you claim is actually true and accurate, and you can´t do that, not even to 1%.) Evidence doesnt have to be physically held in your hand it can merely be of ruling out and logic. (How again have you ruled out the flying spaghettimonster, universe-shitting pixies, that the universe is eternal, that antimatter created our universe, a multiverse or literally an endless amount of other possibilities? Please understand that "nobody knows" is in no way evidence for anything let alone a god who makes pedophile killers write books.) If it was more likely that we had more gods and every God would have his field then we come back to one of two conclusions. (How will you even start to figure out what supernatural nonsense is more or less likely when you live in a world with ZERO demonstrable evidence for ANYTHING supernatural?!) Those are not almighty at all, as they cannot interact with others' fields, returning to my initial argument of almightiness. (Your god can do as much or little as every other god ever invented.) The second scenario is still logically flawed, as all the matrixes are still a part of a larger matrix that Should have a source, that means that those gods still have a god higher than them. (And your god is an atheist? He actually believes nobody created him?) It would not take a genius to know that we are not actually made of soil and ribs as in our biological composition.. and I dont think it's hard for God to manipulate matter to his own will turning any atom to any other. (Can you really not see how ridiculous you sound? it´s like talking to a 6 year old who is telling me about his favoite superhero. Please name anything in the real world you can show that your god has ever done. And when you can do that, THEN we can talk about how this god should be able to use strange magic to ignore all what we know about how stuff works and turn ribs to humans or childish nonsense like that.) Being made out of soil was for us more of a remainder of what we will become (That´s what you say, not what the book says. Can´t your god communicate in a way everybody understands? And while we are at it, why would a real god ever write books like in all the thousands of other religions. That´s insanely stupid.) There's nothing in Islam about god killing Egypt's newborn's (Correct, that´s the bible, the same shit just a different color. But passages such as sure 9, verse 5 aren´t really better, so my point stands.) In Islam each prophet was sent down to his own land's people (Yeah sure, strange that your god is obviously not abe to "sent down" prophets to countries where nobody knows about him. If we would find a tribe in the jungle and they would know about Allah, THAT would actually be an impressive argument, but no such thing has ever happened. it´s always people who make other people believe in their gods.) Meaning that the flood was not global in according to Islam.. rather local. (Then the entire story makes absolutely no sense, right?) Again idk about Christianity but I think that might be there. (And please understand that for the exact same reasons why you don´t care about Christianity or one of the 5000 other religions worldwide, I do not care about the religion you accidentally have been raised in.) Again if you have any other arguments I'm here, and won't get bored as long as there's civility in our discussion.. (Other arguments? I debunked every sentence you wrote, so the question would be if you have actually anything at least slightly interesting to say about why your god should be more real then all the others we invented.) Good day for you. (For you as well. Don´t get me wrong, I respect you and it´s not my intention to insult you, but I feel ashamed to live in the 21 century and have billions of people still believing in braindead fairytales from the dark age. Take care.)

Scientists (both theistic and atheistic) who actually study cosmology and the early universe conditions do not think that there was "nothing" at the start of our current presentation of the Universe. The "something from nothing" is just a strawman argument. What we have is evidence that, for our presentation of the universe, in as close as we can get to a true nothing there are still virtual particles popping in and out of existence. Randomness and chance is a part of the universe. The classic example of the lottery. The chances of a specific person winning the lottery is rather high, yet at some point in time, someone wins. When a piece of radioactive material decays we have a pretty good idea the rate of that decay. What we do not yet understand is when a specific atom of that material triggers to decay.

@@AnotherViewer Brother stop butting around and just accept the fact that there is a designer behind all of this

@@AnotherViewer It's either you didn't get what I said or you don't know what a strawman argument is. saying that the universe came by chance as if you are saying the universe came from nothing because chance is a concept it is not an entity and the question remains, what is your explanation for the existence of the universe? I didn't say that scientists said there was nothing at the start of the universe, in fact science cannot tell you how the universe started or what was there before the point where the universe started. science is just a tool humans use to study the physical world around us and it has a limitation as well as humans. The virtual particles popping in and out I didn't get what you were trying to say. Again how did the universe come to exist? If you know that sth can't come from nothing, then you are by necessity saying that the universe requires sth external to it, to bring it into existence.

As an atheist i agree that come thing came "by chance" is ridiculous. Chance is the probability of a certain outcome in a random event. It doesn't do anything. nothing can happen "by chance". I have also only ever heard apologists say this, not atheists. The same goes for "from nothing" btw.

@@aidanya1336 thats the problem when atheists are asked how do you think the universe came to exist they either reply with "I don't know" or "by chance". These are the most common answers that people mostly gives. And that why we ask them can sth come from nothing which is surely no, then sth out of this universe brought it to exist, and that thing has to have attributes to bring this complex universe like power, knowledge and it has to be independent of anything in this universe which the basic definition of god.

That means you are not an atheist because you found sense in it, because if you at least thought seriously about it AT LEAST you'd think about those questions, and even much more. Of course, not everyone has the capabilities to come up with answers themselves, that's why such videos, arguments and books exist; for the sake of those who actually want the truth. You just are not willing to give up anything for it, you wanna live life. You wish for the creator to not exist so you could continue living your life your way. My dude, please dont take my comment in an attacking manner. You seriously need to stop lying to yourself and actually think, hear from all sides and be fair. Don't prioritize your desires or you will definitely regret it.

@spooonpro614 amazing the number of false conclusions u took from a simple frase. I would invite you to actually ask people what their position is instead of believing u know more about people then people. Practically every phrase u said about me is wrong.

@spooonpro614 BTW, what I actually meant by my comment was simply that those are very poor and Ill formulated questions, that seem prepared and pressuposed to pose atheism as something that it is not. Those questions are not related to atheism, their are prepared so he can make an theistic argument each time.

@@spooonpro614 "My dude, please dont take my comment in an attacking manner." Are you kidding me?!?!

@@spooonpro614You know this person? Because you seem to talk like you know them personally and know exactly how they feel. You don’t. They said a single sentence.